journal article·2025-10-04Open access

Intelligent Optimal Seismic Design of Buildings Based on the Inversion of Artificial Neural Networks

Augusto Montisci, Francesca Pibi, Maria Cristina Porcu, Juan Carlos Vielma

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

The growing need for safe, cheap and sustainable earthquake-resistant buildings means that efficient methods for optimal seismic design must be found. The complexity and nonlinearity of the problem can be addressed using advanced automated techniques. This paper presents an intelligent three-step procedure for optimally designing earthquake-resistant buildings based on the training (1st step) and successive inversion (2nd step) of Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Networks. This involves solving the inverse problem of determining the optimal design parameters that meet pre-assigned, code-based performance targets, by means of a gradient-based optimization algorithm (3rd step). The effectiveness of the procedure was tested using an archetypal multistory, moment-resisting, concentrically braced steel frame with active tension diagonal bracing. The input dataset was obtained by varying four design parameters. The output dataset resulted from performance variables obtained through non-linear dynamic analyses carried out under three earthquakes consistent with the Chilean code spectrum, for all cases considered. Three spectrum-consistent records are sufficient for code-based seismic design, while each seismic excitation provides a wealth of information about the behavior of the structure, highlighting potential issues. For optimization purposes, only information relevant to critical sections was used as a performance indicator. Thus, the dataset for training consisted of pairs of design parameter sets and their corresponding performance indicator sets. A dedicated MLP was trained for each of the outputs over the entire dataset, which greatly reduced the total complexity of the problem without compromising the effectiveness of the solution. Due to the comparatively low number of cases considered, the leave-one-out method was adopted, which made the validation process more rigorous than usual since each case acted once as a validation set. The trained network was then inverted to find the input design search domain, where a cost-effective gradient-based algorithm determined the optimal design parameters. The feasibility of the solution was tested through numerical analyses, which proved the effectiveness of the proposed artificial intelligence-aided optimal seismic design procedure. Although the proposed methodology was tested on an archetypal building, the significance of the results highlights the effectiveness of the three-step procedure in solving complex optimization problems. This paves the way for its use in the design optimization of different kinds of earthquake-resistant buildings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Remote Sensing and Land Use

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy

Department of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy

School of Civil Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaiso 2340000, Chile

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review of Optimum Seismic Design of RC Frames: State-of-the-Art, Challenges and Future Directions10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118455 ↗
2. Seismic Design Optimization of Engineering Structures: A Comprehensive Review10.1007/s00707-022-03470-6 ↗
3. Multi-Objective Seismic Design Optimization of Structures: A Review10.1007/s11831-023-09992-z ↗
4. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part I: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-1:2004). Technical Committee 250/SC8.
5. (2009). Seismic Design of Buildings (Standard No. NCh433.Of1996).
6. Non-Linear Analyses to Assess the Seismic Performance of RC Buildings Retrofitted with FRP
7. Seismic Retrofit of Existing Buildings Led by Non-Linear Dynamic Analyses
8. Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis to Assess the Seismic Performance of Cross-Laminated Timber Structures10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.008 ↗
9. Experimental Evaluation of the Seismic Performance of Modular Steel-Braced Frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.024 ↗
10. Titirla, M.D. (2023). A State-of-the-Art Review of Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Steel Braces. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13040851 ↗
11. Metal Foam-Filled Tubes as Plastic Dissipaters in Earthquake-Resistant Steel Buildings10.1088/1757-899X/416/1/012051 ↗
12. Seismic Resilient Steel Structures: A Review of Research, Practice, Challenges and Opportunities10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107172 ↗
13. Improved Substitute-Frame (ISF) Model for Seismic Response of Steel-MRF with Vertical Irregularities10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106918 ↗
14. Probabilistic Updating of Fishbone Model for Assessing Seismic Damage to Beam–Column Connections in Steel Moment-resisting Frames10.1111/mice.12429 ↗
15. Bracing Systems for Seismic Retrofitting of Steel Frames10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.02.013 ↗
16. Issa, A., Stephen, S., and Mwafy, A. (2024). Unveiling the Seismic Performance of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames: A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16010427 ↗
17. Seismic and Collapse Behavior of Existing High-Rise Steel Buildings under Long-Period Earthquakes10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108151 ↗
18. Local Ductility of Steel Elements under Near-Field Earthquake Loading10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.001 ↗
19. Seismic Collapse Margin of Steel Frame Structures with Symmetrically Placed Concentric Braces10.1007/s13296-017-9009-6 ↗
20. Collapse Analysis of Steel Moment Frames with Various Seismic Connections10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.11.006 ↗
21. Collapse Fragility of Steel Structures Subjected to Earthquake Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001019 ↗
22. Numerical Investigation of the Post-Elastic Seismic Response of the Multi-Vaulted Beit-El-Din Hammam
23. Performance-Based Optimum Seismic Design of Steel Structures by a Modified Firefly Algorithm and a New Neural Network10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.11.003 ↗
24. Optimal Seismic Design of Steel Frame Buildings Based on Life Cycle Cost Considerations10.1002/eqe.273 ↗
25. Optimal Design of Steel Frames under Seismic Loading Using Two Meta-Heuristic Algorithms10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.12.003 ↗
26. Optimum Design of Steel Frame Structures Considering Construction Cost and Seismic Damage10.12989/sss.2015.16.1.001 ↗
27. Performance-Based Seismic Design of Steel Frames Using Ant Colony Optimization10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.11.006 ↗
28. An Overview to Structural Seismic Design Optimisation Frameworks10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.10.021 ↗
29. An Experience Based Artificial Neural Network in the Design Optimization of Steel Frames10.1088/2631-8695/aca6ce ↗
30. Structural Optimization by Wavelet Transforms and Neural Networks10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.046 ↗
31. Cabestany, J., Sandoval, F., Prieto, A., and Corchado, J.M. (2009). Multi Objective Optimization Algorithm Based on Neural Networks Inversion. Bio-Inspired Systems: Computational and Ambient Intelligence, Springer.
32. Calledda, C., Montisci, A., and Porcu, M.C. (2021). Optimal Design of Earthquake-Resistant Buildings Based on Neural Network Inversion. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11104654 ↗
33. Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks—Robustness Included?10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3148324 ↗
34. Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
35. Approximation by Superpositions of a Sigmoidal Function10.1007/BF02551274 ↗
36. (MATLAB, 2024). MATLAB, version 24.2.
37. A Constructive Algorithm of Neural Approximation Models for Optimization Problems10.1108/03321640910969520 ↗
38. (2009). Structural Design—Permanent Loads and Use Loads (Standard No. NCh1537.Of2009).
39. (2003). Seismic Design of Industrial Structures and Facilities (Standard No. NCh2369.Of2003).
40. (2017). Structural Design—General Provisions and Load Combinations (Standard No. NCh3171.Of2010).
41. (2017). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (Standard No. ASCE 7-16).
42. (2021). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (Standard No. ASCE/SEI 7-22).
43. (2016). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (Standard No. AISC 341-16).
44. (2016). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (Standard No. AISC 360-16).
45. Seismosoft (2016). A Computer Program for Spectrum Matching of Earthquake Records, Seismosoft.
46. Non-Stationary Spectral Matching
47. An Improved Method of Matching Response Spectra of Recorded Earthquake Ground Motion Using Wavelets10.1080/13632460609350629 ↗
48. Seismosoft (2018). A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures, Seismosoft.
49. Performance Evaluation of Classification Algorithms by K-Fold and Leave-One-out Cross Validation10.1016/j.patcog.2015.03.009 ↗