journal article·2025-10-08Open access

Exploratory Analysis of Physiological and Biomechanical Determinants of CrossFit Benchmark Workout Performance: The Role of Sex and Training Experience

Alexandra Malheiro, Pedro Forte, David Rodríguez-Rosell, Diogo L. Marques, Mário C. Marques

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

CrossFit performance is influenced by physiological, neuromuscular, and perceptual factors, yet the extent to which these determinants vary by sex or training experience in standardized CrossFit Workouts of the Day (WODs) remains unclear. This study examined whether variables such as lactate accumulation, oxygen uptake dynamics, jump performance loss, and ventilatory responses relate differently to performance when stratified by sex and expertise. Fifteen trained athletes (eight males, seven females; overall mean age 27.7 ± 4.6 years) took part. Assessments included body composition, squat (SJ) and countermovement jumps (CMJ), and maximal oxygen consumption [VO2max]. On a separate day, they performed Fran (21-15-9 thrusters and pull-ups, Rx or scaled) The prescribed (‘Rx’) version used standardized barbell loads (43 kg for men, 29 kg for women), while the scaled version involved reduced loads or pull-up modifications. Respiratory gas exchange and heart rate were continuously monitored, while blood lactate and jump performance were measured pre- and post-WOD. Workout completion time [s] was the primary outcome. Correlation heatmaps explored associations in the overall sample and by sex and expertise. Mean completion time was 422.1 ± 173.2 s (range: 200–840). Faster performance correlated with higher ventilatory responses [ΔVe, r = −0.60, p = 0.018], greater mean VO2 (r = −0.62, p = 0.014), superior jump power [CMJ pre, r = −0.65, p = 0.009], and higher post-WOD lactate [r = −0.54, p = 0.036]. Sex-stratified analyses showed that males relied on ventilatory efficiency and neuromuscular power, whereas females were more constrained by performance loss and higher resting perceived exertion (RPE). Experts depended on ventilatory and neuromuscular efficiency, while initiates showed stronger associations with decrements in jump performance and higher RPE. These findings highlight subgroup-specific performance profiles and reinforce the need for tailored training strategies in CrossFit athletes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention · Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal

Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences, and Human Development (CIDESD), 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal

Department of Sports, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5301-854 Bragança, Portugal

Department of Sports, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, 4560-708 Penafiel, Portugal

Research Center for Active Living and Wellbeing (LiveWell), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5301-854 Bragança, Portugal

Physical Performance and Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, Spain

Department of Sport and Informatics, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, Spain

Funding

National Funds

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. Mangine, G., Tankersley, J., McDougle, J., Velazquez, N., Roberts, M., Esmat, T., and Feito, Y. (2020). Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance. Sports, 8.10.3390/sports8070102 ↗
2. Jacob, M., Keiner, M., Holmberg, H.C., and Häkkinen, K. (2020). Physiological Responses to CrossFit® Training: A Systematic Review. Front. Physiol., 11.10.3389/fphys.2020.01001 ↗
3. Dexheimer, J.D., Schroeder, E.T., Sawyer, B.J., Pettitt, R.W., Aguinaldo, A.L., and Torrence, W.A. (2019). Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit® Performance. Sports, 7.10.3390/sports7040093 ↗
4. Six-Months CrossFit Training Improves Metabolic Efficiency in Young Trained Men
5. DeBlauw, J., Drake, N., Kurtz, B., Crawford, D., Carper, M., Wakeman, A., and Heinrich, K. (2021). High-Intensity Functional Training Guided by Individualized Heart Rate Variability Results in Similar Health and Fitness Improvements as Predetermined Training with Less Effort. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol., 6.10.3390/jfmk6040102 ↗
6. Physiological Responses after Two Different CrossFit Workouts10.5114/biolsport.2021.102928 ↗
7. Toledo, R., Dias, M., Toledo, R., Erotides, R., Pinto, D., Reis, V., and Heinrich, K. (2021). Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women. Life, 11.10.20944/preprints202105.0733.v1 ↗
8. Acute Physiological Responses during CrossFit® Workouts
9. Leitão, L., Dias, M.R., Campos, Y., Vieira, J.G., Sant’Ana, L.O., Telles, L.G.S., and Vianna, J.M. (2021). Physical and Physiological Predictors of Fran CrossFit WOD Athlete’s Performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18084070 ↗
10. Zeitz, E., Cook, L., Dexheimer, J.D., Lemez, S., Leyva, W.D., Terbio, I.Y., and Jo, E. (2020). The Relationship between CrossFit Performance and Laboratory-Based Measurements of Fitness. Sports, 8.10.3390/sports8080112 ↗
11. Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Body Composition in NCAA Division I Athletes: Exploration of Mass Distribution10.1177/1941738119861572 ↗
12. Sex-Related Differences in the Acute Physiological Response to a High-Intensity CrossFit Workout
13. Effect of the Fran CrossFit Workout on Oxygen Uptake Kinetics, Energetics, and Postexercise Muscle Function in Trained CrossFitters10.1123/ijspp.2023-0201 ↗
14. Hormonal Basis of Biological Sex Differences in Human Athletic Performance10.1210/endocr/bqae036 ↗
15. Archacki, D., Zieliński, J., Ciekot-Sołtysiak, M., Zarębska, E., and Kusy, K. (2024). Sex Differences in the Energy System Contribution during Sprint Exercise in Speed-Power and Endurance Athletes. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13164812 ↗
16. Exercise Testing in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis—Importance of Ventilatory Parameters10.1007/s00421-018-4018-5 ↗
17. Ventilation Limits Aerobic Capacity after Functional Electrical Stimulation Row Training in High Spinal Cord Injury10.1249/MSS.0000000000000880 ↗
18. The Influence of Age, Gender, and Training on Exercise Efficiency10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.066 ↗
19. Gender Differences in the Decline in Aerobic Capacity and Its Physiological Determinants during the Later Decades of Life10.1152/japplphysiol.01398.2005 ↗
20. Trunk, Mass Grasp, Knee, and Hip Muscle Performance in CrossFit Participants: Reference Values According to Participants’ Sex and Limb Dominance10.26603/001c.75222 ↗
21. Schlegel, P., and Křehký, A. (2022). Performance Sex Differences in CrossFit®. Sports, 10.10.3390/sports10110165 ↗
22. Previous Experience Influences Pacing during 20 km Time Trial Cycling10.1136/bjsm.2009.057315 ↗
23. The Effects of Plyometric versus Dynamic Stabilization and Balance Training on Lower Extremity Biomechanics10.1177/0363546505281241 ↗
24. Bridging the Gap between Training and Competition in Elite Rink Hockey: A Pilot Study10.1177/19417381241273219 ↗
25. Pacing Strategies of Inexperienced Children during Repeated 800 m Individual Time-Trials and Simulated Competition10.1123/pes.25.2.198 ↗
26. Pacing Behaviour Development and Acquisition: A Systematic Review10.1186/s40798-022-00540-w ↗
27. High-Intensity Exercise Training Enhances Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation Efficiency in a Temperature-Dependent Manner in Human Skeletal Muscle: Implications for Exercise Performance10.1096/fj.201900106RRR ↗
28. The Relationship of Aerobic Capacity, Anaerobic Peak Power and Experience to Performance in HIT Exercise10.5604/20831862.1174771 ↗
29. Meier, N., Schlie, J., and Schmidt, A. (2023). CrossFit: ‘Unknowable’ or Predictable?—A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit Performance. Sports, 11.10.3390/sports11060112 ↗
30. CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5 ↗
31. Mangine, G.T., and McDougle, J.M. (2022). CrossFit Open Performance Is Affected by the Nature of Past Competition Experiences. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil., 14.10.1186/s13102-022-00434-0 ↗
32. Aravena-Sagardia, P., Barramuño-Medina, M., Vásquez, B.P., Pichinao, S., Sepúlveda, P.R., Herrera-Valenzuela, T., Hernandez-Martinez, J., Levín-Catrilao, Á., Villagrán-Silva, F., and Vásquez-Carrasco, E. (2025). Effects of a CrossFit Training Program on Body Composition and Physical Fitness in Novice and Advanced Practitioners: An Inter-Individual Analysis. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15073554 ↗
33. The Role of Measurement Error in the Evaluation of Causal Effects
34. Szklo, M., and Nieto, F.J. (2014). Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics, Jones & Bartlett Learning. [3rd ed.].
35. An Overview of Confounding. Part 1: The Concept and How to Address It10.1111/aogs.13295 ↗
36. Sensitivity Analysis for Unobserved Confounding of Direct and Indirect Effects Using Uncertainty Intervals10.1002/sim.7620 ↗
37. The Concept of Residual Confounding in Regression Models and Some Applications10.1002/sim.4780111308 ↗
38. Training Confounder-Free Deep Learning Models for Medical Applications10.1038/s41467-020-19784-9 ↗
39. Forte, P., Encarnação, S.G., Teixeira, J.E., Branquinho, L., Barbosa, T.M., Monteiro, A.M., and Pecos-Martín, D. (2025). Predicting Sleep Quality Based on Metabolic, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness Variables in Aged People: Exploratory Analysis with a Conventional Machine Learning Model. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol., 10.10.3390/jfmk10030337 ↗
40. Comparisons in Heart Rate Readings between the Bioconnected Wireless Exercise Earpiece and a Polar T31-Coded Chest Strap during a GXT10.14198/jhse.2018.133.05 ↗
41. Bagchi, A., Raizada, S., Thapa, R.K., Ștefănică, V., and Ceylan, H.İ. (2024). Reliability and Accuracy of Portable Devices for Measuring Countermovement Jump Height in Physically Active Adults: A Comparison of Force Platforms, Contact Mats, and Video-Based Software. Life, 14.10.3390/life14111394 ↗
42. Reliability and Validity of a Low-Cost Portable Force Platform10.3233/IES-202106 ↗
43. Panoutsakopoulos, V., Kotzamanidou, M.C., Papaiakovou, G., and Kollias, I. (2021). The Ankle Joint Range of Motion and Its Effect on Squat Jump Performance with and without Arm Swing in Adolescent Female Volleyball Players. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol., 6.10.3390/jfmk6010014 ↗
44. Comparison of Countermovement Jump and Squat Jump Performance between 627 State and Non-State Representative Junior Australian Football Players10.1519/JSC.0000000000004299 ↗
45. Evaluation of Work Efficiency in Structural Firefighters10.1519/JSC.0000000000004577 ↗
46. Direct Measurement of Cell-Free DNA from Serially Collected Capillary Plasma during Incremental Exercise10.1152/japplphysiol.00002.2014 ↗
47. Coco, M., Corrado, D.D., Cirillo, F., Iacono, C., Perciavalle, V., and Buscemi, A. (2021). Effects of General Fatigue Induced by Exhaustive Exercise on Posture and Gait Stability of Healthy Young Men. Behav. Sci., 11.10.3390/bs11050072 ↗
48. Piero, D.W., Esteve, T.V., Castán, J.C.R., Abella, C.P., and Díaz-Pintado, J.V.S. (2018). Effects of Work-Interval Duration and Sport Specificity on Blood Lactate Concentration, Heart Rate and Perceptual Responses during High Intensity Interval Training. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0200690 ↗
49. The Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Athletic Performance: Consensus Statement for the American College of Sports Medicine10.1249/MSS.0000000000003300 ↗
50. Training and Coaching of Female vs. Male Endurance Athletes on Their Road to Gold: Perceptions among Successful Elite Athlete Coaches
51. Hung, C.-H., Su, C.-H., and Wang, D. (2025). The Role of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Neuromuscular Adaptations: Implications for Strength and Power Development—A Review. Life, 15.10.20944/preprints202503.1163.v1 ↗
52. Developing Maximal Neuromuscular Power: Part 2—Training Considerations for Improving Maximal Power Production10.2165/11538500-000000000-00000 ↗
53. Psychological Variables of CrossFit Participants: A Systematic Review10.1007/s11332-020-00685-9 ↗
54. The Sensitivity of Differential Ratings of Perceived Exertion as Measures of Internal Load10.1123/ijspp.2015-0223 ↗
55. Kaufman, M., Nguyen, C., Shetty, M., Oppezzo, M., Barrack, M., and Fredericson, M. (2023). Popular Dietary Trends’ Impact on Athletic Performance: A Critical Analysis Review. Nutrients, 15.10.3390/nu15163511 ↗
56. Reliability and Validity of the Chronojump Open-Source Jump Mat System10.5114/biolsport.2020.95636 ↗
57. The Role of Age on Neuromuscular Performance Decay Induced by a Maximal Intensity Sprint Session in a Group of Competitive Endurance Athletes10.4081/ejtm.2022.10378 ↗
58. Sex-Based Differences in Physiology: What Should We Teach in the Medical Curriculum?10.1152/advan.00118.2006 ↗
59. Ankle-Joint Self-Mobilization and CrossFit Training in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial10.4085/1062-6050-181-18 ↗
60. Physiological Profiles of Male and Female CrossFit Athletes10.1123/ijspp.2023-0386 ↗
61. Men vs. Women World Marathon Records’ Pacing Strategies from 1998 to 201810.1080/17461391.2019.1596165 ↗
62. Injury Risk Is Different between Male and Female Athletes during 14 International Athletics Championships
63. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2nd ed.].
64. The Importance of Movement Velocity as a Measure to Control Resistance Training Intensity
65. Full-Squat as a Determinant of Performance in CrossFit10.1055/a-0960-9717 ↗
66. Kozinc, Ž., Pleša, J., and Šarabon, N. (2021). Questionable Utility of the Eccentric Utilization Ratio in Relation to the Performance of Volleyball Players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph182211754 ↗
67. Martínez-Gómez, R., Valenzuela, P., Alejo, L., Gil-Cabrera, J., Montalvo-Pérez, A., Talavera, E., and Barranco-Gil, D. (2020). Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.37247/PAENVR.1.2020.19 ↗
68. Marzano-Felisatti, J.M., Lucca, L.D., Luján, J.F.G., Priego-Quesada, J.I., and Pino-Ortega, J. (2024). A Preliminary Investigation about the Influence of WIMU ProTM Location on Heart Rate Accuracy: A Comparative Study in Cycle Ergometer. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24030988 ↗
69. Maté-Muñoz, J.L., Maicas-Pérez, L., Aparicio-García, I., Hernández-Lougedo, J., Sousa, L.S., Hontoria-Galán, M., and Elvar, J.R.H. (2025). Are Perceived Effort Scales (OMNI-RES) Appropriate for Defining and Controlling Strength Training Intensity?. Sports, 13.10.3390/sports13020057 ↗
70. Petrigna, L., Karsten, B., Marcolin, G., Paoli, A., D’Antona, G., Palma, A., and Bianco, A. (2019). A Review of Countermovement and Squat Jump Testing Methods in the Context of Public Health Examination in Adolescence: Reliability and Feasibility of Current Testing Procedures. Front. Physiol., 10.10.3389/fphys.2019.01384 ↗
71. The Association of Whole and Segmental Body Composition and Anaerobic Performance in CrossFit Athletes: Sex Differences and Performance Prediction10.47197/retos.v62.109115 ↗
72. Sex Differences in Anaerobic Performance in CrossFit® Athletes: A Comparison of Three Different All-Out Tests10.7717/peerj.18930 ↗
73. Tibana, R., Neto, I., Sousa, N., Romeiro, C., Hanai, A., Brandão, H., and Voltarelli, F. (2021). Local Muscle Endurance and Strength Had Strong Relationship with CrossFit Open 2020 in Amateur Athletes. Sports, 9.10.20944/preprints202106.0034.v1 ↗
74. Keeping Pace: A Practitioner-Focused Review of Pacing Strategies in Running10.1519/SSC.0000000000000505 ↗
75. Sauvé, B., Haugan, M., and Paulsen, G. (2024). Physical and Physiological Characteristics of Elite CrossFit Athletes. Sports, 12.10.3390/sports12060162 ↗
76. Zhang, W., Cui, Z., Shen, D., Li, G., and Li, Q. (2025). Testosterone Levels Positively Linked to Muscle Mass but Not Strength in Adult Males Aged 20–59 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front. Physiol., 16.10.3389/fphys.2025.1512268 ↗
77. Smajla, D., Vlahović, T., Rupčić, T., Pocek, S., and Baić, M. (2024). Reliability of an Inertial Sensor Device for Jump Performance Assessment in Collegiate Athletes. Life, 14.