Can Pulsed Electric Fields Be an Alternative for Disinfection in Endodontic Treatment?
Source abstract
Abstract
Persistent Enterococcus faecalis infections represent a major cause of endodontic treatment failure, highlighting the need for innovative disinfection strategies beyond conventional irrigation. This in vitro study evaluated the antimicrobial potential of pulsed electric fields (PEF) as a non-thermal and non-chemical adjunctive method for root canal disinfection. Fifty-two extracted mandibular premolars with single canals were standardized to 16 ± 0.1 mm, inoculated with E. faecalis, and incubated for 28 days to establish mature biofilms. The teeth were subsequently exposed to PEF under varying electrical parameters using sterile water as the irrigant, and bacterial viability and metabolic activity were assessed post-treatment. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was performed to visualize bacterial distribution within dentinal tubules, with particular attention to the apical region, which is most resistant to disinfection. PEF application significantly reduced bacterial viability and metabolic activity compared with baseline (p < 0.05), although complete elimination was not achieved. CLSM images revealed both red-stained non-viable cells, reflecting irreversible electroporation, and green-stained viable cells, indicating reversible electroporation and residual bacterial survival. These findings demonstrate that PEF can inactivate microorganisms through electroporation while maintaining tissue compatibility, and its antimicrobial effect may be enhanced when combined with sodium hypochlorite. Optimization of electrical parameters and evaluation in polymicrobial biofilm models are warranted to establish clinical relevance and support translation into practice.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Radiography and Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Endodontics, Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Ankara 06018, Turkey
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Düzce University, Düzce 81620, Turkey
Cooperative Extension, The University of Maine, Orono, ME 04473, USA
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. da R.; Alves, M.C.; Carvalho, C.A.T.; Valera, M.C. Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.032 ↗
2. Wu, B., Zhou, Z., Hong, X., Xu, Z., Xu, Y., He, Y., and Chen, S. (2025). Novel Approaches on Root Canal Disinfection Methods against E. Faecalis. J. Oral Microbiol., 17.10.1080/20002297.2025.2475947 ↗
3. The Root Canal Microbiome Diversity and Function. A Whole-Metagenome Shotgun Analysis10.1111/iej.13911 ↗
4. de Brito, L.C.N., Doolittle-Hall, J., Lee, C.-T., Moss, K., Bambirra Júnior, W., Tavares, W.L.F., Ribeiro Sobrinho, A.P., and Teles, F.R.F. (2020). The Apical Root Canal System Microbial Communities Determined by Next-Generation Sequencing. Sci. Rep., 10.10.1038/s41598-020-67828-3 ↗
5. Alghamdi, F., and Shakir, M. (2020). The Influence of Enterococcus faecalis as a Dental Root Canal Pathogen on Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cureus, 12.10.7759/cureus.7257 ↗
6. In Vitro Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Root Canal Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.001 ↗
7. Antimicrobial Effects of Calcium Hydroxide and Chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.013 ↗
8. Efficacy of Calcium Oxide and Calcium Hydroxide Nanoparticles on the Elimination of Enterococcus faecalis in Human Root Dentin10.1007/s00784-016-1836-x ↗
9. Antibacterial Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite, Ozonated Water, and 980 Nm Diode Laser Used for Disinfection of Root Canal against Enterococcus faecalis: A Microbiological Study10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1860 ↗
10. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy, Diode Laser, and Sodium Hypochlorite and Their Combinations on Endodontic Pathogens10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.09.009 ↗
11. Root Canal Irrigation: Chemical Agents and Plant Extracts Against Enterococcus faecalis10.2174/1874210601610010692 ↗
12. Khalifa, L., Shlezinger, M., Beyth, S., Houri-Haddad, Y., Coppenhagen-Glazer, S., Beyth, N., and Hazan, R. (2016). Phage Therapy against Enterococcus faecalis in Dental Root Canals. J. Oral Microbiol., 8.10.3402/jom.v8.32157 ↗
13. Universal adhesive fortified with inorganic nanoparticles on dentin affected by caries: A comprehensive study utilizing SEM, EDX, micro-tensile bond strength and antimicrobial effectiveness10.1002/jemt.24816 ↗
14. Miklavcic, D. (2017). Pulsed Electric Field Treatment for Beverage Production and Preservation. Handbook of Electroporation, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-32886-7 ↗
15. Current Applications and New Opportunities for the Use of Pulsed Electric Fields in Food Science and Industry10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.015 ↗
16. Jaiswal, A.K., and Shankar, S. (2024). Chapter 14—Pulsed Electric Field Processing: Food Pasteurization, Tissue Treatment, and Seed Disinfection. Food Packaging and Preservation, Academic Press.
17. Nanosecond Electric Pulses: A Mini-Review of the Present State of the Art10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.07.008 ↗
18. Review on Electroporation Mechanisms for PEF-Assisted Extraction and Microbial Inactivation10.1007/s12393-025-09416-7 ↗
19. An Assessment of the Impact of Pulsed Electric Fields Processing Factors on Oxidation, Color, Texture, and Sensory Attributes of Turkey Breast Meat10.3382/ps/pev097 ↗
20. Yin, W.-Z., Xu, J.-X., Xu, J., Lu, G., and Liu, H. (2025). Synchronous Nanowire-Assisted Electroporation and Peracetic Acid Oxidation to Inhibit VBNC Cells Formation: Reversible Electroporation Pores Reinforce Permeation of Peracetic Acid for Cellular Destruction. J. Hazard. Mater., 496.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139405 ↗
21. Skin Electroporation for Transdermal Drug Delivery: Electrical Measurements, Numerical Model and Molecule Delivery10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.01.036 ↗
22. Novickij, V., Grainys, A., Lastauskienė, E., Kananavičiūtė, R., Pamedytytė, D., Kalėdienė, L., Novickij, J., and Miklavčič, D. (2016). Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Assisted in Vitro Electroporation: A Pilot Study. Sci. Rep., 6.10.1038/srep33537 ↗
23. Leveraging the Immunological Impacts of Irreversible Electroporation as a New Frontier for Cancer Therapy10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-082223-054259 ↗
24. Nafie, E.H.O., Pastori, C., and Neal, R.E. (2025). Evaluating the Immune Response in a Murine Cancer Model between Irreversible Electroporation and an Advanced Biphasic Pulsed Electric Field Technology. Front. Oncol., 15.10.3389/fonc.2025.1592610 ↗
25. Sterilization of Extracted Human Teeth: A Comparative Analysis10.1016/j.jobcr.2012.09.002 ↗
26. Present Status and Future Directions in Endodontic Microbiology10.1111/etp.12060 ↗
27. Rexford, A.M. (2012). Biodegradability of Resilon, a Resin Based Root Canal Obturating Material, by Typical Endodontic Pathogens. [Master’s Thesis, Indiana University].
28. Chelation in Root Canal Therapy Reconsidered10.1097/01.don.0000158233.59316.fe ↗
29. In Vivo Evaluation of Microbial Reduction after Chemo-Mechanical Preparation of Human Root Canals Containing Necrotic Pulp Tissue10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01121.x ↗
30. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine against Bacteria in Biofilms at Different Stages of Development10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.007 ↗
31. The Effect of the Enzymes Trypsin and DNase I on the Antimicrobial Efficiency of Root Canal Irrigation Solutions10.1007/s10266-023-00894-x ↗
32. Akdere, S.K., Aydin, Z.U., and Erdönmez, D. (2023). Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques on Teeth with Artificial Internal Root Resorption and Contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis: A Confocal Laser Scanning, Icroscopy Analysis. Lasers Med. Sci., 38.10.1007/s10103-023-03748-8 ↗
33. Pulsed Electric Field Treatment as a Potential Method for Microbial Inactivation in Scaffold Materials for Tissue Engineering: The Inactivation of Bacteria in Collagen Gel10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03829.x ↗
34. Effect of Vapor Lock on Root Canal Debridement by Using a Side-Vented Needle for Positive-Pressure Irrigant Delivery10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.022 ↗
35. Dosimetry of Pulsed Magnetic Field towards Attaining Bacteriostatic Effect on Enterococcus faecalis: Implications for Endodontic Therapy10.1111/iej.13580 ↗
36. Pulsed Electric Field Inactivation of Microorganisms: From Fundamental Biophysics to Synergistic Treatments10.1007/s00253-019-10067-y ↗
37. Furukawa, T., Ueno, T., Nozaki, M., Yoshida, A., Amarasiri, M., and Sei, K. (2025). Usefulness of Pulsed Electric Field Application as an Inactivation Technology for Plant Pathogenic Bacteria in Hydroponic Nutrient Solutions. Environ. Technol. Innov., 39.10.1016/j.eti.2025.104237 ↗
38. Jhajharia, K., Parolia, A., Shetty, K.V., and Mehta, L.K. (2015). Biofilm in Endodontics: A Review. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent., 5.10.4103/2231-0762.151956 ↗
39. Biofilm Model Systems for Root Canal Disinfection: A Literature Review10.1111/iej.13050 ↗
40. Vaessen, E.M.J., Timmermans, R.A.H., Tempelaars, M.H., Schutyser, M.A.I., and den Besten, H.M.W. (2019). Reversibility of Membrane Permeabilization upon Pulsed Electric Field Treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Sci. Rep., 9.10.1038/s41598-019-56299-w ↗
41. Mechanism and Use of the Commercially Available Viability Stain, BacLight10.1002/cyto.a.20069 ↗
42. Rosenberg, M., Azevedo, N.F., and Ivask, A. (2019). Propidium Iodide Staining Underestimates Viability of Adherent Bacterial Cells. Sci. Rep., 9.10.1038/s41598-019-42906-3 ↗
43. Maden, M., Ertuğrul, İ.F., Orhan, E.O., Erik, C.E., Yetiş, C.Ç., Tuncer, Y., and Kahriman, M. (2017). Enhancing Antibacterial Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite by Low Electric Current-Assisted Sonic Agitation. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0188672 ↗
44. Jarin, M., Wang, T., and Xie, X. (2024). Operando Investigation of the Synergistic Effect of Electric Field Treatment and Copper for Bacteria Inactivation. Nat. Commun., 15.10.1038/s41467-024-45587-3 ↗
45. Synergistic Nanowire-Enhanced Electroporation and Electrochlorination for Highly Efficient Water Disinfection10.1021/acs.est.2c01793 ↗
46. In Vitro Infection and of Dentinal Tubules10.1177/00220345870660081801 ↗
47. Enterococcus faecalis: Its Role in Root Canal Treatment Failure and Current Concepts in Retreatment10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.049 ↗
48. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in Root Canals Ex Vivo10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01009.x ↗
49. Talebi, M., Asghari Moghadam, N., Mamooii, Z., Enayati, M., Saifi, M., and Pourshafie, M.R. (2015). Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus faecalis in Patient and Environmental Samples. Jundishapur J. Microbiol., 8.10.5812/jjm.23349 ↗
50. Ali, L., Goraya, M.U., Arafat, Y., Ajmal, M., Chen, J.-L., and Yu, D. (2017). Molecular Mechanism of Quorum-Sensing in Enterococcus faecalis: Its Role in Virulence and Therapeutic Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 18.10.3390/ijms18050960 ↗
51. A Review of Basic to Clinical Studies of Irreversible Electroporation Therapy10.1109/TBME.2014.2367543 ↗
52. Akdemir Evrendilek, G., Bulut, N., Atmaca, B., and Uzuner, S. (2022). Prediction of Aspergillus Parasiticus Inhibition and Aflatoxin Mitigation in Red Pepper Flakes Treated by Pulsed Electric Field Treatment Using Machine Learning and Neural Networks. Food Res. Int., 162.10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111954 ↗
53. Dayıcan, N.M., and Aktemur Türker, S. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Microbiota in Patients with Diabetes and Systemically Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Next-Generation Sequencing Study. J. Clin. Med., 14.10.3390/jcm14186643 ↗
54. PCR-based identification of bacteria associated with endodontic infections10.1128/JCM.40.9.3223-3231.2002 ↗