journal article·2025-09-03Open access

Life Cycle Analysis of Particleboard Made of Corn Stalk and Citric Acid at Laboratory Scale

Lilik Astari, Robert H. Crawford, Kenji Umemura, Barbara Ozarska, Benoit Belleville

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

Research on particleboard fabrication using non-wood biomass as an alternative to wood particles is steadily increasing due to environmental awareness. Information on the life cycle assessment (LCA) of particleboards made of non-wood biomass and non-formaldehyde adhesives is scarce. This research presents the life cycle assessment (LCA) of particleboard fabrication made from corn stalk particles and citric acid in Indonesia and Australia at laboratory scale. Cradle-to-gate boundaries were applied with the fabrication steps involving particle preparation, citric acid solution preparation, the mixing of adhesive and particle, a hot-pressing process, and a final production process. The functional unit is a particleboard with 282 mm × 208 mm × 12 mm dimensions. The life cycle inventory data were obtained from particleboard sheet fabrication on a lab scale. Southeast Asia (Indonesia) and Southern Australia (Victoria) conditions were adopted for geographical background processes, using data from the Ecoinvent V.3.10 database. LCA calculation was conducted using the OpenLCA V.2.1.1 software. The environmental impacts were calculated using the ReCiPe Midpoint 2016 methodology. The results showed that oven drying and pre-treatment drying contributed the most to energy consumption in both regions, accounting for 97.14% at the Indonesian site and 96.49% at the Australian site. The environmental impacts in the Australian context showed higher values in 10 out of 18 categories. The five highest environmental impacts were terrestrial ecotoxicity (5.50 × 102 kg 1,4-DCB in Indonesia, 6.37 × 102 kg 1,4-DCB in Australia), global warming (2.72 × 102 kg CO2 eq in Indonesia, 2.49 × 102 kg CO2 eq in Australia), human non-carcinogenic toxicity (4.65 × 102 kg 1,4-DCB in Indonesia, 4.18 × 102 kg 1,4-DCB in Australia), water consumption (2.50 × 102 m3 in Indonesia, 4.62 × 102 m3 in Australia), and fossil resource scarcity (7.34 × 101 kg oil eq in Indonesia, 6.86 × 101 kg oil eq in Australia). Implementing solar drying and sourcing raw materials from farms closer to the production site could reduce energy consumption by up to 48.57% in Indonesia and 48.24% in Australia. These findings underscore the high energy demand of drying and the importance of site selection in particleboard production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Sustainable Supply Chain Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia

Research Center for Biomass and Bioproducts, National Research and Innovation Agency of Indonesia (BRIN), Jalan Raya Bogor KM 46, Bogor 16911, Indonesia

Melbourne School of Design, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia

Research Institute of Sustainable Humanosphere, Kyoto University, Uji-Shi, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan

Funding

Australia Awards Scholarships (L.A.)

References (78)

Show source-provided references
1. (2017). Reconstituted Wood-Based Panels—Specifications—Part 1: Particleboard (Standard No. AS/NZS 1859.1:2017).
2. Rossi, L., Wechsler, L., Peltzer, M.A., Ciannamea, E.M., Ruseckaite, R.A., and Stefani, P.M. (2024). Sustainable particleboards based on brewer’s spent grains. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16010059 ↗
3. The influence of moisture content of raw material on the physical and mechanical properties, surface roughness, wettability, and formaldehyde emission of particleboard composite10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.10.020 ↗
4. Selected properties of corrugated particleboards made from bamboo waste (Phyllostachys edulis) laminated with medium-density fiberboard panels10.15376/biores.9.1.1085-1096 ↗
5. Rochester, I., Kearly, V., and Boulton, N. (2014). Panel Guide, The National Panel Product Division. Version 4.1.
6. Physico-chemical and anatomical characterization of residual lignocellulosic fibers10.1007/s10570-014-0398-9 ↗
7. Particleboard manufacturing with low formaldehyde content for indoor applications10.1080/17480272.2022.2134821 ↗
8. Mechanical properties of structural particleboard and termite and decay resistance10.15376/biores.18.3.6169-6182 ↗
9. FAOSTAT (2024). Forestry Production and Trade, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO.
10. A research challenge vision regarding management of agricultural waste in a circular bio-based economy10.1080/10643389.2018.1471957 ↗
11. Tucker, S.N., Tharumarajah, A., May, B., England, J., Paul, K., Hall, M., Mitchell, P., Rouwette, R., and Syme, M. (2009). Life Cycle Inventory of Australian Forestry and Wood Products, Forest & Wood Products Australia Limited (FWPA). Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26151873.
12. Alwani, M.S., Khalil, H.P.S.A., Asniza, M., Suhaily, S.S., Amiranajwa, A.S.N., and Jawaid, M. (2014). Agricultural Biomass Raw Materials: The Current State and Future Potentialities, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-07641-6_5 ↗
13. Nonwood-Based composites10.1007/s40725-015-0023-7 ↗
14. Particleboard from agricultural biomass and recycled wood waste: A review10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.166 ↗
15. Zakia, H., Taha, A., Mervat, K., Adel, B., Samir, A., Jutta, H., and Azra, K. (2019). Rice Straw and Flax Fiber Particleboards as a Product of Agricultural Waste: An Evaluation of Technical Properties. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183878 ↗
16. Influence of rice straw and wood fiber combination on physical and mechanical properties of rice straw pulverized composite board
17. Novel lignocellulosic hybrid particleboard composites made from rice straws and coir fibers10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.066 ↗
18. Blended formaldehyde adhesive bonded particleboards made from groundnut shell and rice husk wastes10.1007/s10098-021-02270-1 ↗
19. Flexural and tensile properties of biobased rice husk-jute-soybean protein particleboards10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101261 ↗
20. Preparation and evaluation of particleboard from insect rearing residue and rice husks using starch/citric acid mixture as a natural binder10.1007/s13399-020-00994-6 ↗
21. Surface Characteristics of particleboard produced from hydro-thermally treated wheat stalks10.15376/biores.15.4.7648-7659 ↗
22. Delgado-Aguilar. Development of high-performance binderless fiberboards from wheat straw residue10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117247 ↗
23. Tupciauskas, R., Rizhikovs, J., Andzs, M., and Bikovens, O. (2022). Influence of manufacturing conditions on binder-less boards from steam-exploded hemp shives and wheat straw. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15093141 ↗
24. Utilization of agricultural rests: Straw-based composite panels made from enzymatic modified wheat and rapeseed straw10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.112067 ↗
25. A contribution to the thermal insulation performance characterization of corn cob particleboards10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.11.019 ↗
26. Corn cob lightweight concrete for non-structural applications10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.043 ↗
27. Impact sound insulation technique using corn cob particleboard10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.064 ↗
28. Thermal performance and life cycle assessment of corn cob particleboards10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102998 ↗
29. Advances and prospects of corn husk as a sustainable material in composites and other technical applications10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133563 ↗
30. Manufacturing and characterization of particleboard as partition material made of corn husk bonded using water soluble chitosan adhesive
31. Mechanical, fatigue and DMA behaviour of high content cellulosic corn husk fibre and orange peel biochar epoxy biocomposite: A greener material for cleaner production10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133931 ↗
32. Determination of physical and mechanical properties of particleboard obtained from cotton and corn stubble with fibreglass plaster net
33. Efficient utilization of corn stalk and poplar planer shavings in manufacturing particleboard10.4067/S0718-221X2021000100449 ↗
34. Fabrication and characterization of a novel corn straw/modified ammonium lignosulfonate bio-composite strengthened by polyethylenimine pretreatment10.1039/C9RA06237H ↗
35. Astari, L., Belleville, B., Ozarska, B., Umemura, K., Crawford, R., Kusumaningrum, W.B., and Ismayati, M. (2024). Performance of self-binding engineered panels made from sweet corn stalks (Zea mays L.) for furniture applications. Bioresour. Technol. Rep., 25.10.1016/j.biteb.2024.101802 ↗
36. Zhang, Q.Y., Xu, G.X., Pizzi, A., Lei, H., Xi, X.D., and Du, G.B. (2022). A green resin wood adhesive from synthetic polyamide crosslinking with glyoxal. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14142819 ↗
37. Ergun, M.E., Özlüsoylu, İ., İstek, A., and Can, A. (2023). Analysis and impact of activated carbon incorporation into urea-formaldehyde adhesive on the properties of particleboard. Coatings, 13.10.3390/coatings13091476 ↗
38. Human health risks of formaldehyde indoor levels: An issue of concern10.1080/10934529.2015.1109411 ↗
39. Estimation of occupational formaldehyde exposure in cadaver dissection laboratory and its implications10.5115/acb.19.105 ↗
40. Adhesivity of bio-based anhydrous citric acid, tannin-citric acid and ricinoleic acid in the properties of formaldehyde free medium density particleboard (MDP)10.5552/drvind.2020.1917 ↗
41. bonding ability of a new adhesive composed of citric acid-sucrose for particleboard10.15376/biores.11.2.4526-4535 ↗
42. Sutiawan, J., Syahfitri, A., Purnomo, D., Akbar, F., Triwibowo, D., Amanda, P., and Kusumah, S.S. (2023). Characterization and application of non-formaldehyde binder based citric acid, maleic acid, and molasses adhesive for plywood composite. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15193897 ↗
43. Development of moulding using sweet sorghum bagasse and citric acid: Effects of application method and citric acid content
44. Lee, S.H., Tahir, P.M., Lum, W.C., Tan, L.P., Bawon, P., Park, B.-D., Al Edrus, S.S.O., and Abdullah, U.H. (2020). A Review on citric acid as green modifying agent and binder for wood. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12081692 ↗
45. Utilization of sweet sorghum bagasse and citric acid for manufacturing of particleboard I: Effects of pre-drying treatment and citric acid content on the board properties10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.042 ↗
46. Utilization of sweet sorghum bagasse and citric acid for manufacturing of particleboard II: Influences of pressing temperature and time on particleboard properties10.1007/s10086-016-1605-0 ↗
47. Ferrandez-Garcia, M.T., Ferrandez-Garcia, C.E., Garcia-Ortuño, T., Ferrandez-Garcia, A., and Ferrandez-Villena, M. (2019). Experimental Evaluation of a New Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) Composite using citric acid as a natural binder. Agronomy, 9.10.3390/agronomy9120882 ↗
48. Effects of mat composition and pressing time on citric acid-bonded ultra-low-density hemp hurd particleboard10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118070 ↗
49. Effect of pressing temperatures on bonding properties of sucrose-citric acid for nipa palm fronds particleboard10.37763/wr.1336-4561/65.5.747756 ↗
50. Manufacture and properties of citric acid-bonded composite board made from salacca frond: Effects of maltodextrin addition, pressing temperature, and pressing method10.15376/biores.13.4.8662-8676 ↗
51. Manufacture and properties of citric acid-bonded particleboard made from bamboo materials10.1007/s00107-015-0967-0 ↗
52. Utilization Of citric acid as bonding agent in sembilang bamboo (Dendrocalamus giganteus Munro) particleboard production
53. (2022). Japan Industrial Standard A 5908: Particleboard (Standard No. JIS A 5908: 2022).
54. Life cycle assessment of end-of-life engineered wood10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164018 ↗
55. (2006). Technical Committee ISO/TC 207, 206, E.m.S.S., Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040: 2006).
56. (2006). Technical Committee ISO/TC 207, E.m.S.S., Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14044: 2006).
57. Jahan, I., Zhang, G., and Bhuiyan, M. (2022). Navaratnam. Circular economy of construction and demolition wood waste—A theoretical framework approach. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141710478 ↗
58. Mata, T.M., Freitas, C., Silva, G.V., Monteiro, S., Martins, J.M., de Carvalho, L.H., Silva, L.M., and Martins, A.A. (2023). Life cycle analysis of a particleboard based on cardoon and starch/chitosan. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152316179 ↗
59. Comparative study of the life cycle assessment of particleboards made of residues from sugarcane bagasse (Saccharum spp.) and pine wood shavings (Pinus elliottii)10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.039 ↗
60. Nara, C., Luiza, C.V.M., and Lino, M. (2023). Environmental analysis of the incorporation of sugarcane bagasse in medium density particleboard panels through life cycle assessment. Recycling, 8.10.3390/recycling8020044 ↗
61. (2023, December 20). Wood Solutions. Environmental Product Declaration: Particleboard. Available online: https://www.woodsolutions.com.au/resources/publications/environmental-product-declarations.
62. Hattori. Life cycle assessment of wood-based boards produced in Japan and impact of formaldehyde emissions during the use stage10.1007/s11367-017-1343-6 ↗
63. Life cycle assessment of medium-density fiberboard (MDF) manufacturing process in Brazil10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.007 ↗
64. Cross-country comparison on environmental impacts of particleboard production in Brazil and Spain10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104434 ↗
65. Environmental profile analysis of particleboard production: A study in a Pakistani technological condition10.1007/s11367-017-1385-9 ↗
66. Gate to gate life cycle assessment of flat pressed particleboard production in Islamic Republic of Iran10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.056 ↗
67. Determination of physical, mechanical and fire retardancy properties of innovative particleboard made from corn stalk (Zea mays L.) particles10.32604/jrm.2024.054786 ↗
68. Investigation of a new natural adhesive composed of citric acid and sucrose for particleboard10.1007/s10086-013-1326-6 ↗
69. The Assessment of environmental impact of the chicken meat agroindustry in Indonesia: Life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective10.5398/tasj.2023.46.2.249 ↗
70. Comparative life cycle assessment of medium density fiberboard and particleboard: A case study in China10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117443 ↗
71. Kocsis, L., Hudoba, Z., and Vojtela, T. (2012, January 8–12). Investigation of the maize stalk gathering for energetic use. Proceedings of the International Conference of Agricultural Engineering—CIGR-AgEng, Valencia, Spain. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20133223039.
72. Harvest date influence on dry matter yield and moisture of corn and stover10.13031/2013.41360 ↗
73. Distribution of aboveground biomass in corn stover10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00124-7 ↗
74. BMKG (2024, June 01). Informasi Prakiraan Potensi Energi, Available online: https://iklim.bmkg.go.id/id/.
75. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia (2024, June 01). Technology Info: Corn Cultivation, Available online: https://ppid.pertanian.go.id/doc/1/budidaya%20jagung.pdf.
76. Cropping calendar analysis for dry season 2020 in Indonesia10.1088/1755-1315/648/1/012117 ↗
77. Modelling and analysis of a hybrid solar dryer for woody biomass10.1016/j.energy.2020.119287 ↗
78. Global crop calendars of maize and wheat in the framework of the WorldCereal project10.1080/15481603.2022.2079273 ↗