Investigation on Ground Collapse Due to Exfiltration of Shallowly Buried Water-Supply Pipeline
Source abstract
Abstract
Pipeline exfiltration from damaged water-supply systems frequently causes soil erosion and ground subsidence, which jeopardizes the safety of pedestrians and vehicles and even causes casualties. Despite the severe consequences, it is difficult for engineers to give reliable assessments of pipeline exfiltration hazards. In this study, erosion processes were explored using model tests and coupled computational fluid dynamics–discrete element method (CFD-DEM) simulations. It was discovered that the erosion zone can be divided into two zones—the exfiltration zone and the seepage diffusion zone. When water pressure reached 2.412 × 10−2 MPa, local porosity approached 1.0, indicating there were no soil particles remaining. As pipeline pressure increased from 2.122 × 10−3 MPa to 2.412 × 10−2 MPa, ground failure transitioned from downward settlement to upward bulge, and the ground failure duration of the fractured prototype pipe was reduced by 22–28% (from 125 s to 98 s), with a standard deviation of less than 5. The established exponential decay model (v(t)=v0e(−αt),R2>0.89) enabled prediction of erosion duration. Based on the erosion height curve, the erosion duration and erosion area in similar engineering environments can be estimated, providing a reference for evaluating the risk of ground collapse due to pipe exfiltration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Shanghai 200444, China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Failure mechanisms of ground collapse caused by shield tunnelling in water-rich composite sandy stratum: A case study10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107100 ↗
2. Catastrophe mechanism and control technology of ground collapse induced by urban tunneling
3. Alarifi, H., Mohamad, H., Nordin, N.F., Yusoff, M., Rafindadi, A.D., and Widjaja, B. (2021). A large-scale model of lateral pressure on a buried pipeline in medium dense sand. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11125554 ↗
4. China Association of City Planning (2024). Urban Planning Association Statistical Analysis Report of Underground Pipeline Accidents in China in 2023, Underground Pipeline Comprehensive Management Research Center.
5. Water main break rates in the United States and Canada10.1002/awwa.2401 ↗
6. Dastpak, P., Sousa, R.L., and Dias, D. (2023). Soil erosion due to defective pipes: A hidden hazard beneath our feet. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15118931 ↗
7. Review of cave-in failures of urban roadways in China: A database10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001658 ↗
8. Experimental study on seepage erosion induced by pipeline damage under full pipe flow condition
9. Shao, Y., Yao, T., Gong, J., Liu, J., Zhang, T., and Yu, T. (2019). Impact of main pipe flow velocity on leakage and intrusion flow: An experimental study. Water, 11.10.3390/w11010118 ↗
10. Yu, T., Zhang, X., Neto, I.E.L., Zhang, T., Shao, Y., and Ye, M. (2019). Impact of orifice-to-pipe diameter ratio on leakage flow: An experimental study. Water, 11.10.3390/w11102189 ↗
11. Experimental Study of External Pipe Wall Erosion due to Water Pipe Leakage10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1352 ↗
12. Computational fluid dynamic simulation of small leaks in water pipelines for direct leak pressure transduction10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.12.016 ↗
13. Assessing the accuracy of TDR-based water leak detection system10.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.027 ↗
14. Novel leak localization in pressurized pipeline networks using acoustic emission and geometric connectivity10.1016/j.ijpvp.2012.01.001 ↗
15. A novel noise reduction method applied in negative pressure wave for pipeline leakage localization10.1016/j.psep.2016.08.014 ↗
16. Soil arching due to leaking of tunnel buried in water-rich sand10.1016/j.tust.2019.103158 ↗
17. Physical and analytical modeling of soil loss caused by a defective sewer pipe with different defect locations10.1007/s11440-022-01747-7 ↗
18. Soil and groundwater erosion rates into a sewer pipe crack10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001306 ↗
19. Experimental and numerical investigation on internal erosion induced by infiltration of defective buried pipe10.1007/s10064-024-04073-2 ↗
20. Ground failure and soil erosion caused by bursting of buried water pipeline: Experimental and numerical investigations10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108965 ↗
21. Dynamics of soil erosion due to underground pipeline fractures: A transparent soil study under varied hydraulic conditions
22. Experimental and theoretical investigations of ground settlement around submerged defective pipelines10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101395 ↗
23. Karoui, T., Jeong, S.-Y., Jeong, Y.-H., and Kim, D.S. (2018). Experimental study of ground subsidence mechanism caused by sewer pipe cracks. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8050679 ↗
24. Lee, S., Kang, J., and Kim, J. (2023). A Study on Factors Influencing Ground Subsidence and a Risk Analysis Method Using the Attributes of Sewer Pipes. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13179714 ↗
25. Discrete and continuum analysis of localised deformation in sand using X-ray μCT and volumetric digital image correlation10.1680/geot.2010.60.5.315 ↗
26. Characterization of initialization and formation of shear zones in sandy slopes10.1007/s13369-022-07253-y ↗
27. Study on soil-rock slope instability at mesoscopic scale using discrete element method10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105268 ↗
28. Liu, F. (2019). Multi-scale analyses of granular flows for disaster resilience enhancement. Ga. Inst. Technol.
29. Modulus of subgrade reaction that varies with magnitude of displacement of cohesionless soil10.1007/s12517-018-3713-1 ↗
30. Xu, T. (1982). Similarity Theory and Model Test, China Agricultural Machinery Press.
31. Self-similarity and Reynolds number invariance in Froude modelling10.1080/00221686.2016.1250832 ↗
32. Scale effects in physical hydraulic engineering models10.1080/00221686.2011.578914 ↗
33. Hughes, S.A. (1993). Physical Models and Laboratory Techniques in Coastal Engineering, World Scientific.10.1142/9789812795939 ↗
34. Physical modeling on sand erosion around defective sewer pipes under the influence of groundwater10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000785 ↗
35. Yuan, P. (2015). Study on Collapse Mechanism of Soil Subgrade of City Roads by Water Erosion, China University of Mining & Technology.
36. Cui, X. (2013). Numerical Simulation of Internal Fluidisation and Cavity Evolution Due to a Leaking Pipe Using the Coupled DEM-LBM Technique, University of Birmingham.10.1016/j.powtec.2014.01.048 ↗
37. (2016). Code for Comprehensive Planning of Urban Engineering Pipeline (Standard No. GB 50289-2016).
38. Zhao, Z.Y. (2018). The Study About Liquid-Pipeline Specification Small Hole Leakage Law and Pressure Calculation Method After Leakage, China University of Petroleum.
39. Chow, V.T. (1959). Open Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill.
40. (2007). Standard for Engineering Classification of Soil (Standard No. GB/T 50145-2007).
41. 3D discrete element simulation of a geotextile-encased stone column under uniaxial compression testing10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103769 ↗
42. Itasca Consulting Group, INC (2022). PFC3D: Particle Flow Code in 3 Dimensions, Version 9.0, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc.. Available online: https://www.itascacg.com/software/pfc.
43. A novel framework for calibrating DEM parameters: A case study of sand and soil-rock mixture10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106619 ↗