APMEG: Quadratic Time–Frequency Distribution Analysis of Energy Concentration Features for Unveiling Reliable Diagnostic Precursors in Global Major Earthquakes Towards Short-Term Prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
Earthquake prediction remains a significant challenge in seismology, and advancements in signal processing techniques have opened new avenues for improving prediction accuracy. This paper explores the application of Time–Frequency Distributions (TFDs) to seismic signals to identify diagnostic precursory patterns of major earthquakes. TFDs provide a comprehensive analysis of the non-stationary nature of seismic data, allowing for the identification of precursory patterns based on energy concentration features. Current earthquake prediction models primarily focus on long-term forecasts, predicting events by identifying a cycle in historical data, or on nowcasting, providing alerts seconds after a quake has begun. However, both approaches offer limited utility for disaster management, compared to short-term earthquake prediction methods. This paper proposes a new possible precursory pattern of major earthquakes, tested through analysis of recent major earthquakes and their respective prior minor earthquakes for five earthquake-prone countries, namely Türkiye, Indonesia, the Philippines, New Zealand, and Japan. Precursors in the time–frequency domain have been consistently identified in all datasets within several hours or a few days before the major earthquakes occurred, which were not present in the observation and analysis of the earthquake catalogs in the time domain. This research contributes towards the ongoing efforts in earthquake prediction, highlighting the potential of quadratic non-linear TFDs as a significant tool for non-stationary seismic signal analysis. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no similar approach for consistently identifying earthquake diagnostics precursors has been proposed, and, therefore, we propose a novel approach in reliable earthquake prediction using TFD analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Earthquake Detection and Analysis · earthquake and tectonic studies · Seismology and Earthquake Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer and Communication Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Jalan Universiti 1, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
Institute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Jalan Universiti 1, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
Department of Electrical and Electronical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Jalan Universiti 1, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. The Impact of Faulting Complexity and Type on Earthquake Rupture Dynamics10.1038/s43247-022-00593-5 ↗
2. A Moment Magnitude Scale10.1029/JB084iB05p02348 ↗
3. Tao, D., Lin, J., and Lu, Z. (2019). Time-Frequency Energy Distribution of Ground Motion and Its Effect on the Dynamic Response of Nonlinear Structures. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11030702 ↗
4. On Vibration Suppression and Energy Dissipation Using Tuned Mass Particle Damper10.1115/1.4034777 ↗
5. State of the Art of Structural Control10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(845) ↗
6. Hough, S. (2020). The Great Quake Debate: The Crusader, the Skeptic, and the Rise of Modern Seismology, University of Washington Press.10.1515/9780295747378 ↗
7. (2024, March 26). Can You Predict Earthquakes?, Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes.
8. (2024, February 08). Earthquakes: Prediction, Forecasting and Mitigation. Available online: https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/earthquake-briefing.
9. Earthquake Prediction: State-of-the-Art and Emerging Possibilities10.1146/annurev.earth.30.100301.083856 ↗
10. First-Year Performance of a Nationwide Earthquake Early Warning System Using a Wavefield-Based Ground-Motion Prediction Algorithm in Japan10.1785/0220190263 ↗
11. DeepShake: Shaking Intensity Prediction Using Deep Spatiotemporal RNNs for Earthquake Early Warning10.1785/0220210141 ↗
12. Earth Sciences: MyShake: A Smartphone Seismic Network for Earthquake Early Warning and Beyond10.1126/sciadv.1501055 ↗
13. Peng, C., Jiang, P., Ma, Q., Su, J., Cai, Y., and Zheng, Y. (2022). Chinese Nationwide Earthquake Early Warning System and Its Performance in the 2022 Lushan M6.1 Earthquake. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14174269 ↗
14. Earthquake Prediction: A Critical Review10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb06588.x ↗
15. On the Apparently Inappropriate Use of Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Earthquake Prediction Studies10.1785/0220180378 ↗
16. Big Data Seismology10.1029/2021RG000769 ↗
17. Shanthi, D.L., Ashwini, N., Prasanna, K., and Haneesh, A.N. (2021, January 17–19). FM Radio Wave Based Early Earthquake Detection. Proceedings of the 2021 8th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, India.
18. Hutchison, A. (2024, March 26). How Machine Learning Might Unlock Earthquake Prediction. Available online: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/12/29/1084699/machine-learning-earthquake-prediction-ai-artificial-intelligence/.
19. Neural Network Applications in Earthquake Prediction (1994–2019): Meta-Analytic and Statistical Insights on Their Limitations10.1785/0220200021 ↗
20. Reliable Earthquake Precursors?10.1126/science.adi8032 ↗
21. The Precursory Phase of Large Earthquakes10.1126/science.adg2565 ↗
22. New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement10.1785/BSSA0840040974 ↗
23. Rafferty, J.P. (2023, July 20). Richter Scale. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/science/Richter-scale.
24. Turkey–Syria Earthquake: What Scientists Know10.1038/d41586-023-00364-y ↗
25. (CNN Indonesia, 2018). BNPB: Kerugian Akibat Gempa Palu Capai Rp18,4 Triliun, CNN Indonesia.
26. Loft, P. (2023). Earthquake in Syria and Turkey February 2023, House of Commons Library.
27. Earthquake Doublet in Turkey and Syria10.1038/s43247-023-00747-z ↗
28. (2017). Economic Impact of Kaikōura Quake Revealed, New Zealand Government.
29. Demiralp, S. (2023). The Economic Impact of the Turkish Earthquakes and Policy Options 2023, Istanbul Political Research Institute.
30. (2024, January 30). AFP Quake Could Cost US$17bil. Available online: https://www.thestar.com.my/aseanplus/aseanplus-news/2024/01/27/quake-could-cost-us17bil.
31. Does the Catalog of California Earthquakes, With Aftershocks Included, Contain Information About Future Large Earthquakes?10.1029/2022EA002521 ↗
32. Baughman, I., Rundle, J.B., and Zhang, T. (2023). Nowcasting ETAS Earthquakes: Information Entropy of Earthquake Catalogs. Authorea Prepr.
33. Global Seismic Nowcasting With Shannon Information Entropy10.1029/2018EA000464 ↗
34. Wang, X., Zhong, Z., Yao, Y., Li, Z., Zhou, S., Jiang, C., and Jia, K. (2023). Small Earthquakes Can Help Predict Large Earthquakes: A Machine Learning Perspective. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13116424 ↗
35. Time–Frequency Feature Representation Using Energy Concentration: An Overview of Recent Advances10.1016/j.dsp.2007.12.004 ↗
36. Time-Frequency Representations of Earthquake Motion Records
37. Huerta-Lopez, C.I., Shin, Y., Powers, E.J., and Roesset, J.M. (February, January 30). Time-Frequency Analysis of Earthquake Records. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
38. Upegui-Botero, F.M., Huerta-López, C.I., Caro-Cortes, J.A., Martínez-Cruzado, J.A., and Suarez-Colche, L.E. (2012, January 24–28). Joint Time-Frequency Analysis of Seismic Records. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
39. Seismic Time-Frequency Analysis via Empirical Wavelet Transform10.1109/LGRS.2015.2493198 ↗
40. Han, L., Bonar, D., and Sacchi, M. (2012, January 6–9). Seismic Denoising by Time-Frequency Reassignment. Proceedings of the CSEG Expanded Abstracts, Calgary, AB, Canada.
41. Rivero-Moreno, C., and Escalante-Ramirez, B. (1996, January 18–21). Seismic Signal Detection with Time-Frequency Models. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis (TFTS-96), Paris, France.
42. Performance Evaluation of Time-Frequency Distributions for ECG Signal Analysis10.1007/s10916-017-0871-8 ↗
43. Hussein, A.F., Hashim, S.J., Rokhani, F.Z., and Wan Adnan, W.A. (2021). An Automated High-Accuracy Detection Scheme for Myocardial Ischemia Based on Multi-Lead Long-Interval ECG and Choi-Williams Time-Frequency Analysis Incorporating a Multi-Class SVM Classifier. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21072311 ↗
44. Dincer, B. (2023, March 14). EarthQuake Turkey 06 Feb 2023—Latest. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/brsdincer/earthquake-turkey-06-feb-2023-latest.
45. (2023, March 22). BMKG Earthquakes in Indonesia. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/dsv/5415797.
46. (2023, May 14). PHIVOLCS Latest Earthquake Information, Available online: https://earthquake.phivolcs.dost.gov.ph/EQLatest-Monthly/2022/2022_July.html.
47. (2023, August 03). GeoNet Quake Search. Available online: https://quakesearch.geonet.org.nz/csv?bbox=172.8479,-43.3012,177.7368,-39.0704&startdate=2016-11-01T0:00:00&enddate=2016-11-30T23:00:00.
48. (2024, January 05). Earthquake Information. Available online: https://www.data.jma.go.jp/multi/quake/index.html?lang=en.
49. What Is the Fast Fourier Transform?10.1109/PROC.1967.5957 ↗
50. Chapra, S.C., and Canale, R.P. (2015). Numerical Methods for Engineers, McGraw Hill Education.
51. Hlawatsch, F., and Auger, F. (2013). Time-Frequency Analysis, ISTE; Wiley.
52. Li, G.Z., Ren, X., Zhang, B., and Zong, G. (2015, January 25–27). Analysis of Time-Frequency Energy for Environmental Vibration Induced by Metro. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, La Jolla, CA, USA.
53. The Wigner Distribution: A Time-Frequency Analysis Tool
54. Reducing Cross Terms Effects in the Choi–Williams Transform of Mioelectric Signals10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.06.004 ↗
55. Cohen, L. (1995). Time-Frequency Analysis, Prentice Hall PTR. Electrical engineering signal processing.
56. (2025, June 27). Wigner-Ville Distribution (Advanced Signal Processing Toolkit). Available online: https://www.ni.com/docs/en-US/bundle/labview-advanced-signal-processing-toolkit-api-ref/page/lvasptconcepts/tfa_wvd.html#d42e50.
57. Improved Time-Frequency Representation of Multicomponent Signals Using Exponential Kernels10.1109/ASSP.1989.28057 ↗
58. Mallat, S. (2008). A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Third Edition: The Sparse Way, Academic Press, Inc.. [3rd ed.].
59. Njirjak, M., Otović, E., Jozinović, D., Lerga, J., Mauša, G., Michelini, A., and Štajduhar, I. (2022). The Choice of Time–Frequency Representations of Non-Stationary Signals Affects Machine Learning Model Accuracy: A Case Study on Earthquake Detection from LEN-DB Data. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10060965 ↗
60. Optimized Nonuniform FFTs and Their Application to Array Factor Computation10.1109/TAP.2018.2826368 ↗
61. Least-Squares Wavelet Analysis of Unequally Spaced and Non-Stationary Time Series and Its Applications10.1007/s11004-017-9691-0 ↗
62. Optimization of the End Effect of Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT)10.1007/s10033-017-0101-9 ↗
63. Non-Linear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Intermediate-Term Earthquake Prediction10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00080-4 ↗
64. Keilis-Borok, V.I., and Soloviev, A.A. (2003). Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-05298-3 ↗
65. Techniques to Obtain Good Resolution and Concentrated Time-Frequency Distributions: A Review10.1155/2009/673539 ↗
66. Why Is Earthquake Prediction Research Not Progressing Faster?10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00077-4 ↗
67. A Seismic Moment Magnitude Scale10.1785/0120180338 ↗
68. Sparse Time-Frequency Analysis of Seismic Data: Sparse Representation to Unrolled Optimization10.1109/TGRS.2023.3334492 ↗
69. Hurst, D. (The Guardian, 2019). “This Is Not a ‘What If’ Story”: Tokyo Braces for the Earthquake of a Century, The Guardian.
70. (Lockforce, 2022). Are You Ready For “The Big One”?, Lockforce.