journal article·2025-09-01Open access

Generative Denoising Method for Geological Images with Pseudo-Labeled Non-Matching Datasets

Huan Zhang, Chunlei Wu, Jing Lu, Wenqi Zhao

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

Accurate prediction of oil and gas reservoirs requires precise river morphology. However, geological sedimentary images are often degraded by scattered non-structural noise from data errors or printing, which distorts river structures and complicates reservoir interpretation. To address this challenge, we propose GD-PND, a generative framework that leverages pseudo-labeled non-matching datasets to enable geological denoising via information transfer. We first construct a non-matching dataset by deriving pseudo-noiseless images via automated contour delineation and region filling on geological images of varying morphologies, thereby reducing reliance on manual annotation. The proposed style transfer-based generative model for noiseless images employs cyclic training with dual generators and discriminators to transform geological images into outputs with well-preserved river structures. Within the generator, the excitation networks of global features integrated with multi-attention mechanisms can enhance the representation of overall river morphology, enabling preliminary denoising. Furthermore, we develop an iterative denoising enhancement module that performs comprehensive refinement through recursive multi-step pixel transformations and associated post-processing, operating independently of the model. Extensive visualizations confirm intact river courses, while quantitative evaluations show that GD-PND achieves slight improvements, with the chi-squared mean increasing by up to 466.0 (approximately 1.93%), significantly enhancing computational efficiency and demonstrating its superiority.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques · Image and Signal Denoising Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Qingdao Institute of Software, College of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China

Shandong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Oil & Gas Industrial Software, Qingdao 266580, China

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province · the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the Qingdao Natural Science Foundation

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Current situation and prospect of structure-attribute integrated 3D geological modeling technology for geological big data
2. Application of Bayesian generative adversarial networks to geological facies modeling10.1007/s11004-022-09994-w ↗
3. Bi, Z., and Wu, X. (October, January 26). Implicit structural modeling of geological structures with deep learning. Proceedings of the First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, Denver, CO, USA.
4. Progress of deep learning in oil and gas reservoir geological modeling
5. A Physics-Constrained Two-Stage GAN for Reservoir Data Generation: Enhancing Predictive Accuracy10.1088/2631-8695/adf797 ↗
6. Dual-driven gas reservoir productivity prediction with small sample data: Integrating physical constraints and GAN-based data augmentation10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213711 ↗
7. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. arXiv.
8. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021, January 11–17). Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Virtually.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
9. Swin transformer for seismic denoising
10. Self-supervised pretraining transformer for seismic data denoising
11. Klochikhina, E., Crawley, S., and Chemingui, N. (October, January 26). Seismic image denoising with convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, USA.
12. Deep learning for simultaneous seismic image super-resolution and denoising
13. Zhang, H., Wu, C., Lu, J., Wang, L., Hu, F., and Zhang, L. (2023). An Unsupervised Automatic Denoising Method Based on Visual Features of Geological Images. (CN202211291834.3).
14. Multiscale Contrastive Learning Networks for Automatic Denoising of Geological Sedimentary Model Images10.1109/TGRS.2022.3214195 ↗
15. Integrated reservoir geological modeling based on seismic, log and geological data
16. Reservoir modeling: Current situation and development prospect
17. Research achievements on reservoir geological modeling of China in the past three decades
18. Oliver, M.A., and Webster, R. (2015). Basic Steps in Geostatistics: The Variogram and Kriging, Springer. Technical report.10.1007/978-3-319-15865-5 ↗
19. Rock Mass Wave Velocity Visualization Model Based on the Ordinary Kriging Method
20. Stochastic modeling of iron in coal seams using two-point and multiple-point geostatistics: A case study
21. Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.008 ↗
22. Filter-based classification of training image patterns for spatial simulation10.1007/s11004-005-9004-x ↗
23. Multi-Point Geostatistical Sedimentary Facies Modeling Based on Three-Dimensional Training Images10.15377/2409-5710.2020.07.3 ↗
24. Applying multi-point statistical methods to build the facies model for Oligocene formation, X oil field, Cuu Long basin10.1007/s13202-018-0604-7 ↗
25. Geological Facies modeling based on progressive growing of generative adversarial networks (GANs)10.1007/s10596-021-10059-w ↗
26. Hybrid geological modeling: Combining machine learning and multiple-point statistics10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104519 ↗
27. Generating geologically realistic 3D reservoir facies models using deep learning of sedimentary architecture with generative adversarial networks10.1007/s12182-019-0328-4 ↗
28. U-net generative adversarial network for subsurface facies modeling10.1007/s10596-020-10027-w ↗
29. A convolutional autoencoder method for simultaneous seismic data reconstruction and denoising
30. Al-Fakih, A., Kaka, S., and Koeshidayatullah, A. (2024, January 30–31). Utilizing GANs for Synthetic Well Logging Data Generation: A Step Towards Revolutionizing Near-Field Exploration. Proceedings of the EAGE/AAPG Workshop on New Discoveries in Mature Basins. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.3997/2214-4609.202471016 ↗
31. Al-Fakih, A., Koeshidayatullah, A., Mukerji, T., Al-Azani, S., and Kaka, S.I. (2025). Well log data generation and imputation using sequence based generative adversarial networks. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-95709-0 ↗
32. Generative adversarial network as a stochastic subsurface model reconstruction10.1007/s10596-020-09978-x ↗
33. Garcia, L.G., Ramos, G.D.O., de Oliveira, J.M.M.T., and Da Silveira, A.S. (2024, January 18–20). Enhancing Synthetic Well Logs with PCA-Based GAN Models. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/ICMLA61862.2024.00210 ↗
34. Masci, J., Meier, U., Cireşan, D., and Schmidhuber, J. (2011, January 14–17). Stacked convolutional auto-encoders for hierarchical feature extraction. Proceedings of the Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning–ICANN 2011: 21st International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Espoo, Finland. Proceedings, Part I 21.10.1007/978-3-642-21735-7_7 ↗
35. Pan, X., Ge, C., Lu, R., Song, S., Chen, G., Huang, Z., and Huang, G. (2022, January 18–24). On the integration of self-attention and convolution. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00089 ↗
36. Applications of deep convolutional neural networks in prospecting prediction based on two-dimensional geological big data10.1007/s00521-019-04341-3 ↗
37. Petrophysical properties prediction from prestack seismic data using convolutional neural networks10.1190/geo2019-0650.1 ↗
38. Deep learning reservoir porosity prediction using integrated neural network10.1007/s13369-021-06080-x ↗
39. Dropout-Based Robust Self-Supervised Deep Learning for Seismic Data Denoising
40. DCNNs-based denoising with a novel data generation for multidimensional geological structures learning10.1109/LGRS.2020.3007819 ↗
41. Disentangling noise patterns from seismic images: Noise reduction and style transfer10.1109/TGRS.2022.3219117 ↗
42. Zhang, H., and Wang, W. (2022). Imaging Domain Seismic Denoising Based on Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (CGANs). Energies, 15.10.3390/en15186569 ↗
43. A patch based denoising method using deep convolutional neural network for seismic image10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949774 ↗
44. Weighted multisteps adaptive autoregression for seismic image denoising10.1109/LGRS.2018.2841840 ↗
45. Zhang, Y., Lin, H., and Li, Y. (2018, January 14–19). Noise attenuation for seismic image using a deep residual learning. Proceedings of the SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1190/segam2018-2997974.1 ↗
46. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015, January 5–9). U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany. Proceedings, Part III 18.
47. Akcay, S., Atapour-Abarghouei, A., and Breckon, T.P. (2018, January 2–6). Ganomaly: Semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Perth, Australia.10.1007/978-3-030-20893-6_39 ↗
48. GAN-based anomaly detection: A review10.1016/j.neucom.2021.12.093 ↗