journal article·2025-10-05Open access

Conic Programming Approach to Limit Analysis of Plane Rigid-Plastic Problems

Artur Zbiciak, Adam Kasprzak, Kazimierz Józefiak

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

This paper presents the application of conic programming methods to the limit analysis of plane rigid-plastic problems in structural and geotechnical engineering. The approach is based on the formulation of yield criteria as second-order cone constraints and on the dual optimization problem, which directly provides collapse mechanisms and limit loads. Two benchmark examples are investigated. The first concerns a deep beam under uniform top pressure, analyzed with linear and quadratic finite elements. The results confirm the ability of the method to reproduce realistic collapse mechanisms and demonstrate the effect of mesh refinement and element type on convergence. The second example addresses the ultimate bearing capacity of a strip footing on cohesive-frictional soil. The numerical implementation was carried out in MATLAB using CVX with MOSEK as the solver, which ensures practical applicability and efficient computations. Different soil models are considered, including Mohr–Coulomb and two Drucker–Prager variants, and the results are compared with the classical Terzaghi solution. Additional elastoplastic FEM simulations carried out in a commercial program are also presented. The comparison highlights the differences between rigid-plastic optimization and incremental elastoplastic analyses, showing that both conservative and liberal estimates of bearing capacity can be obtained. The study shows that conic programming is an efficient and flexible framework for limit analysis of plane rigid-plastic problems, providing engineers with complementary tools for assessing ultimate loads, while also ensuring good computational efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Contact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Al. Armii Ludowej 16, 00-637 Warsaw, Poland

Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska St, 20, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland

Funding

Warsaw University of Technology

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Wojewódzki, W. (2005). Nośność Graniczna Konstrukcji Prętowych, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
2. Neal, B.G. (1977). The Plastic Methods of Structural Analysis, Halsted Press (John Wiley & Sons). [3rd ed.].
3. Horne, M.R. (1979). Plastic Theory of Structures, Pergamon Press. [2nd ed.]. Structures and Solid Body Mechanics Series; SI/Metric Units.
4. Wong, M.B. (2011). Plastic Analysis and Design of Steel Structures, Butterworth-Heinemann.
5. Worst-Case Load in Plastic Limit Analysis of Frame Structures10.2140/jomms.2013.8.415 ↗
6. Chen, W.-F., and Han, D.-J. (2007). Plasticity for Structural Engineers, J. Ross Publishing.
7. Wojewódzki, W. (1995). Nośność graniczna płyt, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
8. Ingerslev, A. (2025, October 01). The Strength of Rectangular Slabs. The Structural Engineer, Volume 1, Issue 1, 1923. Available online: https://www.istructe.org/journal/volumes/volume-1-(published-in-1923)/issue-1/the-strength-of-rectangular-slabs/.
9. Johansen, K.W. (1962). Yield Line Theory, Cement and Concrete Association. [1st ed.].
10. Yield Line Method by Finite Elements and Linear Programming
11. Jones, L.L., and Wood, R.H. (1967). Yield-Line Analysis of Slabs, Thames & Hudson: Chatto & Windus. Available online: https://discovered.ed.ac.uk/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=44UOE_INST:44UOE_VU2&search_scope=UoE&tab=Everything&docid=alma9923863141202466&lang=en&context=L&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&query=sub,exact,Criticism,AND&pfilter=pfilter,exact,books,AND&sortby=rank&mode=advanced&facet=topic,include,Criticism&offset=0.
12. Wojewódzki, W. (2002). Nośność Graniczna Powłok, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
13. The Safety Factor of an Elastic-Plastic Body in Plane Strain10.1115/1.4010353 ↗
14. Simo, J.C., and Hughes, T.J.R. (1998). Computational Inelasticity, Springer. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics.
15. Dunne, F. (2005). Introduction to Computational Plasticity, Oxford University Press. [1st ed.]. Oxford Scholarship Online.
16. De Souza Neto, E.A., Perić, D., and Owen, D.R.J. (2008). Computational Methods for Plasticity: Theory and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470694626 ↗
17. Boyd, S., and Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804441 ↗
18. Ben-Tal, A., and Nemirovski, A. (2001). Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization | SIAM Publications Library, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. MOS-SIAM Series on Optimization.10.1137/1.9780898718829 ↗
19. A Formulation for Gurson’s Criterion in Limit Analysis10.1016/j.mechrescom.2021.103738 ↗
20. Nesterov, Y., and Nemirovskii, A. (1994). Interior-Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Studies in Applied and Numerical Mathematics.10.1137/1.9781611970791 ↗
21. Second-Order Cone Programming10.1007/s10107-002-0339-5 ↗
22. An Interior-Point Method for Semidefinite Programming10.1137/0806020 ↗
23. Wolkowicz, H. (2005). Semidefinite and Cone Programming Bibliography/Comments, Department of Combinatorics & Optimization University of Waterloo.
24. Anjos, M.F., and Lasserre, J.B. (2012). Handbook on Semidefinite, Conic and Polynomial Optimization, Springer. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science.10.1007/978-1-4614-0769-0 ↗
25. Pataki, G. (2013). Strong Duality in Conic Linear Programming: Facial Reduction and Extended Duals. Computational and Analytical Mathematics: In Honor of Jonathan Borwein’s 60th Birthday, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7621-4_28 ↗
26. Interior Point Methods in Semidefinite Programming with Applications to Combinatorial Optimization10.1137/0805002 ↗
27. Blondel, V., Boyd, S., and Kimura, H. (2008). Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs. Recent Advances in Learning and Control, Springer. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences.10.1007/978-1-84800-155-8 ↗
28. Grant, M., and Boyd, S. (2025, September 15). CVX: Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming, Version 2.2. March 2014. Available online: https://cvxr.com/cvx/.
29. MOSEK ApS (2024). The MOSEK Optimization Suite. Version 10.2.1, MOSEK ApS.
30. Second-Order Cone Programming with Warm Start for Elastoplastic Analysis with von Mises Yield Criterion10.1007/s11081-011-9144-4 ↗
31. Chandrasekaran, V., and Shah, P. (2014, January 19–21). Conic Geometric Programming. Proceedings of the 2014 48th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, Princeton, NJ, USA.10.1109/CISS.2014.6814151 ↗
32. Conic Optimization Theory: Convexification Techniques and Numerical Algorithms10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.11.002 ↗
33. Setting the Free Material Design Problem through the Methods of Optimal Mass Distribution10.1007/s00526-022-02186-8 ↗
34. On Material Design by the Optimal Choice of Young’s Modulus Distribution10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.021 ↗
35. Formulation and Solution of Some Plasticity Problems as Conic Programs10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.036 ↗
36. Strang/G. J. Fix, An Analysis of the Finite Element Method. (Series in Automatic Computation. XIV + 306 S. m. Fig. Englewood Clifs, N. J. 1973. Prentice-Hall, Inc10.1002/zamm.19750551121 ↗
37. Lower Bound Limit Analysis of Cohesive-Frictional Materials Using Second-Order Cone Programming10.1002/nme.1567 ↗
38. Limit Analysis of Lateral Earth Pressure on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Retaining Structures Using Finite Element and Second-Order Cone Programming10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104119 ↗
39. Numerical Modelling and Bearing Capacity Analysis of Pile Foundation10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.101 ↗
40. Numerical analysis of diaphragm wall model executed in Poznań clay formation applying selected FEM codes10.1515/ace-2015-0093 ↗
41. Popielski, P., Kasprzak, A., and Bednarz, B. (2022). Using Thermal Monitoring and Fibre Optic Measurements to Verify Numerical Models, Soil Parameters and to Determine the Impact of the Implemented Investment on Neighbouring Structures. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14074050 ↗
42. Helwany, S. (2007). Applied Soil Mechanics with ABAQUS Applications, Wiley.10.1002/9780470168097 ↗
43. A Hybrid Second-Order Exponential Cone Programming–Based Lower Bound Finite-Element Limit Analysis Framework for Rock Tunnels in Anisotropic Rock Masses10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-10937 ↗