Enhancement of Visual Feedback Ownership in Hand Mirror Therapy Using Automated Control of Electrical Muscle Stimulation Based on Healthy Hand Movement
Source abstract
Abstract
Mirror therapy (MT) has been recognized for its potential to harness neuroplasticity and improve recovery in post-stroke patients. In MT, a mirror tricks the brain into thinking that the weak or paralyzed side of the body is moving when the healthy side moves, thereby helping to stimulate healing and relearn movement after a stroke or injury. However, MT is limited in addressing the sensory impairment and visual feedback ownership on the affected hand. A combination of MT and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is believed to enhance muscle strength and sensory perception, but lacks synchronization with the movement intention of the healthy hand. This study aims to advance MT to further promote neuroplasticity through movement synchronization in both hands. A stretch-sensor glove was used on the unaffected hand to capture finger movement kinematics, controlling the electrical intensity of an EMS device on the assumed affected hand. Thereby, a proportional control of electrical intensity and synchronous movement of both hands was achieved. This study compared four types of electrical intensities, spanning from baseline (no stimulation) to higher intensities (S0–S4). As a result, body representation perception showed an overall negative correlation with the level of comfort associated with the stimulus. Enhancements in body representation perception were significantly confirmed (p < 0.01) in stronger stimulus types, notably S4 and S4F of the spontaneous movement scheme, compared to the baseline stimulus S0 and the weak intensity S1. There may be a possibility of enhancing neuroplasticity by strategically using various electrical intensities. The proposed system shows promising performance by enhancing body representation through improved visual feedback ownership at higher electrical intensities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Engineering, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodaicho, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
Funding
JST Moonshot R&D Program
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Population Shifts and the Future of Stroke: Forecasts of the Future Burden of Stroke10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06665.x ↗
2. Projections of the Stroke Burden at the Global, Regional, and National Levels up to 2050 Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 202110.1161/JAHA.124.036142 ↗
3. Forecasting the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke in the United States Through 2050—Prevalence of Risk Factors and Disease: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association
4. Poststroke Hypertonicity: Upper Limb Assessment and Treatment10.1310/tsr1803-179 ↗
5. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties10.1177/154596802401105171 ↗
6. Rehabilitation for Stroke: A Review10.1161/01.STR.17.3.363 ↗
7. Emerging Neuroplasticity-Based Therapies in Stroke Rehabilitation: Literature Review10.12928/admj.v5i2.11626 ↗
8. Motor Recovery and Cortical Reorganization After Mirror Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients10.1177/1545968310385127 ↗
9. Mirror Therapy for Improving Motor Function after Stroke
10. Mirror Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation: Current Perspectives10.2147/TCRM.S206883 ↗
11. The Effectiveness of Mirror Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation: Current Perspective Review
12. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5 ↗
13. Mirror Therapy in Hemiplegic Patient
14. Mirror Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Lower-Limb Amputation10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b74698 ↗
15. Salhab, G., Sarraj, A.R., and Saleh, S. (2016, January 16–20). Mirror Therapy Combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation for Rehabilitation of Stroke Survivors’ Ankle Dorsiflexion. Proceedings of the 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591776 ↗
16. Effects of Mirror Therapy Combined with Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Motor Recovery of Lower Limbs and Walking Ability of Patients with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study10.1177/0269215517705689 ↗
17. Oh, Z.-H., Liu, C.-H., Hsu, C.-W., Liou, T.-H., Escorpizo, R., and Chen, H.-C. (2023). Mirror Therapy Combined with Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Poststroke Lower Extremity Motor Function Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-47272-9 ↗
18. The Synergic Effects of Mirror Therapy and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Hand Function in Stroke Patients10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.316 ↗
19. Combining Functional Electrical Stimulation and Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb Motor Recovery Following Stroke: A Randomised Trial10.1080/21679169.2018.1472635 ↗
20. A Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Mirror Therapy and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Upper-Extremity Motor Recovery, Motor Function, and Quality of Life in Subacute Stroke Subjects10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_191_19 ↗
21. Effect of Mirror Therapy and Electrical Stimulation on Upper Extremity Function in Stroke with Hemiplegic Patient: A Pilot Study10.1589/jpts.29.2085 ↗
22. Electrical Stimulation: Neurophysiological Basis and Application
23. Neuroplasticity – Basis for Lifelong Learning10.17925/ENR.2014.09.02.143 ↗
24. Puderbaugh, M., and Emmady, P.D. (2025, July 30). Neuroplasticity-StatPearls-NCBI Bookshelf, Available online: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557811.
25. Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation: Harnessing Brain Plasticity for Stroke Recovery and Functional Improvement
26. Naritomi, H., and Krieger, D.W. (2013). Rehabilitation and Plasticity. Clinical Recovery from CNS Damage, S. Karger AG.10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-02309-1 ↗
27. Asea, A.A.A., Geraci, F., and Kaur, P. (2017). Neuroplasticity-Based Technologies and Interventions for Restoring Motor Functions in Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis: Bench to Bedside, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-47861-6 ↗
28. Jarmolowska, J., Miladinović, A., Valvason, E., Busan, P., Ajčević, M., Battaglini, P.P., and Accardo, A. (December, January 29). Effects of Mirror Therapy on Motor Imagery Elicited ERD/S: An EEG Study on Healthy Subjects. Proceedings of the 8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference (EMBEC), Portorož, Slovenia.
29. Mirror Therapy Simultaneously Combined with Electrical Stimulation for Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials10.1177/0269215520951935 ↗
30. Feasibility Study of a Combined Treatment of Electromyography-Triggered Neuromuscular Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Crossover Trial
31. Measuring Movement Imagery Abilities: A Revision of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire
32. Iwanami, J., Mutai, H., Sagari, A., Sato, M., and Kobayashi, M. (2023). Relationship between Corticospinal Excitability While Gazing at the Mirror and Motor Imagery Ability. Brain Sci., 13.10.3390/brainsci13030463 ↗
33. Kusano, K., Hayashi, M., Iwama, S., and Ushiba, J. (2025). Improved Motor Imagery Skills after Repetitive Passive Somatosensory Stimulation: A Parallel-Group, Pre-Registered Study. Front. Neural Circuits, 18.10.3389/fncir.2024.1510324 ↗
34. Electrical Muscle Stimulation Preserves the Muscle Mass of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Study10.1186/cc8123 ↗
35. H2L Inc. (2025, August 07). UnlimitedHand Developer’s Site. Available online: http://dev.unlimitedhand.com/devise/.
36. P, A.R.S.S., Ohnishi, A., Terada, T., and Tsukamoto, M. (2025). Estimation of Cylinder Grasping Contraction Force of Forearm Muscle in Home-Based Rehabilitation Using a Stretch-Sensor Glove. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15137534 ↗
37. Images Scientific Instruments, Inc. (2025, March 20). Flexible Stretch Sensor. Available online: https://www.imagesco.com/sensors/stretch-sensor.html.
38. Safety of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation among Critically Ill Patients: Systematic Review10.5935/0103-507X.20180036 ↗
39. The MIQ-RS: A Suitable Option for Examining Movement Imagery Ability10.1093/ecam/nem170 ↗
40. Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness Alters the Effect of NMES10.1123/jsr.17.1.68 ↗
41. The effect of the subcutaneous fat on the transfer of current through skin and into muscle10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.02.009 ↗
42. Skinfold thickness affects the isometric knee extension torque evoked by Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0114 ↗
43. Electrical Impedance Behavior of Biological Tissues During Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation
44. Quadriceps activation normative values and the affect of subcutaneous tissue thickness
45. Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Intensity Level on Corticomuscular Coherence during Action Observation10.18857/jkpt.2020.32.5.307 ↗
46. Insausti-Delgado, A., López-Larraz, E., Omedes, J., and Ramos-Murguialday, A. (2021). Intensity and Dose of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Influence Sensorimotor Cortical Excitability. Front. Neurosci., 14.10.3389/fnins.2020.593360 ↗
47. Paillard, T. (2022). Neuromuscular or Sensory Electrical Stimulation for Reconditioning Motor Output and Postural Balance in Older Subjects?. Front. Physiol., 12.10.3389/fphys.2021.779249 ↗
48. Shindo, M., Isezaki, T., and Aoki, R. (2023, January 24–27). Electrical Stimulation Intensity to Induce Sensory Reweighting Dynamics While Standing on Balance Board. Proceedings of the 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Sydney, Australia.10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340950 ↗
49. Unraveling Mechanisms of Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.028 ↗