journal article·2025-09-09Open access

Minimizing 3T MRI Geometric Distortions for Stereotactic Radiosurgery via Anterior–Posterior Phase Encoding–A Phantom Study

Bernardo Campilho, Sofia Silva, Sara Pinto, Pedro Conde, Joana Lencart, Bruno Mendes, João Santos

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 18

Abstract

To directly address the important issue of MRI geometric distortions in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning, we performed a phantom study of sequence acquisition optimization. This study analyzed, in particular, the effects of clinically relevant gadolinium (Gd) concentration as filling solution for the phantom, as well as phase encoding reversal direction and flip angle on distortion. We created a rigid geometric grid phantom with 840 fiducial markers for distortion quantification on a 3T MRI scanner. To choose the optimal filling solution, an anthropomorphic RANDO phantom was employed, and 1 mmol/L gadolinium was chosen due to clinical relevance. An automated Python-based software (version 3.7.1) was developed for efficient detection and matching of phantom inserts between MRI and CT scans. A series of MRI acquisition parameter optimizations were systematically evaluated. The standard SRS protocol exhibited the highest average distortion of 1.301 mm. Notably, reversing the phase-encoding direction to anterior–posterior (AP) reduced the mean distortion to 0.725 mm, a 44.27% decrease, while the maximum distortion was reduced by 15.65%. The AP phase sequence maintained acquisition time, SAR, SNR, and CNR within acceptable limits. Additional distortion reduction was achieved by increasing the flip angle from 12° to 18°. In this work, we succeeded in significantly reducing the mean distortion observed in phantom images. As the gadolinium concentration used in the phantom is clinically similar to the gadolinium concentration observed in patients undergoing MRI scans with contrast agents, the achieved distortion reduction is prospectively reproducible in patients.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · MRI in cancer diagnosis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal

High-Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and BME, Medical University of Vienna, 1009 Vienna, Austria

Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPO), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO/Porto), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal

Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal

Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO/Porto), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal

Radiotherapy Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO/Porto), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. New developments in mri for target volume delineation in radiotherapy10.1259/bjr/41321492 ↗
2. Consensus opinion on mri simulation for external beam radiation treatment planning10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.018 ↗
3. Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in mr images10.1118/1.2402331 ↗
4. Development of a geometrically accurate imaging protocol at 3 tesla mri for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning10.1088/0031-9155/55/22/002 ↗
5. A review of mr physics: 3t versus 1.5 t10.1016/j.mric.2007.06.002 ↗
6. Reliability of stereotactic coordinates of 1.5-tesla and 3-tesla mri in radiosurgery and functional neurosurgery10.3340/jkns.2014.55.3.136 ↗
7. Lavrador, R.F.D. (2010). Correction of Image Distortions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Intensity Inhomogeneities Correction and Evaluation. [PhD Thesis, Universidade de Coimbra].
8. Inhomogeneity correction using an estimated linear field map10.1002/mrm.1910350221 ↗
9. Aspects of mr image distortions in radiotherapy treatment planning10.1007/PL00002385 ↗
10. Simpson, J.H. (2012). Simpson. Chapter 2-instrumental considerations. Organic Structure Determination Using 2-D NMR Spectroscopy, Academic Press. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-384970-0.00002-8 ↗
11. B0 magnetic field homogeneity and shimming for in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy10.1016/j.ab.2016.06.003 ↗
12. Sense: Sensitivity encoding for fast mri10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199911)42:5<952::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
13. Liu, X., Li, Z., Rong, Y., Cao, M., Li, H., Jia, C., Shi, L., Lu, W., Gong, G., and Yin, Y. (2021). A comparison of the distortion in the same field mri and mr-linac system with a 3d printed phantom. Front. Oncol., 11.10.3389/fonc.2021.579451 ↗
14. Mri distortion: Considerations for mri based radiotherapy treatment planning10.1007/s13246-014-0252-2 ↗
15. Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.004 ↗
16. Distortion-free diffusion mri using an mri-guided tri-cobalt 60 radiotherapy system: Sequence verification and preliminary clinical experience10.1002/mp.12465 ↗
17. A simple and efficient methodology to improve geometric accuracy in gamma knife radiation surgery: Implementation in multiple brain metastases10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.08.349 ↗
18. Task group 284 report: Magnetic resonance imaging simulation in radiotherapy: Considerations for clinical implementation, optimization, and quality assurance
19. Geometric distortion in structural magnetic resonance imaging10.2174/1573405052953029 ↗
20. Fully-automated analysis of jaszczak phantom measurements as part of routine spect quality control10.1002/mp.12150 ↗
21. Spect: Single photon emission computed tomography10.1109/TNS.1980.4330986 ↗
22. MODUS (2025, August 29). Measuring Geometric Distortion with Sub-Millimeter Accuracy in Mrgrt qa. White Paper, 2021. Available online: https://modusqa.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/MRID3D_WhitePaper-v3_PRINT.pdf.
23. Gadolinium-based contrast agent use, their safety, and practice evolution10.34067/KID.0000272019 ↗
24. Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents for neuroradiology: An overview10.1016/j.mric.2012.08.004 ↗
25. Comparative study of the physicochemical properties of six clinical low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents10.1002/cmmi.100 ↗
26. Bettiol, M., Aragno, D., and Bencivenghi, A. (2013, January 16–19). RM phantom preparation with CuSO4 and NiCl2 water solutions. Proceedings of the Congresso Nazionale AIFM, Torino, Italy.
27. Aqueous paramagnetic solutions for mri phantoms at 3 t:A detailed study on relaxivities10.3906/elk-1602-123 ↗
28. Fabrication of anthropomorphic phantoms for use in total body irradiations studies10.1017/S1460396919000591 ↗
29. Anthropomorphic radiation therapy phantoms: A quantitative assessment of tissue substitutes10.1118/1.596552 ↗
30. DeWerd, L.A., and Kissick, M. (2014). The Phantoms of Medical and Health Physics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-8304-5 ↗
31. Silva, S., Pinto, S., Conde, P., Lencart, J., Machado, E., and Santos, J.A.M. (2022, January 7–10). Optimization of the 3t mri acquisition for radiosurgery patients using a customized head phantom. Proceedings of the FÍSICA 2022–23ª Conferência Nacional de Física e 32º Encontro Ibérico para o Ensino da Física, Porto, Portugal.
32. Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in mr images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters10.1002/jmri.20969 ↗
33. Seo, Y., and Wang, Z.J. (2021). Measurement and evaluation of specific absorption rate and temperature elevation caused by an artificial hip joint during mri scanning. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-020-80828-7 ↗
34. Critical questions regarding gadolinium deposition in the brain and body after injections of the gadolinium-based contrast agents, safety, and clinical recommendations in consideration of the ema’s pharmacovigilance and risk assessment committee recommendation for suspension of the marketing authorizations for 4 linear agents10.1097/RLI.0000000000000374 ↗
35. Gadolinium-based contrast agents: Why nephrologists need to be concerned10.1097/MNH.0000000000000475 ↗
36. Nickel chloride (nicl2) in hepatic toxicity: Apoptosis, g2/m cell cycle arrest and inflammatory response10.18632/aging.101108 ↗
37. Toxic effect of nickel in an in vitro model of human oral epithelium10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.05.019 ↗
38. Natural blue colourant preparations from blue pea flower and spirulina: A comparison stability study10.1016/j.focha.2023.100457 ↗
39. FDA (2013). Dotarem® (Gadoterate Meglumine) Injection for Intravenous Use.
40. Schilling, K.G., Blaber, J., Hansen, C., Cai, L., Rogers, B., Anderson, A.W., Smith, S., Kanakaraj, P., Rex, T., and Resnick, S.M. (2020). Distortion correction of diffusion weighted MRI without reverse phase-encoding scans or field-maps. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1101/2020.01.19.911784 ↗
41. Choosing the polarity of the phase-encoding direction in diffusion MRI: Does it matter for group analysis?10.1016/j.nicl.2016.03.022 ↗
42. Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Jiang, L., Fu, K., Xie, H., and Ran, Q. (2023). Effect of the phase encoding direction on the image quality of breast diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Preprint.10.21203/rs.3.rs-2758615/v1 ↗
43. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging10.1016/0730-725X(85)90397-2 ↗
44. Magnetic susceptibility of the elements and inorganic compounds
45. Metal-Induced Artifacts in MRI10.2214/AJR.11.7364 ↗
46. Geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT: Refining the CTV-PTV margin for contemporary photon radiotherapy