journal article·2025-09-29Open access

Game-Theoretic Secure Socket Transmission with a Zero Trust Model

Evangelos D. Spyrou, Vassilios Kappatos, Chrysostomos Stylios

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

A significant problem in cybersecurity is to accurately detect malicious network activities in real-time by analyzing patterns in socket-level packet transmissions. This challenge involves distinguishing between legitimate and adversarial behaviors while optimizing detection strategies to minimize false alarms and resource costs under intelligent, adaptive attacks. This paper presents a comprehensive framework for network security by modeling socket-level packet transmissions and extracting key features for temporal analysis. A long short-term memory (LSTM)-based anomaly detection system predicts normal traffic behavior and identifies significant deviations as potential cyber threats. Integrating this with a zero trust signaling game, the model updates beliefs about agent legitimacy based on observed signals and anomaly scores. The interaction between defender and attacker is formulated as a Stackelberg game, where the defender optimizes detection strategies anticipating attacker responses. This unified approach combines machine learning and game theory to enable robust, adaptive cybersecurity policies that effectively balance detection performance and resource costs in adversarial environments. Two baselines are considered for comparison. The static baseline applies fixed transmission and defense policies, ignoring anomalies and environmental feedback, and thus serves as a control case of non-reactive behavior. In contrast, the adaptive non-strategic baseline introduces simple threshold-based heuristics that adjust to anomaly scores, allowing limited adaptability without strategic reasoning. The proposed fully adaptive Stackelberg strategy outperforms both partial and discrete adaptive baselines, achieving higher robustness across trust thresholds, superior attacker–defender utility trade-offs, and more effective anomaly mitigation under varying strategic conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Network Security and Intrusion Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, University of Ioannina, 47150 Kostaki Artas, Greece

Hellenic Institute of Transport, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 6th Km Charilaou-Thermi Rd, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece

Industrial Systems Institute, Athena Research Center, 26504 Patras, Greece

Funding

the Smart Networks and Services Joint Undertaking (SNS JU) under the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Delsi Robinsha, S., and Amutha, B. (2023, January 1–2). IoT revolutionizing healthcare: A survey of smart healthcare system architectures. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Research Methodologies in Knowledge Management, Artificial Intelligence and Telecommunication Engineering (RMKMATE), Chennai, India.
2. Tan, S.F., and Samsudin, A. (2021). Recent technologies, security countermeasure and ongoing challenges of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT): A survey. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21196647 ↗
3. A comprehensive survey on interoperability for IIoT: Taxonomy, standards, and future directions
4. Kalsoom, T., Ahmed, S., Rafi-ul Shan, P.M., Azmat, M., Akhtar, P., Pervez, Z., Imran, M.A., and Ur-Rehman, M. (2021). Impact of IoT on manufacturing industry 4.0: A new triangular systematic review. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132212506 ↗
5. Subramaniyaswamy, V., Ganesan, M., and Namachivayam, R.K. (2025). IIoT for Smart Cities. Deep Learning and Blockchain Technology for Smart and Sustainable Cities, Auerbach Publications.
6. Altulaihan, E., Almaiah, M.A., and Aljughaiman, A. (2022). Cybersecurity threats, countermeasures and mitigation techniques on the IoT: Future research directions. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11203330 ↗
7. A comprehensive study on cybersecurity challenges and opportunities in the IoT world10.1002/spy2.318 ↗
8. Device identification method for internet of things based on spatial-temporal feature residuals10.1109/TSC.2024.3440013 ↗
9. Thakur, H.N., Al Hayajneh, A., Thakur, K., Kamruzzaman, A., and Ali, M.L. (2023, January 7–10). A Comprehensive Review of Wireless Security Protocols and Encryption Applications. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/AIIoT58121.2023.10174571 ↗
10. Kwon, H.Y., Kim, T., and Lee, M.K. (2022). Advanced intrusion detection combining signature-based and behavior-based detection methods. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11060867 ↗
11. Butt, U.J. (2023). Developing a Usable Security Approach for User Awareness Against Ransomware. [Ph.D. Thesis, Brunel University London].
12. Advanced AI-Driven Cybersecurity Solutions for Proactive Threat Detection and Response in Complex Ecosystems
13. Strengthening IoT Cybersecurity with Zero Trust Architecture: A Comprehensive Review
14. Flexible zero trust architecture for the cybersecurity of industrial IoT infrastructures10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103414 ↗
15. Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Huang, Z., and Xie, P. (2016, January 13–16). A survey of game theoretic methods for cyber security. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC), Changsha, China.10.1109/DSC.2016.90 ↗
16. Game Theory Classification in Cybersecurity: A Survey10.54254/2755-2721/2/20220644 ↗
17. An Overview of Game Theory Approaches for Mobile Ad-Hoc Network’s Security10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3321082 ↗
18. Butt, M.A., Ajmal, Z., Khan, Z.I., Idrees, M., and Javed, Y. (2022). An in-depth survey of bypassing buffer overflow mitigation techniques. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136702 ↗
19. Shahriar, M.H., Khalil, A.A., Rahman, M.A., Manshaei, M.H., and Chen, D. (2021, January 4–6). iattackgen: Generative synthesis of false data injection attacks in cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS), Tempe, AZ, USA.10.1109/CNS53000.2021.9705034 ↗
20. IoT and man-in-the-middle attacks10.1002/spy2.70016 ↗
21. Ali, M.H., Jaber, M.M., Abd, S.K., Rehman, A., Awan, M.J., Damaševičius, R., and Bahaj, S.A. (2022). Threat analysis and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack recognition in the internet of things (IoT). Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11030494 ↗
22. A robust Stackelberg game for cyber-security investment in networked control systems10.1109/TCST.2022.3207671 ↗
23. Bayesian Stackelberg games for cyber-security decision support10.1016/j.dss.2021.113599 ↗
24. Stackelberg security game for optimizing cybersecurity decisions in cloud computing
25. Optimal DoS attack strategy for cyber-physical systems: A Stackelberg game-theoretical approach10.1016/j.ins.2023.119134 ↗
26. Clempner, J.B. (2025). Learning Deceptive Tactics for Defense and Attack in Bayesian–Markov Stackelberg Security Games. Math. Comput. Appl., 30.10.3390/mca30020029 ↗
27. Xu, S., Guan, Y., and Shen, Y. (2025). A Stackelberg game for optimal control energy of multi-agent networks under cyber-attacks. Int. J. Control, 1–12.10.1080/00207179.2025.2503305 ↗
28. Nonlinear programming10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600425 ↗