journal article·2025-09-17Open access

Structural Optimization and Performance Study of Squeeze Casting Suspension Arm Under Multi-Condition Loads

Sen Deng, Aohua Zhou, Yun Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 18

Abstract

The suspension arm is a crucial connecting component in the automotive powertrain system, required to withstand various working condition loads, thus necessitating high mechanical performance. With the continuous development of forming processes, the forming method of suspension arms has gradually shifted from traditional gravity casting to squeeze casting. Along with the demand for automotive lightweighting, there is an urgent need for lightweight requirements in suspension arm components. This study employs a multi-condition topology optimization method, incorporating the forming requirements of the squeeze casting process, to conduct lightweight design of a certain mounting bracket. The filling and solidification processes were numerically simulated using Anycasting, followed by mechanical property testing and microstructure analysis of the product. The results revealed that the topology-optimized suspension arm met the strength and stiffness requirements under all working conditions, with a mass reduction of approximately 54.7% compared to the pre-optimized version. Based on the forming process analysis of the suspension arm, the design of its squeeze casting mold was completed. Using AnyCasting software (AnyCasting 6.7), numerical simulations of the filling and solidification processes of the suspension arm were conducted. Combined with theoretical calculations, the forming process parameters for the suspension arm were finally determined as follows: extrusion speed of 15 cm/s-10 cm/s-5 cm/s (multi-stage speed), pouring temperature of 690 °C, mold temperature of 250 °C, extrusion pressure of 81.4 MPa, and holding time of 45 s. Through T6 heat treatment, the tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation after fracture of the suspension arm reached 326.05 MPa, 276.87 MPa, and 9.68%, respectively. Metallographic analysis showed that the eutectic silicon in the T6 heat-treated specimens was primarily spherical in shape, uniformly distributed without significant clustering. The reason for this difference may be that heat treatment affects the boundary dissolution degree of alloying elements. For eutectic Al-Si alloys, the boundary dissolution and diffusion of alloying elements are accelerated, which is beneficial for improving the mechanical properties of the alloy. Finally, in order to quantitatively analyze the microstructural properties of the material after heat treatment, analyses of secondary dendrite arm spacing and porosity were conducted, leading to the conclusion that the microstructure after heat treatment is more uniform and dense.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Topology Optimization in Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Lanzhou Petrochemical University of Vocational Technology, Lanzhou 730060, China

School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China

Hubei Longzhong Laboratory, Xiangyang 441100, China

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Tomlin, M., and Meyer, J. (2011, January 10). Topology optimization of an additive layer manufactured (ALM)aerospace part. Proceedings of the 7th Altair CAE Technology Conference, Warwickshire, UK.
2. Dubrovskaya, A., Dongauzer, K., and Faskhutdinov, R. (2017). The design of lightweight gas turbine engine parts using topology optimization. MATEC Web Conf., 129.10.1051/matecconf/201712901067 ↗
3. Mamun, M.M., Singh, H.K., and Ray, T. (2022). An Approach for Computationally Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization Problems with Independently Evaluable Objectives. Swarm Evol. Comput., 75.10.1016/j.swevo.2022.101146 ↗
4. Finding Top-K Solutions for the Decision-Maker in Multiobjective Optimization10.1016/j.ins.2022.09.001 ↗
5. Guest Editorial Special Issue on Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization in Machine Learning10.1109/TEVC.2023.3292528 ↗
6. Zhang, H., Li, H., Li, R., Liu, B., Wu, R., Zhao, D., and Li, S. (2023). Effect of Initial Microstructure Prior to Extrusion on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Extruded AZ80 Alloy with a Low Temperature and a Low Ratio. Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 36.10.1186/s10033-023-00901-w ↗
7. Novel Collaborative Design Method for Lightweight Optimization Design of Vehicle Load-Bearing Parts10.1007/s12239-023-0103-9 ↗
8. Jiang, J., Li, Z., Hu, Y., Chen, S., Song, Y., and Hu, L. (2024). Density-based Topology Optimization of Multi-Condition Peening Pattern for Laser Peen Forming. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 267.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.108968 ↗
9. Structural multi-objective topology optimization in the design and additive manufacturing of spatial structure joints10.1007/s13296-022-00597-z ↗
10. Gunantara, N. (2018). A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications. Cogent Eng., 5.10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242 ↗
11. Nonlinear dynamic response topology optimization using the equivalent static loads method10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.015 ↗
12. Sojobi, A.O., and Liew, K.M. (2021). Flexural Behaviour and Efficiency of CFRP-laminate Reinforced Recycled Concrete Beams: Optimization Using Linear Weighted Sum Method. Compos. Struct., 260.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113259 ↗
13. Structural Design of Special Vehicle Components Based on Topology Optimization10.1007/s12239-023-0045-2 ↗
14. Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code10.1007/s00158-010-0594-7 ↗
15. Performance indicators and analytic hierarchy process to evaluate water supply services management in Algeria10.2166/aqua.2024.040 ↗
16. The effects of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of rheocasting ADC12 aluminum alloy10.1016/j.matpr.2017.10.127 ↗
17. Natural aging behavior in pre-aged Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloys with and without Zn addition10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.244 ↗
18. Kan, W.H., Huang, S., Man, Z., Yang, L., Huang, A., Chang, L., Nadot, Y., Cairney, J.M., and Proust, G. (2021). Effect of T6 treatment on additively-manufactured AlSi10Mg sliding against ceramic and steel. Wear, 482–483.10.1016/j.wear.2021.203961 ↗
19. Influence of Y Content and T6 Heat Treatment on the Organization and Mechanical Properties of Cast A356 Aluminum Alloy10.1080/10584587.2024.2324676 ↗