journal article·2025-10-17Open access

Drilling Monitoring While Drilling and Comprehensive Characterization of Lithology Parameters

Huijie Zhai, Hui Chen, Bin Shi, Hongchao Zhao, Fei Gao

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

The monitoring technology used during drilling has become a crucial means of gathering information about the underground rock mass. However, the drilling response parameters are affected by the coupling of operating parameters and rock mass properties, which leads to the challenge of lithology inversion based on drilling parameters in complex strata. At present, the precise quantitative response mechanism between operating parameters and drilling parameters is still not clear in the common lithology of mining, which restricts the further improvement of the accuracy of lithology identification while drilling and the optimization of drilling technology. In order to improve the measurement of drilling technology, the relationship between rock parameters and drilling parameters in the process of mining drilling is explored. This paper carried out physical and mechanical experiments; built a small drilling platform (including magnetic suction drilling, a data monitoring system, and a rock confining pressure system); carried out three different specifications, 330 r/min, 360 r/min, and 390 r/min, of the initial speed of the drilling experiment; and added 330 r/min initial-speed-drilling different-strength rock-drilling experiments. The experimental results show that rock drilling is divided into three stages: the initial stage of drilling, the crack propagation stage, and the bit retreating stage. The rotation speed has a great influence on the drilling speed, torque, weight on bit, and drilling time. According to the Pearson fitting relationship of drilling parameters, the correlation between F and PR is −0.783, indicating a strong positive correlation, and the correlation between RPM and PR is 0.827, indicating a strong negative correlation. The power function y = axb is used to fit the drilling parameters and rock parameters. The fitting effect is good, and the torque and uniaxial tensile strength R2 is as high as 0.9966. The experimental conclusion provides a theoretical basis for lithology identification in intelligent mining drilling and discusses the feasibility of a dynamic monitoring scheme for the drilling rig.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China

Xinjiang Mineral Resources Green Development and Ecological Restoration Co-Construction Collaborative Innovation Center, Urumqi 830047, China

Funding

Key technology and equipment research and development of mechanical continuous intelligent mining in Xinjiang fluorite mine

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. A practical decision tool to evaluate and rank potential solutions for expected downhole drilling problems during the well-planning phase10.1007/s40033-021-00325-7 ↗
2. Lithocodium mound identification using logging-while-drilling image log and quantified cutting analysis—Validation with analogues10.1190/INT-2023-0071.1 ↗
3. Isheyskiy, V., and Sanchidrián, J.A. (2020). Prospects of Applying MWD Technology for Quality Management of Drilling and Blasting Operations at Mining Enterprises. Minerals, 10.10.3390/min10100925 ↗
4. Boundary Identification and Surface Updates Using MWD10.1007/s11004-020-09891-0 ↗
5. In-situ tests on quantitative evaluation of rock mass integrity based on drilling process index
6. Application of Measurement While Drilling Technology to Predict Rock Mass Quality and Rock Support for Tunnelling10.1007/s00603-019-01979-2 ↗
7. Machine learning for classification of stratified geology from MWD data10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.104737 ↗
8. Abbaszadeh Shahri, A., Shan, C., Larsson, S., and Johansson, F. (2024). Normalizing Large Scale Sensor-Based MWD Data: An Automated Method toward A Unified Database. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24041209 ↗
9. Improved filtering and normalizing of Measurement-While-Drilling (MWD) data in tunnel excavation10.1016/j.tust.2020.103467 ↗
10. Velychkovych, A., Mykhailiuk, V., and Andrusyak, A. (2025). Numerical model for studying the properties of a new friction damper developed based on the shell with a helical cut. Appl. Mech., 6.10.3390/applmech6010001 ↗
11. A smart look at monitoring while drilling (MWD) and optimizing using acoustic emission technique (AET)10.1038/s41598-024-70717-8 ↗
12. Improving the application depth of electromagnetic measurement while drilling (EM-MWD) systems by receiving signals from adjacent wells10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104468 ↗
13. Profiling of weathered argillaceous limestone rock with MWD data from advanced drilling for tunnelling along Wu-Kai expressway in Chongqing, China10.1016/j.tust.2024.105719 ↗
14. Relationship between rock uniaxial compressive strength and digital core drilling parameters and its forecast method10.1007/s40789-020-00383-4 ↗
15. The PDC cutter-rock interaction behavior in rock cutting: A review10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212168 ↗
16. Drilling-based measuring method for the c-φ parameter of rock and its field application10.1016/j.ijmst.2023.06.005 ↗
17. Cutting energy characteristics for brittleness evaluation of rock using digital drilling method10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107099 ↗
18. Evaluating the Anisotropy of Drilling Mechanical Characteristics of Rock in the Process of Digital Drilling10.1007/s00603-023-03242-1 ↗
19. Digital rock physics: Defining the reservoir properties on drill cuttings10.1016/j.petrol.2021.110063 ↗
20. Numerical investigations on rock breaking mechanism and parameter influence of torsional percussive drilling with a single PDC cutter10.1016/j.petrol.2021.110077 ↗
21. Study of the effect of drill bits hardness, drilling machine operating parameters and rock mechanical parameters on noise level in hard rock drilling process10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108447 ↗
22. Method for Measuring Rock Mass Characteristics and Evaluating the Grouting-Reinforced Effect Based on Digital Drilling10.1007/s00603-018-1624-9 ↗
23. Research on inversion method for stress characteristics of roadway surrounding rock based on real-time weight measurement of drill cuttings10.1016/j.simpat.2024.103064 ↗
24. Sensitivity analysis of drilling parameters in rock rotary drilling process based on orthogonal test method10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105576 ↗
25. Estimating rock strength parameters using drilling data10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.02.013 ↗
26. Estimation of optimal drilling efficiency and rock strength by using controllable drilling parameters in rotary non-percussive drilling10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107376 ↗
27. Extracting Rock Parameters Through Digital Drilling Test10.1007/s00603-024-03951-1 ↗
28. Experimental investigation on potential use of drilling parameters to quantify rock strength10.1186/s40703-021-00152-5 ↗
29. An analytical model for estimating rock strength parameters from small-scale drilling data10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.09.005 ↗
30. Utilizing Machine Learning and Digital Twin Technology for Rock Parameter Estimation from Drilling Data
31. Investigation of drilling parameters on hybrid polymer composites using grey relational analysis, regression, fuzzy logic, and ANN models10.1007/s40430-018-1137-1 ↗
32. Siddig, O., Ibrahim, A.F., and Elkatatny, S. (2023). Estimation of rocks’ failure parameters from drilling data by using artificial neural network. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-30092-2 ↗
33. Modelling rate of penetration in drilling operations using RBF, MLP, LSSVM, and DT models10.1038/s41598-022-14710-z ↗
34. New method prediction of rock mechanics parameters in drilling process based on machine learning10.1080/10916466.2023.2298998 ↗
35. Deep convolutional neural network for fast determination of the rock strength parameters using drilling data10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104084 ↗
36. Ore/waste identification in underground mining through geochemical calibration of drilling data using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106045 ↗
37. Real-Time Prediction of Petrophysical Properties Using Machine Learning Based on Drilling Parameters
38. Experimental research on the influence of working parameters on the drilling efficiency10.1016/j.tust.2019.103174 ↗
39. Modelling and controlling of drill string stick slip vibrations in an oil well drilling rig10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110759 ↗
40. Experimental analysis of drillstring vibrations using a small-scale drilling rig10.1007/s11071-025-11119-x ↗
41. Development models for the drill bit lifetime prediction and bit wear types10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104633 ↗
42. Drilling Response Law for PDC Bit Cutting and Breaking Rock: Governing Equation and Experiment Validation10.1007/s00603-025-04532-6 ↗
43. On the Mechanical Properties and Failure Mechanism of Conglomerate Specimens Subjected to Triaxial Compression Tests10.1007/s00603-022-03110-4 ↗
44. Stratigraphic identification using real-time drilling data10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.02.012 ↗
45. A hybrid partial least squares regression-based real time pore pressure estimation method for complex geological drilling process10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109771 ↗