Real-Time Prediction of S-Wave Accelerograms from P-Wave Signals Using LSTM Networks with Integrated Fragility-Based Structural Damage Alerts for Induced Seismicity
Source abstract
Abstract
Early warning of structural damage from induced seismic events requires rapid and reliable ground motion forecasting. This study presents a novel real-time framework that couples a deep learning approach with structural fragility assessment to generate immediate damage alerts following the onset of seismic shaking. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks are employed to predict full S-wave accelerograms from initial P-wave inputs, trained and tested on accelerometric records from induced seismicity scenarios. The predicted S-wave motion is then used as input for a suite of fragility curves in real time to estimate the probability of structural damage for masonry buildings typical in rural areas of geothermal platforms. The proposed method captures both the temporal evolution of shaking and the structural response potential, offering critical seconds of lead time for automated decision-making systems. Results demonstrate high predictive accuracy of the LSTM model and effective early classification of structural risk. This integrated system provides a practical tool for early warning or rapid response in regions experiencing anthropogenic seismicity, such as those affected by geothermal operations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, Parodos Aristotelous 18, 26335 Patras, Greece
Department of Food Science & Technology, University of Patras, Agrinio Campus, G. Seferi 2, 30100 Agrinio, Greece
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Managing induced seismicity risks from enhanced geothermal systems: A good practice guideline10.1029/2024RG000849 ↗
2. Qin, Y., Chen, T., Ma, X., and Chen, X. (2022). Forecasting induced seismicity in Oklahoma using machine learning methods. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-13435-3 ↗
3. Japan’s Earthquake Early Warning System on 11 March 2011: Performance, Shortcomings, and Changes10.1193/1.4000127 ↗
4. Wenzel, F., and Zschau, Z. (2014). The Mexican Seismic Alert System (SASMEX): Its Alert Signals, Broadcast Results and Performance During the M 7.4 Punta Maldonado Earthquake of March 20th, 2012. Early Warning for Geological Disasters, Springer.
5. Faster and More Accurate Earthquake Early Warning System
6. Earthquake Early Warning for the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake: Performance Evaluation of the Current System and the Next-Generation Methods of the Japan Meteorological Agency10.1186/s40623-016-0567-1 ↗
7. Performance of the NCREE’s On-Site Warning System during the 5 February 2016Mw6.53 Meinong Earthquake10.1002/2016GL069372 ↗
8. Comparing the Performance of the NEEWS Earthquake Early Warning System against the CWB System during the 6 February 2018 Mw 6.2 Hualien Earthquake10.1029/2018GL078079 ↗
9. Performance of a Low-Cost Earthquake Early Warning System (P-Alert) and Shake Map Production during the 2018 Mw 6.4 Hualien, Taiwan, Earthquake10.1785/0220180170 ↗
10. The Propagation of Local Undamped Motion (PLUM) Method: A Simple and Robust Seismic Wavefield Estimation Approach for Earthquake Early Warning10.1785/0120170085 ↗
11. An Earthquake Early Warning Method Based on Huygens Principle: Robust Ground Motion Prediction Using Various Localized Distance-Attenuation Models10.1029/2019JB017862 ↗
12. The Realization of an Earthquake Early Warning System for Schools and its Performance during the 2019 ML 6.3 Hualien (Taiwan) Earthquake10.1785/0220190329 ↗
13. Earthquake Early Warning: Advances, Scientific Challenges, and Societal Needs10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060457 ↗
14. Earthquake Early Warning: Recent Advances and Perspectives10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103184 ↗
15. Practical Limitations of Earthquake Early Warning10.1177/8755293020911388 ↗
16. Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Source and Ground-Motion Parameters for Earthquake Early Warning Using Data from a Single Three-Component Broadband or Strong-Motion Sensor10.1785/0120110152 ↗
17. Rapid On-Site Peak Ground Acceleration Estimation Based on Support Vector Regression and P-Wave Features in Taiwan. Soil Dyn
18. Hsu, T.-Y., and Huang, C.-W. (2021). Onsite Early Prediction of PGA Using CNN with Multi-Scale and Multi-Domain P-Waves as Input. Front. Earth Sci., 9.10.3389/feart.2021.626908 ↗
19. Chiang, Y.-J., Chin, T.-L., and Chen, D.-Y. (2022). Neural Network-Based Strong Motion Prediction for On-Site Earthquake Early Warning. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22030704 ↗
20. A Deep Neural Network Framework for Real-Time On-Site Estimation of Acceleration Response Spectra of Seismic Ground Motions10.1111/mice.12830 ↗
21. Rapid Prediction of Earthquake Ground Shaking Intensity Using Raw Waveform Data and a Convolutional Neural Network10.1093/gji/ggaa233 ↗
22. The Transformer Earthquake Alerting Model: A New Versatile Approach to Earthquake Early Warning10.1093/gji/ggaa609 ↗
23. Hsu, T.Y., and Pratomo, A. (2022). Early Peak Ground Acceleration Prediction for On-Site Earthquake Early Warning Using LSTM Neural Network. Front. Earth Sci., 10.10.3389/feart.2022.911947 ↗
24. Sak, H., Senior, A.W., and Beaufays, F. (2014). Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network Architectures for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2014-80 ↗
25. Predicting Stock Prices Using LSTM
26. LSTM Network: A Deep Learning Approach for Short-term Traffic Forecast10.1049/iet-its.2016.0208 ↗
27. A LSTM Neural Network for On-Site Earthquake Early Warning
28. Toward performance-driven seismic risk monitoring for geothermal platforms: Development of ad hoc fragility curves10.1186/s40517-018-0094-3 ↗
29. (2025). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (Standard No. PEER-NGA-East Database). Available online: https://peer.berkeley.edu/research/nga-east.
30. ObsPy: A Python Toolbox for Seismology10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530 ↗
31. Burkov, A. (2025, July 01). The Hundred-Page Machine Learning Book. Available online: https://themlbook.com/.
32. Incremental Dynamic Analysis10.1002/eqe.141 ↗
33. Development of a simplified mechanical model to estimate the seismic vulnerability of heritage unreinforced masonry buildings10.1080/13632469.2015.1060583 ↗
34. (MATLAB: User’s Guide, 2024). MATLAB: User’s Guide, Version R2024b.
35. Filippou, F.C., and Constantinides, M. (2025, July 20). FEDEAS Lab—Getting Started Guide and Simulation Examples, NEESgrid Report 2004-22 and SEMM Report 2004-05, 2004. Available online: http://www.neesgrid.org/news/documents.php.
36. Boxberger, T., Fleming, K., Pittore, M., Parolai, S., Pilz, M., and Mikulla, S. (2017). The Multi-Parameter Wireless Sensing System (MPwise): Its description and application to earthquake risk mitigation. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17102400 ↗
37. (2025, August 25). DESTRESS: Demonstration of Soft Stimulation Treatments of Geothermal Reservoirs, EU Research Project H2020, 2020. Available online: https://www.destress-h2020.eu/en/home/.