journal article·2025-10-13Open access

A Comprehensive Image Quality Evaluation of Image Fusion Techniques Using X-Ray Images for Detonator Detection Tasks

Lynda Oulhissane, Mostefa Merah, Simona Moldovanu, Luminita Moraru

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

Purpose: Luggage X-rays suffer from low contrast, material overlap, and noise; dual-energy imaging reduces ambiguity but creates colour biases that impair segmentation. This study aimed to (1) employ connotative fusion by embedding realistic detonator patches into real X-rays to simulate threats and enhance unattended detection without requiring ground-truth labels; (2) thoroughly evaluate fusion techniques in terms of balancing image quality, information content, contrast, and the preservation of meaningful features. Methods: A total of 1000 X-ray luggage images and 150 detonator images were used for fusion experiments based on deep learning, transform-based, and feature-driven methods. The proposed approach does not need ground truth supervision. Deep learning fusion techniques, including VGG, FusionNet, and AttentionFuse, enable the dynamic selection and combination of features from multiple input images. The transform-based fusion methods convert input images into different domains using mathematical transforms to enhance fine structures. The Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform (NSCT), Curvelet Transform, and Laplacian Pyramid (LP) are employed. Feature-driven image fusion methods combine meaningful representations for easier interpretation. Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Random Forest (RF), and Local Binary Pattern (LBP) are used to capture and compare texture details across source images. Entropy (EN), Standard Deviation (SD), and Average Gradient (AG) assess factors such as spatial resolution, contrast preservation, and information retention and are used to evaluate the performance of the analysed methods. Results: The results highlight the strengths and limitations of the evaluated techniques, demonstrating their effectiveness in producing sharpened fused X-ray images with clearly emphasized targets and enhanced structural details. Conclusions: The Laplacian Pyramid fusion method emerges as the most versatile choice for applications demanding a balanced trade-off. This is evidenced by its overall multi-criteria balance, supported by a composite (geometric mean) score on normalised metrics. It consistently achieves high performance across all evaluated metrics, making it reliable for detecting concealed threats under diverse imaging conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Image Fusion Techniques · Optical Systems and Laser Technology · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Signals and Systems (LSS), Faculty of Science and Technology, Abdelhamid Ibn Badis University of Mostaganem, Route Nationale N° 11 Kharouba, Mostaganem 27000, Algeria

Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, Dunărea de Jos University of Galați, 800008 Galați, Romania

Modelling & Simulation Laboratory (MSlab), Dunărea de Jos, University of Galați, 800008 Galați, Romania

Faculty of Sciences and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Dunărea de Jos, University of Galați, 800008 Galați, Romania

Department of Physics, School of Science and Technology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa, Pretoria 0204, South Africa

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Gong, J., Sun, D., Xu, L., and Peng, R. (2024, January 20–22). YOLO-DenseFuse: A Visible-Infrared Feature Fusion Framework for Intelligent Camouflage Target Detection in Complex Environments. Proceedings of the AISNS ’24: Proceedings of the 2024 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Systems and Network Security, Mianyang, China.10.1145/3714334.3714370 ↗
2. DenseFuse: A fusion approach for infrared and visible images10.1109/TIP.2018.2887342 ↗
3. FusionGAN: A generative adversarial network for infrared and visible image fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.004 ↗
4. Li, L., Shi, Y., Lv, M., Jia, Z., Liu, M., Zhao, X., Zhang, X., and Ma, H. (2024). Infrared and Visible Image Fusion via Sparse Representation and Guided Filtering in Laplacian Pyramid Domain. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16203804 ↗
5. SwinFuse: A Residual Swin Transformer Fusion Network for Infrared and Visible Images10.1109/TIM.2022.3216413 ↗
6. Pixel-level image fusion: A survey of the state of the art10.1016/j.inffus.2016.05.004 ↗
7. Image Fusion in Multi-View Videos Using SURF Algorithm. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems10.1007/978-981-16-0882-7_96 ↗
8. A general framework for multiresolution image fusion10.1016/S1566-2535(03)00046-0 ↗
9. A multi-scale information integration framework for infrared and visible image fusion10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128116 ↗
10. Rao, Y., Gao, Y., and Huang, Y. (2022). TGFuse: Transformer and GAN for Image Fusion. arXiv.
11. Analysis of Different Fusion and Normalization Techniques
12. Fusing synergistic information from multi-sensor images: An overview from implementation to performance assessment10.1016/j.inffus.2017.10.010 ↗
13. Multi-Sensor Image Fusion: A Survey of the State of the Art
14. Infrared and visible image fusion via gradient transfer and total variation minimization10.1016/j.inffus.2016.02.001 ↗
15. IFCNN: A general image fusion framework based on convolutional neural network10.1016/j.inffus.2019.07.011 ↗
16. StackMFF: End-to-end multi-focus image stack fusion network10.1007/s10489-025-06383-8 ↗
17. Cross-Modal Transformers for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion10.1109/TCSVT.2023.3289170 ↗
18. Wen, Y., and Liu, W. (2025). DAGANFuse: Infrared and Visible Image Fusion Based on Differential Features Attention Generative Adversarial Networks. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15084560 ↗
19. Duan, L., Wu, M., Mao, L., Yin, J., Xiong, J., and Li, X. (2023, January 18–22). RWSC-Fusion: Region-Wise Style-Controlled Fusion Network for the Prohibited X-Ray Security Image Synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.02145 ↗
20. MMFuse: A multi-scale infrared and visible images fusion algorithm based on morphological reconstruction and membership filtering10.1049/ipr2.12701 ↗
21. Shafay, M., Hassan, T., Damiani, E., and Werghi, N. (2021, January 17–21). Temporal Fusion Based Mutli-scale Semantic Segmentation for Detecting Concealed Baggage Threats. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/SMC52423.2021.9658932 ↗
22. A deep learning-based recognition for dangerous objects imaged in X-ray security inspection device
23. Dumagpi, J.K., and Jeong, Y.-J. (2021). Evaluating GAN-Based Image Augmentation for Threat Detection in Large-Scale Xray Security Images. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010036 ↗
24. Miao, C., Xie, L., Wan, F., Su, C., Liu, H., Jiao, J., and Ye, Q. (2019, January 16–20). SIXray: A Large-Scale Security Inspection X-Ray Benchmark for Prohibited Item Discovery in Overlapping Images. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00222 ↗
25. Oulhissane, L., Merah, M., Moldovanu, S., and Moraru, L. (2023). Enhanced detonators detection in X-ray baggage inspection by image manipulation and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-41651-y ↗
26. Andriyanov, N. (2023). Deep Learning for Detecting Dangerous Objects in X-rays of Luggage. Eng. Proc., 33.10.3390/engproc2023033020 ↗
27. Minh, Q.T., Grant Colburn, H.D., and Jeong Won-Ki, J. (2021). FusionNet: A Deep Fully Residual Convolutional Neural Network for Image Segmentation in Connectomics. Front. Comput. Sci., 3.10.3389/fcomp.2021.613981 ↗
28. Dai, Y., Gieseke, F., Oehmcke, S., Wu, Y., and Barnard, K. (2021, January 3–8). Attentional Feature Fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/WACV48630.2021.00360 ↗
29. Goyal, S., Singh, V., Rani, A., and Yadav, N. (2022). Multimodal image fusion and denoising in NSCT domain using CNN and FOTGV. Biomed. Signal Process. Control., 71.10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103214 ↗
30. Li, L., Lv, M., Jia, Z., Jin, Q., Liu, M., Chen, L., and Ma, H. (2023). An Effective Infrared and Visible Image Fusion Approach via Rolling Guidance Filtering and Gradient Saliency Map. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15102486 ↗
31. Tikariha, D., Krishnan, P.T., and Kumar, T.S. (2024, January 22–24). Feature-Driven Fusion of Thermal and Visible Images for Face Analysis. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP), Vijayawada, India.10.1109/AISP61711.2024.10870631 ↗
32. Pandey, J.P., and Singh Umrao, L. (2019, January 8–9). Digital Image Processing using Singular Value Decomposition. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Software Engineering (ICACSE), Sultanpur, India.10.2139/ssrn.3350278 ↗
33. PCA-IFNNR: Principal component analysis based image fusion directed nearest neighbor representation for dark face image super resolution10.1007/s11042-024-19880-8 ↗
34. Random forest-based scheme using feature and decision levels information for multi-focus image fusion10.1007/s10044-015-0448-4 ↗
35. Local binary pattern metric-based multi-focus image fusion10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.045 ↗
36. Performance comparison of image fusion using singular value decomposition10.15680/IJIRSET.2015.0409010 ↗
37. A review on infrared and visible image fusion algorithms based on neural networks10.1016/j.jvcir.2024.104179 ↗