Modeling and Analysis of Surface Motion Characteristics for a Dual-Propulsion Amphibious Spherical Robot
Source abstract
Abstract
This study introduces an amphibious spherical robot equipped with a dual-propulsion system (ASR-DPS) and investigates its water-surface motion characteristics. Due to its distinctive spherical geometry, the robot exhibits markedly different hydrodynamic behavior compared to conventional vessels. A comparative analysis of the frontal wetted area is performed, followed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to assess water-surface performance. The results indicate that the hemispherical bow increases hydrodynamic resistance and generates large-scale vortex structures as a consequence of intensified flow separation. Although the resistance is higher than that of traditional hulls, the robot’s greater draft and dual-propulsion configuration enhance stability and maneuverability during surface operations. To validate real-world performance, standard maneuvering tests, including circle and zig-zag maneuvers, are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the propeller-based propulsion system. The robot achieves a maximum surface speed of 1.2 m/s and a zero turning radius, with a peak yaw rate of 0.54 rad/s under differential thrust. Additionally, experiments on the pendulum-based propulsion system demonstrate a maximum speed of 0.239 m/s with significantly lower energy consumption (220.6 Wh at 60% throttle). A four-degree-of-freedom kinematic and dynamic model is formulated to describe the water-surface motion. To address model uncertainties and external disturbances, two control strategies are proposed: one employing model simplification and the other adaptive control. Simulation results confirm that the adaptive sliding mode controller provides precise surge speed tracking and smooth yaw regulation with near-zero steady-state error, exhibiting superior robustness and reduced chattering compared to the baseline controller.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Micro and Nano Robotics · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Cyber Systems and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
Rotunbot (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310018, China
Funding
State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, China · Rotunbot (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Jun, B.-H., Shim, H., Kim, B., Park, J.-Y., Baek, H., Yoo, S., and Lee, P.-M. (2013, January 10–14). Development of seabed walking robot CR200. Proceedings of the 2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS—Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
2. Dhull, S., Canelon, D., Kottas, A., Dancs, J., Carlson, A., and Papanikolopoulos, N. (2012, January 7–12). Aquapod: A small amphibious robot with sampling capabilities. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura-Algarve, Portugal.10.1109/IROS.2012.6385733 ↗
3. Bernstein, C., Connolly, M., Gavrilash, M., Kucik, D., and Threatt, S. (2002, January 22–25). Demonstration of surf zone crawlers: Results from auv fest 01. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Technology and Mine Problem (5th), Monterey, CA, USA.
4. Prahacs, C., Saudners, A., Smith, M.K., McMordie, D., and Buehler, M. (2004, January 29–30). Towards legged amphibious mobile robotics. Proceedings of the Canadian Design Engineering Network Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.
5. Harkins, R., Ward, J., Vaidyanathan, R., Boxerbaum, A., and Quinn, R.D. (2005, January 24–28). Design of an autonomous amphibious robot for surf zone operations: Part II—Hardware, control implementation and simulation. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Monterey, CA, USA.
6. Boxerbaum, A.S., Werk, P., Quinn, R.D., and Vaidyanathan, R. (2005, January 24–28). Design of an autonomous amphibious robot for surf zone operation: Part I—Mechanical design for multi-mode mobility. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Monterey, CA, USA.
7. Design and performance evaluation of an amphibious spherical robot10.1016/j.robot.2014.11.007 ↗
8. Guo, S., Mao, S., Shi, L., and Li, M. (2012, January 5–8). Design and kinematic analysis of an amphibious spherical robot. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Chengdu, China.10.1109/ICMA.2012.6285687 ↗
9. Design, modeling and control of a miniature bio-inspired amphibious spherical robot10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102574 ↗
10. Xing, H., Guo, S., Shi, L., He, Y., Su, S., Chen, Z., and Hou, X. (2018). Hybrid locomotion evaluation for a novel amphibious spherical robot. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8020156 ↗
11. Chi, X., and Zhan, Q. (2021). Design and modelling of an amphibious spherical robot attached with assistant fins. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11093739 ↗
12. A novel amphibious spherical robot equipped with flywheel, pendulum, and propeller10.1007/s10846-017-0558-x ↗
13. Jia, L., Hu, Z., Geng, L., Yang, Y., and Wang, C. (2016, January 19–22). The concept design of a mobile amphibious spherical robot for underwater operation. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems, Chengdu, China.10.1109/CYBER.2016.7574860 ↗
14. Design of an amphibious spherical robot driven by twin eccentric pendulums with flywheel-based inertial stabilization
15. Adaptive sliding mode fault-tolerant fuzzy tracking control with application to unmanned marine vehicles10.1109/TSMC.2020.2964808 ↗
16. Terminal sliding mode disturbance observer based adaptive super twisting sliding mode controller design for a class of nonlinear systems10.1016/j.ejcon.2020.05.004 ↗
17. Model predictive control for path following and roll stabilization of marine vessels based on neurodynamic optimization10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107524 ↗
18. Identification of 4-DoF maneuvering mathematical models for a combatant in intact and damaged conditions10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2022.100480 ↗
19. FTILOS-based self-triggered adaptive neural path following control for 4DOF underactuated unmanned surface vehicles10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.116947 ↗
20. Zou, H., Wang, M., Zhang, F., Guan, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Luo, Z., and Li, G. (2025). Design of an amphibious spherical robot with roll auto-stabilisation and propulsion system auto-switching. Ships Offshore Struct., 1–13.10.1080/17445302.2025.2498112 ↗
21. Zou, H., Lin, B., Cao, X., Zhang, F., Zhang, Z., and Wang, Y. (2023, January 17–19). Research on Amphibious Spherical Robot with Water Surface Posture Self-Stabilization. Proceedings of the 2023 China Automation Congress, Chongqing, China.10.1109/CAC59555.2023.10451385 ↗
22. Kundu, P.K., Cohen, I.M., Dowling, D.R., and Capecelatro, J. (2024). Fluid Mechanics, Elsevier.
23. Zou, H., Hu, D., Zhang, B., Wang, Y., and Li, G. (2024). Analysis and Evaluation of a Multi-Modal Propulsion System for Aquatic Locomotion in Amphibious Spherical Robots. SSRN Electron. J., 5166970.10.2139/ssrn.5166970 ↗
24. Siemens Digital Industries Software (2025, August 06). STAR-CCM+ Marine Resistance Prediction for KCS Hull with Rudder. STAR-CCM+ Case Study., Available online: https://docs.sw.siemens.com/documentation/external/PL20221128664127487/en-US/userManual/starccmp_userguide_html/STARCCMP/GUID-79564ACE-BD7B-4F18-929F-DA6B92A2AE1F.html.
25. Numerical Estimation and Validation of Drag Force for KCS Hull using STAR CCM+
26. IMO (2002). Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability, Resolution MSC.137(76); International Maritime Organization. Available online: https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MSCResolutions/MSC.137(76).pdf.
27. Fossen, T.I. (2011). Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119994138 ↗
28. Guidance and control based on adaptive sliding mode strategy for a USV subject to uncertainties
29. Control of an unmanned surface vehicle with uncertain displacement and drag
30. Lamb, H. (1945). Hydrodynamics, Cambridge at the University Press. [6th ed.].
31. Characterization and system identification of an unmanned amphibious tracked vehicle
32. Dynamic model identification of unmanned surface vehicles using deep learning network10.1016/j.apor.2018.06.011 ↗
33. Gokarn, R. (2024). Ship Manoeuvring Standards and Guidelines. A Study of Ship Manoeuvrability, Springer.10.1007/978-981-97-0625-9 ↗
34. Liao, Y., Pang, Y., and Wan, L. (2010, January 6–7). Combined speed and yaw control of underactuated unmanned surface vehicles. Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Wuhan, China.
35. Polynomial fuzzy model-based approach for underactuated surface vessels10.1049/iet-cta.2017.1106 ↗
36. Asymptotic backstepping stabilization of an underactuated surface vessel10.1109/TCST.2006.880220 ↗
37. Continuous and smooth differentiator based on adaptive sliding mode control for a quad-rotor MAV10.1002/asjc.2249 ↗
38. Cantu, R., and Castañeda, H. (2018, January 12–15). Smooth differentiator based on adaptive sliding mode control for a quadrotor Micro Air Vehicle. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/ICUAS.2018.8453479 ↗