journal article·2025-09-30Open access

Balancing Accuracy and Simplicity in an Interpretable System for Sepsis Prediction Using Limited Clinical Data

Ting-An Chang, Chun-Liang Liu, You-Cheng Liu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by an excessive immune response to infection, and even a one-hour delay in treatment can result in irreversible organ damage and increased mortality. This study aimed to develop an interpretable and efficient machine learning-based system for early sepsis prediction using routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data. The research question focused on whether high predictive performance could be achieved using only a minimal set of clinical features. Data were obtained from intensive care units and general wards in the PhysioNet Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019 dataset. Thirty-seven predefined clinical features were extracted and systematically analyzed to assess their predictive contributions. Several machine learning models were trained and evaluated using area under the receiver operating feature curve (ROC-AUC) and accuracy metrics. The proposed model achieved an ROC-AUC of 0.929 and an accuracy of 0.926 when using all features. Remarkably, comparable performance was maintained (ROC-AUC = 0.912, accuracy = 0.907) when only 10 carefully selected features were used. The system outperformed existing state-of-the-art approaches while relying solely on commonly available clinical parameters. An interpretable, feature-efficient sepsis prediction system was successfully developed, demonstrating strong performance with minimal data requirements. The approach is well-suited for resource-limited healthcare settings, such as rural hospitals, and has the potential to reduce diagnostic burden while enabling timely intervention to improve patient outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (NYUST), Yunlin 640301, Taiwan

Funding

National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2019, December 10). Sepsis. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sepsis.
2. Management of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department10.1007/s11739-021-02735-7 ↗
3. Guarino, M., Perna, B., Cesaro, A.E., Maritati, M., Spampinato, M.D., Contini, C., and De Giorgio, R. (2023). 2023 update on sepsis and septic shock in adult patients: Management in the emergency department. J. Clin. Med., 12.10.3390/jcm12093188 ↗
4. Sepsis definition: What’s new in the treatment guidelines
5. The timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC ↗
6. Epidemiology of sepsis in Taiwan10.1097/MD.0000000000015725 ↗
7. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis10.1378/chest.101.6.1644 ↗
8. The Logistic Organ Dysfunction system: A new way to assess organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit10.1001/jama.1996.03540100046027 ↗
9. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3)10.1001/jama.2016.0287 ↗
10. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions10.1093/qjmed/94.10.521 ↗
11. Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009–201410.1001/jama.2017.13836 ↗
12. Early prediction of sepsis from clinical data: The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 201910.1097/CCM.0000000000004145 ↗
13. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30, Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Abstract.html.
14. Chen, T., He, T., Benesty, M., Khotilovich, V., Tang, Y., Cho, H., Chen, K., Mitchell, R., Cano, I., and Zhou, T. (2025, September 28). Xgboost: Extreme gradient boosting. R Package Version 0.4-2 2015, Volume 1, pp. 1–4. Available online: https://cran.ms.unimelb.edu.au/web/packages/xgboost/vignettes/xgboost.pdf.
15. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., and Liu, T.Y. (2017). Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30, Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/6449f44a102fde848669bdd9eb6b76fa-Abstract.html.
16. Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification10.1080/01431160412331269698 ↗
17. Support vector data description10.1023/B:MACH.0000008084.60811.49 ↗
18. Early prediction of sepsis in the ICU using machine learning: A systematic review10.3389/fmed.2021.607952 ↗
19. Déjean, S., Ionescu, R.T., Mothe, J., and Ullah, M.Z. (April, January 30). Forward and backward feature selection for query performance prediction. Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Virtual.
20. Performance of machine learning algorithms with different K values in K-fold cross-validation
21. Transparency and the black box problem: Why we do not trust AI10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 ↗
22. Unlocking the black box: Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for trust and transparency in ai systems10.33847/2712-8148.4.1_4 ↗
23. Wischmeyer, T. (2019). Artificial intelligence and transparency: Opening the black box. Regulating Artificial Intelligence, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-32361-5_4 ↗
24. The development an artificial intelligence algorithm for early sepsis diagnosis in the intensive care unit10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104176 ↗
25. Evaluation of a machine learning algorithm for up to 48-hour advance prediction of sepsis using six vital signs10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.027 ↗
26. Calvert, J., Saber, N., Hoffman, J., and Das, R. (2019). Machine-learning-based laboratory developed test for the diagnosis of sepsis in high-risk patients. Diagnostics, 9.10.3390/diagnostics9010020 ↗
27. Prospective, multi-site study of patient outcomes after implementation of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system for sepsis10.1038/s41591-022-01894-0 ↗
28. FDA-authorized AI/ML tool for sepsis prediction: Development and validation10.1056/AIoa2400867 ↗
29. Construction and validation of prognostic models in critically Ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: Interpretable machine learning approach10.1186/s12967-023-04205-4 ↗
30. Development and clinical impact assessment of a machine-learning model for early prediction of late-onset sepsis10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107156 ↗
31. Zhang, Y., Li, C., Ji, Y., Wei, B., Guo, S., Mei, X., and Wang, J. (2025). Machine Learning-Based Mortality Risk Prediction Model in Patients with Sepsis. J. Inflamm. Res., 6427–6437. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/JIR.S502837.10.2147/JIR.S502837 ↗