journal article·2025-10-12Open access

Soil Class Effects on the Optimum Design of Spatial Steel Frames Using the Dandelion Optimizer

Ibrahim Behram Ugur, Ozkan Kizilay

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

In recent years, metaheuristic optimization methods have been widely applied across various engineering disciplines, offering effective solutions to complex problems that require both efficiency and reliability. Within this context, this study has two primary objectives. The first is to apply the Dandelion Optimizer (DO), inspired by the three-stage flight of dandelion seeds, to the optimum design of spatial steel frames and to evaluate its performance as a structural optimization algorithm. The second is to investigate the influence of different soil types, as defined in the Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018), on the optimum design outcomes. For this purpose, three benchmark spatial steel frames consisting of 132, 428, and 720 members were optimized using DO. The algorithm was implemented in MATLAB R2017b and integrated with SAP2000 v19 via the Open Application Programming Interface (OAPI). The design process was performed in accordance with TBEC-2018 and the AISC-LRFD, with strength, stability, and serviceability constraints considered. The results indicate that deteriorating soil conditions from ZA to ZE lead to substantial increases in structural demands. In the three analyzed models, total weight increases within the range of 45–57%, whereas total seismic base shear shows a much sharper rise, ranging from 160% to 292% These findings demonstrate both the practical applicability of the DO in steel frame optimization and the critical impact of soil conditions on structural design, underlining the importance of incorporating geotechnical factors into optimization frameworks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Sirnak University, 73000 Sirnak, Türkiye

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (2018). Turkish Building Earthquake Code, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency.
2. Holland, J.H. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press.
3. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle Swarm Optimization. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference On Neural Networks, VOLS1-6, Perth, Australia.
4. Ant System: Optimization by a Colony of Cooperating Agents10.1109/3477.484436 ↗
5. Differential Evolution—A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces10.1023/A:1008202821328 ↗
6. A New Heuristic Optimization Algorithm: Harmony Search10.1177/003754970107600201 ↗
7. Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization: A Novel Method for Constrained Design Optimization Problems
9. The Ant Lion Optimizer10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010 ↗
10. A Novel Metaheuristic Method for Solving Constrained Engineering Optimization Problems: Crow Search Algorithm10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001 ↗
11. Slime Mould Algorithm: A New Method for Stochastic Optimization10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055 ↗
12. Dandelion Optimizer: A Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithm for Engineering Applications10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105075 ↗
13. Optimization of Steel Frames Considering Soil-Structure Interaction
14. Optimum Design of Steel Space Frames Including Soil-Structure Interaction10.1007/s00158-016-1401-x ↗
15. Optimum Design of Steel Space Frames under Earthquake Effect Using Harmony Search10.12989/sem.2016.58.3.597 ↗
16. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement (2007). Turkish Earthquake Code, Specifications for Buildings to Be Built in Seismic Areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement.
17. AISC-LRFD (2001). Manual of Steel Construction-Load and Resistance Factor Design, American Institute of Steel Construction.
18. Application of an Improved Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Design of Planar Steel Frames
19. Discrete Sizing of Steel Frames Using Adaptive Dimensional Search Algorithm
20. A Grouping Method for Optimization of Steel Skeletal Structures by Applying a Combinatorial Search Algorithm Based on a Fully Stressed Design10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113299 ↗
21. Optimized Seismic Design of Planar and Spatial Steel Frames Using the Hybrid Learning Based Jaya Algorithm10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103172 ↗
22. Optimum Design of Nonlinear Semi-Rigid Steel Frame Based on Performance-Price Ratio via Genetic Algorithm10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105287 ↗
23. Improved Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for Design Optimization of Fuzzy Controllers in Steel Building Structures with Nonlinear Behavior Considering near Fault Ground Motion Effects10.1007/s10462-021-10101-4 ↗
24. Capacity Controlled Search: A New and Efficient Design-Driven Method for Discrete Size Optimization of Steel Framesle10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106937 ↗
25. Historical Evolution of Structural Optimization Techniques for Steel Skeletal Structures Including Industrial Design Applications10.1080/0305215X.2024.2390130 ↗
26. Weight Optimization of Outrigger-Braced High-Rise Steel Frames Considering Soil-Structure Interaction via Metaheuristic Algorithms10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109567 ↗
27. Artificial Intelligent in Optimization of Steel Moment Frame Structures A Review
28. Integrated Method for Intelligent Structural Design of Steel Frames Based on Optimization and Machine Learning Algorithm10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115980 ↗
29. Aksöz, Z., and Preisinger, C. (2020). An Interactive Structural Optimization of Space Frame Structures Using Machine Learning. Impact: Design with All Senses, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-29829-6_2 ↗
30. Wang, Y., Du, W., Wang, H., and Zhao, Y. (2021). Intelligent Generation Method of Innovative Structures Based on Topology Optimization and Deep Learning. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14247680 ↗
31. Ranalli, F. (2021). An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Multi-Disciplinary Design Optimization of Steel Buildings. [Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University].
32. Bergies, S., Su, S.F., and Elsisi, M. (2022). Model Predictive Paradigm with Low Computational Burden Based on Dandelion Optimizer for Autonomous Vehicle Considering Vision System Uncertainty. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10234539 ↗
33. Ali, T., Malik, S.A., Daraz, A., Aslam, S., and Alkhalifah, T. (2022). Dandelion Optimizer-Based Combined Automatic Voltage Regulation and Load Frequency Control in a Multi-Area, Multi-Source Interconnected Power System with Nonlinearities. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15228499 ↗
34. Abbassi, R., Saidi, S., Abbassi, A., Jerbi, H., Kchaou, M., and Alhasnawi, B.N. (2023). Accurate Key Parameters Estimation of PEMFCs’ Models Based on Dandelion Optimization Algorithm. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11061298 ↗
35. Enhanced Dandelion Optimizer for Optimum Design of Steel Frames10.1007/s40996-023-01074-1 ↗
36. Computers & Structures Inc. (2019). Sap 2000 V19, Computers & Structures Inc.
37. (MATLAB, 2017). MATLAB, R2017b.
38. Einstein, A. (1956). Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement, Courier Corporation.
39. Stochastic Process with Ultraslow Convergence to a Gaussian: The Truncated Lévy Flight10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2946 ↗
40. Monroe, J.S., Wicander, R., and Hazlett, R. (2007). Physical Geology: Exploring the Earth, Thomson Brooks/Cole.
41. (2025, April 11). AFAD Turkiye Seismic Hazard Map, Available online: https://tdth.afad.gov.tr/.
42. Improving the Performance of Simulated Annealing in Structural Optimization10.1007/s00158-009-0418-9 ↗
43. Aydoğdu, İ. (2010). Optimum Design of 3-D Irregular Steel Frames Using Ant Colony Optimization and Harmony Search Algorithms. [Ph.D. Thesis, Middle East Technical University].