The Effect of Metal Artefacts in Guided Implant Placement: A Review on the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Surgical Implant Template
Source abstract
Abstract
Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) using 3D-printed surgical templates has become a preferred approach for improving implant placement accuracy. Despite its clinical advantages over conventional freehand techniques, CAIS remains limited by the presence of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) metal artefacts, which compromise the 3D data alignment during implant planning and guide fabrication. This narrative review aims to explore the impact of metal artefacts on the accuracy of 3D-printed surgical implant templates and to evaluate current approaches and modifications in implant planning workflows. This article reviews accuracy studies, case reports and technology research on CAIS from the past 5 years. It summarised the CAIS clinical decision framework and data alignment methods to provide alternatives for guided implant therapy in the future. Studies indicate that metal artefacts can distort anatomical data, leading to potential misalignment in 3D data superimposition during surgical guide designs and fabrication. However, various strategies have shown promise in reducing these distortions. Accurate implant planning and template fabrication are essential to ensure clinical success. Special consideration should be given to artefact management during data acquisition. Modified workflows that account for the presence of metal artefacts can enhance guide precision and improve patient outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Radiography and Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Complications and Treatment Errors in Implant Positioning in the Aesthetic Zone: Diagnosis and Possible Solutions10.1111/prd.12474 ↗
2. Complications in Implant Dentistry10.4103/ejd.ejd_340_16 ↗
3. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed10.11607/prd.3254 ↗
4. Cristache, C.M., and Gurbanescu, S. (2017). Accuracy Evaluation of a Stereolithographic Surgical Template for Dental Implant Insertion Using 3D Superimposition Protocol. Int. J. Dent.10.1155/2017/4292081 ↗
5. Accuracy Evaluation of Computer-Designed Surgical Guide Template in Oral Implantology10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.022 ↗
6. Pyo, S.W., Lim, Y.J., Koo, K.T., and Lee, J. (2019). Methods Used to Assess the 3D Accuracy of Dental Implant Positions in Computer-Guided Implant Placement: A Review. J. Clin. Med., 8.10.3390/jcm8010054 ↗
7. Types of Implant Surgical Guides in Dentistry: A Review10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00018 ↗
8. The Influence of Metal Artifact Reduction on the Trueness of Registration of a Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scan with an Intraoral Scan in the Presence of Severe Restoration Artifact10.1111/jopr.13767 ↗
9. Does Partial Adhesive Preparation Design and Finish Line Depth Influence Trueness and Precision of Intraoral Scanners?10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.017 ↗
10. Understanding the Meaning of Accuracy, Trueness and Precision10.1007/s00769-006-0191-z ↗
11. Accuracy, Trueness, and Precision—A Guideline for the Evaluation of these Basic Values in Digital Dentistry
12. Static Surgical Guides and Dynamic Navigation in Implant Surgery10.1007/978-3-031-06223-0_6 ↗
13. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Static versus Dynamic Computer-assisted Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104487 ↗
14. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of 3D Printing Orientation on the Accuracy of Implant Surgical Templates Fabricated by Desktop Printer10.1111/jopr.13485 ↗
15. Influence of Implant Position on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning in Fully Edentulous Arches: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.008 ↗
16. Liu, C., Mohd-Said, S., Leong, X.F., and Tew, I.M. (2025). Effect of Metal Artifacts in Cone-beam Computed Tomography on Accuracy of Implant Placement by Static and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants., 1–29.10.11607/jomi.11183 ↗
17. Is Digital Guided Implant Surgery Accurate and Reliable?10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.006 ↗
18. Impact of Radiographic Field-of-View Volume on Alignment Accuracy during Virtual Implant Planning: A Noninterventional Retrospective Pilot Study10.1111/clr.13983 ↗
19. Registration Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Surface and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Data for Virtual Implant Planning10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02159.x ↗
20. A Digitally Guided Dual Technique for Both Gingival and Bone Resection during Crown Lengthening Surgery10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.018 ↗
21. Validity of Student Worksheet Based on Guided Inquiry Learning Model Assisted by Digital Practicum Tool10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012058 ↗
22. Creating a Virtual Patient for Completely Edentulous Computer-Aided Implant Surgery: A Dental Technique10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.026 ↗
23. Accuracy and Efficiency of a Dynamic Navigation System for Locating Calcified Canals10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.014 ↗
24. Lopes, A., Nobre, M.A., and Santos, D. (2020). The Workflow of a New Dynamic Navigation System for the Insertion of Dental Implants in the Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws: Report of Two Cases. J. Clin. Med., 9.10.3390/jcm9020421 ↗
25. Implant Placement is More Accurate Using Dynamic Navigation10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.026 ↗
26. Edelmann, C., Wetzel, M., Knipper, A., Luthardt, R.G., and Schnutenhaus, S. (2021). Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation in Implant Placement with a Fully Digital Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10091808 ↗
27. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement—Model-Based Evaluation10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025 ↗
28. Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Implant Placement with Insertion Templates
29. Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients with an Intraoral Scanner and Old Complete Denture10.1111/jopr.13073 ↗
30. Adaptation of an Interim Partial Removable Dental Prosthesis as a Radiographic Template for Implant Placement10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.004 ↗
31. Radiopaque Dental Impression Method for Radiographic Interpretation, Digital Alignment, and Surgical Guide Fabrication for Dental Implant Placement10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.022 ↗
32. Effect of Fabrication Methods and Number of Supporting Teeth on the Surface Accuracy and Dimensional Stability of Implant Surgical Guides10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.031 ↗
33. Accuracy Comparison of Guided Surgery for Dental Implants According to the Tissue of Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1111/clr.12841 ↗
34. Use of Stereolithographic Templates for Surgical and Prosthodontic Implant Planning and Placement. Part I. The concept10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00069.x ↗
35. Implant Surgical Guides: From the Past to the Present10.4103/0975-7406.113306 ↗
36. Conversion of an Implant Radiographic Template into a Surgical Template10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00108.x ↗
37. Radiographic Template Used to Facilitate the Alignment of Digital Scans to Computed Tomography Scans with Extensive Beam Hardening Artifacts10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.018 ↗
38. Radiographic Markers for Merging Virtual Data Sets10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.007 ↗
39. A Technique for Registering Digital Dental Casts onto Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans with Excessive Metallic Artifacts10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.018 ↗
40. Radiopaque Fiducial Markers as an Aid to Fabrication of an Implant Surgical Guide for a Patient with Orthodontic Brackets: A Dental Technique10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.029 ↗
41. The Impact of Metal Artifacts within Cone Beam Computed Tomography Data on the Accuracy of Computer-Based Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study10.11607/jomi.7108 ↗
42. Accuracy and Practicality of Intraoral Scanner in Dentistry: A Literature Review10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.010 ↗
43. Accuracy of Digital Technologies for the Scanning of Facial, Skeletal, and Intraoral Tissues: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.015 ↗
44. Nada, R.M., Maal, T.J.J., Breuning, K.H., Bergé, S.J., Mostafa, Y.A., and Kuijpers-Jagtman, A.M. (2011). Accuracy and Reproducibility of Voxel Based Superimposition of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Models on the Anterior Cranial Base and the Zygomatic Arches. PLoS ONE, 6.10.1371/journal.pone.0016520 ↗
45. Different Techniques of Static/Dynamic Guided Implant Surgery: Modalities and Indications10.1111/prd.12056 ↗
46. Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Placement in Long Span Edentulous Area by Novice Implant Clinicians: A Cross-Sectional In Vitro Study Comparing Fully-Guided, Pilot-Guided, and Freehand Implant Placement Protocols10.1111/cid.12998 ↗
47. Evaluation of Artifacts Generated by Titanium, Zirconium, and Titanium–Zirconium Alloy Dental Implants on MRI, CT, and CBCT Images: A Phantom Study10.1016/j.oooo.2019.01.074 ↗
48. A Radiopaque Implant Template for Partially Edentulous Patients10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60085-6 ↗
49. Surgical Planning and Prosthesis Construction Using Computed Tomography, CAD/CAM Technology, and the Internet for Immediate Loading of Dental Implants10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00029.x ↗
50. Predictable Implant Placement with a Diagnostic/Surgical Template and Advanced Radiographic Imaging10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00198-7 ↗
51. A Chairside Digital Radiographic Guide for Registering Digital Casts to Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans with Strong Metallic Artifacts10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.025 ↗
52. A Novel Workflow for Computer Guided Implant Surgery Matching Digital Dental Casts and CBCT Scan
53. Newly Developed Data-Matching Methodology for Oral Implant Surgery Allowing the Automatic Deletion of Metal Artifacts in 3D-CT Images Using New Reference Markers: A Case Report10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_429 ↗
54. Radiopaque Marker Impression and 3D Boolean Inversion for Metal Artifact-Distorted Same-Day Implant Planning: A Digital Workflow
55. Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients: A Case Report10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.008 ↗
56. Influence of Windowing and Evaluation of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm on Five Different Restorative Materials by Using Different Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Scanners: A CBCT Study
57. Radiopacity of Dental Materials: An Overview10.17795/ajdr-36847 ↗