Fault Identification of Seismic Data Based on SEU-Net Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Fault interpretation is a key link in seismic data interpretation. With the continuous increase in seismic data volume in original production, manual fault picking cannot efficiently handle massive seismic data. With the development of artificial intelligence technology, the automatic and rapid picking of faults has become a hot topic in the application of deep learning methods in the field of seismic data interpretation. Therefore, this paper proposes a seismic data fault identification method based on SEU-Net. The SEU-Net network introduces SE blocks on the basis of the original U-Net network, enhancing the weights of effective channels through adaptive feature recalibration, and combines a multi-scale feature fusion strategy to improve the model’s ability to identify fault edges and minor faults. The experimental results show that compared with the original U-Net network, the SEU-Net network exhibits higher fault identification accuracy and robustness both in synthetic seismic data and original work area data. This research provides an efficient and automated solution for fault detection in seismic data and it holds certain theoretical value and practical application potential.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Advanced Data Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
Exploration and Development Research Institute of Sinopec Northwest Oilfield Company, Urumchi 830011, China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Research on Seismic Fault Identification Methods Based on Improved UNet++
2. Automated fault detection in the Arabian Basin10.1190/geo2021-0474.1 ↗
3. Fault detection on seismic structural images using a nested residual U-Net
4. Automatic fault detection on seismic images using a multiscale attention convolutional neural network10.1190/geo2020-0945.1 ↗
5. Learning from unlabelled real seismic data: Fault detection based on transfer learning10.1111/1365-2478.13097 ↗
6. 3D fault detection: Using human reasoning to improve performance of convolutional neural networks10.1190/geo2020-0905.1 ↗
7. Research progress of deep learning in seismic fault interpretation
8. 3-D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features: The coherence cube10.1190/1.1437077 ↗
9. The calculation method of curvature attributes and its effect analysis
10. Application of an ant-tracking technique based on spectral de-composition to fault characterization
11. Pedersen, S.I., Randen, T., Sonneland, L., and Steen, Ø. (2002). Automatic fault extraction using artificial ants. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.1817297 ↗
12. Faults identification of seismic data based on Transformer
13. Fault detection using a convolutional neural network trained with point-spread function-convolution-based samples10.1190/geo2021-0824.1 ↗
14. Di, H.B., Wang, Z., and AlRegib, G. (2018, January 14–19). Why using CNN for seismic interpretation? An investigation. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1190/segam2018-2997155.1 ↗
15. Fault recognition based on affinity propagation clustering and principal component analysis
16. A scalable deep learning platform for identifying geologic features from seismic attributes10.1190/tle36030249.1 ↗
17. FaultSeg3D: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation10.1190/geo2018-0646.1 ↗
18. FaultNet3D: Predicting Fault Probabilities, Strikes, and Dips With a Single Convolutional Neural Network10.1109/TGRS.2019.2925003 ↗
19. Common-azimuth seismic data fault analysis using residual UNet10.1190/INT-2019-0173.1 ↗
20. Tang, Z.X., Wu, B.Y., Wu, W.H., and Ma, D.B. (2023). Fault detection via 2.5D transformer U-Net with seismic data pre-processing. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15041039 ↗
21. Automatic fault recognition with residual network and transfer learning
22. Seismic fault interpretation based on deep convolutional neural networks
23. Fault Identification of Post Stack Seismic Data by Improved Unet Network
24. Three-dimensional fault identification using RAtte-UNet
25. Building realistic structure models to train convolutional neural networks for seismic structural interpretation10.1190/geo2019-0375.1 ↗
26. Guarido, M., Wozniakowska, P., Emery, D.J., Lume, M., Trad, D.O., and Innanen, K.A. (October, January 26). Fault detection in seismic volumes using a 2.5D residual neural networks approach. Proceedings of the First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy Expanded Abstracts, Denver, CO, USA.
27. Fully connected U-Net and its application on reconstructing successively sampled seismic data10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3271518 ↗
28. Automatic geologic fault identification from seismic data using 2.5D channel attention U-Net10.1190/geo2021-0805.1 ↗
29. MTL-FaultNet: Seismic data reconstruction assisted multitask deep learning 3-D fault interpretation
30. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015, January 5–9). U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015 Part III, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
31. Hu, J., Li, S., and Sun, G. (2018, January 18–22). Squeeze-and-excitation networks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗