Predicting Attachment Class Using Coherence Graphs: Insights from EEG Studies on the Secretary Problem
Source abstract
Abstract
Attachment styles, rooted in Bowlby’s Attachment Theory, significantly influence our romantic relationships, workplace behavior, and decision-making processes. Traditional methods like self-report questionnaires often have biases, so we aimed to develop a predictive model using objective physiological data. In our study, participants engaged in the Secretary problem, a sequential decision-making task, while their brain activity was recorded with a 16-electrode EEG device. We transformed this data into coherence graphs and used Node2Vec and PCA to convert these graphs into feature vectors. These vectors were then used to train a machine learning model, XGBoost, to predict attachment styles. Using participant-level nested 5-fold cross-validation, our first model achieved 80% accuracy for Secure and 88% for Fearful-avoidant styles but had difficulty distinguishing between Avoidant and Anxious styles. Analysis of the first three principal components showed these two groups overlapped in coherence space, explaining the confusion. To address this, we created a second model that categorized participants as Secure, Insecure, or Extremely Insecure, improving the overall accuracy to about 92%. Together, the results highlight (i) large-scale EEG connectivity as a viable biomarker of attachment, and (ii) the empirical similarity between Anxious and Avoidant profiles when measured electrophysiologically. This method shows promise in using EEG data and machine learning to understand attachment styles. Our findings suggest that future research should include larger and more diverse samples to refine these models. If validated in multi-site cohorts, such graph-based EEG markers could guide personalised interventions by objectively assessing attachment-related vulnerabilities. This study demonstrates the potential for using EEG data to classify attachment styles, which could have important implications for both research and therapeutic practices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cognitive Functions and Memory · Cognitive Abilities and Testing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University, Ariel 4070000, Israel
References (86)
Show source-provided references
1. Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect10.2307/3333824 ↗
2. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 ↗
3. Attachment theory: Progress and future directions10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.002 ↗
4. Mikulincer, M., and Shaver, P.R. (2020). Applications of attachment theory and research: The blossoming of relationship science. Applications of Social Psychology, Routledge.10.4324/9780367816407-10 ↗
5. Review of attachment theory: Familial predictors, continuity and change, and intrapersonal and relational outcomes10.1080/01494929.2018.1458001 ↗
6. Exploring the association between insecure attachment styles and adolescent autonomy in family decision making: A differentiated approach10.1007/s10964-012-9886-0 ↗
7. High school final year students’ career decision-making self-efficacy, attachment styles and gender role orientations10.1007/s12144-016-9409-3 ↗
8. An investigation of decision making styles and the five-factor personality traits with respect to attachment styles
9. Gander, M., and Buchheim, A. (2015). Attachment classification, psychophysiology and frontal EEG asymmetry across the lifespan: A review. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 9.10.3389/fnhum.2015.00079 ↗
10. Adult attachment measures: A 25-year review10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.08.006 ↗
11. Reliability and validity of the revised experiences in close relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment10.1177/0146167205276865 ↗
12. Machine Learning Prediction of Attachment Type From Bio-Psychological Factors in Patients With Depression10.30773/pi.2024.0392 ↗
13. Verbeke, W.J.M.I., Pozharliev, R., Strien, J.W.V., Belschak, F., and Bagozzi, R.P. (2014). “I am resting but rest less well with you.” The moderating effect of anxious attachment style on alpha power during EEG resting state in a social context. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 8.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00486 ↗
14. Sloan, E.P., Maunder, R.G., Hunter, J.J., and Moldofsky, H. (2007). Insecure attachment is associated with the α-EEG anomaly during sleep. Biopsychosoc. Med., 1.10.1186/1751-0759-1-20 ↗
15. Relationship between adult attachment patterns, emotional experience and EEG frontal asymmetry10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.021 ↗
16. Zuckerman, I., Mizrahi, D., and Laufer, I. (2023). Attachment style, emotional feedback, and neural processing: Investigating the influence of attachment on the P200 and P400 components of event-related potentials. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 17.10.3389/fnhum.2023.1249978 ↗
17. Kuo, C.-C., Ha, T., Ebbert, A.M., Tucker, D.M., and Dishion, T.J. (2017). Dynamic Responses in Brain Networks to Social Feedback: A Dual EEG Acquisition Study in Adolescent Couples. Front. Comput. Neurosci., 11.10.3389/fncom.2017.00046 ↗
18. EPA-1756-EEG activity in the gamma band and late positive potential (LPP) during processing attachment-related stimuli10.1016/S0924-9338(14)78886-8 ↗
19. A Comparative Analysis of EEG-based Stress Detection Utilizing Machine Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers with a Critical Literature Review10.17762/ijritcc.v11i8s.7175 ↗
20. EEG research based on the influence of different music effects10.1088/1742-6596/1631/1/012147 ↗
21. Mizrahi, D., Zuckerman, I., and Laufer, I. (2024, January 5–6). Exploring Cognitive Load in the Secretary Problem Using EEG Signals. Proceedings of the Intelligent Systems Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1007/978-3-031-66428-1_42 ↗
22. Mizrahi, D., Laufer, I., and Zuckerman, I. (2024). Neurophysiological insights into sequential decision-making: Exploring the secretary problem through ERPs and TBR dynamics. BMC Psychol., 12.10.1186/s40359-024-01750-5 ↗
23. Sequential decision making with relative ranks: An experimental investigation of the “secretary problem”10.1006/obhd.1997.2683 ↗
24. Mikulincer, M., and Shaver, P.R. (2010). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change, Guilford Publications.
25. Vrtička, P., Andersson, F., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., and Vuilleumier, P. (2008). Individual attachment style modulates human amygdala and striatum activation during social appraisal. PLoS ONE, 3.10.1371/journal.pone.0002868 ↗
26. Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity10.1038/nn.4135 ↗
27. Grover, A., and Leskovec, J. (2016, January 13–17). node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939754 ↗
28. Property graph representation learning for node classification10.1007/s10115-023-01963-x ↗
29. The secretary problem and its extensions: A review10.2307/1402748 ↗
30. Coherence analysis of EEG in locomotion using graphs10.17488/RMIB.38.1.18 ↗
31. Zuckerman, I., Mizrahi, D., and Laufer, I. (2022). EEG Pattern Classification of Picking and Coordination Using Anonymous Random Walks. Algorithms, 15.10.3390/a15040114 ↗
32. Li, Y., Tarlow, D., Brockschmidt, M., and Zemel, R. (2016, January 2–4). Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
33. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
34. Survey of clustering algorithms10.1109/TNN.2005.845141 ↗
35. Attachment security in infancy and early adulthood: A twenty-year longitudinal study10.1111/1467-8624.00176 ↗
36. Laufer, I., Mizrahi, D., and Zuckerman, I. (2024). Enhancing EEG-Based Attachment Style Prediction: Unveiling the Impact of Feature Domains. Front. Psychol., 15.10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1326791 ↗
37. The effect of incentive structure on search in the secretary problem10.1017/S1930297500006926 ↗
38. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 ↗
39. Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 ↗
40. Resting state cortical connectivity reflected in EEG coherence in individuals with autism10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.012 ↗
41. EEG coherence in theta, alpha, and beta bands in frontal regions and executive functions10.1080/23279095.2019.1632860 ↗
42. Disordered connectivity in the autistic brain: Challenges for the ‘new psychophysiology’10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.012 ↗
43. How does a surgeon’s brain buzz? An EEG coherence study on the interaction between humans and robot10.1186/1744-9081-9-14 ↗
44. Ahmadi, H., Fatemizadeh, E., and Nasrabadi, A.M. (2020). A comparative study of the effect of weighted or binary functional brain networks in fMRI data analysis. Front. Biomed. Technol., 7.10.18502/fbt.v7i3.4618 ↗
45. Community detection in weighted brain connectivity networks beyond the resolution limit10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.026 ↗
46. The small scale functional topology of movement control: Hierarchical organization of local activity anticipates movement generation in the premotor cortex of primates10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116354 ↗
47. Response inhibition in premotor cortex corresponds to a complex reshuffle of the mesoscopic information network10.1162/netn_a_00365 ↗
48. An ensemble of Xgboost models for detecting disorders of consciousness in brain injuries through EEG connectivity10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116778 ↗
49. Elgart, M., Lyons, G., Romero-Brufau, S., Kurniansyah, N., Brody, J.A., Guo, X., Lin, H.J., Raffield, L., Gao, Y., and Chen, H. (2022). Non-linear machine learning models incorporating SNPs and PRS improve polygenic prediction in diverse human populations. Commun. Biol., 5.10.1038/s42003-022-03812-z ↗
50. Tiwari, A., and Chaturvedi, A. (2019, January 4–8). A multiclass EEG signal classification model using spatial feature extraction and XGBoost algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China.10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8967868 ↗
51. Hybrid gene selection approach using XGBoost and multi-objective genetic algorithm for cancer classification10.1007/s11517-021-02476-x ↗
52. Lundberg, S.M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J.M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., and Lee, S.-I. (2019). Explainable AI for trees: From local explanations to global understanding. arXiv.
53. Zhai, W., and Wang, Y. (2024). Lasso Ridge based XGBoost and Deep_LSTM Help Tennis Players Perform better. arXiv.
54. Accelerating the XGBoost algorithm using GPU computing10.7717/peerj-cs.127 ↗
55. Varma, S., and Simon, R. (2006). Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinform., 7.10.1186/1471-2105-7-91 ↗
56. On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation
57. Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 ↗
58. Sweet, J. (2021). The Association Between Attachment Style and Decision Making Style. [Honors Thesis, Union College].
59. Attachment style and self-regulation: How our patterns in relationships reflect broader motivational styles10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.024 ↗
60. Adult attachment styles in the workplace
61. Attachment styles and repressive defensiveness: The accessibility and architecture of affective memories10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.917 ↗
62. An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350 ↗
63. Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview
64. Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations10.1037/pspp0000027 ↗
65. Attachment styles and parental representations10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.407 ↗
66. Hacker, C., and Rieck, B. (2022). On the surprising behaviour of node2vec. arXiv.
67. Dalmia, A., and Gupta, M. Towards interpretation of node embeddings. Proceedings of the Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, Lyon, France, 23–27 April 2018.10.1145/3184558.3191523 ↗
68. Knežević, D., Babić, J., Savić, M., and Radovanović, M. (2022, January 5–7). Evaluation of LID-aware graph embedding methods for node clustering. Proceedings of the International Conference on Similarity Search and Applications, Bologna, Italy.10.1007/978-3-031-17849-8_18 ↗
69. Computer-aided diagnosis of schizophrenia based on node2vec and Transformer10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.109824 ↗
70. Mapping higher-order relations between brain structure and function with embedded vector representations of connectomes10.1038/s41467-018-04614-w ↗
71. Cattai, T., Caporali, C., Corsi, M.-C., and Colonnese, S. (2024, January 26–30). Introducing the modularity graph: An application to brain functional networks. Proceedings of the 2024 32nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Lyon, France.10.23919/EUSIPCO63174.2024.10715482 ↗
72. Kim, J.-G., Kim, H., Hwang, J., Kang, S.H., Lee, C.-N., Woo, J., Kim, C., Han, K., Kim, J.B., and Park, K.-W. (2022). Differentiating amnestic from non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment subtypes using graph theoretical measures of electroencephalography. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-10322-9 ↗
73. The many foibles of Likert scales challenge claims that self-report measures of self-control are better than performance-based measures10.3758/s13428-023-02089-2 ↗
74. Attachment as moderator of treatment outcome in major depression: A randomized control trial of interpersonal psychotherapy versus cognitive behavior therapy10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1041 ↗
75. Fraley, R.C., and Waller, N.G. (1998). Adult attachment patterns: A test of the typological model. Attachment Theory and Close Relationships, The Guilford Press.
76. Attachment security priming: A systematic review10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.03.001 ↗
77. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details
78. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering10.1109/10.623056 ↗
79. Coherence: The measurement and application of brain connectivity10.15540/nr.4.1.3 ↗
80. Uncertain data analysis with regularized XGBoost10.14704/WEB/V19I1/WEB19245 ↗
81. Attachment style in adulthood: Attachment style moderates the impact of social support on depressive symptoms10.1177/0265407520941091 ↗
82. Deep neurocomputational fusion for ASD diagnosis using multi-domain EEG analysis10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130353 ↗
83. Temporal attention fusion network with custom loss function for EEG–fNIRS classification10.1088/1741-2552/ad8e86 ↗
84. Liu, R., Hirn, M., and Krishnan, A. (2023). Accurately modeling biased random walks on weighted networks using node2vec+. Bioinformatics, 39.10.1093/bioinformatics/btad047 ↗
85. Zhao, W., Zhou, D., Qiu, X., and Jiang, W. (2020). A pipeline for fair comparison of graph neural networks in node classification tasks. arXiv.
86. Zhang, Y., and Tang, M. (2021). Exact recovery of community structures using DeepWalk and node2vec. arXiv.