Moving Motivation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Service Learning to Promote Physical Activity in Under-Resourced Youth
Source abstract
Abstract
Guided by self-determination theory (SDT), this study aimed to examine the impact of All Stars Moving Together (ASMT), an 8-week school–university service learning program, on elementary children’s physical activity (PA), school-time behavior, and motivation. A concurrent theory-based mixed-methods study with 21 fourth graders from an under-resourced community (age 9–10) wore Moki PA trackers to capture step count and minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) during school-time. Linear and generalized mixed-effects models examined school-day type on PA and benchmarks for meeting school-based PA (3000 steps; 20 min of MVPA). Self-efficacy and enjoyment were assessed using pictorial scales, and the focus groups explored program experiences thematically using the SDT framework. School day type showed significant main effects for steps (F (5, 642) = 170, p < 0.001) and MVPA (F (5, 581) = 105, p < 0.001), where school days with ASMT added an average of 2000–2400 steps and 10–12 min of MVPA compared to school days with no PA. Enjoyment of PA significantly increased (p = 0.006, d = 0.75). Thematic analysis revealed relatedness (support from peers, college students), competence (self-efficacy, positive feelings, perceived motor competence improvements), and autonomy through preferences and self-regulation of PA. ASMT significantly increased school-time PA and children’s enjoyment while fostering competence and relatedness among elementary children.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Youth Development and Social Support · Children's Physical and Motor Development · Physical Education and Pedagogy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Health and Physical Education, Marjorie K. Unterberg School of Nursing and Health Studies, Monmouth University, West Long Branch, NJ 07764, USA
Funding
Monmouth University
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 2020 WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour for Children and Adolescents Aged 5–17 years: Summary of the Evidence10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z ↗
2. Vaquero-Solís, M., Gallego, D., Tapia-Serrano, M., Pulido, J., and Sánchez-Miguel, P. (2020). School-Based Physical Activity Interventions in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17030999 ↗
3. Fu, Q., Li, L., Li, Q., and Wang, J. (2025). The Effects of Physical Activity on the Mental Health of Typically Developing Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Public Health, 25.10.1186/s12889-025-22690-8 ↗
4. Does Physical Activity Improve Cognition and Academic Performance in Children? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials10.1159/000514682 ↗
5. Physical Activity Alliance (2022). The 2022 U.S. Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth, Physical Activity Alliance.
6. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans10.1001/jama.2018.14854 ↗
7. How many steps/day are enough? For children and adolescents10.1186/1479-5868-8-78 ↗
8. Institute of Medicine (2013). Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School, The National Academies Press.
9. Time trends in physical activity using wearable devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from 1995 to 201710.1249/MSS.0000000000002794 ↗
10. Hawes, A.M., Smith, G.S., McGinty, E., Bell, C., Bower, K., LaVeist, T.A., Gaskin, D.J., and Thorpe, R.J. (2019). Disentangling race, poverty, and place in disparities in physical activity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16071193 ↗
11. Ziegeldorf, A., Schoene, D., Fatum, A., Brauer, K., and Wulff, H. (2024). Associations of family socioeconomic indicators and physical activity of primary school-aged children: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 24.10.1186/s12889-024-19174-6 ↗
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025, September 21). Comprehensive School Physical Activity Programs: A Guide for Schools, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/physical-activity/media/pdfs/2025/01/Comprehensive-School-Physical-Activity-Programs-A-Guide-for-Schools.pdf.
13. Moon, J., Webster, C.A., Stodden, D.F., Brian, A., Mulvey, K.L., Beets, M., Egan, C.A., McIntosh, L.I.F., Merica, C.B., and Russ, L. (2024). Systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity interventions to increase elementary children’s motor competence: A comprehensive school physical activity program perspective. BMC Public Health, 24.10.1186/s12889-024-18145-1 ↗
14. Interventions to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in elementary school physical education lessons: Systematic review10.1111/josh.13070 ↗
15. SHAPE America, and American Heart Association (2016). 2016 Shape of the Nation Report: Status of Physical Education in the USA, SHAPE America. Available online: https://www.shapeamerica.org/Common/Uploaded%20files/uploads/pdfs/son/Shape-of-the-Nation-2016_web.pdf.
16. Correlates of physical activity enjoyment in children and adolescents for a new perspective on the treatment of overweight: A systematic literature review10.1111/obr.13655 ↗
17. Barbosa Cano, D., and Gomez-Baya, D. (2025). Self-Determination Theory-Based Interventions to Promote Physical Activity and Sport in Adolescents: A Scoping Review. Youth, 5.10.20944/preprints202506.1114.v1 ↗
18. Does self-determination theory associate with physical activity? A systematic review of systematic review10.1002/ijop.70044 ↗
19. Self-determination theory informed research for promoting physical activity: Contributions, debates, and future directions10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102879 ↗
20. Llanos-Muñoz, R., Vaquero-Solís, M., López-Gajardo, M.Á., Sánchez-Miguel, P.A., Tapia-Serrano, M.Á., and Leo, F.M. (2023). Intervention Programme Based on Self-Determination Theory to Promote Extracurricular Physical Activity through Physical Education in Primary School: A Study Protocol. Children, 10.10.3390/children10030504 ↗
21. Self-efficacy and enjoyment of physical activity in children: Factorial validity of two pictorial scales10.7717/peerj.7402 ↗
22. Service-learning and physical education in preservice teacher training: Toward the development of civic skills and attitudes10.1123/jtpe.2022-0094 ↗
23. Pérez-Ordás, R., Nuviala, A., Grao-Cruces, A., and Fernández-Martínez, A. (2021). Implementing service-learning programs in physical education teacher education: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18020669 ↗
24. Francisco-Garcés, X., Salvador-Garcia, C., Maravé-Vivas, M., Chiva-Bartoll, O., and Santos-Pastor, M.L. (2022). Research on service-learning in physical activity and sport: Where we have been, where we are, where we are going. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19116362 ↗
25. Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report10.1037/amp0000151 ↗
26. All Stars Moving Together: A school–university partnership for shining youth10.1136/bjsports-2024-109021 ↗
27. Moki Technology Ltd (2025, August 29). Moki Store. Available online: https://moki.health/.
28. Validity of the Fitbit Ace and Moki devices for assessing steps during different walking conditions in young adolescents10.1123/pes.2021-0026 ↗
29. Frömel, K., Groffik, D., Mitáš, J., Madarasová Gecková, A., and Csányi, T. (2020). Physical activity recommendations for segments of school days in adolescents: Support for health behavior in secondary schools. Front. Public Health, 8.10.3389/fpubh.2020.527442 ↗
30. (2025, August 29). Jamovi, Available online: https://www.jamovi.org/.
31. Gallucci, M. (2025, August 29). GAMlj: General Analyses for Linear Models (Jamovi Module). Available online: https://gamlj.github.io/.
32. Reflecting on reflective thematic analysis10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 ↗
33. Smith, B., and Sparkes, A.C. (2017). Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, Routledge.10.4324/9781315762012 ↗
34. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria10.1177/1609406917733847 ↗
35. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development10.1177/160940690600500107 ↗
36. Applying thematic analysis to education: A hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research10.1177/1609406920918810 ↗
37. Physical activity during the school day10.1080/07303084.2022.2053473 ↗
38. Before- and after-school physical activity: Programs and best practices10.1080/07303084.2022.2053474 ↗
39. Examining the reciprocal nature of service-learning for underserved students and preservice teachers10.1123/jtpe.2018-0051 ↗
40. Results of the “Active by Choice Today” (ACT) randomized trial for increasing physical activity in low-income and minority adolescents10.1037/a0023390 ↗
41. Ha, T., Fan, X., and Dauenhauer, B. (2024). Physical activity enjoyment, physical activity behavior, and motor competence in low-income elementary school students. Educ. Sci., 14.10.3390/educsci14060629 ↗
42. Developing out-of-school, community-based physical activity programs for youth from communities affected by poverty10.1080/07303084.2023.2185330 ↗
43. Chen, X., Wang, F., Zhang, H., Lin, Y., Zhu, S., and Yang, Y. (2025). Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers on physical activity among adolescents in school-based settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 25.10.1186/s12889-025-22170-z ↗
44. Effect of wearable activity trackers on physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00139-0 ↗
45. The motivational impact of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies: A self-determination perspective on Fitbits with adolescents10.1080/19325037.2017.1343161 ↗
46. Motivational processes in physical education and objectively measured physical activity among adolescents10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.001 ↗
47. A systematic review of multi-component comprehensive school physical activity program (CSPAP) interventions10.1177/08901171211013281 ↗