Novel Experimental and Simulation Investigation of Transducer Coupling and Specimen Geometry Effects in Low-Frequency Ultrasonic Testing
Source abstract
Abstract
Conventional characterization of ultrasonic testing (UT) transducers primarily focuses on determining centre frequency and usable bandwidth. However, the relative amplitude distribution across different frequency components—particularly in low-frequency transducers used for civil engineering applications—remains largely overlooked. This paper introduces a comprehensive methodology to assess the influence of transducer coupling and specimen geometry on ultrasonic pulse velocity signals. The novel approach combines high-frequency laser Doppler vibrometry, real-time photoelastic imaging, and computer simulations using commercial semi-analytical wave-propagation software. The methodology is applied to the characterization of a 250 kHz UT transducer, with particular emphasis on how coupling with a solid test medium alters its frequency response. A glass specimen with an acoustic impedance comparable to that of concrete is used to simulate practical testing conditions. Vibration patterns recorded at the distal end of the specimen are analysed through computer simulations and validated experimentally using a novel photoelastic system capable of capturing wave–specimen interactions at ultrasonic frequencies in real time. The findings offer valuable insights into frequency-dependent signal behaviour and transducer–medium interactions, providing practical guidance for the design and optimization of UT inspections in concrete and other highly attenuative materials commonly encountered in civil engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Engineering Applied Research · Flow Measurement and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Pulse-Echo Ultrasonic Transducer Characterization10.1109/T-SU.1979.31056 ↗
2. Tone-Burst Testing of Pulse-Echo Transducers10.1109/T-SU.1979.31058 ↗
3. Theoretical and Experimental Methods to Evaluate Ultrasonic Transducers for Inspection and Diagnostic Applications10.1109/T-SU.1979.31059 ↗
4. (2020). E1065/E1065M-20 Standard Guide (Standard No. ASTM E1065/E1065M-20).
5. An automated digital beam profile system for ultrasonic transducer characterization10.1016/0963-8695(92)90157-C ↗
6. Methodologies for characterizing ultrasonic transducers using neural network and pattern recognition techniques10.1109/41.170972 ↗
7. Ultrasonic transducer characterization by neural networks10.1016/S0020-0255(97)10048-2 ↗
8. coustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: A combined measurement and modeling approach10.1121/1.2967836 ↗
9. Fabrication and Characterization of High-Sensitivity Ultrasonic Transducers with Functionally Graded Design10.1109/JSEN.2019.2905625 ↗
10. Complete ultrasonic transducer characterization and its use for models and measurements10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.088 ↗
11. Wolf, F., Lahmer, T., Bahr, L., Hauck, A., Sutor, A., Lerch, R., and Kaltenbacher, M. (2008, January 2–5). Finite element modeling of ultrasonic transducer by utilizing an inverse scheme for the determination of its material parameters. Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Beijing, China.10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0188 ↗
12. Investigation of ultrasonic transducers using optical techniques10.1016/0041-624X(88)90065-0 ↗
13. Ospitia, N., Aggelis, D.G., and Lefever, G. (2021). Sensor Size Effect on Rayleigh Wave Velocity on Cementitious Surfaces. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21196483 ↗
14. Characterization of Piezoelectric Accelerometers Beyond the Nominal Frequency Range10.1520/GTJ20150091 ↗
15. Calibration of a Piezoelectric Transducer through Laser Measurements and Numerical Simulation10.2113/JEEG24.1.39 ↗
16. Feeney, A., Kang, L., Somerset, W.E., and Dixon, S. (2019). The Influence of Air Pressure on the Dynamics of Flexural Ultrasonic Transducers. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19214710 ↗
17. Dynamic Nonlinearity in Piezoelectric Flexural Ultrasonic Transducers10.1109/JSEN.2019.2911158 ↗
18. Characterization of Ultrasonic Transducer Response Using Laser Doppler Interferometer in kHz-Range for Civil Engineering Applications10.1007/s10921-022-00884-z ↗
19. Underwater Acoustic Wavefront Visualization by Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer for the Characterization of Focused Ultrasonic Transducers10.3390/s150819925 ↗
20. Del Savio, A.A., La Torre Esquivel, D., Carrillo, J., and Yep, E.C. (2022). Determination of polypropylene fiber-reinforced concrete compressive strength and elasticity modulus via ultrasonic pulse tests. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122010375 ↗
21. Guo, S., Dai, Q., Sun, X., Sun, Y., and Liu, Z. (2017). Ultrasonic Techniques for Air Void Size Distribution and Property Evaluation in Both Early-Age and Hardened Concrete Samples. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7030290 ↗
22. Zhong, B., and Zhu, J. (2022). Applications of Stretching Technique and Time Window Effects on Ultrasonic Velocity Monitoring in Concrete. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12147130 ↗
23. Kwon, H., Joh, C., and Chin, W.J. (2021). 3D Internal Visualization of Concrete Structure Using Multifaceted Data for Ultrasonic Array Pulse-Echo Tomography. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21196681 ↗
24. Zatar, W., Chen, G., Nghiem, H., and Xiao, F. (2024). Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Signals for Quantitative Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Anomalies. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202403.1428.v1 ↗
25. Ultrasonic tomography with deep learning for detecting embedded components and internal damage of concrete structures10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100742 ↗
26. Phased array ultrasonic and deep learning based internal defect detection in underwater concrete bridge structures
27. Kouddane, B., Sbartaï, Z.M., Alwash, M., Ali-Benyahia, K., Elachachi, S.M., Lamdouar, N., and Kenai, S. (2022). Assessment of Concrete Strength Using the Combination of NDT—Review and Performance Analysis. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122312190 ↗
28. Semi-autonomous aerial robot for ultrasonic assessment of crack depth and surface velocity in concrete structures10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106296 ↗
29. Frequency-dependent reliability of ultrasonic testing based on numerical model with consideration of coarse aggregates in concrete
30. Evaluation of compressive damage in concrete using ultrasonic nonlinear coda wave interferometry10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107438 ↗
31. Characterisation of corrosion-induced crack in concrete using ultrasonic diffuse coda wave10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106883 ↗
32. Tyrtaiou, M., Elenas, A., Andreadis, I., and Vasiliadis, L. (2022). Hilbert-Huang Transform-Based Seismic Intensity Parameters for Performance-Based Design of RC-Framed Structures. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12091301 ↗
33. Shakir, A.M., Cascante, G., and Ameen, T.H. (2025). Methodology for the Early Detection of Damage Using CEEMDAN-Hilbert Spectral Analysis of Ultrasonic Wave Attenuation. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18143294 ↗
34. Time–frequency analysis of ultrasonic signals for quality assessment of bonded concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133062 ↗
35. Zhao, J., Hu, T., and Zhang, Q. (2022). A Wavelet Packet Transform and Convolutional Neural Network Method Based Ultrasonic Detection Signals Recognition of Concrete. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22103863 ↗
36. Deep learning-enhanced nonlinear ultrasonic identification of concrete microcrack development10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141488 ↗
37. Intelligent monitoring of concrete-rock interface debonding via ultrasonic measurement integrated with convolutional neural network10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131865 ↗
38. Wave dispersion in fresh and hardened concrete through the prism of gradient elasticity10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.09.005 ↗
39. Wu, Y.C., Kang, S., Jeong, Y., David, D., and Ham, S. (2023). Wave Dispersion Behavior in Quasi-Solid State Concrete Hydration. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23083947 ↗
40. MathWorks Inc. (2021). MATLAB 2021a Documentation: FFT—Fast Fourier Transform, MathWorks Inc.
41. MathWorks Inc. (2021). MATLAB 2021a Documentation: WSST—Wavelet Synchrosqueezed Transform, MathWorks Inc.
42. CEA (2023). CIVA NDE 2023—User Manual, CEA.
43. Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: An empirical mode decomposition-like tool10.1016/j.acha.2010.08.002 ↗
44. The Synchrosqueezing algorithm for time-varying spectral analysis: Robustness properties and new paleoclimate applications10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.11.029 ↗
45. Experiments on the depolarisation of light as exhibited by various mineral, animal, and vegetable bodies, with a reference of the phenomena to the general principles of polarisation
46. Visualization of pulsed ultrasound using stroboscopic photoelasticity10.1016/0029-1021(72)90064-3 ↗
47. Ultrasonic wave visualization as a teaching aid in non-destructive testing10.1016/0041-624X(77)90066-X ↗
48. Frequency and geometry effects on ultrasonic pulse velocity measurements of concrete specimens
49. Concrete properties evaluation by statistical fusion of NDT techniques10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.064 ↗
50. Ginzel, E.A. (2003). Video of Photo-Elastic Visoalisation of Ultrasound. NDT.net, 8.