journal article·2025-09-26Open access

Early Fault Detection in a Real Scenario of Hybrid Fiber–Coaxial Networks Using Machine Learning: An Approach Based on Decision Trees and Random Forests

Christian Szcerba, Enrique Dávalos, Ariel Leiva, Juan Pinto-Ríos

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

Cable service providers face significant challenges in managing Hybrid Fiber–Coaxial (HFC) networks due to the growing demand for high-speed services. Ensuring high service availability is critical to preventing customer attrition. This study employs machine learning techniques, specifically Decision Tree and Random Forest models, for proactive fault detection in HFC networks using data from the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Two operational scenarios were considered: a network-wide model and node-specific models. The dataset for fault detection exhibited a severe class imbalance, with outage events being extremely rare. To address this, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), which generates synthetic samples of the minority class to balance the dataset, was applied. This significantly improved recall and F1-scores—the harmonic mean of precision and recall—while maintaining high precision. The results demonstrate that these machine learning algorithms achieve up to 98% accuracy, and the SMOTE-enhanced models provide more reliable detection of connectivity faults. This approach is highly effective for cable operators in maintaining quality of service, enabling proactive management of problems and enhancement of network performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Software System Performance and Reliability · Network Security and Intrusion Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polytechnic Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Campus Universitario UNA, San Lorenzo 111421, Paraguay

School of Electrical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Av. Brasil 2950, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. OECD (2024, October 04). Percentage of Fibre Connections in Total Broadband. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/broadband-statistics.html.
2. CableLabs (2024, May 13). DOCSIS 4.0 MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface Specification. Available online: https://www.cablelabs.com/specifications/CM-SP-MULPIv4.0.
3. Cisco (2025, September 24). Cisco Annual Internet Report (2018–2023) White Paper. Available online: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/executive-perspectives/annual-internet-report/white-paper-c11-741490.html.
4. Ji, R., Gao, J., Xie, G., Flowers, G.T., and Jin, Q. (2015, January 11–14). The impact of coaxial connector failures on high frequency signal transmission. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 61st Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (Holm), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/HOLM.2015.7355112 ↗
5. CableLabs (2024, May 13). PNM Best Practices Primer: HFC Networks (DOCSIS 3.1). Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/563981463/CM-GL-PNM-3-1-V01-200506-3.
6. Williams, T.H., and Hunter, D. (2017). Isolating an Upstream Noise Source in a Cable Television Network. (9,729,257), U.S. Patent.
7. Mahmoud, H.H.H., and Ismail, T. (2020, January 29–30). A review of machine learning use-cases in telecommunication industry in the 5G Era. Proceedings of the 2020 16th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO), Cairo, Egypt.10.1109/ICENCO49778.2020.9357376 ↗
8. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority over-Sampling Technique10.1613/jair.953 ↗
9. A Novel Approach for Profile Optimization in DOCSIS 3.1 Networks Exploiting Traffic Information10.1109/TNSM.2019.2901879 ↗
10. A Predictive Handover Approach in LTE Networks with Measurements and Decision Tree Algorithms (Case Study City of Quito)
11. Benhavan, T., and Songwatana, K. (2014, January 5–8). HFC network performance monitoring system using DOCSIS cable modem operation data in a 3 dimensional analysis. Proceedings of the 4th Joint International Conference on Information and Communication Technology, Electronic and Electrical Engineering (JICTEE), Chiang Rai, Thailand.10.1109/JICTEE.2014.6804074 ↗
12. Gibellini, E., and Righetti, C.E. (2018, January 26–28). Unsupervised Learning for Detection of Leakage from the HFC Network. Proceedings of the 2018 ITU Kaleidoscope: Machine Learning for a 5G Future (ITU K), Santa Fe, Argentina.10.23919/ITU-WT.2018.8598128 ↗
13. Millicom (2024). Millicom Earnings Release Q1 2024, Millicom. Technical Report.
14. Simakovic, M., and Cica, Z. (2021). Detection and localization of failures in hybrid fiber–coaxial network using big data platform. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10232906 ↗
15. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
16. Choudhary, R., and Gianey, H.K. (2017, January 14–15). Comprehensive review on supervised machine learning algorithms. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Science (MLDS), Noida, India.10.1109/MLDS.2017.11 ↗
17. A Survey of Deep Learning and Its Applications: A New Paradigm to Machine Learning10.1007/s11831-019-09344-w ↗
18. Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587 ↗
19. A review of machine learning-based failure management in optical networks10.1007/s11432-022-3557-9 ↗
20. Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques
21. Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Brief Survey10.1109/MSP.2017.2743240 ↗
22. Oshiro, T.M., Perez, P.S., and Baranauskas, J.A. (2012). How many trees in a random forest?. Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, MLDM 2012, Berlin, Germany, 13–20 July 2012, Springer. Proceedings 8.10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_13 ↗
23. Elkabalawy, M., Al-Sakkaf, A., Abdelkader, E.M., and Alfalah, G. (2024). CRISP-DM-Based Data-Driven Approach for Building Energy Prediction Utilizing Indoor and Environmental Factors. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16177249 ↗
24. Woundy, R., and Marez, K. (2025, September 24). Cable Device Management Information Base for Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) Compliant Cable Modems and Cable Modem Termination Systems. Available online: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4639.
25. Enhancing SMOTE for imbalanced data with abnormal minority instances
26. The Effect of Class Imbalance on Precision-Recall Curves10.1162/neco_a_01362 ↗
27. Chicco, D., Tötsch, N., and Jurman, G. (2021). The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markedness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation. BioData Mining, 14.10.1186/s13040-021-00244-z ↗
28. Chicco, D., and Jurman, G. (2023). A statistical comparison between Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), prevalence threshold, and Fowlkes–Mallows index. J. Biomed. Inform., 132.10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104426 ↗