journal article·2025-08-14Open access

Design and Implementation of a 3D Korean Sign Language Learning System Using Pseudo-Hologram

Naeun Kim, HaeYeong Choe, Sukwon Lee, Changgu Kang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 16

Abstract

Sign language is a three-dimensional (3D) visual language that conveys meaning through hand positions, shapes, and movements. Traditional sign language education methods, such as textbooks and videos, often fail to capture the spatial characteristics of sign language, leading to limitations in learning accuracy and comprehension. To address this, we propose a 3D Korean Sign Language Learning System that leverages pseudo-hologram technology and hand gesture recognition using Leap Motion sensors. The proposed system provides learners with an immersive 3D learning experience by visualizing sign language gestures through pseudo-holographic displays. A Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) model, combined with Diffusion Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks (DCRNNs) and ProbSparse Attention mechanisms, is used to recognize hand gestures from both hands in real-time. The system is implemented using a server–client architecture to ensure scalability and flexibility, allowing efficient updates to the gesture recognition model without modifying the client application. Experimental results show that the system enhances learners’ ability to accurately perform and comprehend sign language gestures. Additionally, a usability study demonstrated that 3D visualization significantly improves learning motivation and user engagement compared to traditional 2D learning methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hand Gesture Recognition Systems · Education and Learning Interventions · Robotics and Automated Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52828, Republic of Korea

Multimedia IT Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Wonju-si 26403, Republic of Korea

Funding

Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP)

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Hearing loss, loneliness, and social isolation: A systematic review10.1177/0194599820910377 ↗
2. A review of hand gesture and sign language recognition techniques10.1007/s13042-017-0705-5 ↗
3. Signs of their times: Deaf communities and the culture of language10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.020402.101302 ↗
4. Sign language in its social context10.1146/annurev.an.10.100181.001321 ↗
5. Deuchar, M. (2013). British Sign Language, Routledge.10.4324/9781315005089 ↗
6. Chuan, C.H., Regina, E., and Guardino, C. (2014, January 3–5). American sign language recognition using leap motion sensor. Proceedings of the 2014 13th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, Detroit, MI, USA.10.1109/ICMLA.2014.110 ↗
7. Mohandes, M., Aliyu, S., and Deriche, M. (2014, January 1–4). Arabic sign language recognition using the leap motion controller. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/ISIE.2014.6864742 ↗
8. Xue, Y., Gao, S., Sun, H., and Qin, W. (2017, January 21–22). A Chinese sign language recognition system using leap motion. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Virtual Reality and Visualization (ICVRV), Zhengzhou, China.10.1109/ICVRV.2017.00044 ↗
9. Demircioğlu, B., Bülbül, G., and Köse, H. (2016, January 16–19). Turkish sign language recognition with leap motion. Proceedings of the 2016 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference (SIU), Zonguldak, Turkey.10.1109/SIU.2016.7495809 ↗
10. Bird, J.J., Ekárt, A., and Faria, D.R. (2020). British sign language recognition via late fusion of computer vision and leap motion with transfer learning to american sign language. Sensors, 20.10.20944/preprints202008.0209.v1 ↗
11. Exploiting recurrent neural networks and leap motion controller for the recognition of sign language and semaphoric hand gestures10.1109/TMM.2018.2856094 ↗
12. Samaan, G.H., Wadie, A.R., Attia, A.K., Asaad, A.M., Kamel, A.E., Slim, S.O., Abdallah, M.S., and Cho, Y.I. (2022). Mediapipe’s landmarks with rnn for dynamic sign language recognition. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11193228 ↗
13. Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306 ↗
14. Recurrent neural networks: An embedded computing perspective10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982416 ↗
15. American sign language recognition and training method with recurrent neural network10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114403 ↗
16. Uddin, M.Z., Boletsis, C., and Rudshavn, P. (2025). Real-time Norwegian sign language recognition using MediaPipe and LSTM. Multimodal Technol. Interact., 9.10.3390/mti9030023 ↗
17. Wang, J., Ivrissimtzis, I., Li, Z., and Shi, L. (2024). The Impact of 2D and 3D Gamified VR on Learning American Sign Language. arXiv.
18. Design of Sign Language Learning Media Based on Virtual Reality10.3991/ijoe.v19i16.44671 ↗
19. Li, Y., Yu, R., Shahabi, C., and Liu, Y. (2017). Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: Data-driven traffic forecasting. arXiv.
20. Wang, X., Sun, S., Xie, L., and Ma, L. (2021). Efficient conformer with prob-sparse attention mechanism for end-to-endspeech recognition. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2021-415 ↗
21. From pixels to letters: A high-accuracy CPU-real-time American Sign Language detection pipeline
22. Recent Advances on Deep Learning for Sign Language Recognition
23. Effect of sign language learning on temporal resolution of visual attention10.1167/jov.25.1.3 ↗
24. Sign language interpretation using machine learning and artificial intelligence10.1007/s00521-024-10395-9 ↗
25. Sign language recognition system using convolutional neural network and computer vision
26. Mistry, J., and Inden, B. (2018, January 19–21). An approach to sign language translation using the intel realsense camera. Proceedings of the 2018 10th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering (CEEC), Colchester, UK.10.1109/CEEC.2018.8674227 ↗
27. Chong, T.W., and Lee, B.G. (2018). American sign language recognition using leap motion controller with machine learning approach. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18103554 ↗
28. Jiang, S., Sun, B., Wang, L., Bai, Y., Li, K., and Fu, Y. (2021, January 20–25). Skeleton aware multi-modal sign language recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPRW53098.2021.00380 ↗
29. Sign language recognition: A deep survey10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113794 ↗
30. Papastratis, I., Chatzikonstantinou, C., Konstantinidis, D., Dimitropoulos, K., and Daras, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence technologies for sign language. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21175843 ↗
31. Dao, T. (2023). Flashattention-2: Faster attention with better parallelism and work partitioning. arXiv.
32. Flashattention-3: Fast and accurate attention with asynchrony and low-precision
33. Poli, M., Massaroli, S., Nguyen, E., Fu, D.Y., Dao, T., Baccus, S., Bengio, Y., Ermon, S., and Ré, C. (2023, January 23–29). Hyena hierarchy: Towards larger convolutional language models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Honolulu, HI, USA.
34. Setiawan, V., Thendyliputra, R., Santami, S.A., Hansen, D., Warnars, H.L.H.S., Ramdhan, A., and Doucet, A. (2023, January 11–13). An Interactive Sign Language Based Mobile Application for Deaf People. Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), Tirunelveli, India.10.1109/ICOEI56765.2023.10125821 ↗
35. Voultsiou, E., and Moussiades, L. (2025). A systematic review of AI, VR, and LLM applications in special education: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Educ. Inf. Technol., 1–41.10.1007/s10639-025-13550-4 ↗
36. Schioppo, J., Meyer, Z., Fabiano, D., and Canavan, S. (2019, January 4–9). Sign language recognition: Learning american sign language in a virtual environment. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK.10.1145/3290607.3313025 ↗
37. Spatio-temporal graph neural networks for predictive learning in urban computing: A survey10.1109/TKDE.2023.3333824 ↗
38. A survey on graph neural networks for time series: Forecasting, classification, imputation, and anomaly detection10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3443141 ↗
39. Zhou, H., Zhang, S., Peng, J., Zhang, S., Li, J., Xiong, H., and Zhang, W. (2021, January 11–15). Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Virtual.10.1609/aaai.v35i12.17325 ↗
40. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
41. A general method for generating discrete orthogonal matrices10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3107579 ↗
42. Unequal error protection with the H. 264 flexible macroblock ordering