An Interpretable Clinical Decision Support System Aims to Stage Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Deep Learning and Imaging Biomarkers
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of intelligent clinical decision support systems (CDSS) has the potential to improve the accuracy and speed of diagnoses significantly. These systems can analyze a patient’s medical data and generate comprehensive reports that help specialists better understand and evaluate the current clinical scenario. This capability is particularly important when dealing with medical images, as the heavy workload on healthcare professionals can hinder their ability to notice critical biomarkers, which may be difficult to detect with the naked eye due to stress and fatigue. Implementing a CDSS that uses computer vision (CV) techniques can alleviate this challenge. However, one of the main obstacles to the widespread use of CV and intelligent analysis methods in medical diagnostics is the lack of a clear understanding among diagnosticians of how these systems operate. A better understanding of their functioning and of the reliability of the identified biomarkers will enable medical professionals to more effectively address clinical problems. Additionally, it is essential to tailor the training process of machine learning models to medical data, which are often imbalanced due to varying probabilities of disease detection. Neglecting this factor can compromise the quality of the developed CDSS. This article presents the development of a CDSS module focused on diagnosing age-related macular degeneration. Unlike traditional methods that classify diseases or their stages based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, the proposed CDSS provides a more sophisticated and accurate analysis of biomarkers detected through a deep neural network. This approach combines interpretative reasoning with highly accurate models, although these models can be complex to describe. To address the issue of class imbalance, an algorithm was developed to optimally select biomarkers, taking into account both their statistical and clinical significance. As a result, the algorithm prioritizes the selection of classes that ensure high model accuracy while maintaining clinically relevant responses generated by the CDSS module. The results indicate that the overall accuracy of staging age-related macular degeneration increased by 63.3% compared with traditional methods of direct stage classification using a similar machine learning model. This improvement suggests that the CDSS module can significantly enhance disease diagnosis, particularly in situations with class imbalance in the original dataset. To improve interpretability, the process of determining the most likely disease stage was organized into two steps. At each step, the diagnostician could visually access information explaining the reasoning behind the intelligent diagnosis, thereby assisting experts in understanding the basis for clinical decision-making.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Retinal Imaging and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Photonics Engineering and Research Advances (SPhERA), Ufa University of Science and Technology, 32 Z. Validi Street, 450076 Ufa, Russia
Department of Ophthalmology, Bashkir State Medical University, 3 Lenin Street, 450008 Ufa, Russia
Funding
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the state assignment for UUST
References (97)
Show source-provided references
1. Increasing frequency of hospital admissions for retinal detachment and vitreo-retinal surgery in England 2000–2018
2. Stålhammar, G., Lardner, E., Georgsson, M., and Seregard, S. (2023). Increasing demand for ophthalmic pathology: Time trends in a laboratory with nationwide coverage. BMC Ophthalmol., 23.10.1186/s12886-023-02828-1 ↗
3. To study the morbidity pattern of patients attending the ophthalmology OPD of tertiary eye care centre with reference to age
4. Aznabaev, B.M., Mukhamadeev, T.R., and Dibaev, T.I. (2019). Optical Coherence Tomography + Angiography in the Diagnosis, Therapy and Surgery of Eye Diseases, August Borg.
5. AMD-SD: An optical coherence tomography image dataset for wet AMD lesions segmentation10.1038/s41597-024-03844-6 ↗
6. Lopukhova, E.A., Ibragimova, R.R., Idrisova, G.M., Lakman, I.A., Mukhamadeev, T.R., Grakhova, E.P., Bilyalov, A.R., and Kutluyarov, R.V. (2023). Machine learning algorithms for the analysis of age-related macular degeneration based on optical coherence tomography: A systematic review. J. Biomed. Photonics Eng., 9.10.18287/JBPE23.09.020202 ↗
7. The role of imaging in age-related macular degeneration
8. Burnout and work-work imbalance in radiology—Wicked problems on a global scale: A baseline pre-COVID-19 survey of US neuroradiologists compared to international radiologists and adjacent staff10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110153 ↗
9. Information overload: When less is more in medical imaging10.1515/dx-2017-0008 ↗
10. How does workload affect test ordering behavior of physicians? An empirical investigation10.1111/poms.13711 ↗
11. Winder, M., Owczarek, A.J., Chudek, J., Pilch-Kowalczyk, J., and Baron, J. (2021). Are we overdoing it? Changes in diagnostic imaging workload during the years 2010–2020 including the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Healthcare, 9.10.3390/healthcare9111557 ↗
12. Enhancing diagnostic: Machine learning in medical image analysis
13. Reliability and efficiency of human-automation interaction in automated decision support systems10.54097/8bzsah53 ↗
14. Automation in healthcare: Advantages, prospects, perceptual barriers10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2024.v.5i2;181-188 ↗
15. The efficiency of computerised clinical decision support systems10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02839-8 ↗
16. At the Crossroads of Technology and Medicine: Prospects of automation in medical practice with the use of neural networks
17. Przystalski, K., and Thanki, R.M. (2024). Computer vision for medical data analysis. Explainable Machine Learning in Medicine, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-44877-5 ↗
18. Sheelavathi, A., Shanmugapriya, P., Sangeethapriya, J., and Muthukarupaee, K. (2022). A roadmap to smart healthcare automation sensors and technologies. Futuristic Trends in IOT, Iterative International Publishers. Volume 2, Book 15, Part 1.
19. Sindhu, P., and Sivakumar, M. (2024). Healthcare integrating automation and robotics-based industry 5.0 advancement. Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice, IGI Global.10.4018/979-8-3693-2901-6.ch014 ↗
20. Umare Thool, K.B., Wankhede, P.A., Yella, V.R., Tamijeselvan, S., Suganthi, D., and Rastogi, R. (2023, January 6–8). Artificial intelligence in medical imaging data analytics using CT images. Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/ICESC57686.2023.10192998 ↗
21. Attention GhostUNet++: Enhanced segmentation of adipose tissue and liver in CT images
22. Sarvakar, K., Yadav, R., Patel, A., Patel, C.D., Rana, K., and Borisagar, V. (2024). Advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms for healthcare decision support systems: A study. Advances in Healthcare Information Systems and Administration, IGI Global.10.4018/979-8-3693-7457-3.ch002 ↗
23. Chaddad, A., Peng, J., Xu, J., and Bouridane, A. (2023). Survey of explainable AI techniques in healthcare. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23020634 ↗
24. Badhoutiya, A., Verma, R.P., Shrivastava, A., Laxminarayanamma, K., Rao, A.L.N., and Khan, A.K. (2023, January 29–30). Random Forest Classification in Healthcare Decision Support for Disease Diagnosis. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Innovations in Healthcare Industries (ICAIIHI), Raipur, India.10.1109/ICAIIHI57871.2023.10489244 ↗
25. Demonstrating the power of SHAP values in AI-driven classification of Marvel characters10.33851/JMIS.2024.11.2.167 ↗
26. Explainable AI in healthcare: Enhancing trust, transparency, and ethical compliance in medical AI systems
27. A review on the use of imaging biomarkers in oncology clinical trials: Quality assurance strategies for technical validation10.3390/tomography9050149 ↗
28. Chiu, F., and Yen, Y. (2023). Imaging biomarkers for clinical applications in neuro-oncology: Current status and future perspectives. Biomark. Res., 11.10.1186/s40364-023-00476-7 ↗
29. Cho, W.C., Zhou, F., Li, J., Hua, L., and Liu, F. (2022). Editorial: Biomarker detection algorithms and tools for medical imaging or omics data. Front. Genet., 13.10.3389/fgene.2022.919390 ↗
30. Foundation model for cancer imaging biomarkers10.1038/s42256-024-00807-9 ↗
31. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: Applications of deep learning for disease detection and diagnosis
32. Adapted visual analytics process for intelligent decision-making: Application in a medical context10.1142/S0219622019500470 ↗
33. Myrou, A., Barmpagiannos, K., Ioakimidou, A., and Savopoulos, C. (2025). Molecular biomarkers in neurological diseases: Advances in diagnosis and prognosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 26.10.20944/preprints202502.0647.v1 ↗
34. Rasouli, S., Alkurdi, D., and Jia, B. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in modern medical education and practice: A systematic literature review. BMC Med. Educ., 24.10.1101/2024.07.25.24311022 ↗
35. Biomarkers classification for various diseases using machine learning approaches: A review
36. The impact of speed and bias on the cognitive processes of experts and novices in medical image decision-making10.1186/s41235-018-0119-2 ↗
37. The diagnosis and treatment of age-related macular degeneration
38. Current concepts and modalities for monitoring the fellow eye in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: An expert panel consensus10.1097/IAE.0000000000002768 ↗
39. Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.036 ↗
40. Incidence of late-stage age-related macular degeneration in American whites: Systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.ajo.2015.04.003 ↗
41. A systems biology approach towards understanding and treating non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration10.1038/s41467-019-11262-1 ↗
42. Lopukhova, E.A., Yusupov, E.S., Ibragimova, R.R., Idrisova, G.M., Mukhamadeev, T.R., Grakhova, E.P., and Kutluyarov, R.V. (2025). Hybrid intelligent staging of age-related macular degeneration for decision-making on patient management tactics. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 87.10.20944/preprints202410.2033.v1 ↗
43. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
44. Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 6–11). On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning—PMLR, Sydney, Australia.
45. An accurate fuzzy rule-based classification systems for heart disease diagnosis
46. Sirocchi, C., Bogliolo, A., and Montagna, S. (2024). Medical-informed machine learning: Integrating prior knowledge into medical decision systems. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 24.10.1186/s12911-024-02582-4 ↗
47. Liang, S., Li, Y., and Srikant, R. (2017). Enhancing the reliability of out-of-distribution image detection in neural networks. arXiv.
48. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group (2001). A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch. Ophthalmol., 119, 1417–1436.10.1001/archopht.119.10.1417 ↗
49. Biomarkers for the progression of intermediate age-related macular degeneration10.1007/s40123-023-00807-9 ↗
50. Structural OCT and OCT angiography biomarkers associated with the development and progression of geographic atrophy in AMD
51. Early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration: Update and clinical review10.2147/CIA.S142685 ↗
52. Characterization of drusen and hyperreflective foci as biomarkers for disease progression in age-related macular degeneration using artificial intelligence in optical coherence tomography10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1376 ↗
53. Progressive choriocapillaris changes on optical coherence tomography angiography correlate with stage progression in AMD
54. Asani, B., Holmberg, O., Schiefelbein, J.B., Hafner, M., Herold, T., Spitzer, H., Siedlecki, J., Kern, C., Kortuem, K.U., and Frishberg, A. (2024). Evaluation of OCT biomarker changes in treatment-naive neovascular AMD using a deep semantic segmentation algorithm. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41433-024-03264-1 ↗
55. Subretinal fibrosis in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Current concepts, therapeutic avenues, and future perspectives10.1007/s00441-021-03514-8 ↗
56. Geographic atrophy: A histopathological assessment10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5799 ↗
57. Biomarkers for nonexudative age-related macular degeneration and relevance for clinical trials: A systematic review10.1007/s40291-021-00551-5 ↗
58. Flores, R., Carneiro, Â., Tenreiro, S., and Seabra, M.C. (2021). Retinal progression biomarkers of early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Life, 12.10.3390/life12010036 ↗
59. Exploring the role of granzyme B in subretinal fibrosis of age-related macular degeneration
60. Latifi-Navid, H., Barzegar Behrooz, A., Jamehdor, S., Davari, M., Latifinavid, M., Zolfaghari, N., Piroozmand, S., Taghizadeh, S., Bourbour, M., and Shemshaki, G. (2023). Construction of an exudative age-related macular degeneration diagnostic and therapeutic molecular network using multi-layer network analysis, a fuzzy logic model, and deep learning techniques: Are retinal and brain neurodegenerative disorders related?. Pharmaceuticals, 16.10.3390/ph16111555 ↗
61. Saha, S., Nassisi, M., Wang, M., Lindenberg, S., Kanagasingam, Y., Sadda, S., and Hu, Z.J. (2019). Automated detection and classification of early AMD biomarkers using deep learning. Sci. Rep., 9.10.1038/s41598-019-47390-3 ↗
62. Fluid-based prognostication in n-AMD: Type 3 macular neovascularisation needs an analysis in isolation
63. Anti-VEGF treatment and optical coherence tomography biomarkers in wet age-related macular degeneration
64. Miladinović, A., Biscontin, A., Ajčević, M.S., Kresevic, S., Accardo, A., Marangoni, D., Tognetto, D., and Inferrera, L. (2024). Evaluating deep learning models for classifying OCT images with limited data and noisy labels. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-81127-1 ↗
65. Wu, Z., Zhuo, R., Liu, X., Wu, B., and Wang, J. (2024). Enhancing surgical decision-making in NEC with ResNet18: A deep learning approach to predict the need for surgery through X-ray image analysis. Front. Pediatr., 12.10.3389/fped.2024.1405780 ↗
66. Medical image retrieval using Resnet-18 for clinical diagnosis
67. Rahman Siddiquee, M.M., Shah, J., Chong, C., Nikolova, S., Dumkrieger, G., Li, B., Wu, T., and Schwedt, T.J. (2022). Headache classification and automatic biomarker extraction from structural MRIs using deep learning. Brain Commun., 5.10.1093/braincomms/fcac311 ↗
68. An introduction to ROC analysis10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 ↗
69. Cui, Y., Jia, M., Lin, T., Song, Y., and Belongie, S. (2019, January 15–20). Class-balanced loss based on effective number of samples. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00949 ↗
70. Lin, T., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., and Dollár, P. (2017, January 22–29). Focal loss for dense object detection. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗
71. Bradshaw, T.J., Huemann, Z., Hu, J., and Rahmim, A. (2023). A guide to cross-validation for artificial intelligence in medical imaging. Radiol. Artif. Intell., 5.10.1148/ryai.220232 ↗
72. Domain adaptation for medical image analysis: A survey10.1109/TBME.2021.3117407 ↗
73. Collins, G.S., Moons, K.G.M., Dhiman, P., Riley, R.D., Beam, A.L., Van Calster, B., Ghassemi, M., Liu, X., Reitsma, J.B., and van Smeden, M. (2024). TRIPOD+AI statement: Updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ, 385.10.1136/bmj-2023-078378 ↗
74. Yu, A.C., Mohajer, B., and Eng, J. (2022). External validation of deep learning algorithms for radiologic diagnosis: A systematic review. Radiol. Artif. Intell., 4.10.1148/ryai.210064 ↗
75. Few shot learning for medical imaging: A review of categorized images
76. Malhotra, A. (2023, January 12–13). Single-shot image recognition using siamese neural networks. Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), Greater Noida, India.10.1109/ICACITE57410.2023.10182466 ↗
77. Zero-shot learning—A comprehensive evaluation of the good, the bad and the ugly10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2857768 ↗
78. Deep learning for retina structural biomarker classification using OCT images
79. A few-shot-based model-agnostic meta-learning for intrusion detection in security of Internet of Things
80. Few-shot transfer learning method based on meta-learning and graph convolution network for machinery fault diagnosis
81. Gated multi-scale attention transformer for few-shot medical image segmentation
82. Few-shot medical image segmentation with high-fidelity prototypes
83. Zero-shot diagnosis of unseen pulmonary diseases via spatial domain adaptive correction and guidance by ChatGPT-4o
84. A systematic review of multi-class and one-vs-rest classification techniques for near-infrared spectra of crop cultivars
85. A probabilistic multi-class strategy of one-vs.-rest support vector machines for cancer classification10.1016/j.neucom.2008.04.033 ↗
86. One-vs-rest network-based deep probability model for open set recognition
87. Index for rating diagnostic tests10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
88. Shreffler, J., and Huecker, M.R. (2025). Diagnostic testing accuracy: Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing.
89. Nebro, A.J., Galeano-Brajones, J., Luna, F., and Coello Coello, C.A. (2022). Is NSGA-II ready for large-scale multi-objective optimization?. Math. Comput. Appl., 27.10.3390/mca27060103 ↗
90. Screening for developmental and behavioral problems10.1002/mrdd.20068 ↗
91. Technical adequacy of response to intervention decisions10.1177/001440291107700305 ↗
92. Calculation of threshold and saturation points of sigmoidal baroreflex function curves10.1152/ajpheart.00219.2006 ↗
93. Leão, W. (2018). Attended temperature scaling: A practical approach for calibrating deep neural networks. arXiv.
94. Mukhoti, J., Kulharia, V., Sanyal, A., Golodetz, S., Torr, P.H.S., and Dokania, P.K. (2020). Calibrating deep neural networks using focal loss. arXiv.
95. On temperature scaling and conformal prediction of deep classifiers
96. The explanation necessity for healthcare AI
97. Metta, C., Beretta, A., Pellungrini, R., Rinzivillo, S., and Giannotti, F. (2024). Towards transparent healthcare: Advancing local explanation methods in explainable artificial intelligence. Bioengineering, 11.10.3390/bioengineering11040369 ↗