journal article·2025-10-16Open access

Sensor-Level Anomaly Detection in DC–DC Buck Converters with a Physics-Informed LSTM: DSP-Based Validation of Detection and a Simulation Study of CI-Guided Deception

Jeong-Hoon Moon, Jin-Hong Kim, Jung-Hwan Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

Digitally controlled DC–DC converters are vulnerable to sensor-side spoofing, motivating plant-level anomaly detection that respects the converter physics. We present a physics-informed LSTM (PI–LSTM) autoencoder for a 24→12 V buck converter. The model embeds discrete-time circuit equations as residual penalties and uses a fixed decision rule (τ=μ+3σ, N=3 consecutive samples). We study three voltage-sensing attacks (DC bias, fixed-sample delay, and narrowband noise) in MATLAB/Simulink. We then validate the detection path on a TMS320F28379 DSP. The detector attains F1 scores of 96.12%, 91.91%, and 97.50% for bias, delay, and noise (simulation); on hardware, it achieves 2.9–4.2 ms latency with an alarm-wise FPR of ≤1.2%. We also define a unified safety box for DC rail quality and regulation. In simulations, we evaluate a confusion index (CI) policy for safety-bounded performance adjustment. A operating point yields CI≈0.25 while remaining within the safety limits. In hardware experiments without CI actuation, the Vr,pp and IRR stayed within the limits, whereas the ±2% regulation window was occasionally exceeded under the delay attack (up to ≈2.8%). These results indicate that physics-informed detection is deployable on resource-constrained controllers with millisecond-scale latency and a low alarm-wise FPR, while the full hardware validation of CI-guided deception (safety-bounded performance adjustment) under the complete safety box is left to future work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Plasma Diagnostics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electronic Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea

Department of Software, Paichai University, Daejeon 35345, Republic of Korea

Department of Automotive Engineering, Honam University, Gwangju 62399, Republic of Korea

Funding

Honam University

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. A review of current research trends in power-electronic innovations in cyber–physical systems10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3051876 ↗
2. Emerging Technologies and Future Trends in Cyber-Physical Power Systems: Toward a New Era of Innovations10.1002/9781394334599.ch19 ↗
3. Enhancing Cybersecurity in Onboard Charging Systems of Electric Vehicles: A MATLAB-based Approach10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.1.2259 ↗
4. A comprehensive review on DC fast charging stations for electric vehicles: Standards, power conversion technologies, architectures, energy management, and cybersecurity10.1109/OJPEL.2024.3466936 ↗
5. A novel LDVP-based anomaly detection method for data streams
6. Cyber–physical anomaly detection for inverter-based microgrid using autoencoder neural network10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122283 ↗
7. Hwang, S.Y., Lee, J.c., Lee, S.s., and Min, C. (2025). Anomaly-Detection Framework for Thrust Bearings in OWC WECs Using a Feature-Based Autoencoder. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 13.10.3390/jmse13091638 ↗
8. Alserhani, F. (2025). Intrusion Detection and Real-Time Adaptive Security in Medical IoT Using a Cyber-Physical System Design. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25154720 ↗
9. Mahmoudi, I., Boubiche, D.E., Athmani, S., Toral-Cruz, H., and Chan-Puc, F.I. (2025). Toward Generative AI-Based Intrusion Detection Systems for the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). Future Int., 17.10.3390/fi17070310 ↗
10. Maximizing decision efficiency with edge-based AI systems: Advanced strategies for real-time processing, scalability, and autonomous intelligence in distributed environments
11. Ottaviano, D. (2025, September 23). Real-Time Virtualization of Mixed-Criticality Heterogeneous Embedded Systems for Fusion Diagnostics and Control. Available online: https://www.research.unipd.it/handle/11577/3552539.
12. Isermann, R. (2006). Fault-Diagnosis Systems: An Introduction from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance, Springer.10.1007/3-540-30368-5 ↗
13. A Comprehensive Monitoring System for Online Fault Diagnosis and Aging Detection of Non-Isolated DC–DC Converters’ Components10.1109/TPEL.2018.2875830 ↗
14. Review on fault-diagnosis and fault-tolerance for DC–DC converters
15. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
16. Physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
17. DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations10.1137/19M1274067 ↗
18. Scientific Machine Learning Through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What’s next10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z ↗
19. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from scalar concentration only10.1126/science.aaw4741 ↗
20. Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data10.1109/TKDE.2017.2720168 ↗
21. Condition Monitoring for Device Reliability in Power Electronic Converters: A Review10.1109/TPEL.2010.2049377 ↗
22. An Online and Noninvasive Technique for the Condition Monitoring of Capacitors in Boost Converters10.1109/TIM.2009.2032960 ↗
23. Elabid, Z. (2025). Informed Deep Learning for Modeling Physical Dynamics. [Ph.D. Thesis, Sorbonne Université].
24. Random Switching Pulse Positioning based SVM Techniques for Six-Phase AC Drive to Spread Harmonic Spectrum10.1109/JESTPE.2025.3578374 ↗
25. Ekin, Ö., Perez, F., Wiegel, F., Hagenmeyer, V., and Damm, G. (2024, January 5–8). Grid supporting nonlinear control for AC-coupled DC Microgrids. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Sixth International Conference on DC Microgrids (ICDCM), Columbia, SC, USA.10.1109/ICDCM60322.2024.10664838 ↗
26. Ulrich, B. (2025, January 16–20). A low-cost setup and procedure for measuring losses in inductors. Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/APEC48143.2025.10977260 ↗
27. Bolatbek, Z. (2024). Single Shot Spectroscopy Using Supercontinuum and White Light Sources, University of Dayton.
28. Kim, H., Bandyopadhyay, R., Ozmen, M.O., Celik, Z.B., Bianchi, A., Kim, Y., and Xu, D. (2024, January 20–22). A systematic study of physical sensor attack hardness. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/SP54263.2024.00143 ↗
29. A Survey on Cyber-Attacks for Cyber-Physical Systems: Modeling, Defense and Design
30. Cao, H., Huang, W., Xu, G., Chen, X., He, Z., Hu, J., Jiang, H., and Fang, Y. (2024). Security analysis of WiFi-based sensing systems: Threats from perturbation attacks. arXiv.
31. Rotor dynamic response prediction using physics-informed multi-LSTM networks10.1016/j.ast.2024.109648 ↗
32. Metamodeling of the response trajectories of nonlinear stochastic dynamic systems using physics-informed LSTM networks10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113447 ↗
33. Physics-informed ensemble learning with residual modeling for enhanced building energy prediction10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114853 ↗
34. Kolmogorov–Arnold-Informed neural network: A physics-informed deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems based on Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks10.1016/j.cma.2024.117518 ↗
35. A physics-informed deep reinforcement learning framework for autonomous steel frame structure design10.1111/mice.13276 ↗
36. A hybrid time series and physics-informed machine learning framework to predict soil water content10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110105 ↗
37. Nguyen, M.H., Kwak, S., and Choi, S. (2024). Model Predictive Virtual Flux Control Method for Low Switching Loss Performance in Three-Phase AC/DC Pulse-width-Modulated Converters. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12010066 ↗
38. Multi-Port Traction Converter for Hydrogen Rail Vehicles: A Comparative Study10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3503768 ↗
39. Bacha, A. (2025, October 08). Comprehensive Dataset for Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Inverter-Driven PMSM Systems (Version 3.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340925000186.
40. Deep learning techniques for biometric security: A systematic review of presentation attack detection systems10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107569 ↗
41. Rajendran, R.M., and Vyas, B. (2024, January 15–24). Detecting apt using machine learning: Comparative performance analysis with proposed model. Proceedings of the SoutheastCon 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/SoutheastCon52093.2024.10500217 ↗
42. Calibrating F1 Scores for Fair Performance Comparison of Binary Classification Models with Application to Student Dropout Prediction10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3594735 ↗
43. Credit risk assessment using a combined approach of supervised and unsupervised learning
44. Time-series anomaly detection in automated vehicles using d-cnn-lstm autoencoder10.1109/TITS.2024.3380263 ↗
45. Rethinking domain generalization: Discriminability and generalizability10.1109/TCSVT.2024.3422887 ↗
46. Open-set single-domain generalization for robust face anti-spoofing10.1007/s11263-024-02129-0 ↗
47. CAF-induced physical constraints controlling T cell state and localization in solid tumours10.1038/s41568-024-00740-4 ↗
48. Physics-informed machine learning for low-cycle fatigue life prediction of 316 stainless steels10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108187 ↗
49. Kwon, Y., Kim, W., and Kim, H. (2024, January 8–12). HARD: Hardware-Aware lightweight Real-time semantic segmentation model Deployable from Edge to GPU. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Hanoi, Vietnam.10.1007/978-981-96-0963-5_15 ↗
50. Enhancing anomaly detection accuracy and interpretability in low-quality and class imbalanced data: A comprehensive approach10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122157 ↗
51. Instruments, T. (2025, September 23). The TMS320F2837xD Architecture: Achieving a New Level of High Performance. Available online: https://www.radiolocman.com/datasheet/data.html?di=333939&/TMS320F28379D.
52. Instruments, T. (2019). TMS320C28x Extended Instruction Sets Technical Reference Manual, Texas Instruments.
53. (2023). Road Vehicles—Environmental Conditions and Testing for Electrical and Electronic Equipment—Part 2: Electrical Loads (Standard No. ISO 16750-2:2023).
54. (2020). Road Vehicles—Supply Voltage of 48 V—Electrical Requirements and Tests (Standard No. ISO 21780:2020).
55. (2016). Low-Voltage Power Supplies, DC Output—Part 3: Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) (Standard No. IEC 61204-3:2016).
56. (2020). Single Rail Power Supply ATX12VO Design Guide. Design Guide, Intel Corporation.
57. (2014). Power Supply Measurement and Analysis with Bench Oscilloscopes. Technical Report Application Note 3GW-23612-6, Tektronix, Inc.
58. Instruments, T. (2025, September 07). Cycle Scavenging on C2000™ MCUs, Part 5: TMU and CLA. Available online: https://www.ti.com/lit/ta/sszt866/sszt866.pdf?ts=1760149313235&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com.hk%252F.
59. Instruments, T. (2024). TMS320F2837xD Dual-Core Real-Time Microcontrollers Technical Reference Manual, Texas Instruments.
60. MathWorks (2025, September 07). C28x-Build Options—Enable FastRTS. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/ti-c2000/ref/sect-hw-imp-pane-c28x-build-options.html.
61. (2024). Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems—Part 2-1: Security Program Requirements for IACS Asset Owners (Standard No. IEC 62443-2-1:2024).
62. (2018). Road Vehicles—Functional Safety (All Parts) (Standard No. ISO 26262:2018).
63. (2021). Road Vehicles—Cybersecurity Engineering (Standard No. ISO/SAE 21434:2021).