Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Land-Use Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province
Source abstract
Abstract
Land-use carbon emissions denote the release or sequestration of greenhouse gases (e.g., CO2, N2O) resulting from human land-use activities, with land-use changes exerting a major influence on land-use carbon emissions. Revealing the coupling mechanism between land-use changes and carbon emissions is of crucial theoretical significance for achieving “dual carbon” goals and mitigating global climate change. Based on the land-use change data of Jiangxi Province, this study explored the Spatial–temporal relationship between land-use carbon emissions and land-use changes in Jiangxi Province from 2000 to 2020 using a model of land-use dynamic degrees, a model of land-use transfer matrices, and the IPCC carbon emission accounting model. In this study, the factors influencing changes in land-use carbon emissions were comprehensively analyzed using an LMDI model and the Tapio decoupling model. The results indicated that: (1) Jiangxi Province’s land-use changes show a “two-increase, four-decrease” trend, with construction land and unused land experiencing the most significant shifts, while water, grassland, cropland, and forestland changes stayed near 1%. (2) Net land-use carbon emissions exhibit a rapid then gradual increase, with higher emissions in the north/south and lower levels in central regions. While overall land-use carbon emission intensity is declining, per capita emissions continue to rise. (3) Land-use carbon emission changes are primarily driven by emission intensity, land-use structure, efficiency, and economic level. In Jiangxi, economic growth mainly increases land-use carbon emissions, while land-use efficiency enhancement counters this trend. Jiangxi Province shows weak land-use carbon emission–economic growth decoupling, with land-use carbon emissions rising more slowly than economic growth. This study not only provides a typical case analysis and methodological framework for understanding the carbon emission effects of human–land relationships in rapidly urbanizing regions but also offers a specific scientific basis and policy insights for Jiangxi Province and other similar regions to formulate differentiated territorial spatial planning, promote ecological protection and restoration, and achieve green and low-carbon development pathways under the “dual carbon” goals.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Regional Development and Environment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, 1 Daxue Road, Xuzhou 221116, China
College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, 99 Ziyang Avenue, Nanchang 330022, China
Funding
the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Falegnami, A., Romano, E., and Tomassi, A. (2024). The emergence of the GreenSCENT competence framework: A constructivist approach: The GreenSCENT theory. The European Green Deal in Education, Routledge.10.4324/9781003492597-17 ↗
2. Effectiveness of environmental taxes and environmental stringent policies on CO2 emissions: The European experience10.1007/s10668-022-02262-1 ↗
3. Huang, Z.K., Zeng, N.C., Zhang, D.M., Argyroudis, S., and Mitoulis, S.A. (2025). Resilience Models for Tunnels Recovery After Earthquakes. Engineering.10.1016/j.eng.2025.06.028 ↗
4. Unraveling the enigma of NPP variation in Chinese vegetation ecosystems: The interplay of climate change and land use change10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169023 ↗
5. Exploring potential of urban land-use management on carbon emissions—A case of Hangzhou, China10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109902 ↗
6. Spatiotemporal pattern evolution and influencing factors of land-use carbon emissions in counties, Jiangxi Province
7. The four-dimensional carbon cycle of the Southern Ocean10.1146/annurev-marine-041923-104057 ↗
8. Multi-scenario simulation of land use/cover change and carbon storage assessment in Hainan coastal zone from perspective of free trade port construction10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135630 ↗
9. Research progress on carbon sources and sinks of farmland ecosystems
10. Assessment of carbon balance attribution and carbon storage potential in China’s terrestrial ecosystem10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106748 ↗
11. Evidence and attribution of the enhanced land carbon sink10.1038/s43017-023-00456-3 ↗
12. Strengthening grassland carbon source and sink management to enhance its contribution to regional carbon neutrality10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110341 ↗
13. Interactions between land-use change and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks10.1007/s40641-018-0099-9 ↗
14. Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes10.1038/s41467-018-05980-1 ↗
15. Contribution of land use to the interannual variability of the land carbon cycle10.1038/s41467-020-16953-8 ↗
16. Spatio-temporal dynamic evolution of carbon emissions from land use change in Guangdong Province, China, 2000–202010.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111131 ↗
17. Spatio-temporal impacts of land use change on water-energy-food nexus carbon emissions in China, 2011–202010.1016/j.eiar.2024.107436 ↗
18. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics, influencing factors of land use carbon emissions, and low-carbon development in Hubei Province, China10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102567 ↗
19. Carbon emission prediction model of prefecture-level administrative region: A land-use-based case study of Xi’an city, China10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121488 ↗
20. Real-time characterization model of carbon emissions based on land-use status: A case study of Xi’an city, China10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140069 ↗
21. Ecological footprint: Refining the carbon footprint calculation10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.040 ↗
22. Supporting national-level policies for sustainable consumption in Portugal: A socio-economic Ecological Footprint analysis10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107687 ↗
23. Meng, Q., Zheng, Y., Liu, Q., Li, B., and Wei, H. (2023). Analysis of spatiotemporal variation and influencing factors of land-use carbon emissions in nine provinces of the yellow river basin based on the LMDI model. Land, 12.10.3390/land12020437 ↗
24. The relationship between agricultural and animal husbandry economic development and carbon emissions in Henan Province, the analysis of factors affecting carbon emissions, and carbon emissions prediction10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115134 ↗
25. Research on ecological compensation based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services in the Qinling-Daba Mountains10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110687 ↗
26. The influence of psychological cognition and policy environment on the basin residents’ behavior of ecological compensation under the background of carbon neutrality: A case study in upper Yellow River basin, China10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110031 ↗
27. A new estimation of carbon emissions from land use and land cover change in China over the past 300 years10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160963 ↗
28. Effects of land-use change on carbon emission and its driving factors in Shaanxi Province from 2000 to 202010.1007/s11356-023-27110-1 ↗
29. Land-use carbon emissions and built environment characteristics: A city-level quantitative analysis in emerging economies10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107019 ↗
30. Spatial correlation evolution and prediction scenario of land use carbon emissions in the Yellow River Basin10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110701 ↗
31. Decomposition analysis of factors affecting carbon dioxide emissions across provinces in China10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.206 ↗
32. Theoretical and empirical analyses on the factors affecting carbon emissions: Case of Zhejiang Province, China10.1007/s10668-022-02148-2 ↗
33. Factor decomposition of carbon emissions in Chinese megacities10.1016/j.jes.2018.03.026 ↗
34. China’s carbon intensity factor decomposition and carbon emission decoupling analysis10.1016/j.energy.2021.122175 ↗
35. Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis of carbon emission allowance and stock returns10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.136 ↗
36. Carbon emission efficiency network formation mechanism and spatial correlation complexity analysis: Taking the Yangtze River Economic Belt as an example10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156719 ↗
37. Grey relational analysis, principal component analysis and forecasting of carbon emissions based on long short-term memory in China10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.128 ↗
38. Modeling the nexus between carbon emissions, urbanization, population growth, energy consumption, and economic development in Asia: Evidence from grey relational analysis10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.179 ↗
39. The role of financial development on carbon emissions: A meta regression analysis10.1007/s11356-020-07641-7 ↗
40. The nonlinear effects of population aging, industrial structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions: A panel threshold regression analysis of 137 countries10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125381 ↗
41. Analysis on the influencing factors of carbon emission in China’s logistics industry based on LMDI method10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138473 ↗
42. Factors Influencing Energy Consumption from China’s Tourist Attractions: A Structural Decomposition Analysis with LMDI and K-Means Clustering10.1007/s10666-023-09898-x ↗
43. Land use and land cover dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon: An overview10.1016/0921-8009(96)00033-X ↗
44. Land use change of Kitakyushu based on landscape ecology and Markov model10.1007/s11442-008-0455-0 ↗
45. Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: An input–output analysis10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.002 ↗
46. China’s black carbon emission from fossil fuel consumption in 2015, 2020, and 203010.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.032 ↗
47. A review of techno-economic data for road transportation fuels10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.041 ↗
48. Kaya identity for analysis of the main drivers of GHG emissions and feasibility to implement EU “20–20–20” targets in the Baltic States10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.311 ↗
49. Assessing the decoupling of economic growth from environmental impacts in the European Union: A consumption-based approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.010 ↗
50. (2017). Current Land Use Classification (Standard No. GB/T 21010-2017).