Synergistic Role of Low-Strength Ultrasound and Co-Digestion in Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Wastewater
Source abstract
Abstract
Swine manure poses significant challenges for anaerobic digestion due to its low carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio and elevated ammonia concentrations, both of which restrict methane generation. This study investigated the impact of integrating low-intensity ultrasound with co-digestion of piggery wastewater and food waste leachate. Laboratory-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors were employed under four operational conditions to evaluate anaerobic digestion performance, track shifts in microbial community structure, and assess the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Co-digestion significantly enhanced methane production, yielding 1.3–3.2 times more than manure alone, while low-intensity ultrasound further increased methane yields by approximately 36–44% at high loading rates. Moreover, coupling low-intensity ultrasound with co-digestion led to the most rapid recovery following an overloading shock. Unexpectedly, ultrasound treatment alone increased the expression of certain ARGs (tetG, sul1, ermB) and the Integrase gene (intI1), while co-digestion led to a reduction in these genetic markers. These findings clearly indicate that the concurrent application of co-digestion and low-intensity ultrasound achieved the highest methane yield, the fastest recovery after organic overloading, and greater suppression of specific ARGs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Food Industry and Aquatic Biology · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10326, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. van der Laan, S., Breeman, G., and Scherer, L. (2024). Animal Lives Affected by Meat Consumption Trends in the G20 Countries. Animals, 14.10.3390/ani14111662 ↗
2. Enhancement of Sewage Sludge Digestion by Co-Digestion with Food Waste and Swine Waste10.1007/s12649-018-00558-w ↗
3. The Republic of Korea’s Experience with an Ocean Dumping Management System to Enhance Compliance with the London Protocol: Highlights of Major Institutional History over 40 Years10.3389/fmars.2023.1282490 ↗
4. Review on Research Achievements of Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032 ↗
5. A New Approach for Concurrently Improving Performance of South Korean Food Waste Valorization and Renewable Energy Recovery via Dry Anaerobic Digestion under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.049 ↗
6. Rekleitis, G., Haralambous, K.-J., Loizidou, M., and Aravossis, K. (2020). Utilization of Agricultural and Livestock Waste in Anaerobic Digestion (AD): Applying the Biorefinery Concept in a Circular Economy. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13174428 ↗
7. Optimizing Feeding Composition and Carbon–Nitrogen Ratios for Improved Methane Yield during Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy, Chicken Manure and Wheat Straw10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.058 ↗
8. A Critical Review on Inhibition of Anaerobic Digestion Process by Excess Ammonia10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.030 ↗
9. The Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Cattle Manure10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.138 ↗
10. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Poultry Litter and Wheat Straw Affected by Solids Composition, Free Ammonia and Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio10.1080/10934529.2018.1546494 ↗
11. The Anaerobic Treatment of Low Strength Wastewaters in UASB and EGSB Reactors10.2166/wst.1997.0613 ↗
12. Aerobic and Anaerobic Sewage Biodegradable Processes: The Gap Analysis
13. Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Livestock Waste: Occurrence, Dissemination, and Treatment10.1038/s41545-020-0051-0 ↗
14. Antibiotics as Growth Promotants: Mode of Action10.1081/ABIO-120005768 ↗
15. Antimicrobial Growth Promoter Use in Livestock: A Requirement to Understand Their Modes of Action to Develop Effective Alternatives10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.08.006 ↗
16. Distribution Characteristics of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria and Genes in Fresh and Composted Manures of Livestock Farms10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133781 ↗
17. Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens “Superbugs”: A Rising Public Health Threat10.3389/fmicb.2023.1135614 ↗
18. Survival of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria and Horizontal Gene Transfer Control Antibiotic Resistance Gene Content in Anaerobic Digesters10.3389/fmicb.2016.00263 ↗
19. Antibiotic Residues in Animal Waste: Occurrence and Degradation in Conventional Agricultural Waste Management Practices10.1007/s40726-016-0037-1 ↗
20. Relationship between Modification of Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment and Changes in Antibiotic Resistance of Bacteria10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.165 ↗
21. Distribution of Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) in Anaerobic Digestion and Land Application of Swine Wastewater10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.038 ↗
22. Low-Strength Ultrasonication Positively Affects Methanogenic Granules toward Higher AD Performance: Hydrolytic Enzyme Excretions10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.11.023 ↗
23. Low-Strength Ultrasonication Positively Affects Methanogenic Granules toward Higher AD Performance: Implications from Microbial Community Shift10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.03.010 ↗
24. Effect of Biofilm Physical Characteristics on Their Susceptibility to Antibiotics: Impacts of Low-Frequency Ultrasound10.1038/s41522-024-00544-2 ↗
25. Inactivation of Microorganisms by Low-Frequency High-Power Ultrasound: 1. Effect of Growth Phase and Capsule Properties of the Bacteria10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.06.006 ↗
26. Ultrasound Assisted Method to Increase Soluble Chemical Oxygen Demand (SCOD) of Sewage Sludge for Digestion10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.05.012 ↗
27. Improvement of the Activity of Anaerobic Sludge by Low-Intensity Ultrasound10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.004 ↗
28. Enhanced Activity of Methanogenic Granules by Low-Strength Ultrasonication10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.046 ↗
29. Response Surface Optimization of Substrates for Thermophilic Anaerobic Codigestion of Sewage Sludge and Food Waste10.1080/10473289.2007.10465334 ↗
30. Development and Application of Real-Time PCR Assays for Quantification of Erm Genes Conferring Resistance to Macrolides-Lincosamides-Streptogramin B in Livestock Manure and Manure Management Systems10.1128/AEM.02799-06 ↗
31. Effect of River Landscape on the Sediment Concentrations of Antibiotics and Corresponding Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARG)10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.017 ↗
32. Use Estimates of In-Feed Antimicrobials in Swine Production in the United States10.1089/fpd.2011.0983 ↗
33. Class 1 Integrons Potentially Predating the Association with Tn 402-like Transposition Genes Are Present in a Sediment Microbial Community10.1128/JB.01950-05 ↗
34. Development of Methanogens within Cathodic Biofilm in the Single-Chamber Microbial Electrolysis Cell10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.002 ↗
35. Quantitative Analysis of Small-Subunit rRNA Genes in Mixed Microbial Populations via 5′-Nuclease Assays10.1128/AEM.66.11.4605-4614.2000 ↗
36. Zubair, M., Li, Z., Zhu, R., Wang, J., Liu, X., and Liu, X. (2023). The Antibiotics Degradation and Its Mechanisms during the Livestock Manure Anaerobic Digestion. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28104090 ↗
37. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT Method10.1006/meth.2001.1262 ↗
38. A Critical Review on the Interaction of Substrate Nutrient Balance and Microbial Community Structure and Function in Anaerobic Co-Digestion10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.095 ↗
39. Links between Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio, Synergy and Microbial Characteristics of Long-Term Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste, Cattle Manure and Corn Straw10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126094 ↗
40. Co-Composting Cow Manure with Food Waste: The Influence of Lipids Content
41. Optimization of the Specific Methanogenic Activity during the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Pig Manure and Rice Straw, Using Industrial Clay Residues as Inorganic Additive10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.031 ↗
42. Anaerobic Codigestion of Kitchen Waste with Cattle Manure for Biogas Production10.1021/ef8008772 ↗
43. Production of Methane and Hydrogen from Biomass through Conventional and High-Rate Anaerobic Digestion Processes10.1080/10643380802013415 ↗
44. Cogeneration of Hydrogen and Methane from Glucose to Improve Energy Conversion Efficiency10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.048 ↗
45. Reclassification of Bacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides goldsteinii and Bacteroides merdae as Parabacteroides distasonis Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov., Parabacteroides goldsteinii Comb. Nov. and Parabacteroides merdae Comb. Nov10.1099/ijs.0.64192-0 ↗
46. Descriptions of Prevotella tannerae Sp. Nov. and Prevotella enoeca Sp. Nov. from the Human Gingival Crevice and Emendation of the Description of Prevotella zoogleoformans
47. Description of Christensenella minuta Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Human Faeces, Which Forms a Distinct Branch in the Order Clostridiales, and Proposal of Christensenellaceae Fam. Nov10.1099/ijs.0.026989-0 ↗
48. Microbial Syntrophy: Interaction for the Common Good10.1111/1574-6976.12019 ↗
49. Energetics of Syntrophic Cooperation in Methanogenic Degradation
50. Acetate Oxidation Is the Dominant Methanogenic Pathway from Acetate in the Absence of Methanosaetaceae10.1128/AEM.00489-06 ↗
51. Energy Conservation and Hydrogenase Function in Methanogenic Archaea, in Particular the Genus Methanosarcina10.1128/MMBR.00020-19 ↗
52. Syntrophic Metabolism Facilitates Methanosarcina-Led Methanation in the Anaerobic Digestion of Lipidic Slaughterhouse Waste10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125250 ↗
53. The Genome Sequence of Methanosphaera stadtmanae Reveals Why This Human Intestinal Archaeon Is Restricted to Methanol and H2 for Methane Formation and ATP Synthesis10.1128/JB.188.2.642-658.2006 ↗
54. Synergistic Effect of Ultrasound and Antibiotics against Chlamydia Trachomatis-Infected Human Epithelial Cells in Vitro10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.07.015 ↗
55. Fate of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Mobile Genetic Elements during Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Chinese Medicinal Herbal Residues and Swine Manure10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.100 ↗
56. Fate of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Its Drivers during Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Sewage Sludge Based on Microwave Pretreatment10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.140 ↗
57. Variations of Antibiotic Resistome in Swine Wastewater during Full-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Treatment10.1016/j.envint.2021.106694 ↗
58. mcrA Gene Abundance Correlates with Hydrogenotrophic Methane Production Rates in Full-Scale Anaerobic Waste Treatment Systems10.1111/lam.12515 ↗
59. Pyrosequencing of mcrA and Archaeal 16S rRNA Genes Reveals Diversity and Substrate Preferences of Methanogen Communities in Anaerobic Digesters10.1128/AEM.02566-14 ↗