journal article·2025-09-26Open access

Efficiency Comparison and Optimal Voyage Strategy of CPP Combination and Fixed Modes Based on Ship Operational Data

Ji-Woong Lee, Quang Dao Vuong, Eun-Seok Jeong, Jung-Ho Noh, Jae-Ung Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

This study examines the efficiency trade-offs of Controllable Pitch Propeller (CPP) systems by comparing Combination and Fixed operation modes using real ship operational data. The analysis focuses on mechanical efficiency (ηmech), propulsive efficiency expressed through the normalized Relative Propulsive Efficiency Index (RPEInorm), and fuel consumption. Combination mode consistently maintained higher ηmech across all load conditions, with pronounced advantages at low load and low speed (<50% load, <12 knots), where both propulsive efficiency and fuel economy improved. In contrast, Fixed mode outperformed Combination mode at high load and high speed, exceeding approximately 50% load and 12 knots, as propeller performance approached its optimal operating point despite some sacrifice in engine efficiency. To integrate these effects, a proxy overall efficiency index (ηoverall,proxy = ηmech × RPEInorm) was introduced, revealing a crossover point at 0.525 load where the efficiency dominance shifted between modes. These findings demonstrate that neither mode is universally superior, but rather their advantages depend on operating conditions. The results provide practical insights for adaptive operational strategies, enabling real-time switching between modes to optimize fuel consumption and overall propulsion performance while supporting compliance with environmental regulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Maritime Ports and Logistics · Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Maritime Navigation and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Marine System Engineering, National Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. (2025). Regulatory Affairs IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 83)-Summary Report, Lloyd’s Register.
2. Tian, W., Lang, X., Zhang, C., Yan, S., Li, B., and Zang, S. (2024). Optimization of Controllable-Pitch Propeller Operations for Yangtze River Sailing Ships. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12091579 ↗
3. Design Analysis and Optimal Matching of a Controllable Pitch Propeller to the Hull and Diesel Engine of a CODOG System10.4236/jpee.2018.63005 ↗
4. Propeller, K. (2019). A Smart Way of Using a Controllable Pitch Propeller. Kamome Propeller Co., Ltd.
5. Design and Control of Hybrid Power and Propulsion Systems for Smart Ships: A Review of Developments10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.060 ↗
6. Ship Energy Management System Development and Experimental Evaluation Utilizing Marine Loading Cycles Based on Machine Learning Techniques10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118085 ↗
7. Adaptive Pitch Control for Ships with Diesel Mechanical and Hybrid Propulsion10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.080 ↗
8. Controllable-Pitch Propeller Design Process for a Wind-Powered Car-Carrier Optimising for Total Energy Consumption10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113426 ↗
9. Novel Combinator Surface Concept for Efficiency Optimization of Ship Propulsion System10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114489 ↗
10. Power Management and Optimization of Marine Hybrid Propulsion Systems: A Combinator Surface Methodology10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118354 ↗
11. Effect of Propeller Pitch on Ship Propulsion10.7225/toms.v11.n01.w09 ↗
12. A Study on Performance and Exhaust Emission Characteristics According to the Controllable Pitch Propeller Operation of Two-Stroke Diesel Engine in Sailing Condition10.5916/jamet.2024.48.6.384 ↗
13. (2025, September 01). Marcelo Borba Understanding Load Calculation in Thrusters: Fixed Pitch (FPT) and Controllable Pitch Propellers (CPP)—Part 2. LinkedIn 2025. Available online: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/understanding-load-calculation-thrusters-fixed-pitch-fpt-borba-8dnlf/.
14. Predicting Propeller Emergence Severity in Adverse Sea Conditions: An Integrated Approach Using Stacked Machine Learning Models10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117811 ↗
15. On the Performance of Marine Propeller in Regular Waves, Part I: Single Blade Loads in Moderate Sea States10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118290 ↗
16. Propeller–Hull Interactions and Added Power in Head Seas10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110630 ↗
17. Marine Propeller Optimization Based on a Novel Parametric Model
18. A Study on the Matching Problem of Engine, Propeller, and Ship Hull under Actual Service Conditions10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2023.100538 ↗
19. Halilbeşe, A.N. (2025). Investigating the Torsional Vibration Behaviour of Composite Drive Shafts in Marine Propulsion Shaft Systems. J. Nav. Archit. Mar. Technol., 43–51.10.54926/jnamt.2025.248 ↗
20. Energy Coefficients for a Propeller Series10.1016/j.oceaneng.2003.06.002 ↗
21. Shi, W., Stapersma, D., and Grimmelius, H. (2009). Analysis of Energy Conversion in Ship Propulsion System in Off-Design Operation Conditions. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ., 121.10.2495/ESU090411 ↗
22. Effects of Coating Roughness and Biofouling on Ship Resistance and Powering10.1080/08927010701461974 ↗
23. Fouling Effect on the Resistance of Different Ship Types10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107736 ↗
24. Fast Approach to the Estimation of the Added Resistance of Ships in Head Waves10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.022 ↗
25. Molland, A.F. (2008). Chapter 5—Powering. The Maritime Engineering Reference Book, Butterworth-Heinemann.
26. Pitch Control for Ships with Diesel Mechanical and Hybrid Propulsion: Modelling, Validation and Performance Quantification10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.103 ↗
27. International Maritime Organization (2020). Fourth IMO Greenhouse Gas Study (2020), International Maritime Organization.
28. Lee, J.-U., Lee, W.-J., Jeong, E.-S., Noh, J.-H., Kim, J.-S., and Lee, J.-W. (2022). Algorithm for Monitoring Emissions Based on Actual Speed of Ships Participating in the Korean Vessel Speed Reduction Program. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15249555 ↗
29. MAN Energy Solutions Basic Pricciples of Ship Propulsion, MAN Energy Solutions.