Proactive Scheduling and Routing of MRP-Based Production with Constrained Resources
Source abstract
Abstract
This research addresses the challenges of proactive scheduling and routing in manufacturing systems governed by the Material Requirement Planning (MRP) method. Such systems often face capacity constraints, difficulties in resource balancing, and limited traceability of component requirements. The lack of seamless integration between customer orders and production tasks, combined with the manual and time-consuming nature of schedule adjustments, highlights the need for an automated and optimized scheduling method. We propose a novel optimization-based approach that leverages mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) combined with a proprietary procedure for reducing the size of the modeled problem to generate feasible and/or optimal production schedules. The model incorporates dynamic routing, partial resource utilization, limited additional resources (e.g., tools, workers), technological breaks, and time quantization. Key results include determining order feasibility, identifying unfulfilled order components, minimizing costs, shortening deadlines, and assessing feasibility in the absence of available resources. By automating the generation of data from MRP/ERP systems, constructing an optimization model, and exporting the results back to the MRP/ERP structure, this method improves decision-making and competes with expensive Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS) systems. The proposed innovation solution—the integration of MILP-based optimization with the proprietary PT (data transformation) and PR (model-size reduction) procedures—not only increases operational efficiency but also enables demand source tracking and offers a scalable and economical alternative for modern production environments. Experimental results demonstrate significant reductions in production costs (up to 25%) and lead times (more than 50%).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms · Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Computer Science, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, Poland
Funding
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Vollmann, T.E., Berry, W.L., Whybark, D.C., and Jacobs, F.R. (2005). Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management, McGraw-Hill/Irwin. [5th ed.].
2. Ptak, C.A., and Smith, C. (2011). Demand Driven MRP: A Practical and Proven Method for Managing the Planning and Execution of Manufacturing and Distribution, Industrial Press.
3. Pinedo, M. (2016). Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems, Springer. [5th ed.].
4. Kempf, K., Keskinocak, P., and Uzsoy, R. (2011). Uncertainty and Production Planning. Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-8191-2 ↗
5. Herrmann, J.W. (2006). A history of production scheduling. Handbook of Production Scheduling, Springer.10.1007/0-387-33117-4 ↗
6. A Review of Multi Agent-based Production Scheduling in Manufacturing System10.2174/1872212114999200423112955 ↗
7. ERP plans and decision-support benefits10.1016/j.dss.2003.07.001 ↗
8. Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues
9. Reinforcement learning for dynamic scheduling in Industry 4.0: A survey. Journal of Manufacturing Systems
10. Jang, J., Klabjan, D., Liu, H., Patel, N.S., Li, X., Ananthanarayanan, B., and Juang, T.H. (2024). Scalable Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Factory-wide Dynamic Scheduling. arXiv.
11. Reinforcement learning and digital twin-based real-time scheduling method in intelligent manufacturing systems10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.413 ↗
12. On the design of online production scheduling algorithms
13. A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for decentralized production scheduling in smart factories
14. (2025, June 28). AMPL. Available online: https://ampl.com/.
15. (2025, June 28). Gurobi. Available online: https://www.gurobi.com.
16. Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., and Ruszczynski, A. (2021). Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory. MOS-SIAM Series on Optimization, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.10.1137/1.9781611976595 ↗
17. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 ↗
18. Machine learning for combinatorial optimization: A methodological tour d’horizon10.1016/j.ejor.2020.07.063 ↗
19. Capacitated vehicle routing problem with pick-up and alternative delivery (CVRPPAD): Model and implementation using hybrid approach10.1007/s10479-017-2722-x ↗
20. Nguyen, N.T., Matsuo, T., Gaol, F.L., Manolopoulos, Y., Fujita, H., Hong, T.-P., and Wojtkiewicz, K. (2025). Proactive Approach to Personnel Assignment in University Course Timetabling Problem. Intelligent Information and Database Systems, Springer. ACIIDS 2025.10.1007/978-981-96-6005-6 ↗
21. Wikarek, J., Juzoń, Z., and Sitek, P. (2025, January 11–12). Optimization of Production Process through TOGAF-Based Audits and Mathematical Programming Models. Proceedings of the 15th IFAC Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, Koszalin, Poland.