Quantitative Risk Assessment and Tiered Classification of Indoor Airborne Infection Based on the REHVA Model: Application to Multiple Real-World Scenarios
Source abstract
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for a scientific framework that enables quantitative assessment and control of airborne infection risks in indoor environments. This study identifies limitations in the traditional Wells–Riley model—specifically its assumptions of perfect mixing and steady-state conditions—and addresses these shortcomings by adopting the REHVA (Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Associations) infection risk assessment model. We propose a five-tier risk classification system (Monitor, Caution, Alert, High Risk, Critical) based on two key metrics: the probability of infection (Pₙ) and the event reproduction number (R_event). Unlike the classical model, our approach integrates airborne virus removal mechanisms—such as natural decay, gravitational settling, and filtration—with occupant dynamics to reflect realistic contagion scenarios. Simulations were conducted across 10 representative indoor settings—such as classrooms, hospital waiting rooms, public transit, and restaurants—considering ventilation rates and activity-specific viral emission patterns. The results quantify how environmental variables (ventilation, occupancy, time) impact each setting’s infection risk level. Our findings indicate that static mitigation measures such as mask-wearing or physical distancing are insufficient without dynamic, model-based risk evaluation. We emphasize the importance of incorporating real-time crowd density, occupancy duration, and movement trajectories into risk scoring. To support this, we propose integrating computer vision (CCTV-based crowd detection) and entry/exit counting sensors within a live airborne risk assessment framework. This integrated system would enable proactive, science-driven epidemic control strategies, supporting real-time adaptive interventions in indoor spaces. The proposed platform could serve as a practical tool for early warning and management during future airborne disease outbreaks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infection Control and Ventilation · Noise Effects and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
i CAPTAIN Co., Ltd., Incheon 22146, Republic of Korea
Department of Smart Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, 2 Tongyeong Haean-ro, Tongyeong-si 53064, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Coronavirus disease outbreak in call center, South Korea10.3201/eid2608.201274 ↗
2. Economic impact of targeted government responses to COVID-19: Evidence from the large-scale clusters in Seoul10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.013 ↗
3. Wood, S.G., Craske, J., and Burridge, H.C. (2023). Relating quanta conservation and compartmental epidemiological models of airborne disease outbreaks in buildings. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-44527-3 ↗
4. Review and comparison between the Wells–Riley and dose-response approaches to risk assessment of infectious respiratory diseases10.1111/j.1600-0668.2009.00621.x ↗
5. Kurnitski, J., Boerstra, A., Franchimon, F., Sikonczyk, I., van Dijken, F., Lungu, C., and Hovorka, F. (2021). REHVA COVID-19 Ventilation Calculator Documentation (Version 2.0), REHVA.
6. Airborne spread of measles in a suburban elementary school10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112560 ↗
7. Wells-Riley based COVID-19 infectious risk assessment model combining both short range and room scale effects. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press10.1007/s12273-023-1060-y ↗
8. Modelling the transmission of airborne infections in enclosed spaces10.1017/S0950268806005875 ↗
9. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics
10. Mwalili, S., Kimathi, M., Ojiambo, V., Gathungu, D., and Mbogo, R. (2020). SEIR model for COVID-19 dynamics incorporating the environment and social distancing. BMC Res. Notes, 13.10.1186/s13104-020-05192-1 ↗
11. Agent-Based Modeling to Simulate Aerosolized Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 inside Small Ventilated Spaces10.3390/covid3070068 ↗
12. Crawford, C., Vanoli, E., Decorde, B., Lancelot, M., Duprat, C., Josserand, C., Timsit, J.F., Jilesen, J., and Bouadma, L. (2021). Modeling of aerosol transmission of airborne pathogens in ICU rooms of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-91265-5 ↗
13. Wang, F., Zhang, T.T., You, R., and Chen, Q. (2023). Evaluation of infection probability of Covid-19 in different types of airliner cabins. Build. Environ., 234.10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110159 ↗
14. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by inhalation of respiratory aerosol in the Skagit Valley Chorale superspreading event10.1111/ina.12751 ↗
15. Lau, Z., Griffiths, I.M., English, A., and Kaouri, K. (2022). Predicting the spatio-temporal infection risk in indoor spaces using an efficient airborne transmission model. Proc. R. Soc. A, 478.10.1098/rspa.2021.0383 ↗
16. COVID-19 outbreak among attendees of an exercise facility—Chicago, Illinois, August–September 202010.15585/mmwr.mm7009e2 ↗