Improving Segmentation Accuracy for Asphalt Pavement Cracks via Integrated Probability Maps
Source abstract
Abstract
Asphalt crack segmentation is essential for preventive maintenance but is sensitive to noise, viewpoint, and illumination. This study evaluates a minimally invasive strategy that augments standard RGB input with an auxiliary fourth channel—a crack-probability map generated by a multi-scale ensemble of classifiers—and injects it into segmentation backbones. Field imagery from unmanned aerial vehicles and action cameras was used to train and compare U-Net, ENet, HRNet, and DeepLabV3+ under unified settings; the probability map was produced by an ensemble of lightweight convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Across models, the four-channel configuration improved performance over three-channel baselines; for DeepLabV3+, the Intersection over Union (IoU) increased by 6.41%. Transformer-based classifiers, despite strong accuracy, proved less effective and slower than lightweight CNNs for probability-map generation; the final ensemble processed images in approximately 0.63 s each. Integrating ensemble-derived probability maps yielded consistent gains, with the best four-channel CNNs surpassing YOLO11x-seg and Transformer baselines while remaining practical. This study presents a systematic evaluation showing that probability maps from classifier ensembles can serve as an auxiliary channel to improve segmentation of asphalt pavement cracks, providing a novel modular complement or alternative to attention mechanisms. The findings demonstrate a practical and effective strategy for enhancing automated pavement monitoring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Advanced Neural Network Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
Institute of Civil Engineering and Architecture, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, 33028 Rivne, Ukraine
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Barrington-Leigh, C., and Millard-Ball, A. (2017). The World’s User-Generated Road Map Is More than 80% Complete. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0180698 ↗
2. Paved or Unpaved? A Deep Learning Derived Road Surface Global Dataset from Mapillary Street-View Imagery10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.02.020 ↗
3. StreetSurfaceVis: A Dataset of Crowdsourced Street-Level Imagery Annotated by Road Surface Type and Quality10.1038/s41597-024-04295-9 ↗
4. International Transport Forum (2025). Global Transport Infrastructure Investment Data Update, OECD Publishing/International Transport Forum. ITF Statistics Briefs.
5. Analysis of direct rework costs in Ukrainian construction10.24425/ace.2021.137175 ↗
6. Loprencipe, G., and Pantuso, A. (2017). A Specified Procedure for Distress Identification and Assessment for Urban Road Surfaces Based on PCI. Coatings, 7.10.3390/coatings7050065 ↗
7. Deep Learning-Based Concrete Defects Classification and Detection Using Semantic Segmentation10.1177/14759217231168212 ↗
8. Trach, R., Moshynskyi, V., Chernyshev, D., Borysyuk, O., Trach, Y., Striletskyi, P., and Tyvoniuk, V. (2022). Modeling the Quantitative Assessment of the Condition of Bridge Components Made of Reinforced Concrete Using ANN. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142315779 ↗
9. An Improved U-Net Model for Concrete Crack Detection
10. Zulfiqar, A., Cabieses, M., Mikhail, A., and Khan, N. (2014). Design of a Bridge Inspection System (BIS) to Reduce Time and Cost, George Mason University.
11. YOLO Series Target Detection Technology and Application10.54097/hset.v39i.6653 ↗
12. Chen, X., Liu, C., Chen, L., Zhu, X., Zhang, Y., and Wang, C. (2024). A Pavement Crack Detection and Evaluation Framework for a UAV Inspection System Based on Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202401.1925.v1 ↗
13. Zhang, J., Xia, H., Li, P., Zhang, K., Hong, W., and Guo, R. (2024). A Pavement Crack Detection Method via Deep Learning and a Binocular-Vision-Based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14051778 ↗
14. Zhang, H., Liu, J., and Hu, G. (2025). FCN Attention Enhancing Asphalt Pavement Crack Detection through Attention Mechanisms and Fully Convolutional Networks. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-92971-0 ↗
15. Zhang, Q., Chen, S., Wu, Y., Ji, Z., Yan, F., Huang, S., and Liu, Y. (2024). Improved U-Net Network Asphalt Pavement Crack Detection Method. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0300679 ↗
16. Data Generation for Asphalt Pavement Evaluation: Deep Learning-Based Insights from Generative Models
17. Elamin, A., and El-Rabbany, A. (2023). UAV-Based Image and LiDAR Fusion for Pavement Crack Segmentation. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23239315 ↗
18. Hamishebahar, Y., Guan, H., So, S., and Jo, J. (2022). A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning-Based Crack Detection Approaches. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031374 ↗
19. A Review of the Progress in Machine Vision-Based Crack Detection and Identification Technology for Asphalt Pavements10.48130/dts-0025-0006 ↗
20. Ma, N., Song, Z., Hu, Q., Liu, C.-W., Han, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, R., and Xie, L. (2025). Vehicular Road Crack Detection with Deep Learning: A New Online Benchmark for Comprehensive Evaluation of Existing Algorithms. arXiv.
21. A Novel Model for the Pavement Distress Segmentation Based on Multi-Level Attention DeepLabV3+10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109175 ↗
22. Network for Robust and High-Accuracy Pavement Crack Segmentation10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105375 ↗
23. Yu, Y., Xia, W., Zhao, Z., and He, B. (2024). A Lightweight and High-Accuracy Model for Pavement Crack Segmentation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142411632 ↗
24. DeepCrack: A Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning Architecture for Crack Segmentation10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.036 ↗
25. CrackFormer Network for Pavement Crack Segmentation10.1109/TITS.2023.3266776 ↗
26. Chen, S., Feng, Z., Xiao, G., Chen, X., Gao, C., Zhao, M., and Yu, H. (2024). Pavement Crack Detection Based on the Improved Swin-Unet Model. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14051442 ↗
27. Automatic Crack Detection on Concrete and Asphalt Surfaces Using Semantic Segmentation Network with Hierarchical Transformer10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117903 ↗
28. ConvNeXt-UperNet-Based Deep Learning Model for Road Extraction from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images
29. Pixel-Level Pavement Crack Segmentation Using UAV Remote Sensing Images Based on the ConvNeXt-UPerNet10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.072 ↗
30. A Multiscale Enhanced Pavement Crack Segmentation Network Coupling Spectral and Spatial Information of UAV Hyperspectral Imagery
31. Nooralishahi, P. (2022). Dataset for Drone-Based Inspection of Road Pavement Structures for Cracks. Mendeley.
32. A Cost Effective Solution for Pavement Crack Inspection Using Cameras and Deep Neural Networks10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119397 ↗
33. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
34. Paszke, A., Chaurasia, A., Kim, S., and Culurciello, E. (2016). ENet: A Deep Neural Network Architecture for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation. arXiv.
35. Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2983686 ↗
36. Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., and Adam, H. (2018, January 8–14). Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 ↗
37. Tyvoniuk, V., Trach, R., and Trach, Y. (2025). Integration of Probability Maps into Machine Learning Models for Enhanced Crack Segmentation in Concrete Bridges. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15063201 ↗
38. ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
39. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.-C. (2018). MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
40. Howard, A., Sandler, M., Chu, G., Chen, L.-C., Chen, B., Tan, M., Wang, W., Zhu, Y., Pang, R., and Vasudevan, V. (November, January 27). Searching for MobileNetV3. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
41. Ma, N., Zhang, X., Zheng, H.-T., and Sun, J. (2018, January 8–14). ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8 ↗
42. Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Lin, M., and Sun, J. (2017, January 21–26). ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00716 ↗
43. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2020). An Image Is Worth 16 × 16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. arXiv.
44. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021, January 11–17). Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer Using Shifted Windows. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
45. Hu, J., Shen, L., and Sun, G. (2018, January 18–23). Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
46. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., and Kweon, I.S. (2018, January 8–14). CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 ↗