Quality and Reliability of Web-Based Information About 3D Printing in Dentistry
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this research was to assess the quality, substance, and ease of reading of online information regarding the use of 3D printing in dental practices. Materials and Methods: The search term selected was ‘3D printing in dentistry’. The first 100 websites retrieved through the Google Search Engine based on this search term were reviewed. Duplicate websites, scientific articles, social media links, videos, advertisements, and broken links were excluded from our study. The quality of the websites analyzed in this study was assessed using the DISCERN tool and JAMA benchmarks, while their readability was measured using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). A significance level of p < 0.05 was established for the analysis. Results: The 75 websites reviewed were categorized into two groups: blogs and commercial sites. It was determined that commercial sites (N: 42) were the majority compared to blog websites (N: 33). Blog websites scored higher than commercial sites in the total DISCERN, DISCERN 1, and Q16 scores. In the JAMA criteria, the minimum sources criterion (n = 12) and the maximum authorship criterion (n = 71) were met. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of FRES and FKGL scores (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The quality of online information sources regarding ‘3D printers in dentistry’ worldwide is considered to be at a moderate level. The readability of the data is at a low level. There is a need for higher quality and highly readable websites about ‘3D printing in dentistry’.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Research and COVID-19 · Engineering Technology and Methodologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu 52200, Turkey
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu 52200, Turkey
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Nevsehir Oral and Dental Health Center, Nevşehir 50300, Turkey
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu 52200, Turkey
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Nesic, D., Schaefer, B.M., Sun, Y., Saulacic, N., and Sailer, I. (2020). 3D Printing Approach in Dentistry: The Future for Personalized Oral Soft Tissue Regeneration. J. Clin. Med., 9.10.3390/jcm9072238 ↗
2. Comparison of the Flexural Strength of Three Different Aged and Nonaged 3D-Printed Permanent Crown Resins10.11607/ijp.8987 ↗
3. Alassaf, M.S., Bakkari, A., Saleh, J., Habeeb, A., Aljuhani, B.F., Qazali, A.A., and Alqutaibi, A.Y. (2025). An Infodemiologic Review of Internet Resources on Dental Hypersensitivity: A Quality and Readability Assessment. PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0312832 ↗
4. A Scoping Review of the Quality of Orthodontic Information on YouTube10.1111/ocr.12913 ↗
5. Major Trends in Population Growth Around the World10.46234/ccdcw2021.160 ↗
6. Determinants of Broadband Access and Affordability: An Analysis of a Community Survey on the Digital Divide10.1016/j.cities.2020.102904 ↗
7. Investigation of the Effect of Cyberchondria Behavior on E-Health Literacy in Healthcare Workers10.1080/00185868.2021.1969873 ↗
8. Changes in Everyday Internet Use and Home Activity During and After Pandemic-Related Lockdowns: A Case Study in Shuangjing Subdistrict, Beijing10.1111/tesg.12545 ↗
9. The Quality and Reliability of the Internet as a Source of Information for Hypodontia Patients10.1177/14653125221145705 ↗
10. Readability of Written Information for Patients across 30 Years: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews10.1016/j.pec.2025.108656 ↗
11. Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Lid Loading Videos on YouTube10.1007/s10792-022-02606-w ↗
12. Jeong, M., Radomski, K., Lopez, D., Liu, J.T., Lee, J.D., and Lee, S.J. (2024). Materials and Applications of 3D Printing Technology in Dentistry: An Overview. Dent. J., 12.10.3390/dj12010001 ↗
13. 3D Printing in Dentistry—State of the Art10.2341/18-229-L ↗
14. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications10.1155/2021/9950131 ↗
15. Schweiger, J., Edelhoff, D., and Güth, J.F. (2021). 3D Printing in Digital Prosthetic Dentistry: An Overview of Recent Developments in Additive Manufacturing. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10092010 ↗
16. Evaluation of Information Quality on the Internet for Periodontal Disease Patients10.1111/odi.13546 ↗
17. Assessment of the Quality of Online Information on Dietary Recommendations for Inflammatory Bowel Disease10.1177/20552076241277033 ↗
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025, September 14). Clear Communication Index User Guide, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/ccindex/tool/index.html.
19. The Quality of Web-Based Orthodontic Information: A Scoping Review10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.018 ↗
20. Alpaydin, M.T., Alpaydin, T., Koklu, M., and Buyuk, S.K. (2024). Quality Assessment of Available Internet Information on Early Orthodontic Treatment. BMC Oral Health, 24.10.1186/s12903-024-04019-w ↗
21. Quality and Readability of the Dental Information Obtained by Patients on Internet: Criteria for Selecting Medical Consultation Websites
22. Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet: Caveant Lector et Viewor—Let the Reader and Viewer Beware10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039 ↗
23. DISCERN: An Instrument for Judging the Quality of Written Consumer Health Information on Treatment Choices10.1136/jech.53.2.105 ↗
24. Assessment of American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-Approved Teams’ Websites for Patient-Oriented Content and Readability10.1177/1055665619850441 ↗
25. Assessment of the Readability of Online Orthodontic Educational Resources Related to ‘Orthodontic Treatment’: A Cross-Sectional Study10.1053/j.sodo.2024.01.015 ↗
26. Web-Based Information on Orthodontic Clear Aligners: A Qualitative and Readability Assessment10.1111/adj.12776 ↗
27. Readability of Patient Education Materials From High-Impact Medical Journals: A 20-Year Analysis10.1177/2374373521998847 ↗
28. Online Plain Language Tool and Health Information Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37955 ↗
29. Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis10.2196/54072 ↗
30. Jung, M.J., and Seo, M.S. (2022). Assessment of Reliability and Information Quality of YouTube Videos about Root Canal Treatment after 2016. BMC Oral Health, 22.10.1186/s12903-022-02540-4 ↗
31. Content, Readability, and Accountability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Epiretinal Membranes10.1080/08820538.2021.1913192 ↗
32. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): A New Measure of Understandability and Actionability10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027 ↗
33. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: Evidence-Informed Framework and 2021 Update