Improving Vertical Dimensional Accuracy in PBF-LB/M Through Artefact-Based Evaluation and Correction
Source abstract
Abstract
Achieving high dimensional accuracy in the build direction remains a critical challenge in laser-based powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M), particularly for taller components. This study investigates the application of the standardized Z-artefact defined in ISO/ASTM 52902:2023 to evaluate and correct vertical dimensional deviations in AlSi10Mg parts. Benchmark artefacts were produced without Z-scaling and measured using a structured light 3D scanner. A linear trend of increasing undersizing with build height was observed across two build jobs, indicating a systematic Z-error. Based on the reproducible average deviation, a shrinkage compensation factor of 1.0017 was derived and applied in a third build job using the same processing parameters. This correction reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) from over 100 µm to below 25 µm and improved the achievable ISO tolerance grades from IT 9–11 to IT 5–9. The approach proved effective without requiring changes to process parameters. However, local surface features such as elevated edges and roughness remained dominant sources of deviation and are not captured in step height-based evaluations. Overall, this study demonstrates a practical, standard-compliant method to improve vertical dimensional accuracy in PBF-LB/M, with potential applicability to industrial quality assurance and future extension to more complex geometries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Design and Production Engineering, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Funding
“dtec.bw—Digitalization and Technology Research Center of the Bundeswehr” · European Union—NextGenerationEU. · Universität der Bundeswehr München.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Additive manufacturing of metallic components–Process, structure and properties10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
2. Evaluating the Use of Additive Manufacturing in Industry Applications10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.004 ↗
3. Defect Formation Mechanisms in Selective Laser Melting: A Review10.1007/s10033-017-0121-5 ↗
4. Processing and characterization of Al-Si-Mg alloy made through 3D printing and comparison with equivalent cast alloy10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.004 ↗
5. Additive Manufacturing in the Context of Repeatability and Reliability10.1007/s11665-023-07897-3 ↗
6. A review on qualification and certification for metal additive manufacturing10.1080/17452759.2021.2018938 ↗
7. Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser melting10.1007/s11740-009-0192-y ↗
8. Investigation of the effect of scan vector length on residual stresses in selective laser melting of maraging steel 300
9. Optimization of surface roughness and dimensional accuracy in LPBF additive manufacturing10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107246 ↗
10. Investigation of the accuracy and roughness in the laser powder bed fusion process10.1080/17452759.2018.1426368 ↗
11. Electric discharge aided surface post-treatment of laser powder bed fused non-planar metallic components for enhanced form accuracy10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.12.028 ↗
12. Peng, X., Kong, L., Fuh, J.Y.H., and Wang, H. (2021). A Review of Post-Processing Technologies in Additive Manufacturing. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 5.10.3390/jmmp5020038 ↗
13. Fabricating high dimensional accuracy LPBFed Ti6Al4V part by using bi-parameter method10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.04.009 ↗
14. Ahmed, A., Majeed, A., Atta, Z., and Jia, G. (2019). Dimensional Quality and Distortion Analysis of Thin-Walled Alloy Parts of AlSi10Mg Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 3.10.3390/jmmp3020051 ↗
15. Giorgetti, A., Ceccanti, F., Baldi, N., Kemble, S., Arcidiacono, G., and Citti, P. (2024). Axiomatic Design of a Test Artifact for PBF-LM Machine Capability Monitoring. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12030199 ↗
16. Investigation into the shrinkage in Z-direction of components manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM)10.1007/s00170-016-9596-y ↗
17. Size effects on geometrical accuracy for additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V ELI parts10.1007/s00170-019-04184-1 ↗
18. Brenner, S., and Nedeljkovic-Groha, V. (2024). Enhancing Dimensional Accuracy in Laser Powder Bed Fusion by Scaling Factor Optimization and 3D Scanner Capability Analysis. RTe J.
19. Proposal of design rules for improving the accuracy of selective laser melting (SLM) manufacturing using benchmarks parts10.1108/RPJ-06-2021-0130 ↗
20. Geometrical Benchmarking of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Systems Based on Designer Needs10.1017/pds.2021.427 ↗
21. Dimensional accuracy of fabricated geometries through powder bed fusion: An overview and a new benchmark artifact proposal10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114361 ↗
22. A review on benchmark artifacts for evaluating the geometrical performance of additive manufacturing processes10.1007/s00170-017-0570-0 ↗
23. Benchmark Test Artifacts for Selective Laser Melting—A Critical Review10.2174/1872212115666210629124235 ↗
24. Test artefacts for additive manufacturing: A design methodology review10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.09.008 ↗
25. An Additive Manufacturing Test Artifact10.6028/jres.119.017 ↗
26. Castillo, L. (2005). Study About the Rapid Manufacturing of Complex Parts of Stainless Steel and Titanium, TNO. TNO Report with the Collaboration of AIMME.
27. On the Z-dimensional accuracy of L-powder bed fusion
28. Process Shrinkage and Accuracy during Indirect Laser Sintering of Aluminium10.1002/adem.200500265 ↗
29. Progress Towards Metal Additive Manufacturing Standardization to Support Qualification and Certification10.1007/s11837-017-2265-2 ↗
30. (2023). Additive Manufacturing—Test Artefacts—Geometric Capability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Systems. Standard No. ISO/ASTM 52902:2023.
31. (2025, July 18). Elsevier—Scopus Document Search. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic#basic.
32. Assessing laser powder bed fusion system geometric errors through artifact-based methods10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.042 ↗
33. The effects of varying wall thickness on the surface roughness of Ti-6Al-4V by electron beam powder bed fusion10.1088/2051-672X/acf67c ↗
34. Influence of scanning strategies on dimensional accuracy in laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.measen.2025.101840 ↗
35. Application-inspired additive manufacturing of Raman optics10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109574 ↗
36. Monzón, E., Bordón, P., Paz, R., and Monzón, M. (2024). Dimensional Characterization and Hybrid Manufacturing of Copper Parts Obtained by Atomic Diffusion Additive Manufacturing, and CNC Machining. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17061437 ↗
37. Adaptive benchmarking design for additive manufacturing processes10.1088/1361-6501/ac5877 ↗
38. Flierl, F., Spies, B.C., Rothlauf, S., Vach, K., Kohal, R.J., and Lüchtenborg, J. (2025). Effects of monomer contamination during post-rinsing in vat photopolymerization on dimensional stability. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-94404-4 ↗
39. ANSYS, Inc. (2025, July 01). Ansys Workbench | Simulation Integration Platform. Available online: https://www.ansys.com/products/ansys-workbench.
40. Nikon SLM Solutions (2025, June 02). AlSi10Mg DIN EN 1706/EN AC-43000. Available online: https://www.slm-solutions.com/fileadmin/Content/Powder/MDS/nw/2024/MDS_AlSi10Mg_2024-04.1_EN.pdf.
41. (2022). Additive Manufacturing Processes—Powder Bed Fusion of Metal Using a Laser Beam (PBF-LB/M)—Presentation of Material Properties in Material Data Sheets. Standard No. VDI 3405 Part 2.6.
42. Keyence (2025, June 02). VL-550 3D Scanner. Available online: https://www.keyence.com/products/3d-measure/3d-scanner/vl/models/vl-550/.
43. Keyence (2025, June 02). VR-5200 3D-Profilometer. Available online: https://www.keyence.com/products/3d-measure/roughness-measure/vr-3000/models/vr-5200/.
44. Dentaco (2025, June 02). Induscan‘Spray. Available online: https://www.dentaco.de/english-1/for-the-industry/indu-scan/.
45. (2019). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS), ISO Code System for Tolerances on Linear Sizes: Part 1: Basis of Tolerances, Deviations and Fits. Standard No. ISO 286-1:2019-09.
46. Influence of layer thickness on dimensional and geometrical properties of aluminium parts produced by powder bed fusion10.1007/s00170-025-15592-x ↗
47. Experimental sampling of the Z-axis error and laser positioning error of an EOSINT M280 DMLS machine
48. Microstructure evolution and thermal properties of an additively manufactured, solution treatable AlSi10Mg part10.1557/jmr.2018.405 ↗
49. Punch Tool Speed and Material Effect on Keychain Cranioplasty Plate Dimensions Using Finite Element Method10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.851.105 ↗
50. Yasa, E., Deckers, J., Craeghs, T., Badrossamay, M., and Kruth, J.-P. (2009, January 3–5). Investigation on Occurrence of Elevated Edges in Selective Laser Melting. Proceedings of the International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, USA.
51. Edge and corner effects in selective laser melting of IN 625 alloy
52. Reverse Engineering and Dimensional Limits Analysis of Samples Fabricated Using Selective Laser Melting Process
53. Calignano, F., Galati, M., and Iuliano, L. (2019). A Metal Powder Bed Fusion Process in Industry: Qualification Considerations. Machines, 7.10.3390/machines7040072 ↗
54. Recoater crashes during powder bed fusion of metal with laser beam: Simulative prediction of interference and experimental evaluation of resulting part quality10.1007/s40964-023-00471-2 ↗
55. Craeghs, T., Clijsters, S., Yasa, E., and Kruth, J.-P. (2011, January 8–10). Online Quality Control of Selective Laser Melting. Proceedings of the 20th Solid Freeform Fabrication (SFF) Symposium, Austin, TX, USA.
56. On the influence of building position on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of aluminum blocks manufactured by L-PBF10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109830 ↗
57. Distortion prediction and compensation in selective laser melting
58. The effect of texture on the anisotropy of thermophysical properties of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg
59. (2021). Additive Manufacturing—Qualification Principles—Installation, Operation and Performance (IQ/OQ/PQ) of PBF-LB Equipment. Standard No. ISO/ASTM/TS 52930:2021.
60. Eynard, B., Nigrelli, V., Oliveri, S., Peris-Fajarnes, G., and Rizzuti, S. (2017). Comparative Study for the Metrological Characterization of Additive Manufacturing artefacts. Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9 ↗
61. Patuelli, C., Cestino, E., Frulla, G., Valente, F., Servetti, G., Esposito, F., and Barbero, L. (2023). FEM Simulation of AlSi10Mg Artifact for Additive Manufacturing Process Calibration with Industrial-Computed Tomography Validation. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16134754 ↗
62. Towards a comprehensive understanding of distortion in additive manufacturing based on assumption of constraining force10.1080/17452759.2021.1881873 ↗
63. Altenbach, H., Hitzler, L., Johlitz, M., Merkel, M., and Öchsner, A. (2024). Distortion Compensation of Thin-Walled Parts by Pre-Deformation in Powder Bed Fusion with Laser Beam. Lectures Notes on Advanced Structured Materials 2, Springer International Publishing AG.10.1007/978-3-031-49043-9 ↗
64. Toward a common laser powder bed fusion qualification test artifact