Preliminary Design and Parametric Study of Minimum-Weight Steel Tied-Arch Bridges Obtained According to a Maximum Allowable Deflection Criterion
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we present a novel iterative method that minimizes the weight of an all-steel arch bridge during the in-plane preliminary design stage. The behavior of the bridge is assumed to be contained within the plane of the arch. The preliminary design is assumed to be governed by the maximum allowable static deflection at a given checkpoint at the deck under a simplified load combination selected by the designer. The designer can select variables commonly used in preliminary design, such as the web slenderness of the cross-sections of both the arch and the deck and their relative flexural stiffness levels. Moreover, the general method is particularized for tied-arch bridges with vertical hangers: its iterative flowchart is adapted, an approximate analytical formulation that allows manual calculations is provided, and a parametric study that illustrates the effect of the main variables on the weight of the bridge is carried out. The main design recommendations drawn from this research for minimizing the weight of a bridge are as follows: a rise/span ratio between 1/5 and 1/7; cross-sections with significantly different stiffnesses in the arch and deck, ideally with highly flexible arches; and cross-sections with the thinnest possible webs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mining and Civil Engineering Department, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (UPCT), Paseo Alfonso XIII, 50, 30203 Cartagena, Spain
Funding
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Stavridis, L. (2010). Structural Systems: Behaviour and Design, Thomas Telford.10.1680/ssbd.41059 ↗
2. Steel and composite tied-arch bridges: A conceptual approach to structural design
3. Mermigas, K.K., and Wang, H. (2007, January 12–14). Comparative Study of the Proportions and Efficiency of Steel Arch Bridges. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Arch Bridges, Funchal, Portugal.
4. Manterola-Armisén, J. (2006). Puentes (Bridge Engineering), Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos. (In Spanish).
5. Lebet, J.P., and Hirt, M.A. (2013). Steel Bridges, EPFL Press.
6. Leonhardt, F. (1982). Bridges/Brücken, The Architectural Press.
7. Menn, C. (1989). Prestressed Concrete Bridges, Birkhäuser Verlag.10.1007/978-3-0348-9131-8 ↗
8. Comparative Study of the Proportions, Form, and Efficiency of Concrete Arch Bridges10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000537 ↗
9. Optimization of geometric parameters of arch bridges using visual programming FEM components and genetic algorithm10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112465 ↗
10. Jorquera-Lucerga, J.J. (2018). Form-Finding of Funicular Geometries in Spatial Arch Bridges through Simplified Force Density Method. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8122553 ↗
11. A form-finding method for spatial arch bridges based on inverse hanging method10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.058 ↗
12. Economy of High Strength Steel Structural Members10.1061/TACEAT.0008791 ↗
13. (2003). Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures-Part 2: Traffic Loads on Bridges, CEN.
14. (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, CEN.
15. Argüelles Álvarez, R. (2005). Estructuras de Acero: Cálculo (Steel Structures: Analysis), Bellisco, Ediciones Técnicas y Científicas. [2nd ed.]. (In Spanish).
16. Design optimization of 3D steel structures: Genetic algorithms vs. classical techniques10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.02.005 ↗
17. Genetic evolutionary structural optimization10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.08.002 ↗
18. Saka, M.P., Geem, Z.W., and Shen, P.S. (2013). Mathematical and Metaheuristic Applications in Design Optimization of Steel Frame Structures: An Extensive Review. Math. Probl. Eng., 271031.10.1155/2013/271031 ↗
19. Billington, D.P. (1979). Robert Maillart’s Bridges: The Art of Engineering, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691216072 ↗
20. Predimensionamiento gráfico multicriterio en el plano de secciones metálicas bisimétricas (Graphical Multi-Criteria in-Plane Preliminary Sizing of Bisymmetrical All-Metal Cross-Sections)10.3989/ic.82283 ↗
21. García-Guerrero, J.M. (2018). El Puente Arco Espacial Como una Evolución Tipológica (The Spatial Arch Bridge as a Typological Evolution). [Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Cartagena]. (In Spanish).
22. Park, G., and Hewson, N. (2008). ICE Manual of Bridge Engineering, Thomas Telford. [2nd ed.].
23. Considerations for Design of Network Arches10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:10(2189) ↗
24. Investigation of the arch in-plane buckling behaviour in arch bridges10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.035 ↗
25. In-plane nonlinear buckling analysis of circular arches considering shear deformation10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105762 ↗
26. Prediction of the elastoplastic in-plane buckling of parabolic steel arch bridges10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.105988 ↗
27. Strasky, J. (2011). Stress Ribbon and Cable Supported Pedestrian Bridges, ICE Publishing. [2nd ed.].10.1680/srcspb.41462 ↗
28. Ministerio de Fomento de España (2011). Instrucción Sobre las Acciones a Considerar en el Proyecto de Puentes de Carretera, (IAP-11), Ministerio de Fomento.
29. Anejo Nacional Para el Eurocódigo 0: Bases de Cálculo de Estructuras y Anejo A2: Aplicación a Puentes. Standard No. AN/UNE-EN 1990. (In Spanish).
30. Nettleton, D.A. (1977). Arch Bridges, U.S. Department of Transportation.
31. Buchholdt, H.A. (1999). An Introduction to Cable Roof Structures, Thomas Telford. [2nd ed.].
32. The MathWorks Inc (2017). Matlab, The MathWorks Inc.. R2017.
33. Computers and Structures, Inc. (2024). Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000® v 26, CSI.