MH-WMG: A Multi-Head Wavelet-Based MobileNet with Gated Linear Attention for Power Grid Fault Diagnosis
Source abstract
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in power systems to boost efficiency, reliability, and automation. This study introduces an end-to-end, AI-driven fault-diagnosis pipeline built around a Multi-Head Wavelet-based MobileNet with Gated Linear Attention (MH-WMG). The network takes time-series signals converted into images as input and branches into three heads that, respectively, localize the fault area, classify the fault type, and predict the distance bin for all short-circuit faults. Evaluation employs the canonical Kundur two-area four-machine system, partitioned into six regions, twelve fault scenarios (including normal operation), and twelve predefined distance bins. MH-WMG achieves high performance: perfect accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 (1.00) for fault-area detection; strong fault-type identification (accuracy = 0.9604, precision = 0.9625, recall = 0.9604, and F1 = 0.9601); and robust distance-bin prediction (accuracy = 0.8679, precision = 0.8725, recall = 0.8679, and F1 = 0.8690). The model is compact and fast (2.33 M parameters, 44.14 ms latency, 22.66 images/s) and outperforms baselines in both accuracy and efficiency. The pipeline decisively outperforms conventional time-series methods. By rapidly pinpointing and classifying faults with high fidelity, it enhances grid resilience, reduces operational risk, and enables more stable, intelligent operation, demonstrating the value of AI-driven fault detection for future power-system reliability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Power Systems and Technologies · Smart Grid and Power Systems · Power Systems Fault Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey
Center for Environmental Research and Technology (Ce-CERT), Bourns College of Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Firat University, 23200 Elazig, Turkey
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Auditing and analysis of energy consumption of an educational building in hot and humid area10.1016/j.enconman.2012.10.005 ↗
2. Sevilla, J., Heim, L., Ho, A., Besiroglu, T., Hobbhahn, M., and Villalobos, P. (2022, January 18–23). Compute trends across three eras of machine learning. Proceedings of the 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Padua, Italy.10.1109/IJCNN55064.2022.9891914 ↗
3. ChatGPT: Tackle the growing carbon footprint of generative AI10.1038/d41586-023-00843-2 ↗
4. Lawson, A. (2025, March 02). Google to Buy Nuclear Power for AI Datacentres in ‘World First’ Deal. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/oct/15/google-buy-nuclear-power-ai-datacentres-kairos-power.
5. University of Cambridge (2025, March 08). Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. Available online: https://ccaf.io/cbnsi/cbeci/comparisons.
6. Transmission line faults in power system and the different algorithms for identification, classification and localization: A brief review of methods10.1007/s40031-020-00530-0 ↗
7. Glover, J.D., Overbye, T.J., and Sarma, M.S. (2017). Power System Analysis & Design, Cengage Learning.
8. Das, J.C. (2002). Power System Analysis: Short-Circuit Load Flow and Harmonics, CRC Press.
9. Kasikci, I. (2018). Short Circuits in Power Systems: A Practical Guide to IEC 60909-0, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9783527803378 ↗
10. A novel distance protection algorithm for the phase-ground fault10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2286627 ↗
11. Wavelet transform based digital protection for transmission lines10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.03.024 ↗
12. Unsymmetrical fault diagnosis in transmission/distribution networks10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.09.005 ↗
13. Biologically inspired compound defect detection using a spiking neural network with continuous time–frequency gradients10.1016/j.aei.2025.103132 ↗
14. Adaptive thresholding and coordinate attention-based tree-inspired network for aero-engine bearing health monitoring under strong noise10.1016/j.aei.2024.102559 ↗
15. The bearing multi-sensor fault diagnosis method based on a multi-branch parallel perception network and feature fusion strategy10.1016/j.ress.2025.111122 ↗
16. Tleis, N. (2007). Power Systems Modelling and Fault Analysis: Theory and Practice, Elsevier.
17. Kothari, D.P., and Nagrath, I.J. (2003). Modern Power System Analysis, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
18. Bose, B.K. (1986). Power Electronics and AC Drives, Prentice-Hall.
19. Anderson, P.M. (1995). Analysis of Faulted Power Systems, John Wiley & Sons.
20. (2014). IEEE Guide for Determining Fault Location on AC Transmission and Distribution Lines (Standard No. IEEE Std C37.114-2014). Available online: https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/C37.114/4977/.
21. Schweitzer, E.O. (1990, January 16). A review of impedance-based fault locating experience. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Iowa–Nebraska System Protection Seminar, Omaha, NE, USA.
22. Qualitrol (2025, September 22). Introduction to Qualitrol’s Traveling-Wave Fault Locator. Technical Article. Available online: https://www.qualitrolcorp.com/introduction-to-qualitrols-traveling-wave-fault-locator/.
23. Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient10.1002/asi.10242 ↗
24. An introduction to wavelet transforms: A tutorial approach
25. Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence10.1146/annurev.fl.24.010192.002143 ↗
26. The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis10.1109/18.57199 ↗
27. Advanced dual RNN architecture for electrical motor fault classification10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3344676 ↗
28. Mallat, S. (1999). A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-012466606-1/50008-8 ↗
29. Jin, J., Dundar, A., and Culurciello, E. (2014). Flattened convolutional neural networks for feedforward acceleration. arXiv.
30. Howard, A.G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., and Adam, H. (2017). Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv.
31. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.C. (2018, January 18–22). Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
32. Howard, A., Sandler, M., Chu, G., Chen, L.C., Chen, B., Tan, M., Wang, W., Zhu, Y., Pang, R., and Vasudevan, V. (November, January 27). Searching for mobilenetv3. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
33. Yang, S., Wang, B., Shen, Y., Panda, R., and Kim, Y. (2023). Gated linear attention transformers with hardware-efficient training. arXiv.
34. A comparative analysis of time series forecasting models and the novel ELSTMD approach for renewable energy generation10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3558120 ↗
35. Brito Palma, L. (2024). Hybrid Approach for Detection and Diagnosis of Short-Circuit Faults in Power Transmission Lines. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17092169 ↗
36. Wavelet-transform based early detection method for short-circuit faults in power distribution networks10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.013 ↗
37. A deep learning based intelligent approach in detection and classification of transmission line faults10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107102 ↗
38. High impedance single-phase faults diagnosis in transmission lines via deep reinforcement learning of transfer functions10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051411 ↗
39. EMTP transient modeling of a distance relay and a comparison with EMTP laboratory testing10.1109/61.252626 ↗
40. Anwar, T., Mu, C., Yousaf, M.Z., Khan, W., Khalid, S., Hourani, A.O., and Zaitsev, I. (2025). Robust fault detection and classification in power transmission lines via ensemble machine learning models. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-86554-2 ↗
41. CNN-based transformer model for fault detection in power system networks10.1109/TIM.2023.3238059 ↗
42. Deep learning-based application for fault location identification and type classification in active distribution grids10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120932 ↗
43. Deep learning through LSTM classification and regression for transmission line fault detection, diagnosis and location in large-scale multi-machine power systems10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109330 ↗
44. Ünal, F., and Ekici, S. (2017, January 19–21). A fault location technique for HVDC transmission lines using extreme learning machines. Proceedings of the 2017 5th International Istanbul Smart Grid and Cities Congress and Fair (ICSG), Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/SGCF.2017.7947616 ↗
45. Nasser Mohamed, Y., Seker, S., and Akinci, T.C. (2023). Signal processing application based on a hybrid wavelet transform to fault detection and identification in power system. Information, 14.10.3390/info14100540 ↗
46. Power system stability
47. Matlab Help Center (2025, February 01). Kundur’s Two-Area System with PMU. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/sps/ug/pmu-pll-based-positive-sequence-kundur-s-two-area-system.html.
48. Matlab Help Center (2025, February 01). Three-Phase PI Section Line. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/sps/powersys/ref/threephasepisectionline.html.
49. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge.10.4324/9780203771587 ↗