journal article·2025-09-12Open access

Life Cycle Assessment of Portland Cement Alternatives in Mine Paste Backfill

Martín J. Valenzuela-Díaz, Antonio J. Diosdado-Aragón, José Charango Munizaga-Rosas, Manuel Caraballo

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 18

Abstract

Mining activities generate huge volumes of mine tailings (MTs), which pose huge environmental management challenges. Reuse as cemented paste backfill (CPB), a mixture of tailings with water and a binder—often cementitious or alkaline—is amongst the best methods to reduce surface disposal, and it is used to backfill underground mine voids. Although the most widely used binder in CPB production remains Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), it is associated with a high carbon footprint and a high economic cost. In this study, both the economic feasibility and the environmental performance of three alkaline activators—sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium silicate (Na2SiO3), and a high MgCO3 and MgO content calcined magnesite residue—are evaluated as OPC replacements in CPB products. A gate-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed at a CPB plant located in southwestern Spain with the use of tailings from a massive sulfide deposit. The results from the uniaxial compressive strength test and LCA demonstrate that paste formulations using the magnesite residue achieve comparable mechanical performance while significantly reducing both the environmental footprint and total cost relative to OPC-based mixtures. These results support the use of alkaline binders as viable substitutes that enable more sustainable and cost-effective tailings management practices in the mining sector.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tailings Management and Properties · Materials Engineering and Processing · Mining Techniques and Economics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mining, Mechanic, Energetic and Construction Engineering, Higher Technical School of Engineering, University of Huelva, Avda. de las Fuerzas Armadas, S/N, 21071 Huelva, Spain

Department of Water, Mining and Environment, Scientific and Technological Center of Huelva, University of Huelva, 21004 Huelva, Spain

Faculty of Mining Engineering, National University of the Altiplano, Puno 21001, Peru

Funding

FEDER, UE, and NextGenerationEU/PRTR and by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 · Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. OECD (2019). Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060, OECD.
2. Upadhyay, A., Laing, T., Kumar, V., and Dora, M. (2021). Exploring barriers and drivers to the implementation of circular economy practices in the mining industry. Resour. Policy, 72.10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102037 ↗
3. Zhou, Y. (2024). Natural resources and green economic growth: A pathway to innovation and digital transformation in the mining industry. Resour. Policy, 90.10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104667 ↗
4. The Twelve Principles of Circular Hydrometallurgy10.1007/s40831-022-00636-3 ↗
5. Kinnunen, P., Karhu, M., Yli-Rantala, E., Kivikytö-Reponen, P., and Mäkinen, J. (2022). A review of circular economy strategies for mine tailings. Cleaner Eng. Technol., 8.10.1016/j.clet.2022.100499 ↗
6. Baker, E., Davies, M., Fourie, A., Mudd, G., and Thygesen, K. (2019). Chapter II: Mine Tailings Facilities: Overview and Industry Trends. Towards Zero Harm—A Compendium of Papers Prepared for the Global Tailings Review, Global Tailings Review.
7. Franks, D.M., Stringer, M., Torres-Cruz, L.A., Baker, E., Valenta, R., Thygesen, K., Matthews, A., Howchin, J., and Barrie, S. (2021). Tailings facility disclosures reveal stability risks. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-84897-0 ↗
8. New approaches for extracting and recovering metals from mine tailings10.1016/j.mineng.2016.10.008 ↗
9. Di Maria, A., Khoshkhoo, M., Sand, A., and Van Acker, K. (2024). Towards sustainable resource valorization: A life cycle sustainability assessment of metals recovery from sulfidic mining residues in Sweden. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 204.10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107513 ↗
10. Rosario-Beltré, A.J., Sánchez-España, J., Rodríguez-Gómez, V., Fernández-Naranjo, F.J., Bellido-Martín, E., Adánez-Sanjuán, P., and Arranz-González, J.C. (2023). Critical Raw Materials recovery potential from Spanish mine wastes: A national-scale preliminary assessment. J. Clean. Prod., 407.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137163 ↗
11. Adrianto, L.R., Ciacci, L., Pfister, S., and Hellweg, S. (2023). Toward sustainable reprocessing and valorization of sulfidic copper tailings: Scenarios and prospective LCA. Sci. Total Environ., 871.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162038 ↗
12. Sarker, S.K., Haque, N., Bhuiyan, M., Bruckard, W., and Pramanik, B.K. (2022). Recovery of strategically important critical minerals from mine tailings. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 10.10.1016/j.jece.2022.107622 ↗
13. Alkaline residues and the environment: A review of impacts, management practices and opportunities10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.111 ↗
14. Reuse of mining waste as aggregates in fly ash-based geopolymers10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.164 ↗
15. Utilization of sulphidic tailings from gold mine as a raw material in geopolymerization10.1016/j.minpro.2016.02.012 ↗
16. Mine tailings-based geopolymers: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.345 ↗
17. Utilization potential of mine tailings in geopolymers: Physicochemical and environmental aspects10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.028 ↗
18. Thejas, H.K., and Hossiney, N. (2022). Alkali-activated bricks made with mining waste iron ore tailings. Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 16.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00973 ↗
19. Veiga Simão, F., Chambart, H., Vandemeulebroeke, L., Nielsen, P., Adrianto, L.R., Pfister, S., and Cappuyns, V. (2022). Mine waste as a sustainable resource for facing bricks. J. Clean. Prod., 368.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133118 ↗
20. Production of eco-friendly bricks from copper mine tailings through geopolymerization10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.048 ↗
21. Mabroum, S., Moukannaa, S., El Machi, A., Taha, Y., Benzaazoua, M., and Hakkou, R. (2020). Mine wastes based geopolymers: A critical review. Clean. Eng. Technol., 1.10.1016/j.clet.2020.100014 ↗
22. Veiga Simão, F., Chambart, H., Vandemeulebroeke, L., and Cappuyns, V. (2021). Incorporation of sulphidic mining waste material in ceramic roof tiles and blocks. J. Geochem. Explor., 225.10.1016/j.gexplo.2021.106741 ↗
23. Lemougna, P.N., Yliniemi, J., Nguyen, H., Adesanya, E., Tanskanen, P., Kinnunen, P., Roning, J., and Illikainen, M. (2020). Utilisation of glass wool waste and mine tailings in high performance building ceramics. J. Build. Eng., 31.10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101383 ↗
24. Zhang, Y., Shen, W., Wu, M., Shen, B., Li, M., Xu, G., Zhang, B., Ding, Q., and Chen, X. (2020). Experimental study on the utilization of copper tailing as micronized sand to prepare high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater., 244.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118312 ↗
25. Benahsina, A., El Haloui, Y., Taha, Y., Elomari, M., and Bennouna, M.A. (2022). Natural sand substitution by copper mine waste rocks for concrete manufacturing. J. Build. Eng., 47.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103817 ↗
26. Reusing copper tailings in concrete: Corrosion performance and socioeconomic implications for the Lefke-Xeros area of Cyprus10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.036 ↗
27. Adiguzel, D., Tuylu, S., and Eker, H. (2022). Utilization of tailings in concrete products: A review. Constr. Build. Mater., 360.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129574 ↗
28. Innovative use of copper mine tailing as an additive in cement mortar10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.066 ↗
29. Evaluation of iron ore tailings as replacement for fine aggregate in concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.095 ↗
30. Vargas, F., Lopez, M., and Rigamonti, L. (2020). Environmental impacts evaluation of treated copper tailings as supplementary cementitious materials. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 160.10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104890 ↗
31. Development of a new supplementary cementitious material from the activation of copper tailings: Mechanical performance and analysis of factors10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.223 ↗
32. Araujo, F.S.M., Taborda-Llano, I., Nunes, E.B., and Santos, R.M. (2022). Recycling and Reuse of Mine Tailings: A Review of Advancements and Their Implications. Geosciences, 12.10.20944/preprints202207.0010.v3 ↗
33. Sivakugan, N., Veenstra, R., and Naguleswaran, N. (2015). Underground Mine Backfilling in Australia Using Paste Fills and Hydraulic Fills. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng., 1.10.1007/s40891-015-0020-8 ↗
34. Zhang, X., Zhao, J., Xin, L., Wang, K., and Pan, H. (2021). Monitoring and Assessment of Cemented Paste Backfill Containing Coal Gangue and Fly Ash in an Underground Mine. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021.10.1155/2021/5946148 ↗
35. Cemented Paste Backfill Geomechanics at a Narrow-Vein Underhand Cut-and-Fill Mine10.1007/s00603-019-01850-4 ↗
36. Behavior of Cemented Paste Backfill in Two Mine Stopes: Measurements and Modeling10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000418 ↗
37. Qi, C., and Fourie, A. (2019). Cemented paste backfill for mineral tailings management: Review and future perspectives. Miner. Eng., 144.10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106025 ↗
38. A review of binders used in cemented paste tailings for underground and surface disposal practices10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.039 ↗
39. Designing mine tailings for better environmental, social and economic outcomes: A review of alternative approaches10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.079 ↗
40. Design and application of underground mine paste backfill technology10.1007/s10706-007-9154-3 ↗
41. Behera, S.K., Mishra, D.P., Ghosh, C.N., Mandal, P.K., Singh, K.M.P., Buragohain, J., and Singh, P.K. (2019). Characterization of lead–zinc mill tailings, fly ash and their mixtures for paste backfilling in underground metalliferous mines. Environ. Earth Sci., 78.10.1007/s12665-019-8395-9 ↗
42. Mix proportioning of underground cemented tailings backfill10.1016/j.tust.2006.08.005 ↗
43. Behera, S.K., Mishra, D.P., Singh, P., Mishra, K., Mandal, S.K., Ghosh, C.N., Kumar, R., and Mandal, P.K. (2021). Utilization of mill tailings, fly ash and slag as mine paste backfill material: Review and future perspective. Constr. Build. Mater., 309.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125120 ↗
44. Chemical factors that inf luence the performance of mine sulphidic paste backfill10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00752-4 ↗
45. Diosdado-Aragón, A.J., Valenzuela-Díaz, M.J., Dávila, J.M., Becerra-Herrera, M., and Caraballo, M.A. (2025). Influence of mine tailings mineralogy and curing conditions in the cementation of pastes for mine galleries backfilling. Miner. Eng., 232.10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109524 ↗
46. Soomro, M., Tam, V.W.Y., and Jorge Evangelista, A.C. (2022). Production of cement and its environmental impact. Recycled Concrete: Technologies and Performance, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-85210-4.00010-2 ↗
47. A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: Comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007 ↗
48. Saedi, A., Jamshidi-Zanjani, A., and Darban, A.K. (2020). A review on different methods of activating tailings to improve their cementitious property as cemented paste and reusability. J. Environ. Manag., 270.10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110881 ↗
49. Sala, S., Reale, F., Cristobal-Garcia, J., Marelli, L., and Rana, P. (2016). Life Cycle Assessment for the Impact Assessment of Policies, Publications Office of the European Union.
50. IMPACT 2002+, ReCiPe 2008 and ILCD’s recommended practice for characterization modelling in life cycle impact assessment: A case study-based comparison10.1007/s11367-014-0708-3 ↗
51. Rachid, S., Taha, Y., and Benzaazoua, M. (2023). Environmental evaluation of metals and minerals production based on a life cycle assessment approach: A systematic review. Miner. Eng., 198.10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108076 ↗
52. Life Cycle Assessment in the minerals industry: Current practice, harmonization efforts, and potential improvement through the integration with process simulation10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.318 ↗
53. Segura-Salazar, J., and Tavares, L.M. (2021). A life cycle-based, sustainability-driven innovation approach in the minerals industry: Application to a large-scale granitic quarry in Rio de Janeiro. Miner. Eng., 172.10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107149 ↗
54. Life cycle analysis of copper-gold-lead-silver-zinc beneficiation process10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.318 ↗
55. Impacts of aluminum production: A cradle to gate investigation using life-cycle assessment10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.400 ↗
56. A global life cycle assessment of manganese mining processes based on EcoInvent database10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.184 ↗
57. Life cycle assessment of mine tailings management in Canada10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.014 ↗
58. Comparative life cycle assessment of tailings management and energy scenarios for a copper ore mine: A case study in Northern Norway10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.021 ↗
59. A review on the impact of mining and mineral processing industries through life cycle assessment10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.264 ↗
60. Doka, G. (2002). A Model for Waste-Specific and Climate-Specific Life Cycle Inventories of Tailings Impoundments, Doka Life Cycle Assessments.
61. Regionalized Life Cycle Inventories of Global Sulfidic Copper Tailings10.1021/acs.est.1c01786 ↗
62. Utilization potential of fly ash and copper tailings in concrete as partial replacement of cement along with life cycle assessment10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.036 ↗
63. Saldanha, R.B., Caicedo, A.M.L., de Araújo, M.T., Scheuermann Filho, H.C., Moncaleano, C.J., Silva, J.P.S., and Consoli, N.C. (2023). Potential use of iron ore tailings for binder production: A life cycle assessment. Constr. Build. Mater., 365.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130008 ↗
64. A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete produced from industrial side streams in comparison with traditional concrete10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161230 ↗
65. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 ↗
66. Can LCA be FAIR? Assessing the status quo and opportunities for FAIR data sharing10.1007/s11367-024-02280-3 ↗
67. Diosdado-Aragón, A.J., Valenzuela-Díaz, M.J., Ruíz-Rodríguez, M., Davila, J.M., Becerra-Herrera, M., and Caraballo, M.A. (2025). Chemometric study of mine tailings cementation, using NaOH or Mg(OH)2, for mine galleries backfilling. Miner. Eng., 232.10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109518 ↗
68. Life-cycle carbon footprint analysis of magnesia products10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.023 ↗
69. Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and new fused magnesia production10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.043 ↗
70. Evaluation of GHG emissions from the production of magnesia refractory raw materials in Dashiqiao, China10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.118 ↗
71. Comparative life cycle assessment of reactive MgO and Portland cement production10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.071 ↗
72. Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on the performance and environmental impacts of reactive magnesia cement concrete10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.044 ↗
73. Shahbaz, F., Singh, I., Krishnan, P., and Celik, K. (2022). Life cycle assessment of brucite and synthetic MgO produced from reject brine using different alkalis. J. Clean. Prod., 380.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135071 ↗
74. Is magnesia cement low carbon? Life cycle carbon footprint comparing with Portland cement10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.082 ↗
75. Trojer, M. (2009). Principles of Benchmarking Criteria for the European Magnesia Industry. [Master’s Thesis, University of Leoben].
76. Zhao, L., Feng, J., and Dong, H. (2022). Analysis of carbon footprint and reduction approach of magnesia production in China. J. Clean. Prod., 334.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130194 ↗
77. Arguillarena, A., Margallo, M., Irabien, Á., and Urtiaga, A. (2022). Life cycle assessment of zinc and iron recovery from spent pickling acids by membrane-based solvent extraction and electrowinning. J. Environ. Manag., 318.10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115567 ↗
78. Identifying improvement potentials in cement production with life cycle assessment10.1021/es100771k ↗
79. Environmental impact of cement production: Detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.014 ↗
80. Fernando, S., Gunasekara, C., Law, D.W., Nasvi, M.C.M., Setunge, S., and Dissanayake, R. (2021). Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of fly ash–rice husk ash blended alkali-activated concrete. J. Environ. Manag., 295.10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113140 ↗
81. Critical analysis of the Life Cycle Assessment of the Italian cement industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.136 ↗
82. Ramagiri, K.K., Chintha, R., Bandlamudi, R.K., Kara De Maeijer, P., and Kar, A. (2021). Cradle-to-gate life cycle and economic assessment of sustainable concrete mixes—Alkali-activated concrete (Aac) and bacterial concrete (bc). Infrastructures, 6.10.3390/infrastructures6070104 ↗
83. Hybrid life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from cement, concrete and geopolymer concrete in Australia10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.122 ↗
84. Implementation of best available techniques in cement manufacturing: A life-cycle assessment study10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.055 ↗
85. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 ↗
86. Abdulkareem, M., Havukainen, J., Nuortila-Jokinen, J., and Horttanainen, M. (2021). Environmental and economic perspective of waste-derived activators on alkali-activated mortars. J. Clean. Prod., 280.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124651 ↗
87. Habert, G., D’Espinose De Lacaillerie, J.B., Lanta, E., and Roussel, N. (2010, January 28–30). Environmental Evaluation for Cement Substitution with Geopolymers. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, Ancona, Italy.
88. Habert, G., and Ouellet-Plamondon, C. (2016). Recent Update on the Environmental Impact of Geopolymers, RILEM.10.21809/rilemtechlett.v1.6 ↗
89. Komkova, A., and Habert, G. (2023). Environmental impact assessment of alkali-activated materials: Examining impacts of variability in constituent production processes and transportation. Constr. Build. Mater., 363.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129032 ↗
90. Nikravan, M., Firdous, R., and Stephan, D. (2023). Life cycle assessment of alkali-activated materials: A systematic literature review. Low-Carbon Mater. Green Constr., 1.10.1007/s44242-023-00014-6 ↗
91. Greenhouse gas emissions of different fly ash based geopolymer concretes in building construction10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.311 ↗
92. A hybrid life cycle assessment of water treatment chemicals: An Australian experience10.1007/s11367-013-0574-4 ↗
93. Sodium Hydroxide Production from Seawater Desalination Brine: Process Design and Energy Efficiency10.1021/acs.est.8b01195 ↗
94. Environmental challenges of the chlor-alkali production: Seeking answers from a life cycle approach10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.202 ↗
95. Life cycle assessment of caustic soda production: A case study in China10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.009 ↗
96. Medina-Martos, E., Gálvez-Martos, J.L., Almarza, J., Lirio, C., Iribarren, D., Valente, A., and Dufour, J. (2022). Environmental and economic performance of carbon capture with sodium hydroxide. J. CO2 Util., 60.10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101991 ↗
97. Raza, M.H., Khan, M., and Zhong, R.Y. (2024). Strength, porosity and life cycle analysis of geopolymer and hybrid cement mortars for sustainable construction. Sci. Total Environ., 907.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167839 ↗
98. Utilization of Desalination Brine for Sodium Hydroxide Production: Technologies, Engineering Principles, Recovery Limits, and Future Directions10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02276 ↗
99. Sala, S., and Crenna, E. (2017). Global Normalisation Factors for the Environmental Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment, Publications Office of the European Union.
100. Hou, C., Yang, L., Li, L., and Yan, B. (2022). Mechanical Characteristics and Stress Evolution of Cemented Paste Backfill: Effect of Curing Time, Solid Content, and Binder Content. Front. Mater., 8.10.3389/fmats.2021.812402 ↗