Design and Aerodynamic Analysis of Rigid Wing Sail of Unmanned Sailboat at Sea Based on CFD
Source abstract
Abstract
As a novel type of ocean monitoring tool, unmanned sailboats exhibit significant application potential. In this study, a novel wing sail structure for offshore unmanned sailboats is proposed and its performance compared with that of the conventional NACA 0021 wing sail. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are employed for numerical analysis, and the aerodynamic performance is evaluated using ANSYS Fluent. The results indicate that the lift coefficient and lift-to-drag ratio of the HF-14-CE-01 wing sail are significantly superior to those of the NACA 0021 wing sail. Compared to the NACA 0021 wing sail, the HF-14-CE-01 wing sail has undergone structural optimization. The HF-14-CE-01 wing sail demonstrates improved wind direction efficiency, uniform force distribution, ease of adjustment, and extends the service life of the sail. Subsequent research examined the influence of aspect ratio on both the aerodynamic performance of the wing sail and the thrust generated by the unmanned sailboat, identifying an optimal aspect ratio of 4 for the HF-14-CE-01 wing sail. Analysis of the velocity and static pressure contour maps for the HF-14-CE-01 wing sail identified a critical angle of attack of 28°, providing a clear visual representation of its aerodynamic performance. Furthermore, compared with other rigid sail designs, the HF-14-CE-01 wing sail achieved a 30.9% increase in peak lift coefficient, indicating superior propulsion capability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems · Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability · Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physics Science and Information Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China
Funding
Shandong Province science and technology SMES innovation ability improvement project of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Qin, H., Xiang, K., Cao, X., Qi, B., Huang, X., and Wang, Y. (2025). Optimization design and experimental verification of unmanned sailboat sails. Phys. Fluids, 37.10.1063/5.0251022 ↗
2. Development of autonomous sailboat sails and future perspectives: A review10.1016/j.rser.2024.114918 ↗
3. Chiodi, A.M., Zhang, C., Cokelet, E.D., Yang, Q., Mordy, C.W., Gentemann, C.L., Cross, J.N., Lawrence-Slavas, N., Meinig, C., and Steele, M. (2021). Exploring the Pacific Arctic seasonal ice zone with saildrone USVs. Front. Mar. Sci., 8.10.3389/fmars.2021.640697 ↗
4. Fer, I., and Peddie, D. (2013, January 10–13). Near surface oceanographic measurements using the SailBuoy. Proceedings of the 2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS-Bergen, Bergen, Norway.10.1109/OCEANS-Bergen.2013.6607969 ↗
5. Ouchi, K., Uzawa, K., and Kanai, A. (2011, January 17). Huge hard wing sails for the propulsor of next generation sailing vessel. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany.
6. Viola, I.M., Biancolini, M.E., Sacher, M., and Cella, U. (2015, January 9–11). A CFD-based wing sail optimisation method coupled to a VPP. Proceedings of the 5th High Performance Yacht Design Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
7. Analysis of lift, drag and CX polar graph for a 3D segment rigid sail using CFD analysis10.1080/20464177.2018.1494953 ↗
8. A numerical study on the thrust and interaction of a three-sail wind-assisted propulsion system
9. Propulsive performance of a rigid wingsail with crescent-shaped profiles10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115349 ↗
10. Investigation of the flow around an aircraft wing of section NACA 2412 utilising ANSYS fluent10.13111/2066-8201.2018.10.1.10 ↗
11. Guo, H., Li, G., and Zou, Z. (2022). Numerical simulation of the flow around NACA0018 airfoil at high incidences by using RANS and DES methods. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10070847 ↗
12. Bernoulli’s principle
13. Tinoco, V., Malheiro, B., and Silva, M.F. (2021). Design, modeling, and simulation of a wing sail land yacht. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11062760 ↗
14. Feasibility study of wing sail technology for commercial ship
15. Mi, B., and Yu, J. (2024). A New Grid-Slat Fusion Device to Improve the Take-Off and Landing Performance of Amphibious Seaplanes. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12122303 ↗
16. Aerodynamic performance of a new double-flap wing sail10.2478/pomr-2019-0067 ↗
17. Chen, Y., Liu, S., Xie, T., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Lin, W., Jiang, K., and Wang, T. (2024). Parameter Identification of an Unmanned Sailboat Combining Experiments and Numerical Analysis. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12122226 ↗
18. Kleinstreuer, C. (2018). Modern Fluid Dynamics, CRC Press.
19. Kajishima, T., and Taira, K. (2016). Reynolds-averaged navier–stokes equations. Computational Fluid Dynamics: Incompressible Turbulent Flows, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-45304-0_7 ↗
20. Navier–stokes equations
21. Adjustment of the k-ω SST turbulence model for prediction of airfoil characteristics near stall
22. Zhao, M., Wan, D., and Gao, Y. (2021). Comparative study of different turbulence models for cavitational flows around NACA0012 hydrofoil. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9070742 ↗
23. Liu, J., Jiang, Z., Du, L., Lv, Z., Cui, H., Li, X., and Liang, G. (2025). Hydrodynamic and Vibroacoustic Simulation Analysis of the Main Float in an Acoustic Submerged Buoy System. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 13.10.3390/jmse13071254 ↗
24. Large-eddy simulation with near-wall modeling using weakly enforced no-slip boundary conditions10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.06.016 ↗
25. Mesh quality effects on the accuracy of CFD solutions on unstructured meshes10.1016/j.jcp.2011.06.023 ↗
26. Overview and control strategies of autonomous sailboats—A survey10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114879 ↗
27. Effect of chord length ratio on aerodynamic performance of two-element wing sail10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115946 ↗
28. Li, Y., Hu, J., Zhao, Q., Pan, Z., and Ma, Z. (2020). Hydrodynamic performance of autonomous underwater gliders with active twin undulatory wings of different aspect ratios. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8070476 ↗
29. Dimensionally and Physically Proper Lift, Drag, and Thrust-Related Numbers as Figures of Merit: Normalized Lift, Drag, and Thrust, η L, η D, and η T10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000689 ↗
30. Yasuda, A., Taniguchi, T., and Katayama, T. (2024). Numerical Investigation of Aerodynamic Interactions between Rigid Sails Attached to Ship. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12081425 ↗
31. Wu, C.H., Chen, J.Z., Lo, Y.L., and Fu, C.-L. (2023). Numerical and Experimental Studies on the Aerodynamics of NACA64 and DU40 Airfoils at Low Reynolds Numbers. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031478 ↗