journal article·2025-08-26Open access

Structural Analysis for Earthquake-Resistant Design of Buildings: Closing Editorial

Angelo Aloisio, Dag Pasquale Pasca

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

Advances in computing and data have transformed seismic analysis from code-calibrated approximations toward performance-based verification, often anchored in nonlinear dynamics [...]
Only a short abstract or summary was supplied by the source.
Source: crossref · Quality: short

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering Department, Universita’ degli Studi dell’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy

Norsk Treteknisk Institutt (Norwegian Institute of Wood Technology), 0373 Oslo, Norway

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Hamburger, R.O., Moehle, J.P., Baker, J.W., Bray, J.D., Crouse, C.B., Deierlein, G.G., Hooper, J., Lew, M., Maffei, J., and Mahin, S.A. (2017). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings, Version 2.03. PEER Report 2017/06, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
2. Stewart, J.P., Parker, G.A., Harmon, J.A., Atkinson, G.M., Boore, D.M., Darragh, R.B., Silva, W.J., and Hashash, Y.M.A. (2017). Expert Panel Recommendations for Ergodic Site Amplification in Central and Eastern North America. PEER Report 2017/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.10.55461/TZSY8988 ↗
3. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration10.1002/eqe.495 ↗
4. Deterioration Modeling of Steel Components in Support of Collapse Prediction of Steel Moment Frames under Earthquake Loading10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376 ↗
5. Stewart, J., Crouse, C.B., Hutchinson, T.C., Lizundia, B., Naeim, F., and Ostadan, F. (2012). Soil–Structure Interaction for Building Structures. Technical Report NIST GCR 12-917-21, NIST.
6. Machine-learning-aided regional post-seismic usability prediction of buildings: 2016–2017 Central Italy earthquakes10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109526 ↗
7. Machine learning predictions of code-based seismic vulnerability for reinforced concrete and masonry buildings: Insights from a 300-building database10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117295 ↗
8. Sattar, S., Kersting, R., Arendt, L., Bonowitz, D., Comerio, M., Davis, C., Deierlein, G.G., and Johnson, K.J. (2021). Recommended Options for Improving the Built Environment for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Time. Technical Report NIST SP 1254/FEMA P-2090, National Institute of Standards and Technology/FEMA.10.6028/NIST.SP.1254 ↗
9. NIST (2017). Seismic Analysis, Design, and Installation of Nonstructural Components and Systems—Recommended Guidance. Technical Report NIST GCR 17-917-44, NIST.
10. NGA-West2 Research Project: An Overview10.1193/072113EQS209M ↗
11. An Improved Algorithm for Selecting Ground Motions to Match a Conditional Spectrum10.1080/13632469.2016.1264334 ↗
12. NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture (2011). Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performing Response-History Analysis. Technical Report NIST GCR 11-917-15, NIST.
13. Generative adversarial networks review in earthquake-related engineering fields10.1007/s10518-023-01645-7 ↗