journal article·2025-08-08Open access

The Irrigation Water pH Has a Dominant Impact on the Growth and Stress Markers of Bigleaf Hydrangea

Monika Marković, Vlatko Galić, Veronika Težak, Marija Ravlić, Željko Barač, Irena Jug, Lucija Galić

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 16

Abstract

Hydrangeas are economically important ornamental plants whose growth and flower characteristics depend on irrigation water quality (IWC), i.e., hydrogenionic potential (pH) and electrical conductivity (EC). Unfavorable IWC causes plant stress, reduced growth and tissue damage, leading to physiological responses such as proline accumulation (for stress protection) and increased malondialdehyde (MDA, an indicator of damage). A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted as a three-factor study in three replicates. The study examined the impact of different pH levels (4, 5, and 6, compared to a control treatment of pH 7), and EC levels (2, 3, and 4 dS m−1, compared to a control treatment of 1 dS m−1) on biomass, i.e., plant height (cm), stem number (n), flower number (n), leaf number (n) and weight (g), flower weight (g) and diameter (cm), growth index (GI) and the proline and MDA concentrations in two hydrangea varieties (Early Blue and Bianco). Study results showed a significant impact of (p = 0.0001) pH on all tested morphological properties, except flower diameter. Notably, pH 6 maximized biomass accumulation, i.e., plant height (56.6 cm), leaf number (n = 97) and weight, flower weight (156.8 g), and GI (36 cm), while pH 4 promoted the highest number of flowers (n = 10) and stems (n = 10), which are both crucial for aesthetic and market value. EC significantly (p = 0.001) affected plant height (EC 2 = 56.3 cm), flower (EC 2 = 181.9 g) and leaf weight (EC 3 = 148.2 g), and growth index (EC 2 = 27.2 cm). The lowest stress indicators (proline and MDA concentrations) were recorded at pH 6 (MDA = 0.215 µmol g−1 FW, proline = 659.5 µmol g−1 FW) and EC 2 (MDA = 0.551 µmol g−1 FW, proline = 4068.2 µmol g−1 FW). The highest MDA and proline concentrations were observed under extreme conditions of pH 4 (MDA = 1.257 µmol g−1 FW, proline = 12,811.7 µmol g−1 FW) and EC 4 (MDA = 0.692 µmol g−1 FW, proline = 4880.8 µmol g−1 FW). No significant effect of variety on proline and MDA concentrations was observed, while the highest GI was recorded for the Early Blue variety (24.3 cm). This research identifies pH 6 and EC 2 as key conditions for optimizing hydrangea biomass and reducing stress, offering practical guidelines for growers. The findings provide a foundation for developing precise irrigation water quality strategies in the commercial production of ornamental plants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies · Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance · Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Agrobiotechnical Sciences Osijek, University of Josip Juraj Strossmayer of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia

Agricultural Institute Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Hydrangea Cultivation: Advances in Propagation, Soil Management, and Disease Control10.51470/JPB.2025.4.1.11 ↗
2. Xue, C., Wen, Y., Sheng, S., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, T., Peng, J., and Cao, S. (2024). Hormonal Regulation and Transcriptomic Insights into Flower Development in Hydrangea paniculata ‘Vanilla Strawberry’. Plants, 13.10.3390/plants13040486 ↗
3. Croatian Bureau of Statistics (2025, July 23). Flower Production. Available online: https://web.dzs.hr/PxWeb/pxweb/hr/Poljoprivreda,%20lov,%20%c5%a1umarstvo%20i%20ribarstvo/Poljoprivreda,%20lov,%20%c5%a1umarstvo%20i%20ribarstvo__Biljna%20proizvodnja/BP1_NUTS2021.px/.
4. Croatian Chamber of Economy (2025, July 23). Cvijeće Uvezeno u Listopadu Vrijedi pet Milijuna Kuna. Available online: https://www.hgk.hr/cvijece-uvezeno-u-listopadu-vrijedi-pet-milijuna-kuna.
5. Application of Vermicompost Improves Strawberry Growth and Quality through Increased Photosynthesis Rate, Free Radical Scavenging and Soil Enzymatic Activity10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.023 ↗
6. Yang, T., Samarakoon, U., Altland, J., and Ling, P. (2024). Influence of Electrical Conductivity on Plant Growth, Nutritional Quality, and Phytochemical Properties of Kale (Brassica napus) and Collard (Brassica oleracea) Grown Using Hydroponics. Agronomy, 14.10.3390/agronomy14112704 ↗
7. Growth Response of Hydrangea macrophylla and Ilex crenata Cultivars to Low-Phosphorus Controlled-Release Fertilizers10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.045 ↗
8. Systemic Regulation of Soybean Nodulation by Acidic Growth Conditions10.1104/pp.112.204149 ↗
9. Rathinapriya, P., Maharajan, T., Jothi, R., Prabakaran, M., Lee, I.B., Yi, P.H., and Jeong, S.T. (2024). Unlocking Biochar Impacts on Abiotic Stress Dynamics: A Systematic Review of Soil Quality and Crop Improvement. Front. Plant Sci., 15.10.3389/fpls.2024.1479925 ↗
10. Cassaniti, C., Romano, D., and Flowers, T.J. (2012). The Response of Ornamental Plants to Saline Irrigation Water. Irrigation—Water Management, Pollution and Alternative Strategies, InTech.10.5772/31787 ↗
11. Xiao, J., Guo, G., and Jeong, B.R. (2021). Iron Supplement-enhanced Growth and Development of Hydrangea macrophylla in Vitro under Normal and High Ph. Cells, 10.10.3390/cells10113151 ↗
12. Li, Z., Lyu, T., and Lyu, Y. (2024). The Molecular Biology Analysis for the Growing and Development of Hydrangea macrophylla ‘Endless Summer’ under Different Light and Temperature Conditions. Horticulturae, 10.10.3390/horticulturae10060586 ↗
13. Crop Physiological Response to Nutrient Solution Electrical Conductivity and PH in an Ebb-and-Flow Hydroponic System10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.045 ↗
14. Soil Properties Influencing Apparent Electrical Conductivity: A Review10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.001 ↗
15. Measurement and Use of PH and Electrical Conductivity for Soil Quality Analysis10.2136/sssaspecpub49.c10 ↗
16. The Effect of Electrical Conductivity of Irrigation Water on Water Uptake by Capsicum in Soilless Media10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.262 ↗
17. Lam, V.P., Kim, S.J., and Park, J.S. (2020). Optimizing the Electrical Conductivity of a Nutrient Solution for Plant Growth and Bioactive Compounds of Agastache rugosa in a Plant Factory. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10010076 ↗
18. Ding, X., Jiang, Y., Zhao, H., Guo, D., He, L., Liu, F., Zhou, Q., Nandwani, D., Hui, D., and Yu, J. (2018). Electrical Conductivity of Nutrient Solution Influenced Photosynthesis, Quality, and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity of Pakchoi (Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis) in a Hydroponic System. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0202090 ↗
19. Omar, M.M., Shitindi, M.J., Massawe, B.H.J., Pedersen, O., Meliyo, J.L., and Fue, K.G. (2024). Modeling the Electrical Conductivity Relationship between Saturated Paste Extract and 1:2.5 Dilution in Different Soil Textural Classes. Front. Soil Sci., 4.10.3389/fsoil.2024.1421661 ↗
20. Ion-Specific Nutrient Management in Closed Systems: The Necessity for Ion-Selective Sensors in Terrestrial and Space-Based Agriculture and Water Management Systems10.3390/s121013349 ↗
21. Mechanisms of Plant Responses and Adaptation to Soil Salinity
22. Light intensity and fertilizer concentration: I. Estimating optimal fertilizer concentrations from water-use efficiency of wax begonia10.21273/HORTSCI.39.6.1287 ↗
23. Gao, Y., Wu, J., Pan, Y., Zhao, J., and Zou, X. (2025). Effects of Different pH Values on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Anoectochilus roxburghii. J. Plant Growth Regul.10.1007/s00344-025-11699-3 ↗
24. Effect of nutrient solution pH on the quality of Lactuca sativa L. in a hydroponic system under struvite fertilization
25. Ferrarezi, R.S., Lin, X., Gonzalez Neira, A.C., Tabay Zambon, F., Hu, H., Wang, X., Huang, J.H., and Fan, G. (2022). Substrate pH Influences the Nutrient Absorption and Rhizosphere Microbiome of Huanglongbing-Affected Grapefruit Plants. Front. Plant Sci., 13.10.3389/fpls.2022.856937 ↗
26. Penn, C.J., and Camberato, J.J. (2019). A Critical Review on Soil Chemical Processes that Control How Soil pH Affects Phosphorus Availability to Plants. Agriculture, 9.10.3390/agriculture9060120 ↗
27. Hypersensitivity of Ranunculus asiaticus to Salinity and Alkaline pH in Irrigation Water in Sand Cultures10.21273/HORTSCI.44.1.138 ↗
28. Salinity and Alkaline pH in Irrigation Water Affect Marigold Plants: I. Growth and Shoot Dry Weight Partitioning10.21273/HORTSCI.44.6.1719 ↗
29. Salinity and Alkaline pH in Irrigation Water Affect Marigold Plants: II. Mineral Ion Relations10.21273/HORTSCI.44.6.1726 ↗
30. Loganathachetti, D.S., and Mundra, S. (2023). Water pH, not soil pH, alters bacterial community structural pattern and nitrogen cycling pathways in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) roots and bulk soil under freshwater irrigation regime. Front. Ecol. Evol., 11.10.3389/fevo.2023.1142073 ↗
31. Response of five hydrangea species to foliar salt spray
32. Irrigation of Hydrangea with Saline Reclaimed Wastewater: Effects of Fresh Water Flushing10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1000.30 ↗
33. Insights on Physiological, Antioxidant and Flowering Response to Salinity Stress of Two Candidate Ornamental Species: The Native Coastal Geophytes Pancratium maritimum L. and Eryngium maritimum L.10.1007/s12298-024-01502-0 ↗
34. Photo-Oxidative Stress Markers as a Measure of Abiotic Stress-Induced Leaf Senescence: Advantages and Limitations10.1093/jxb/eru086 ↗
35. How Plants Sense and Respond to Stressful Environments10.1104/pp.19.01464 ↗
36. Linking Abiotic Stress, Plant Metabolites, Biostimulants and Functional Food10.1111/aab.12651 ↗
37. Water Stress, Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Lipid Peroxidation in Wheat Seedling
38. Physiological Changes and Defense Mechanisms Induced by Cadmium Stress in Maize10.1002/jpln.200520573 ↗
39. Improvement of Morphophysiological and Anatomical Attributes of Plants under Abiotic Stress Conditions Using Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria and Safety Treatments10.7717/peerj.17286 ↗
40. Rédei, G.P. (2008). Proline Biosynthesis. Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Informatics, Springer. [3rd ed.].10.1007/978-1-4020-6754-9 ↗
41. Synchronization and Interaction of Proline, Ascorbate and Oxidative Stress Pathways under Abiotic Stress Combination in Tomato Plants10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104351 ↗
42. Evaluation of Proline Functions in Saline Conditions10.1016/j.phytochem.2017.04.016 ↗
43. Role of Proline under Changing Environments: A Review10.4161/psb.21949 ↗
44. Ayers, R.S., and Westcot, D.W. (1985). Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
45. Kos, Z. (1997). Kriteriji Kvalitete Vode Za Natapanje. Priručnik za Hidrotehničke Melioracije, Kvaliteta i Raspoloživost Vode Za Natapanje, Građevinski Fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci.
46. FAO (2023). Standard Operating Procedure for Soil Moisture Content by Gravimetric Method, FAO.
47. Morphological and physiological responses of ten ornamental taxa to saline water irrigation10.21273/HORTSCI12463-17 ↗
48. Lead, Zinc Tolerance Mechanism and Phytoremediation Potential of Alcea rosea (Linn.) Cavan. and Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser. and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Effect10.1007/s11356-021-18243-2 ↗
49. Water Use of Hydrangea macrophylla and Gardenia jasminoides in Response to a Gradually Drying Substrate10.21273/HORTSCI.49.4.493 ↗
50. Photosynthesis, Growth, and Water Use of Hydrangea paniculata ‘Silver Dollar’ Using a Physiological-Based or a Substrate Physical Properties-Based Irrigation Schedule and a Biochar Substrate Amendment10.1007/s00271-020-00670-7 ↗
51. Nitrogen Fertilization and Irrigation Frequency Affect Hydrangea Growth and Nutrient Uptake in Two Container Types10.21273/HORTSCI13513-18 ↗
52. Effect of air humidity on the growth and morphology of Hydrangea macrophylla L.10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.036 ↗
53. Temperature and photoperiod control of morphology and flowering time in two greenhouse grown Hydrangea macrophylla cultivars10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.019 ↗
54. Zaman, M., Shahid, S.A., and Heng, L. (2018). Irrigation Water Quality. Guideline for Salinity Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Using Nuclear and Related Techniques, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-96190-3 ↗
55. Rahmati, R., Hamid, R., Ghorbanzadeh, Z., Jacob, F., Azadi, P., Zeinalabedini, M., Farsad, L.K., Kazemi, M., Ebrahimi, M.A., and Shahinnia, F. (2022). Comparative transcriptome analysis unveils the molecular mechanism underlying sepal colour changes under acidic pH substratum in Hydrangea macrophylla. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms232315428 ↗
56. Anaya-Covarrubias, J.Y., Larranaga, N., Almaráz-Abarca, N., Escoto-Delgadillo, M., Rodríguez-Macías, R., and Torres-Morán, M.I. (2019). Hydrangea DNA Methylation Caused by pH Substrate Changes to Modify Sepal Colour is Detected by MSAP and ISSR Markers. Agronomy, 9.10.3390/agronomy9120871 ↗
57. Midcap, J.T., and Bilderback, T.E. (2002). Evaluating Hydrangea Production with Improved Substrates, Center Applied Nursery Research.
58. Pietsch, G.M., Brindley, J.C., Owen, J.S., and Fulcher, A. (2022). A Fine Line between Phytotoxicity and Blue When Producing Hydrangea macrophylla in a Nursery at a Low Substrate pH. Horticulturae, 8.10.3390/horticulturae8080690 ↗
59. Mechanisms of hormone action in plants
60. Iron uptake and transport in plants: The good, the bad, and the ionome10.1021/cr900112r ↗
61. Marschner, P. (2012). Function of nutrients: Micronutrients. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].
62. Enhancing Manganese Availability for Plants through Microbial Potential: A Sustainable Approach for Improving Soil Health and Food Security10.3390/bacteria2030010 ↗
63. The effects of pH on nutrient availability depend on both soils and plants10.1007/s11104-023-05960-5 ↗
64. Saharan, B.S., Brar, B., Duhan, J.S., Kumar, R., Marwaha, S., Rajput, V.D., and Minkina, T. (2022). Molecular and Physiological Mechanisms to Mitigate Abiotic Stress Conditions in Plants. Life, 12.10.3390/life12101634 ↗
65. Yang, X., Lu, M., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., and Chen, S. (2021). Response Mechanism of Plants to Drought Stress. Horticulturae, 7.10.20944/preprints202102.0466.v1 ↗
66. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 ↗
67. Molecular approaches unravel the mechanism of acid soil tolerance in plants10.1016/j.cj.2013.08.002 ↗
68. Toscano, S., Romano, D., and Ferrante, A. (2023). Molecular Responses of Vegetable, Ornamental Crops, and Model Plants to Salinity Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms24043190 ↗
69. Morphological and Physiological Responses of Three Ornamental Species to Saline Water Irrigation10.21273/HORTSCI18286-24 ↗
70. Rius-García, X., Videgain-Marco, M., Casanova-Gascón, J., Acuña-Rello, L., Zufiaurre-Galarza, R., and Martín-Ramos, P. (2025). Evaluation of Salt Tolerance in Four Self-Rooted Almond Genotypes for Super-High-Density Orchards Under Varying Salinity Levels. Agriculture, 15.10.3390/agriculture15030254 ↗
71. Niu, G., Sun, Y., Hooks, T., Altland, J., Dou, H., and Perez, C. (2020). Salt Tolerance of Hydrangea Plants Varied among Species and Cultivar within a Species. Horticulturae, 6.10.3390/horticulturae6030054 ↗
72. Wang, F., Wu, H., Yang, M., Xu, W., Zhao, W., Qiu, R., Kang, N., and Cui, G. (2024). Unveiling Salt Tolerance Mechanisms and Hub Genes in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Through Transcriptomic and WGCNA Analysis. Plants, 13.10.3390/plants13223141 ↗
73. Effect of aluminium supply on aluminium uptake, translocation and blueing of Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser. cultivars in a peat-clay substrate10.1080/14620316.2003.11511651 ↗
74. Morphological and biochemical variations caused by salinity stress in some varieties of Pennisetum glaucum L.10.1016/j.jksus.2023.102994 ↗
75. Physiological and Molecular Responses of Red Maple (Acer rubrum L.) Cultivars to Drought Stress10.9787/PBB.2022.10.1.62 ↗
76. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Machinery in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 ↗
77. Interactive Effects of PH, EC and Nitrogen on Yields and Nutrient Absorption of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)10.1016/j.agwat.2017.08.012 ↗
78. Soufi, H.R., Roosta, H.R., and Hamidpour, M. (2023). The Plant Growth, Water and Electricity Consumption, and Nutrients Uptake Are Influenced by Different Light Spectra and Nutrition of Lettuce. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-48284-1 ↗
79. Sun, J., He, L., and Li, T. (2019). Response of Seedling Growth and Physiology of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench to Saline-Alkali Stress. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0220340 ↗
80. Melatonin Alleviates Salt Damage in Tomato Seedling: A Root Architecture System, Photosynthetic Capacity, Ion Homeostasis, and Antioxidant Enzymes Analysis10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110145 ↗
81. Wu, L., and Dodge, L. (2025, July 23). Landscape Plant Salt Tolerance Selection Guide for Recycled Water Irrigation. Available online: https://slosson.ucdavis.edu/Landscape_Plant_Selection_Guide_for_Recycled_Water_Irrigation/.