The Influence of Digital Capabilities on Elderly Pedestrians’ Road-Sharing Acceptance with Autonomous Vehicles: A Case Study of Wuhan, China
Source abstract
Abstract
While autonomous vehicles (AVs) are increasingly integrated into urban mobility, little is known about how digital capability shapes elderly pedestrians’ willingness to share roads with these technologies. This is especially true in the absence of explicit vehicle–pedestrian communication mechanisms. To address this gap, we combine the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) with the Pedestrian Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ) and segment elderly pedestrians using Latent Class Analysis (LCA). A sample of 750 older adults in Wuhan, China, was divided into two latent groups: digitally disengaged (70.8%) and digitally engaged (29.2%). Classification was based on four indicators: smart device usage, online social interaction, online entertainment, and online economic behavior. We then applied ordered logit models to estimate group-specific determinants of AV road-sharing acceptance. Results reveal clear heterogeneity across digital capability levels. For digitally disengaged seniors, positive pedestrian behaviors significantly increased willingness (β = 0.316, p = 0.001). Prior accident experience reduced willingness (0 accident: β = 0.435, p = 0.021; 1–2 accidents: β = −0.518, p = 0.012). For digitally engaged seniors, perceived behavioral control showed a marginally positive effect (β = 0.353, p = 0.066). Errors had a significant positive effect (β = 0.540, p = 0.009). Positive behaviors had a significant negative effect (β = −0.414, p = 0.007). These patterns indicate that digital capability not only modulates the strength of TPB pathways but also reshapes behavior–intention linkages captured by PBQ dimensions. Methodologically, the study contributes an integrated TPB–PBQ–LCA–OLM framework. This framework identifies digital capability as a critical moderator of AV acceptance among elderly pedestrians. Practically, the findings suggest differentiated strategies. For digitally disengaged users, interventions should build digital literacy and reinforce safe walking norms. For digitally engaged users, strategies should prioritize transparent AV intent signaling and features that enhance perceived control.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Older Adults Driving Studies · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Transportation and Mobility Innovations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China
Funding
Wuhan Pilot construction of a strong Transportation Country Science and Technology Joint Research Projects
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. Wuhan Municipal Bureau of Information Industry and Wuhan Municipal Information Center (2024, March 11). Wuhan Becomes World’s Largest Autonomous Driving Operation Service Region, Available online: https://english.wuhan.gov.cn/H_1/NWP/202403/t20240311_2370634.shtml.
2. A Human Factors Perspective on Automated Driving10.1080/1463922X.2017.1293187 ↗
3. Mao, Y., Mei, Q., Jing, P., Zha, Y., Xue, Y., Huang, J., Shao, D., and Luo, P. (2022). Factors Affecting the Parental Intention of Using AVs to Escort Children: An Integrated SEM—Hybrid Choice Model Approach. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141811640 ↗
4. On Optimizing Driving Patterns of Autonomous Cargo Bikes as a Function of Distance and Speed—A Psychological Study10.1109/OJITS.2022.3198120 ↗
5. Qiu, Y., Zheng, B., Jiang, B., Jiang, S., and Zou, C. (2025). Effect of non-structural components on over-track building vibrations induced by train operations on concrete floor. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 2650180.10.1142/S0219455426501804 ↗
6. Wu, J., Han, B., Zhang, Y., Huang, C., Qiu, S., Feng, W., Liu, Z., and Zou, C. (2025). Enhancing Bolt Object Detection via AIGC-Driven Data Augmentation for Automated Construction Inspection. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15050819 ↗
7. Trauma by Traffic Accident in Elderly People: Risk Factors and Consequences10.1590/0104-07072017004220015 ↗
8. Mortalidade De Pedestres Em Acidentes De Trânsito No Brasil: Análise De Tendência Temporal, 1996–2015
9. Jobert, O., Dugdale, J., and Prédhumeau, M. (2023, January 6–9). Modelling and Simulating Age-Dependent Pedestrian Behaviours with an Autonomous Vehicle. Proceedings of the 37th International ECMS Conference on Modelling and Simulation (ECMS 2023), Florence, Italy.10.7148/2023-0473 ↗
10. Autonomous Vehicles That Interact with Pedestrians: A Survey of Theory and Practice10.1109/TITS.2019.2901817 ↗
11. User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A questionnaire study10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.024 ↗
12. Impact of risk perception and trust in autonomous vehicles on pedestrian crossing decision: Navigating the social-technological intersection with the ICLV model10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.05.001 ↗
13. An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.013 ↗
14. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view10.2307/30036540 ↗
15. Digital Media Literacy and Their Role at Elderly Live (Studies Phenomenology at Yang-Eyang School Community at Jember)10.52728/ijss.v4i1.641 ↗
16. IT Humanities Education Program to Improve Digital Literacy of the Elderly10.5430/jct.v11n5p138 ↗
17. Harada, S., Sato, D., Takagi, H., and Asakawa, C. (2013). Characteristics of Elderly User Behavior on Mobile Multi-Touch Devices. IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-40498-6_25 ↗
18. The Effect of Information Communication Technology Interventions on Reducing Social Isolation in the Elderly: A Systematic Review10.2196/jmir.4596 ↗
19. Benefits and Barriers: A Qualitative Study of Online Social Participation Among Widowed Older Adults in Southwest China10.1186/s12877-021-02381-w ↗
20. A Cross-generational Examination of Electronic Commerce Adoption10.1108/07363761111143150 ↗
21. Huang, T. (2023). Expanding the UTAUT2 Framework to Determine the Drivers of Mobile Shopping Behaviour Among Older Adults. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0295581 ↗
22. Pedestrian behavior interacting with autonomous vehicles during unmarked midblock multilane crossings: Role of infrastructure design, AV operations and signaling10.1016/j.trf.2023.11.003 ↗
23. Jayaraman, S.K., Creech, C., Tilbury, D.M., Yang, X.J., Pradhan, A.K., Tsui, K.M., and Robert, L.P. (2019). Pedestrian Trust in Automated Vehicles: Role of Traffic Signal and AV Driving Behavior. Front. Robot. AI, 6.10.3389/frobt.2019.00117 ↗
24. A comparison of pedestrian behavior in interactions with autonomous and human-driven vehicles: An extreme value theory approach10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.006 ↗
25. Designing the Interaction of Automated Vehicles with Other Traffic Participants: A Literature Overview
26. Functional Declines as Indicators of Risky Street-Crossing Decisions in Older Pedestrians
27. Pedestrian Decision-Making in Interactions with Automated Vehicles: A Review and Framework
28. The Elderly Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicle Services in Beijing, China
29. Links between ease of use, perceived usefulness, and attitudes towards technology in older people
30. Systematic review of digital technology acceptance in older adults
31. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology10.2307/249008 ↗
32. Older Adults and New Technology: Mapping Review of Factors Associated with Intention to Adopt Digital Technologies10.2196/44564 ↗
33. Prosocial Behavior in Aging: Which Factors Can Explain Age-Related Differences in Social-Economic Decision Making?10.1017/S1041610219000061 ↗
34. Configuring the Older Non-User: Between Research, Policy and Practice of Digital Exclusion10.17645/si.v8i2.2607 ↗
35. The Theory of Planned Behavior10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T ↗
36. Older pedestrians’ crossing behavior and age-related vulnerability: A systematic literature review
37. The role of trust in influencing consumers’ adoption of autonomous vehicles
38. Investigating pedestrian crossing intentions when interacting with autonomous vehicles
39. Rothenbücher, D., Li, J., Sirkin, D., Mok, B., and Ju, W. (2016, January 26–31). Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles. Proceedings of the 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), New York, NY, USA.10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745210 ↗
40. Crossing roads safely: An experimental study of age differences in gap selection by pedestrians10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.017 ↗
41. Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x ↗
42. Gender differences in pedestrian rule compliance and visual search at signalized and unsignalized crossroads
43. Predicting the intention of distracted pedestrians to cross using a mobile phone in real-world environments10.1016/j.aap.2022.106707 ↗
44. The role of perceptual, cognitive, and motor abilities in street-crossing decisions of young and older pedestrians10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00835.x ↗
45. Conducting confirmatory latent class analysis using Mplus10.1080/10705511.2011.532732 ↗
46. Digital Healthcare Technology Adoption by Elderly People: A Capability Approach Model10.1016/j.tele.2019.101315 ↗
47. Digital inclusion and online participation of older adults
48. Exploring the role of digital literacy in supporting older adults’ online economic behavior
49. Comparison of technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to assess a priori acceptance of fully automated vehicles10.1016/j.tra.2022.103565 ↗
50. Jing, P., Xu, G., Chen, Y., Shi, Y., and Zhan, F. (2020). The determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12051719 ↗
51. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology10.2307/41410412 ↗
52. Patil, U., Kostareva, U., Hadley, M., Manganello, J.A., Okan, O., Dadaczynski, K., Massey, P.M., Agner, J., and Sentell, T. (2021). Health Literacy, Digital Health Literacy, and COVID-19 Pandemic Attitudes and Behaviors in U.S. College Students: Implications for Interventions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18063301 ↗
53. Ma, Q., Chan, A.H.S., and Teh, P.L. (2020). Bridging the Digital Divide for Older Adults via Observational Training: Effects of Model Identity from a Generational Perspective. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12114555 ↗
54. Developing and validating a measurement tool to self-report pedestrian safety-related behavior: The Pedestrian Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ)
55. Young and older adult pedestrians’ behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars10.1016/j.aap.2021.106256 ↗
56. A review of virtual reality studies on autonomous vehicle–pedestrian interaction10.1109/THMS.2021.3107517 ↗
57. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., and Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson College Division, Person.
58. On the Relationship Between Coefficient Alpha and Composite Reliability10.1037/a0030767 ↗
59. Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We’ll Take It from Here10.1037/met0000144 ↗
60. Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y ↗
61. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error10.1177/002224378101800104 ↗
62. Regression Model Selection—A Residual Likelihood Approach10.1111/1467-9868.00335 ↗
63. Digital Engagement of Older Adults: Scoping Review10.2196/40192 ↗
64. Awdziej, M., Lipowski, M., and Wolniak, R. (2025, February 05). Personal Innovativeness as Moderator of the Acceptance of Smart Transportation Solutions. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie. Available online: https://managementpapers.polsl.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/209-Awdziej-Lipowski-Wolniak.pdf.
65. Healthcare Staff Digital Literacy Levels and Their Attitudes Towards Information Systems10.1177/1460458219839613 ↗
66. Tegegne, M.D., Tilahun, B., Mamuye, A., Kerie, H., Nurhussien, F., Zemen, E., Mebratu, A., Sisay, G., Getachew, R., and Gebeyehu, H. (2023). Digital Literacy Level and Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in a Referral and Teaching Hospital: An Implication for Future Digital Health Systems Implementation. Front. Public Health, 11.10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130894 ↗
67. Nordhoff, S., Stapel, J., He, X., Gentner, A., and Happee, R. (2023). Do Driver’s Characteristics, System Performance, Perceived Safety, and Trust Influence How Drivers Use Partial Automation? A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis. Front. Psychol., 14.10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125031 ↗
68. How People Speak About Autonomous Cars—An Analysis of Internet Discussions in Czech Republic10.5507/tots.2021.014 ↗
69. Aldakkhelallah, A., Alamri, A.S., Georgiou, S., and Simic, M. (2023). Public Perception of the Introduction of Autonomous Vehicles. World Electr. Veh. J., 14.10.20944/preprints202310.1168.v1 ↗
70. Ahmad, A., Rasul, T., Yousaf, A., and Zaman, U. (2020). Understanding Factors Influencing Elderly Diabetic Patients’ Continuance Intention to Use Digital Health Wearables: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 6.10.3390/joitmc6030081 ↗
71. Liu, H., Li, S., and Wen, H. (2024). Effect of Smart Construction Technology Characteristics on the Safety Performance of Construction Projects: An Empirical Analysis Based on Structural Equation Modeling. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14071894 ↗
72. Digital Competence: Where Do the Higher Education Teachers Stand?10.13189/ujer.2021.091005 ↗
73. Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model on Democratic Education of Student Teachers in Spain10.1177/17461979221084111 ↗
74. In Automatic We Trust: Investigating the Impact of Trust, Control, Personality Characteristics, and Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations on the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles10.1080/10447318.2019.1572353 ↗
75. Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education?10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266 ↗
76. Exploring students’ digital informal learning: The roles of digital competence and DTPB factors10.1080/0144929X.2020.1752800 ↗
77. Examining the Impact of Age and Gender on Drivers’ Perceptions Toward Autonomous Vehicles Before and After Autonomous Driving Simulator Exposure10.18280/ijtdi.070203 ↗
78. Lee, S.H., Britten, N., Block, A., Pandya, A., Jung, M.F., and Schmitt, P. (2023). Coming In! Communicating Lane Change Intent in Autonomous Vehicles. Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM.10.1145/3568294.3580113 ↗
79. Mishra, A., Kim, J., Cha, J., Kim, D., and Kim, S. (2021). Authorized Traffic Controller Hand Gesture Recognition for Situation-Aware Autonomous Driving. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21237914 ↗