journal article·2025-08-28Open access

Combined Dynamics of Route Choice and Gap Acceptance in Road Networks with Priority Intersections

Claudio Meneguzzer

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

A key determinant of the capacity of unsignalized intersection approaches operating under priority control is the gap acceptance behavior of drivers. The parameter commonly used to characterize this behavior is the critical gap, which is the minimum time interval in the priority traffic stream that minor road drivers consider acceptable to safely execute the desired maneuver. When the operation of priority intersections is considered in a network-wide perspective, the analysis of the interaction between gap acceptance behavior and route choice emerges as a compelling research question. This paper proposes a model of the day-to-day dynamics arising from this interaction when the critical gap of minor road drivers is treated as an endogenous variable. We formulate a discrete-time, deterministic nonlinear dynamical system in which the critical gap depends on the traffic flow on the major road. After providing a general formulation of the model, an explicit analysis of fixed-point stability is carried out for an elementary network. Numerical results obtained from the implementation on two example networks suggest that the evolutionary dynamics of the system are affected by the relationship between the critical gap and major road flow. We conclude that, upon proper calibration of the variable critical gap formulation on observed driver behavior, the proposed model has the potential to deliver improved estimates of intersection approach capacities, delays and queue lengths to be used for policy evaluation in a dynamic perspective.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transportation Planning and Optimization · Traffic control and management · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 9, 35131 Padova, Italy

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Gartner, N.H., Messer, C.J., and Rathi, A.K. (2002). Unsignalized Intersection Theory, Traffic Flow Theory—A State-of-the-Art Report: Revised Monograph on Traffic Flow Theory.
2. Transportation Research Board (2016). Highway Capacity Manual: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis, The National Academies Press. [6th ed.].
3. Comparative investigation of the critical gap at priority junctions: A review paper10.3390/futuretransp3020028 ↗
4. Gap-accepteance parameters for roundabouts: A systematic review10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4 ↗
5. Review of roundabout capacity based on gap acceptance10.1155/2019/4971479 ↗
6. Examining crossing conflicts by vehicle type at unsignalized T-intersections using accepted gaps: A perspective from emerging countries10.1061/JTEPBS.0000665 ↗
7. Analyzing the impact of time pressure on drivers’ safety by assessing gap-acceptance behavior at un-signalized intersections10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105582 ↗
8. Disaggregate gap-acceptance model for unsignalized T-intersections10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:1(36) ↗
9. Tian, Z.Z., Troutbeck, R., Kyte, M., Brilon, W., Vandehey, M., Kittelson, W., and Robinson, B. (July, January 27). A further investigation on critical gap and follow-up time. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Maui, HI, USA. Transportation Research Circular E-C018, Transportation Research Board.
10. A decision model for gap acceptance and capacity at intersections10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00024-8 ↗
11. Investigating the influence of conflicting flow’s composition on critical gap under heterogeneous traffic conditions10.1016/j.ijtst.2021.01.004 ↗
12. Headway distribution effect on gap-acceptance behavior at roundabouts: Driving simulator experiments in a case study
13. Understanding gap acceptance behavior at unsignalized intersections using naturalistic driving study data10.1177/03611981211007140 ↗
14. Gap-acceptance behavior at roundabouts: Validation of a driving simulator environment using field observations10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.069 ↗
15. Using gap sequences to estimate gap acceptance functions10.1016/0191-2615(81)90001-1 ↗
16. Influence of stopped delay on driver gap acceptance behavior10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1989)115:3(305) ↗
17. Delay effects on driver gap acceptance characteristics at two-way stop-controlled intersections
18. Non-stationary gap acceptance assuming drivers’ learning and impatience
19. Critical gap as a function of waiting time in determining roundabout capacity10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:5(504) ↗
20. Evaluation of the waiting-time effect on critical gaps at roundabouts by a logit model
21. Dynamic modeling of VISSIM’s critical gap parameter at unsignalized intersections10.3141/2395-02 ↗
22. The stability of stochastic equilibrium in a two-link transportation network10.1016/0191-2615(84)90003-1 ↗
23. Stability of the stochastic equilibrium assignment problem: A dynamical systems approach10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00033-2 ↗
24. Dynamic processes and equilibrium in transportation networks: Towards a unifying theory10.1287/trsc.29.4.305 ↗
25. Stability and attraction domains of traffic equilibria in a day-to-day dynamical system formulation10.1016/j.trb.2009.06.007 ↗
26. Meneguzzer, C. (2024). Stability of traffic equilibria in a day-to-day dynamic model of route choice and adaptive signal control. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14051891 ↗
27. Combined route choice and adaptive traffic control in a day-to-day dynamical system10.1007/s11067-014-9248-4 ↗
28. A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process10.1016/j.tre.2021.102421 ↗
29. A day-to-day dynamic model for mixed traffic flow of autonomous vehicles and inertial human-driven vehicles10.1016/j.tre.2023.103113 ↗
30. Meneguzzer, C. (2023). Modeling the combined effect of travelers’ contrarian behavior, learning and inertia on the day-to-day dynamics of route choice. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13053294 ↗
31. Experimental analysis of dynamic route choice behavior10.1016/0191-2615(92)90017-Q ↗
32. Commuters route choice behavior10.1016/j.geb.2006.03.012 ↗
33. Experimental study of day-to-day route-choice behavior: Evaluating the effect of ATIS market penetration
34. The effect of travel time information on day-to-day route choice behaviour: Evidence from a real-world experiment
35. Exploration of day-to-day route choice models by a virtual experiment10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.020 ↗
36. Investigating day-to-day route choices based on multi-scenario laboratory experiments, Part I: Route-dependent attraction and its modeling
37. Microsimulation models incorporating both demand and supply dynamics
38. Die leistungsermittlung an knotenpunkten ohne lichtsignalsteuerung
39. Review of models combining traffic assignment and signal control10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:2(148) ↗
40. Stephanedes, Y.J., and Filippi, F. (1995, January 27–30). Computational experiments with a combined traffic assignment and control model with asymmetric cost functions. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation Engineering, Capri, Italy.