CAESAR: A Unified Framework for Foundation and Generative Models for Efficient Compression of Scientific Data
Source abstract
Abstract
We introduce CAESAR, a new framework for scientific data reduction that stands for Conditional AutoEncoder with Super-resolution for Augmented Reduction. The baseline model, CAESAR-V, is built on a standard variational autoencoder with scale hyperpriors and super-resolution modules to achieve high compression. It encodes data into a latent space and uses learned priors for compact, information-rich representations. The enhanced version, CAESAR-D, begins by compressing keyframes using an autoencoder and extends the architecture by incorporating conditional diffusion to interpolate the latent spaces of missing frames between keyframes. This enables high-fidelity reconstruction of intermediate data without requiring their explicit storage. By distinguishing CAESAR-V (variational) from CAESAR-D (diffusion-enhanced), we offer a modular family of solutions that balance compression efficiency, reconstruction accuracy, and computational cost for scientific data workflows. Additionally, we develop a GPU-accelerated postprocessing module which enforces error bounds on the reconstructed data, achieving real-time compression while maintaining rigorous accuracy guarantees. Experimental results across multiple scientific datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves up to 10× higher compression ratios compared to rule-based compressors such as SZ3. This work provides a scalable, domain-adaptive solution for efficient storage and transmission of large-scale scientific simulation data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Algorithms and Data Compression · Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems · Advanced Data Compression Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer & Information Science & Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A.C., and Lo, W.Y. (2023, January 2–3). Segment anything. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Paris, France.10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00371 ↗
2. Multilevel techniques for compression and reduction of scientific data-the univariate case10.1007/s00791-018-00303-9 ↗
3. Li, X., Gong, Q., Lee, J., Klasky, S., Rangarajan, A., and Ranka, S. (2024). Machine Learning Techniques for Data Reduction of Climate Applications. arXiv.10.1007/978-981-96-8170-9_34 ↗
4. Li, X., Lee, J., Rangarajan, A., and Ranka, S. (2024, January 15–18). Attention based machine learning methods for data reduction with guaranteed error bounds. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), Washington DC, USA.10.1109/BigData62323.2024.10825655 ↗
5. SZ3: A modular framework for composing prediction-based error-bounded lossy compressors10.1109/TBDATA.2022.3201176 ↗
6. Li, X., Zhu, L., Rangarajan, A., and Ranka, S. (2025). Generative Latent Diffusion for Efficient Spatiotemporal Data Reduction. arXiv.
7. The DOE E3SM coupled model version 1: Overview and evaluation at standard resolution10.1029/2018MS001603 ↗
8. Direct numerical simulations of ignition of a lean n-heptane/air mixture with temperature inhomogeneities at constant volume: Parametric study10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.01.025 ↗
9. A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study Lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence10.1080/14685240802376389 ↗
10. Stability analysis of inline ZFP compression for floating-point data in iterative methods10.1137/19M126904X ↗
11. TTHRESH: Tensor compression for multidimensional visual data
12. Multilevel techniques for compression and reduction of scientific data—The multivariate case10.1137/18M1166651 ↗
13. MGARD: A multigrid framework for high-performance, error-controlled data compression and refactoring10.1016/j.softx.2023.101590 ↗
14. Mun, S., and Fowler, J.E. (2012, January 27–31). DPCM for quantized block-based compressed sensing of images. Proceedings of the 2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Bucharest, Romania.
15. MPEG immersive video coding standard10.1109/JPROC.2021.3062590 ↗
16. Liang, X., Di, S., Tao, D., Li, S., Li, S., Guo, H., Chen, Z., and Cappello, F. (2018, January 10–13). Error-controlled lossy compression optimized for high compression ratios of scientific datasets. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/BigData.2018.8622520 ↗
17. Liu, J., Di, S., Zhao, K., Liang, X., Chen, Z., and Cappello, F. (2023, January 21–23). FAZ: A flexible auto-tuned modular error-bounded compression framework for scientific data. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Supercomputing, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1145/3577193.3593721 ↗
18. Kingma, D.P., and Welling, M. (2013). Auto-encoding variational Bayes. arXiv.
19. Minnen, D., Ballé, J., and Toderici, G.D. (2018, January 3–8). Joint autoregressive and hierarchical priors for learned image compression. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
20. Li, X., Lee, J., Rangarajan, A., and Ranka, S. (2025, January 10–13). Foundation Model for Lossy Compression of Spatiotemporal Scientific Data. Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Sydney, Australia.10.1007/978-981-96-8295-9_27 ↗
21. Diffusion models in vision: A survey10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3261988 ↗
22. He, C., Shen, Y., Fang, C., Xiao, F., Tang, L., Zhang, Y., Zuo, W., Guo, Z., and Li, X. (2025). Diffusion models in low-level vision: A survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.10.1109/TPAMI.2025.3545047 ↗
23. Voleti, V., Jolicoeur-Martineau, A., and Pal, C. (2022). MCVD: Masked Conditional Video Diffusion for Prediction, Generation, and Interpolation. arXiv, arXiv:2205.09853.
24. Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E., Maheswaranathan, N., and Ganguli, S. (2015, January 6–11). Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics. Proceedings of the the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.
25. Song, Y., and Ermon, S. (2019, January 8–14). Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
26. Ho, J., Jain, A., and Abbeel, P. (2020, January 6–12). Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Virtual.
27. Song, J., Meng, C., and Ermon, S. (2021, January 3–7). Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Virtual.
28. Yang, R., and Mandt, S. (2023, January 10–16). Lossy image compression with conditional diffusion models. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Orleans, LA, USA.
29. Ballé, J., Minnen, D., Singh, S., Hwang, S.J., and Johnston, N. (2018). Variational image compression with a scale hyperprior. arXiv.
30. Bai, H., and Liang, X. (2024). A very lightweight image super-resolution network. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-64724-y ↗
31. Haase, D., and Amthor, M. (2020, January 14–19). Rethinking depthwise separable convolutions: How intra-kernel correlations lead to improved mobilenets. Proceedings of the the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01461 ↗
32. Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., and Xie, S. (2022, January 18–24). A convnet for the 2020s. Proceedings of the the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01167 ↗
33. Hui, Z., Gao, X., Yang, Y., and Wang, X. (2019, January 21). Lightweight image super-resolution with information multi-distillation network. Proceedings of the the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Nice, France.10.1145/3343031.3351084 ↗
34. Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., and Ommer, B. (2022, January 18–24). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042 ↗
35. Blattmann, A., Rombach, R., Ling, H., Dockhorn, T., Kim, S.W., Fidler, S., and Kreis, K. (2023, January 17–24). Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.02161 ↗
36. Ho, J., Salimans, T., Gritsenko, A., Chan, W., Norouzi, M., and Fleet, D.J. (2022). Video diffusion models. arXiv.
37. Blattmann, A., Dockhorn, T., Kulal, S., Mendelevitch, D., Kilian, M., Lorenz, D., Levi, Y., English, Z., Voleti, V., and Letts, A. (2023). Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets. arXiv.
38. Van den Oord, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Espeholt, L., Vinyals, O., and Graves, A. (2016, January 5–10). Conditional image generation with pixelcnn decoders. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain.
39. Lee, J., Gong, Q., Choi, J., Banerjee, T., Klasky, S., Ranka, S., and Rangarajan, A. (2022). Error-Bounded Learned Scientific Data Compression with Preservation of Derived Quantities. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136718 ↗
40. Lee, J., Rangarajan, A., and Ranka, S. (2023, January 3–5). Nonlinear-by-Linear: Guaranteeing Error Bounds in Compressive Autoencoders. Proceedings of the 2023 Fifteenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing, IC3-2023, Noida, India.10.1145/3607947.3609702 ↗
41. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) (2025, June 09). ERA5 Hourly Data on Pressure Levels from 1940 to Present. Available online: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels?tab=overview.
42. (2025, August 10). National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Available online: http://vis.computer.org/vis2004contest/data.html.
43. Lienen, M., Lüdke, D., Hansen-Palmus, J., and Günnemann, S. (2025, August 12). 3D Turbulent Flow Simulations around Various Shapes. Dataset. TUM University Library, Munich, Germany, 2024. Available online: https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1737748.
44. (2025, June 09). HYCOM: Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model. Available online: https://www.hycom.org/dataserver.
45. Takamoto, M., Praditia, T., Leiteritz, R., MacKinlay, D., Alesiani, F., Pflüger, D., and Niepert, M. (2022). PDEBench Datasets, DaRUS, University of Stuttgart.
46. OpenFOAM Foundation (2025, August 10). OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox. Available online: https://openfoam.org.
47. Fixed-Rate Compressed Floating-Point Arrays10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346458 ↗