Flow Stabilization and Velocity Uniformity in a Göttingen-Type Closed-Circuit Subsonic Wind Tunnel with an Expanded Test Section
Source abstract
Abstract
Flow stabilization and velocity uniformity in a Göttingen-type closed-circuit subsonic aerodynamic wind tunnel with an expanded test section are investigated in this study. Both experimental and numerical approaches were employed. The experiments were performed by using Laser Doppler Anemometry, Pitot tubes, and thermal anemometry. For numerical simulations, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations with a standard k-ε turbulence model were employed to evaluate flow characteristics in the velocity range of 0.05–20 m/s. The study shows that a properly contoured contraction nozzle suppresses inlet turbulence and ensures stable Reynolds-independent core flow. The contraction nozzle significantly accelerates and redistributes the flow, allowing rapid hydrodynamic stabilization and ensuring velocity measurements with high repeatability. These characteristics are inherent in a benchmark facility. Additionally, the study shows that the outlet-to-inlet diameter has the most prominent role in longitudinal velocity distribution in the test section. An optimal ratio of 1.10 was identified, stabilizing the pressure distribution and providing the most uniform longitudinal velocity profile. These findings offer geometry-dependent design guidelines for achieving high-quality measurements in Göttingen-type wind tunnels with expanded test sections and support accurate velocity measurement instrument calibration and aerodynamic testing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Heat-Equipment Research and Testing, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos Str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania
Funding
Association “Santakos slėnis”
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Uncertainty analysis of the air velocity standard based on LDA and wind tunnel10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112228 ↗
2. Uncertainty evaluation for wind tunnel test based on new flow field and balance models10.1016/j.ast.2025.110593 ↗
3. Dynamic calibration of a high-resolution wind tunnel model for ultra-low-range fluctuating surface pressure measurement10.1088/1361-6501/ad97d5 ↗
4. Kosiak, P., Radnic, T., Mamula, M., Hála, J., Šimurda, D., and Luxa, M. (2022, January 7–8). Assessment of Various Converging Inlet Nozzles for Wind Tunnel Using CFD. Proceedings of the Topical Problems of Fluid Mechanics 2022, Prague, Czech Republic.10.14311/TPFM.2022.014 ↗
5. Dependence of wall jet phenomenology on inlet conditions and near-field flow development10.1080/14685248.2022.2070174 ↗
6. Optimization of contraction cone length in an open-circuit wind tunnel10.25092/baunfbed.1339334 ↗
7. Kao, Y.H., Jiang, Z.W., and Fang, S.C. (2017). A computational simulation study of fluid mechanics of low-speed wind tunnel contractions. Fluids, 2.10.3390/fluids2020023 ↗
8. Flow quality analysis of contraction section and test section of low-speed wind tunnel based on CFD numerical simulation10.1088/1742-6596/1176/5/052064 ↗
9. Nozzle geometry effects on supersonic wind tunnel studies of shock–boundary-layer interactions10.1007/s00348-022-03543-1 ↗
10. Experimental evaluation for the feasibility of test chamber in the open-loop wind tunnel10.37394/232013.2021.16.12 ↗
11. Study of Flow Characteristics in a Closed-Loop Low-Speed Wind Tunnel10.12962/j25807471.v1i2.3900 ↗
12. Trailing-Edge Noise Comparability in Open, Closed, and Hybrid Wind Tunnel Test Sections10.2514/1.J061460 ↗
13. Hartung, K.M., Sanders, D.M., and Oehlert, K. (2022, January 18–20). Economically and Aerodynamically Optimized Closure of Wind Tunnel Test Sections. Proceedings of the Global Power and Propulsion Society, Chania, Greece.
14. Analysis of subsonic wind tunnel with variation shape rectangular and octagonal on test section10.1088/1757-899X/308/1/012036 ↗
15. Conceptual study of a low speed wind tunnel for performance test of wind turbine
16. Dimensions optimization design of a low-speed wind tunnel for an expanded test section with limited overall space
17. Karali, H., Inalhan, G., and Tsourdos, A. (2024). Advanced UAV Design Optimization Through Deep Learning-Based Surrogate Models. Aerospace, 11.10.3390/aerospace11080669 ↗
18. Aerodynamic performance optimization of a UAV’s airfoil at low-Reynolds number and transonic flow under the Martian carbon dioxide atmosphere10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.07.040 ↗
19. An Efficient Parametric Modeling, Evaluation and Optimization Strategy for Aerodynamic Configuration Design of eVTOL Aircraft10.3389/arc.2025.14986 ↗
20. Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic design optimization of UAVs using a surrogate model10.1016/j.jsv.2024.118539 ↗
21. A review of wind tunnel based virtual flight testing techniques for evaluation of flight control systems10.1155/2015/672423 ↗
22. He, P., Koyuncuoglu, H.U., Hu, H., Dhulipalla, A., Hu, H., and Hu, H. (2023, January 23–27). High-fidelity Aerodynamic and Aerostructural Optimization of UAV Propellers Using the Adjoint Method. Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech Forum 2023, National Harbor, MD, USA.10.2514/6.2023-0531 ↗
23. Khan, S.H., Danish, M., Ayaz, M., Husain, A., Saeed, S., Abdulla, S., Shaheen, S., Saeed, A., and Thaher, A. (2025). Aerodynamic analysis and ANN-based optimization of NACA airfoils for enhanced UAV performance. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-95848-4 ↗