journal article·2025-08-26Open access

Sex Differences in the High Jump Kinematics of U18 Adolescent Athletes

Vassilios Panoutsakopoulos

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

Biomechanical analyses of technique are essential for performance improvement in athletic jumps, but scarce evidence exists for adolescent athletes in the literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the sex differences in the high jump biomechanics of U18 athletes. Twenty-one women (15.2 ± 1.0 yrs) and twenty-one men (15.2 ± 1.2 yrs) Greek U18 high jumpers were recorded in regional competitions using two cameras (sampling frequency: 60 fps). The kinematic parameters of the last step, the take-off, and the crossbar clearance were calculated using 3D-DLT analysis. The independent samples t-test was used to detect significant (p < 0.05) differences between groups. Results revealed that men had significantly (p < 0.05) better performance, with larger last step angle and length, body center of mass (BCM) height at the final touchdown and take-off, approach and vertical BCM take-off velocity, touchdown lateral inclination of the take-off leg, and swing leg knee angle at take-off. Women had significantly (p < 0.05) higher vertical BCM velocity at touchdown. No differences (p > 0.05) were observed for take-off angle, the support leg knee angle, the inclination of the torso at touchdown, or the vertical BCM displacement during the take-off phase. The anthropometric and physical conditioning differences between sexes contributed to the findings of the study. Coaches should consider the age and sex differences of adolescent athletes when designing training programs to optimize high jump performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention · Physical Education and Training Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport Science at Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

Funding

Kostas Chimonides’ Athletes and Friends Club

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. Gianikellis, K.E. (2002). The evolution of high jumping technique: Biomechanical analysis. Scientific Proceedings of the XX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports, Universidad de Extremadura.
2. Updates on improvement of human athletic performance: Focus on world records in athletics10.1093/bmb/ldn029 ↗
3. Evolution and revolution: Gauging the impact of technological and technical innovation on Olympic performance10.1080/02640414.2011.587018 ↗
4. The high jump
5. Consequences of the new competition rules for the high jump at the European Team Championships
6. Kollias, I.A. (2019). Biomechanics of Sport Movement, Kyriakidis Bros Publishers.
7. Brüggemann, G.P., and Glad, B. (1990). Biomechanical analysis of the high jump. Scientific Research Project at the Games of the XXIVth Olympiad, Seoul 1988, International Amateur Athletic Federation.
8. Zatsiorsky, V. (2000). The high jump. Biomechanics in Sport, Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470693797 ↗
9. Biomechanical analysis of the preparatory motion for takeoff in the Fosbury Flop10.1123/ijsb.2.2.66 ↗
10. Susanka, P., Brüggemann, G.P., and Tsarouchas, E. (1986). High Jump. Biomechanical Research in Track and Field: 1st World Junior Championships, Athens 1986, S.E.G.A.S.-Ε.Κ.A.Ε.
11. The high jump
12. Men’s high jump
13. Iiboshi, A., Ae, M., Tkamatsu, J., Nagasawa, M., Tang, H.P., and Yuuki, M. (1993). Techniques of elite high jumpers at the 3rd IAAF World Championships in Athletics. Abstracts of the XIV ISB Congress, I.S.B.10.1016/0021-9290(94)90988-1 ↗
14. Biomechanical analysis of the high jump at the 2005 IAAF World Championships in Athletics
15. Zweimal bronze für Deutschlands Höhenjäger
16. Nicholson, G., Jongerius, N., Tucker, C.B., Thomas, A., Merlino, S., and Bissas, A. (2022). The association between hip-shoulder separation angles and technique characteristics in world-class high jumpers. Front. Sports Act. Living, 4.10.3389/fspor.2022.873526 ↗
17. Sport Performance Limits: Long jump and high jump
18. Biomechanical model of the take-off action in the high jump—A case study
19. Mechanics of translation in the Fosbury-flop
20. A regression analysis of high jumping technique10.1123/ijsb.6.3.246 ↗
21. Biomechanical studies in the high jump and the implications to coaching
22. How the free limbs are used by elite high jumpers in generating vertical velocity10.1080/001401300750004041 ↗
23. The influence of touchdown parameters on the performance of a high jumper10.1123/jab.16.4.367 ↗
24. Why do high jumpers use a curved approach?10.1080/02640410400021534 ↗
25. Vertical and radial motions of the body during the take-off phase of high jumping10.1249/00005768-198806000-00014 ↗
26. Hay, J.G. (1985). The Biomechanics of Sports Techniques, Prentice-Hall. [3rd ed.].
27. The differences of kinematic parameters high jump between male and female finalists World Championship Daegu, 2011
28. Diferencias de género en salto de altura según categorías de edad10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2013/1).111.06 ↗
29. Effect of age on high jump take-off biomechanics
30. Fosbury flop: Predicting performance with a three-variable model10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f0aab5 ↗
31. Junior triple jumpers: Kinematic differences between male and female
32. A biomechanical analysis and assessment of the technique elements of the last strides, the touchdown and the takeoff of junior male and female long jumpers
33. Sources of error and their elimination in the use of DLT with the basic recording tools for the analysis of human body in motion
34. Plagenhoef, S. (1985). Patterns of Human Motion: A Cinematographic Analysis, Prentice-Hall.
35. Measurement and reduction of noise in kinematics of locomotion10.1016/0021-9290(74)90056-6 ↗
36. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. [2nd ed.].
37. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
38. Lenhard, W., and Lenhard, A. (2014). Hypothesis Tests for Comparing Correlations. Psychometrica, Available online: https://www.psychometrica.de/correlation.html.
39. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the technique of top Greek male high jumpers
40. 3-D biomechanical analysis of women’s high jump
41. Intraindividual comparison of the jumps of Stefka Kostadinova at the II World Championships in Athletics Rome 1987 and the Games of the XXIV Olympiad Seoul 1988
42. New methodological approach for distancing the takeoff point further from the bar when high jumping using the flop technique10.5432/jjpehss.13015 ↗
43. Biomechanical determinants of elite high jump performance in Egypt: Part 2, the percentage contributions of biomechanical indicators and special factors to achievement level
44. Panoutsakopoulos, V., Kotzamanidou, M.C., and Manou, V. (2024). Sex differences exist in the relationship between vertical jump performance biomechanical parameters and hamstring/quadriceps ratio in adolescent U18 track and field athletes. Sports, 12.10.3390/sports12110295 ↗
45. Sex differences in growth and performance of track and field athletes 11–15 years10.2478/v10078-010-0023-4 ↗
46. Biomechanical analysis of centre of mass height during the takeoff phase in fosbury flop high jump of national level participants
47. Analysis of effectiveness of free segment actions and antero-posterior and lateral body displacements during the take-off phase of high jump (flop style)10.1080/24748668.2018.1555737 ↗
48. Biomechanical determinants of elite high jump performance in Egypt: Part 1-analysis of kinematic variables and performance
49. Biomechanics aspects of technique of high jump
50. Characteristics of joint kinetics of the lower limb during take-off motion in high jump10.5432/jjpehss.18044 ↗
51. Assessment of takeoff execution ability in high jumpers by rebound jump10.5432/jjpehss.22049 ↗
52. Mechanical properties of the gastrocnemius muscle-tendon unit in male athletic high jumpers10.14814/phy2.70370 ↗
53. Biomechanical analysis of the top three male high jumpers at the 2007 World Championships in Athletics
54. Le saut en hauteur en Fosbury et les facteurs de performance
55. Leg- and joint stiffness in male elite high jump: The influence of stiffness on sports performance
56. Kinematic analysis of high jump using the scissors technique
57. Sado, N., Yoshioka, S., and Fukashiro, S. (2020). Non-extension movements inducing over half the mechanical energy directly contributing to jumping height in human running single-leg jump. J. Biomech., 113.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110082 ↗
58. Inter-joint differences exist in kinetic demand for performance in high jump
59. Toshihide, F., Naoto, T., and Natsuki, S. (2024). Joint kinetic demand for performance in high jump. Sports Biomech., in press.
60. Kinematic analysis of the final stride approach in Spanish elite high jumpers10.1080/24748668.2021.1908040 ↗
61. Mechanics of rotation in the Fosbury-flop
62. Curved approach in high jump induces greater jumping height without greater joint kinetic exertions than straight approach10.1249/MSS.0000000000002761 ↗
63. Hip abductors and lumbar lateral flexors act as energy generators in running single-leg jumps10.1055/a-0749-8846 ↗
64. Variability of high jump kinematic parameters in longitudinal follow-up
65. Integrating biomechanical and motor control principles in elite high jumpers: A transdisciplinary approach to enhancing sport performance10.1016/j.jshs.2015.09.004 ↗
66. Pose estimation or manual digitising: Can automating technologies change the current in-field assessment of high jump?
67. Hong, Y., Johns, D.P., and Sanders, R. (2000, January 25–30). A comparison of practice and competition approach velocities and the position of the top handhold at the pole plant in pole vaulters. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of Biomechanics in Sports, Hong Kong, China.
68. Nicholson, G., Epro, G., Merlino, S., Walker, J., and Bissas, A. (2024). Differences in run-up, take-off, and flight characteristics: Successful vs. unsuccessful high jump attempts at the IAAF World Championships. Front. Sports Act. Living, 6.10.3389/fspor.2024.1352725 ↗