Adoption of Blockchain Technology for Weak and Strong Brand Companies
Source abstract
Abstract
As e-commerce competition intensifies, brand companies face challenges such as product homogenization, consumer trust erosion, and price wars. Blockchain technology (BCT) has emerged as a solution to enhance transparency and optimize competitive strategies. In this study, the adoption of BCT and pricing decisions between weak and strong brand companies is analyzed in an asymmetric competitive environment. A game-theoretic framework is developed to analyze whether each company should adopt BCT. The results show that when the difference in brand awareness is small, BCT adoption allows pricing advantages to be shifted between weak and strong brands. As the difference in brand awareness increases, both types of brands reduce their BCT investments. Moreover, when one brand adopts BCT, the other often follows suit to maintain competitiveness. Three equilibrium scenarios are identified based on consumer privacy concerns and differences in brand awareness. Interestingly, the strategy where only the weak brand adopts BCT does not constitute an equilibrium in any scenario. Finally, when the difference in brand awareness is significant and price competition is high, either both brands adopt BCT or neither does. This paper provides strategic insights into BCT adoption and its implications for competitive behavior in asymmetric markets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
Management School, Wuhan College, Wuhan 430212, China
Funding
the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Planning Fund of the Ministry of Education of China · the Outstanding Young and Middle-aged Scientific and Technological Innovation Team of Universities in Hubei Province
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Asymmetric brand alliances: When joint promotions with strong brands hurt10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.022 ↗
2. OM Forum—Distributed ledgers and operations: What operations management researchers should know about blockchain technology10.1287/msom.2018.0752 ↗
3. Designing the right global supply chain network10.1287/msom.2019.0839 ↗
4. Blockchain for sustainable supply chain management: Trends and ways forward10.1007/s10660-022-09569-1 ↗
5. Karaduman, Ö., and Gülhas, G. (2025). Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Management: A Review of Security, Traceability, and Data Integrity Amid the Evolving Systemic Demand. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15095168 ↗
6. 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
7. Blockchain technology: Implications for operations and supply chain management10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0309 ↗
8. How does blockchain mitigate false advertising in live streaming E-commerce? A tripartite stochastic evolutionary game approach10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104287 ↗
9. Apollo (2025, April 22). Blockchain Revolutionising Supply Chains: 5 Real-World Applications Beyond Finance. Available online: https://www.investorideas.com/news/2025/cryptocurrency/04221Blockchain-Revolutionising-Supply-Chains.asp.
10. Dignan, L. (2025, April 20). IBM, Walmart, JD.com a nd Tsinghua University Eye Blockchain for Food Supply Chain Safety in China. Available online: https://www.zdnet.com/article/ibm-walmart-jd-com-and-tsinghua-university-eye-blockchain-for-food-supply-chain-safety-in-china/.
11. Impact of pricing leadership on blockchain data acquisition efforts in a circular supply chain10.1080/00207543.2022.2147237 ↗
12. Will the blockchain solve the supply chain resilience challenges? Insights from a systematic literature review10.1016/j.cie.2023.109623 ↗
13. Battling counterfeit masks during the COVID-19 outbreak: Quality inspection vs. blockchain adoption10.1080/00207543.2021.1961038 ↗
14. Porter, M.E. (1998). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press. [2nd ed.].
15. Aaker, D.A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity, Free Press.
16. The Theory of Business Strategy10.2307/2555656 ↗
17. Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press.
18. Contingent channel strategies for combating brand spillover in a co-opetitive supply chain10.1016/j.tre.2022.102830 ↗
19. Kotler, P., and Keller, K. (2016). Marketing Management, Pearson Education. [15th ed.].
20. Ahmad, A., and Bailey, K. (2021, January 10–11). Blockchain in Food Traceability: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of the 2021 32nd Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), Athlone, Ireland.10.1109/ISSC52156.2021.9467848 ↗
21. Liu, K., Liu, P., and Gao, S. (2024). Research on the Trusted Traceability Model of Taishan Tea Products Based on Blockchain. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210630 ↗
22. Schilling, M. (2023). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, McGraw-Hill Education. [7th ed.].
23. Impact of blockchain technology on the optimal pricing and quality decisions of platform supply chains10.1080/00207543.2022.2050828 ↗
24. Blockchain adoption for combating deceptive counterfeits10.1111/poms.13348 ↗
25. Combating copycats in the supply chain with permissioned blockchain technology10.1111/poms.13456 ↗
26. Consignment with revenue sharing contracting in a marketplace with deceptive counterfeits
27. Timing of blockchain adoption in a supply chain with competing manufacturers10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108430 ↗
28. Incentive alignment for blockchain adoption in medicine supply chains10.1016/j.tre.2021.102276 ↗
29. The information leakage strategies of the supply chain under the block chain technology introduction10.1016/j.omega.2022.102616 ↗
30. Cross-channel influence of blockchain technology on green supply chains under asymmetric retail platform competition10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109584 ↗
31. Price competition and blockchain adoption in retailing markets10.1016/j.ejor.2021.08.027 ↗
32. Information disclosure structure in supply chains with rental service platforms in the blockchain technology era10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.008 ↗
33. Cryptopolitan (2025, July 28). Vietnam Turns to Blockchain Technology to Secure Critical National Data. Available online: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/vietnam-blockchain-technology-national-data/.
34. Terry (2025, July 29). Blockchain Traceability System: Full Life Cycle Traceability of Auto Parts. Available online: https://info.iyunbiao.com/10731.html.
35. (Industry Report, 2025). MBI. Auto Parts Market Analysis 2025–2035: Trends, Growth & Regional Insights, Industry Report.
36. Blockchain-driven win–win strategy of economy and environment in the asymmetric competitive supply chain10.1016/j.cie.2023.108978 ↗
37. Coyle, R.E. (2022). The Impact of Brand Awareness on Purchase Intention Among Consumers Using Social Media, Trident University International.
38. Quality disclosure strategy with asymmetric demand information in food supply chains10.1016/j.tre.2024.103427 ↗
39. FasterCapital (2025, April 22). The Role of Brand Awareness in Market Share Growth. Available online: https://fastercapital.com/content/The-Role-of-Brand-Awareness-in-Market-Share-Growth.html.
40. Mearian, L. (2025, May 31). From Coffee Bean to Cup: Starbucks Brews a Blockchain-Based Supply Chain with Microsoft. Available online: https://www.computerworld.com/article/1723199/from-coffee-bean-to-cup-starbucks-brews-a-blockchain-based-supply-chain-with-microsoft.html.
41. Fisco (2025, May 31). Fisco Introduction. Available online: https://www.fisco.org.cn/.
42. Coad, A. (2009). New Perspectives on the Modern Corporation. The Growth of Firms: A Survey of Theories and Empirical Evidence, Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781848449107 ↗
43. Aghion, P., and Howitt, P.W. (2008). The Economics of Growth, The MIT Press.
44. Food traceability on blockchain: Walmart’s pork and mango pilots with IBM
45. Demand information sharing in competing supply chains with manufacturer-provided service10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.023 ↗