A Systematic Literature Review of Methodologies for Assessing the Circularity of Electric Vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
The transition to a net-zero economy requires a shift towards circular economy principles, particularly within the burgeoning electric vehicle sector. This paper presents a systematic literature review of 57 studies published between 2017 and the end of August 2025, examining methodologies for assessing the circularity of electric vehicles. The analysis reveals a predominant focus on environmental impact quantification through life cycle assessment and material flow analysis, with limited direct application of tailored circularity assessment tools. A significant knowledge gap is identified in the integration of environmental, economic, and social dimensions within electric vehicle circularity assessments. Furthermore, the absence of electric vehicle-specific assessment tools and the challenges associated with data reliability and indicator measurement are highlighted. The paper proposes the adoption of digital product passports and a dynamic systems view to enhance electric vehicle circularity assessments. This approach aims to provide a more comprehensive, multidisciplinary understanding of electric vehicle lifecycle impacts, facilitating informed decision-making for sustainable e-mobility.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Vehicle emissions and performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing Simulation and Robotics, School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
IOTA Foundation, 10437 Berlin, Germany
Funding
European Union’s Horizon - Marie Sklodowska-Curie
References (97)
Show source-provided references
1. Life-cycle environmental impacts of reused batteries of electric vehicles in buildings considering battery uncertainty10.1016/j.rser.2024.114936 ↗
2. Carrara, S., Bobba, S., Blagoeva, D., Alves, D., Cavalli, A., Georgitzikis, K., Grohol, M., Itul, A., Kuzov, T., and Latunussa, C. (2023). Supply Chain Analysis and Material Demand Forecast in Strategic Technologies and Sectors in the EU-A Foresight Study, Publications Office of the European Union. JRC Science for Policy Report.
3. Comparing the circularity and life cycle environmental performance of batteries for electric vehicles10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107833 ↗
4. Evaluating circular economy strategies for raw material recovery from end-of-life lithium-ion batteries: A system dynamics model10.1016/j.spc.2024.07.027 ↗
5. Towards consistent life cycle assessment modelling of circular economy strategies for electric vehicle batteries10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.001 ↗
6. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 ↗
7. Synergies and gaps between circularity assessment and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166611 ↗
8. How to measure circularity? State-of-the-art and insights on positive impacts on businesses10.1016/j.envdev.2024.100989 ↗
9. A Review of Second-Life Lithium-Ion Batteries for Stationary Energy Storage Applications10.1109/JPROC.2022.3175614 ↗
10. Barriers and framework conditions for the market entry of second-life lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37423 ↗
11. Circularity and life cycle environmental impact assessment of batteries for electric vehicles: Industrial challenges, best practices and research guidelines10.1016/j.rser.2022.112941 ↗
12. Life cycle assessment of recycling lithium-ion battery related mineral processing by-products: A review10.1016/j.mineng.2024.108600 ↗
13. The underrepresented key elements of Circular Economy: A critical review of assessment tools and a guide for action10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.019 ↗
14. Combining circular and LCA indicators for the early design of urban projects10.1007/s11367-021-02007-8 ↗
15. Life cycle assessment and circular economy in the production of rare earth magnets: An updated and comprehensive review10.1007/s10098-024-02935-7 ↗
16. A raising alarm on the current global electronic waste situation through bibliometric analysis, life cycle, and techno-economic assessment: A review10.1007/s11356-024-33839-0 ↗
17. A systematic review on sustainability assessment of electric vehicles: Knowledge gaps and future perspectives10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106867 ↗
18. Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498 ↗
19. European Parliament, and Council of the European Union (2025, June 14). Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on Batteries and Waste Batteries, Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and Repealing Directive 2006/66/EC. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1542/oj/eng.
20. Sampaio Cintra, R., Veiga Avila, L., Schvartz, M.A., Filho, W.L., Anholon, R., Salati Marcondes de Moraes, G.H., Mairesse Siluk, J.C., da Silva Lisboa, G., and Dib Khaled, N.N. (2025). Analysis of the Life Cycle and Circular Economy Strategies for Batteries Adopted by the Main Electric Vehicle Manufacturers. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17083428 ↗
21. Roos Lindgreen, E., Salomone, R., and Reyes, T. (2020). A critical review of academic approaches, methods and tools to assess circular economy at the micro level. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12124973 ↗
22. A systemic review for measuring circular economy with multi-criteria methods10.1007/s11356-022-18580-w ↗
23. Critical review of nano and micro-level building circularity indicators and frameworks10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131859 ↗
24. Teunissen, F., and van Bergen, E. (2024). Demonstrating the Lessons Learned for Lightweighting EV Components through a Circular-Economy Approach. World Electr. Veh. J., 15.10.3390/wevj15090415 ↗
25. BEVSIM: Battery electric vehicle sustainability impact assessment model10.1111/jiec.13415 ↗
26. What is the contribution of different business processes to material circularity at company-level? A case study for electric vehicle batteries
27. Patching sustainability loopholes within the lead-acid battery industry of Bangladesh: An environmental and occupational health risk perspective10.1016/j.spc.2024.05.030 ↗
28. The impact of demand-side strategies to enable a more circular economy in private car mobility10.1016/j.spc.2024.06.029 ↗
29. Electric vehicle lithium-ion battery recycled content standards for the US—Targets, costs, and environmental impacts10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106488 ↗
30. Ahmed, A.A., Nazzal, M.A., Darras, B.M., and Deiab, I.M. (2022). A Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment of Battery Electric Vehicles, Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles, and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles through a Comparative Circular Economy Assessment Approach. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010171 ↗
31. Optimising the geospatial configuration of a future lithium ion battery recycling industry in the transition to electric vehicles and a circular economy10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119230 ↗
32. Bobba, S., Bianco, I., Eynard, U., Carrara, S., Mathieux, F., and Blengini, G.A. (2020). Bridging tools to better understand environmental performances and raw materials supply of traction batteries in the future EU fleet. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13102513 ↗
33. Evaluating strategies for managing resource use in lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles using the global MATILDA model10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106951 ↗
34. End-of-life management of electric vehicle batteries utilizing the life cycle assessment10.1080/10962247.2024.2430325 ↗
35. Wüstenhagen, S., and Kirschstein, T. (2024). Substitution of Conventional Vehicles in Municipal Mobility. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16146054 ↗
36. Silvestri, L., Forcina, A., Silvestri, C., Arcese, G., and Falcone, D. (2024). Exploring the Environmental Benefits of an Open-Loop Circular Economy Strategy for Automotive Batteries in Industrial Applications. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17071720 ↗
37. Switched Reluctance Machine for Transportation and Eco-Design: A Life Cycle Assessment10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3400324 ↗
38. Assessing the economic and environmental impacts of battery leasing and selling models for electric vehicle fleets: A study on customer and company implications10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138356 ↗
39. A design process model for battery systems based on existing life cycle assessment results10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137149 ↗
40. Use of life cycle assessment to evaluate circular economy business models in the case of Li-ion battery remanufacturing10.1007/s11367-023-02154-0 ↗
41. Electrochemical leaching of critical materials from lithium-ion batteries: A comparative life cycle assessment10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106973 ↗
42. Environmental Impacts of Graphite Recycling from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Life Cycle Assessment10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04938 ↗
43. Integration of energy flow modelling in life cycle assessment of electric vehicle battery repurposing: Evaluation of multi-use cases and comparison of circular business models10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105773 ↗
44. Sadhukhan, J., and Christensen, M. (2021). An in-depth life cycle assessment (Lca) of lithium-ion battery for climate impact mitigation strategies. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14175555 ↗
45. Simulation-based life cycle assessment for hydrometallurgical recycling of mixed LIB and NiMH waste10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105586 ↗
46. Energy and environmental benefits of circular economy strategies: The case study of reusing used batteries from electric vehicles10.1016/j.est.2019.100845 ↗
47. Life Cycle Assessment of repurposed electric vehicle batteries: An adapted method based on modelling energy flows10.1016/j.est.2018.07.008 ↗
48. Reuse of electric vehicle batteries in buildings: An integrated load match analysis and life cycle assessment approach10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.032 ↗
49. Greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles in Europe considering different charging strategies10.1016/j.trd.2020.102534 ↗
50. Energy and environmental assessment of a traction lithium-ion battery pack for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.056 ↗
51. Geopolitical-related supply risk assessment as a complement to environmental impact assessment: The case of electric vehicles10.1007/s11367-015-0917-4 ↗
52. Díaz-Ramírez, M.C., Ferreira, V.J., García-Armingol, T., López-Sabirón, A.M., and Ferreira, G. (2020). Battery manufacturing resource assessment to minimise component production environmental impacts. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12176840 ↗
53. Comparative life cycle assessment of three recycling approaches for electric vehicle lithium-ion battery after cascaded use
54. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional vehicles with different fuel options, plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles for a sustainable transportation system in Brazil10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.236 ↗
55. Ioakimidis, C.S., Murillo-Marrodán, A., Bagheri, A., Thomas, D., and Genikomsakis, K.N. (2019). Life cycle assessment of a lithium iron phosphate (LFP) electric vehicle battery in second life application scenarios. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11092527 ↗
56. Vehicle’s lightweight design vs. electrification from life cycle assessment perspective10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.145 ↗
57. Prospective LCA of the production and EoL recycling of a novel type of Li-ion battery for electric vehicles10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.237 ↗
58. Life cycle assessment of lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) batteries for electric passenger vehicles10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123006 ↗
59. A comparative life cycle assessment on lithium-ion battery: Case study on electric vehicle battery in China considering battery evolution10.1177/0734242X20966637 ↗
60. A physical allocation method for comparative life cycle assessment: A case study of repurposing Australian electric vehicle batteries10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105759 ↗
61. Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Li-Ion Batteries through Process-Based and Integrated Hybrid Approaches10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05902 ↗
62. Environmental life cycle implications of upscaling lithium-ion battery production10.1007/s11367-021-01976-0 ↗
63. Providing a common base for life cycle assessments of Li-Ion batteries10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.016 ↗
64. Environmental trade-offs of EV battery end-of-life options in Thailand: A life cycle assessment with sensitivity to electricity mix and battery degradation10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.007 ↗
65. Eduardo, S., Recklies, E.A., Nikolic, M., and Severengiz, S. (2025). A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of End-of-Life Scenarios for Light Electric Vehicles: A Case Study of an Electric Moped. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17156681 ↗
66. Trade, extended use, and end of life in the Global South: A regionally expanded electric vehicle life cycle assessment10.1111/jiec.70041 ↗
67. Life cycle assessment of a partially renewable blend for bi-fuel passenger cars and comparison with petrol and battery electric cars10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145347 ↗
68. Environmental performance of second-life lithium-ion batteries repurposed from electric vehicles for household storage systems10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.003 ↗
69. Estimating potentially recoverable Nd from end-of-life (EoL) products to meet future U.S. demands10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106864 ↗
70. Creating a circular EV battery value chain: End-of-life strategies and future perspective10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106484 ↗
71. A simulation model for assessing the potential of remanufacturing electric vehicle batteries as spare parts10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132225 ↗
72. Effect of life extension strategies on demand and recycling of EV batteries—Material flow analysis of Li and Ni in battery value chain for Finnish EV fleet by 205510.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108081 ↗
73. Can circular economy strategies address resource constraints for lithium-ion batteries? A comprehensive dynamic material flow analysis of lithium flows in China’s battery sector10.1111/jiec.13607 ↗
74. Circularity of Lithium-Ion Battery Materials in Electric Vehicles10.1021/acs.est.0c07030 ↗
75. Global warming potential, water footprint, and energy demand of shared autonomous electric vehicles incorporating circular economy practices10.1016/j.spc.2023.02.001 ↗
76. Jones, E.C. (2024). Lithium Supply Chain Optimization: A Global Analysis of Critical Minerals for Batteries. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17112685 ↗
77. Erdogan, C., Contreras, C.A., Stolkin, R., and Rastegarpanah, A. (2024). Multi-Robot Task Planning for Efficient Battery Disassembly in Electric Vehicles. Robotics, 13.10.3390/robotics13050075 ↗
78. Evaluating the recycling potential and economic benefits of end-of-life power batteries in China based on different scenarios10.1016/j.spc.2024.04.001 ↗
79. Baazouzi, S., Grimm, J., and Birke, K.P. (2023). Multi-Method Model for the Investigation of Disassembly Scenarios for Electric Vehicle Batteries. Batteries, 9.10.3390/batteries9120587 ↗
80. Breaking it down: A techno-economic assessment of the impact of battery pack design on disassembly costs10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120437 ↗
81. A quantitative assessment of policy-driven impacts on circular economy of electric vehicle batteries in the United States10.1007/s10669-024-09995-6 ↗
82. Fernández, R.Á., and Campo, O.C. (2025). A Method Based on Circular Economy to Improve the Economic Performance of Second-Life Batteries. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17041765 ↗
83. Circularity scoring system: A product specific application to lithium-ion batteries of electric vehicles10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107546 ↗
84. Robotics for electric vehicles battery packs disassembly towards sustainable remanufacturing10.1007/s13243-023-00134-z ↗
85. Second life use of Li-ion batteries in the heavy-duty vehicle industry: Feasibilities of remanufacturing, repurposing, and reusing approaches10.1016/j.spc.2023.10.007 ↗
86. Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Factors Affecting the Adoption of Electric Vehicle Battery Recycling10.1109/TEM.2022.3164288 ↗
87. Circular design criteria and indicators for the sustainable life cycle management of electric vehicle batteries10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.013 ↗
88. Design for automated disassembly: A comparative study of different battery component designs10.1080/19397038.2025.2504388 ↗
89. A qualitative assessment of lithium ion battery recycling processes10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105219 ↗
90. Digital product passports for electric vehicle batteries: Stakeholder requirements for sustainability and circularity10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100090 ↗
91. Exploring the value ecosystem of digital product passports10.1111/jiec.13621 ↗
92. Authenticated data visualization for hybrid blockchain-based digital product passports10.1016/j.comcom.2025.108110 ↗
93. Blockchain-based digital product passport: Design principles and demonstration10.1080/00207543.2025.2464161 ↗
94. Kim, M.J., Han, C.H., Park, K.J., Moon, J.S., and Um, J. (2025). A Blockchain-Based Digital Product Passport System Providing a Federated Learning Environment for Collaboration Between Recycling Centers and Manufacturers to Enable Recycling Automation. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17062679 ↗
95. Munonye, W.C. (2025). Towards Circular Economy Metrics: A Systematic Review. Circ. Econ. Sustain., 1–43.10.1007/s43615-025-00604-5 ↗
96. Circular battery design: Investing in sustainability and profitability10.1039/D4EE03418J ↗
97. Jose, S.A., Dworkin, L., Montano, S., Noack, W.C., Rusche, N., Williams, D., and Menezes, P.L. (2024). Pathways to Circular Economy for Electric Vehicle Batteries. Recycling, 9.10.3390/recycling9050076 ↗