One Report, Multifaceted Views: Multi-Expert Rewriting for ECG Interpretation
Source abstract
Abstract
Data scarcity is a significant barrier to developing high-performing AI models for medical text classification. To improve stroke prediction from electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretations reports where training data are scarce, we propose a novel data augmentation technique, Multi-Expert Perspective Augmentation. We use the LLM Phi-4 to rewrite original machine-generated ECG reports from the simulated perspectives of five different medical specialists. This prompt-based approach generates text with diverse clinical viewpoints while preserving the original meaning. We trained a BiomedBERT-based Gradient Boosting model to classify for stroke, comparing a baseline model trained only on the original data against a model trained with our augmented data. The model trained solely on original data showed poor performance (F1-score: 0.6698) with a severe precision–recall imbalance. In contrast, the augmented model achieved a significantly improved and balanced performance, with an F1-score of 0.8421, an accuracy of 0.8427, a precision of 0.8571, and a recall of 0.8276. Our method also outperformed other LLM-based augmentation techniques. Our findings demonstrate that rewriting text from multiple simulated expert perspectives is an effective strategy for data augmentation, enhancing the linguistic and contextual diversity of training data and leading to a more balanced and accurate classification model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Topic Modeling · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Convergence Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon-si 24252, Republic of Korea
Department of Neurology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon-si 24253, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korean government (MIST) · National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen, X., and Du, Y. (2025). Enhancing Medical Text Classification with GAN-Based Data Augmentation and Multi-Task Learning in BERT. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-98281-9 ↗
2. Calzolari, N., Béchet, F., Blache, P., Choukri, K., Cieri, C., Declerck, T., Goggi, S., Isahara, H., Maegaard, B., and Mariani, J. (2020, January 11–16). Exploring Transformer Text Generation for Medical Dataset Augmentation. Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, France.
3. Sufi, F. (2024). Addressing Data Scarcity in the Medical Domain: A GPT-Based Approach for Synthetic Data Generation and Feature Extraction. Information, 15.10.3390/info15050264 ↗
4. A Survey on Data Augmentation for Text Classification10.1145/3544558 ↗
5. Barnes, J., De Clercq, O., and Klinger, R. (2023, January 14). Improving Dutch Vaccine Hesitancy Monitoring via Multi-Label Data Augmentation with GPT-3. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment, & Social Media Analysis.
6. Lu, Q., Dou, D., and Nguyen, T.H. (2021, January 9–12). Textual Data Augmentation for Patient Outcomes Prediction. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Houston, TX, USA.10.1109/BIBM52615.2021.9669861 ↗
7. Synthetic Biological Signals Machine-Generated by GPT-2 Improve the Classification of EEG and EMG Through Data Augmentation10.1109/LRA.2021.3056355 ↗
8. Abdin, M., Aneja, J., Behl, H., Bubeck, S., Eldan, R., Gunasekar, S., Harrison, M., Hewett, R.J., Javaheripi, M., and Kauffmann, P. (2024). Phi-4 Technical Report. arXiv.
9. Domain-Specific Language Model Pretraining for Biomedical Natural Language Processing10.1145/3458754 ↗
10. Inui, K., Jiang, J., Ng, V., and Wan, X. (2019, January 3–7). EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Tasks. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China.
11. Huong, T.H., and Hoang, V.T. (2020, January 1–3). A Data Augmentation Technique Based on Text for Vietnamese Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology, IAIT ’20, Bangkok, Thailand.10.1145/3406601.3406618 ↗
12. Qiu, S., Xu, B., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Shen, X., de Melo, G., Long, C., and Li, X. (2020). EasyAug: An Automatic Textual Data Augmentation Platform for Classification Tasks. Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference10.1145/3366424.3383552 ↗
13. 2020, Association for Computing Machinery. WWW '20.
14. Erk, K., and Smith, N.A. (2016, January 7–12). Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Data. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Berlin, Germany.
15. Rodrigues, J.M.F., Cardoso, P.J.S., Monteiro, J., Lam, R., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Lees, M.H., Dongarra, J.J., and Sloot, P.M.A. (2019). Conditional BERT Contextual Augmentation. Computational Science–ICCS 2019, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-22750-0 ↗
16. Shi, B., Zhang, L., Huang, J., Zheng, H., Wan, J., and Zhang, L. (2022). MDA: An Intelligent Medical Data Augmentation Scheme Based on Medical Knowledge Graph for Chinese Medical Tasks. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122010655 ↗
17. Lexical Data Augmentation for Sentiment Analysis10.1002/asi.24493 ↗
18. Burstein, J., Doran, C., and Solorio, T. (2019, January 2–7). Submodular Optimization-Based Diverse Paraphrasing and Its Effectiveness in Data Augmentation. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
19. Bouamor, H., Pino, J., and Bali, K. (2023). End-to-End Adversarial Sample Generation for Data Augmentation. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Bouamor, H., Pino, J., and Bali, K. (2023). Is ChatGPT the Ultimate Data Augmentation Algorithm?. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Ubani, S., Polat, S.O., and Nielsen, R. (2023). ZeroShotDataAug: Generating and Augmenting Training Data with ChatGPT. arXiv.
22. Zhao, H., Chen, H., Ruggles, T.A., Feng, Y., Singh, D., and Yoon, H.-J. (2024). Improving Text Classification with Large Language Model-Based Data Augmentation. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13132535 ↗
23. Ku, L.-W., Martins, A., and Srikumar, V. (2024). Controllable Data Augmentation for Few-Shot Text Mining with Chain-of-Thought Attribute Manipulation. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. Liu, Y., Sharma, P., Oswal, M.J., Xia, H., and Huang, Y. (2024). PersonaFlow: Boosting Research Ideation with LLM-Simulated Expert Personas. arXiv.
25. Ghosal, T., Singh, A., Waard, A., Mayr, P., Naik, A., Weller, O., Lee, Y., Shen, S., and Qin, Y. (2024, January 16). Simulating Expert Discussions with Multi-Agent for Enhanced Scientific Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing (SDP 2024), Bangkok, Thailand.10.18653/v1/2024.sdp-1.1 ↗
26. Generating Synthetic Clinical Text with Local Large Language Models to Identify Misdiagnosed Limb Fractures in Radiology Reports10.1016/j.artmed.2024.103027 ↗
27. Structured LLM Augmentation for Clinical Information Extraction
28. Using Synthetic Health Care Data to Leverage Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition: Development and Validation Study10.2196/66279 ↗
29. Badirli, S., Liu, X., Xing, Z., Bhowmik, A., Doan, K., and Keerthi, S.S. (2020). Gradient Boosting Neural Networks: GrowNet. arXiv.
30. Naver-Hyperclovax (2025, July 17). HyperCLOVAX-SEED-Vision-Instruct-3B. Available online: https://huggingface.co/naver-hyperclovax/HyperCLOVAX-SEED-Vision-Instruct-3B.
31. Google (2025, July 17). Gemma Kaggle. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/models/google/gemma-2.
32. A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
33. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; KDD ’16, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
34. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). “Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; KDD ’16, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗