Effects of Chinese Text Size on the In-Vehicle Text Legibility and Driver Distraction: A Simulator Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The rising popularity of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) in China highlights the significance of Chinese character displays. A key design factor for text-rich in-vehicle human–machine interfaces (HMI) is Chinese text size (CTS). However, the impact of CTS on text legibility and driver distraction has not been extensively explored. The present study launches a simulator experiment and adopts several one-way repeated-measure analyses of variance to identify the optimal CTS that maximizes text legibility while minimizing driver distraction. The findings indicate that both text legibility and driver distraction improved progressively as the CTS increased, reaching a specific size of seven millimeters, at which they approached asymptotes. Subjective measures were more sensitive than objective measures. The analysis showed no significant impact of CTS on task completion time, number of errors, total glance duration, mean speed, or lane position variation. However, larger CTS led to more frequent, shorter glances, whereas smaller CTS resulted in fewer, longer glances. CTS below seven millimeters was associated with lower subjective preference and a higher perceived workload. Therefore, it is recommended that a CTS of seven millimeters or larger be used to promote the design of driver-friendly in-vehicle HMI, control IVIS-related distractions, and enhance road safety in China.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Safety Warnings and Signage · Traffic and Road Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Experience and Service Design Team, School of Arts, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
Funding
Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Sichuan Province · Youth Project of Jiangsu Provincial Social Science Foundation · General Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education of China · General Project of Art Studies, National Social Science Foundation of China
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Statista (2025, May 04). Size of the Global Automotive Infotainment Market in 2021, with a Forecast Through 2027 (in Billion U.S. Dollars). Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/737708/in-vehicle-infotainment-os-and-middleware-market-sizeworldwide/.
2. Mobile phone use while driving-literary review10.1016/j.trf.2017.04.015 ↗
3. How do perceptions of risk and other psychological factors influence the use of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS)?10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.011 ↗
4. In-vehicle information systems to meet the needs of drivers10.1080/10447318.2011.555296 ↗
5. Zhong, Q., Zhi, J., Xu, Y., Gao, P., and Feng, S. (2024). Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to predict young drivers’ in-vehicle information system (IVIS) use intention and behavior while driving: A longitudinal two-wave survey. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16208908 ↗
6. Analysis of psychological influences on navigation use while driving based on extended theory of planned behavior10.1177/0361198119845666 ↗
7. Driver inattention and driver distraction in serious casualty crashes: Data from the Australian national crash in-depth study10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.043 ↗
8. Driver distraction and inattention in fatal and injury crashes: Findings from in-depth road crash data10.1080/15389588.2019.1644627 ↗
9. Systematic review of observational studies on secondary task engagement while driving10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.017 ↗
10. Changes in the sources of distracted driving among Northern Virginia drivers in 2014 and 2018: A comparison of results from two roadside observation surveys10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.004 ↗
11. Driver’s adaptive glance behavior to in-vehicle information systems10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.002 ↗
12. Reading, typing, and driving: How interactions with in-vehicle systems degrade driving performance10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.001 ↗
13. Visual and cognitive demands of CarPlay, Android Auto, and five native infotainment systems10.1177/0018720819836575 ↗
14. Zhong, Q., Zhi, J., Xu, Y., Gao, P., and Feng, S. (2024). Assessing driver distraction from in-vehicle information system: An on-road study exploring the effects of input modalities and secondary task types. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-71226-4 ↗
15. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data10.1073/pnas.1513271113 ↗
16. Analyzing driver behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: A review10.1016/j.aap.2020.105908 ↗
17. Exploring the mechanisms of distraction from in-vehicle technology: The development of the PARRC model10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.014 ↗
18. What’s the law got to do with it? Legislation regarding in-vehicle technology use and its impact on driver distraction10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.015 ↗
19. What technologies do people engage with while driving and why?10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.004 ↗
20. Auto-UI: Global perspectives10.1145/3429265 ↗
21. Ministry of Public Security of China (2025, May 03). There Were 430 Million Motor Vehicles and 520 Million Drivers and 18.21 Million New Energy Vehicles, Available online: https://www.mps.gov.cn/n2254098/n4904352/c9244719/content.html.
22. User resistance to acceptance of in-vehicle infotainment (IVI) systems10.1016/j.telpol.2016.07.006 ↗
23. Text-based information design for in-vehicle displays: A systematic review10.1016/j.trf.2024.04.025 ↗
24. A driving simulator study to explore the effects of text size on the visual demand of in-vehicle displays10.1016/j.displa.2016.05.003 ↗
25. Qian, X., and Sun, Y. (2019, January 27–30). A study of simplified Chinese typeface design applied to automotive user interface. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium of Chinese CHI, Xiamen, China.10.1145/3332169.3333572 ↗
26. You, F., Yang, Y.F., Fu, M.T., Zhang, J., and Wang, J.M. (2021). Design guidelines for the size and length of Chinese characters displayed in the intelligent vehicle’s central console interface. Information, 12.10.3390/info12050213 ↗
27. Effects of font size, display resolution and task type on reading Chinese fonts from mobile devices10.1016/j.ergon.2008.09.004 ↗
28. Effects of the font Size and line spacing of simplified Chinese characters on smartphone readability10.1093/iwc/iwab020 ↗
29. Effects of font size, stroke width, and character complexity on the legibility of Chinese characters10.1002/hfm.20663 ↗
30. Effects of typographic variables on eye-movement measures in reading Chinese from a screen10.1080/0144929X.2010.523900 ↗
31. Effects of Chinese character size, number of characters per line, and number of menu items on visual search task on tablet computer displays for different age groups10.1016/j.ergon.2019.04.006 ↗
32. Legibility and visual fatigue affected by text direction, screen size and character size on color LCD e-reader10.1016/j.displa.2012.11.006 ↗
33. Skimming electronic newspaper headlines: A study of typeface, point size, screen resolution, and monitor size10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00025-3 ↗
34. A meta-analysis of the impacts of operating in-vehicle information systems on road safety10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.01.003 ↗
35. Overall performance impairment and crash risk due to distracted driving: A comprehensive analysis using structural equation modelling10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.018 ↗
36. Understanding the impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance: A systematic review10.1016/j.trc.2016.10.006 ↗
37. The effects of Chinese typeface design, stroke weight, and contrast polarity on glance based legibility10.1016/j.displa.2015.12.001 ↗
38. Effects of ambient illumination, contrast polarity, and letter size on text legibility under glance-like reading10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.001 ↗
39. The effects of visual crowding, text size, and positional uncertainty on text legibility at a glance10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.007 ↗
40. Fujikake, K., Hasegawa, S., Omori, M., Takada, H., and Miyao, M. (2007). Readability of character size for car navigation system. Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interacting in Information Environments, Symposium on Human Interface 2007, Proceedings of the HCI International 2007, Beijing, China, 22–27 July 2007, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-73354-6_55 ↗
41. Estimating the legibility of a single letter E viewed at different display angles10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.010 ↗
42. Assessing the impact of typeface design in a text-rich automotive user interface10.1080/00140139.2014.940000 ↗
43. Reimer, B., Mehler, B., and Coughlin, J.F. (2025, May 02). An Evaluation of Typeface Design in a Text-Rich Automotive User Interface. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264439455_An_Evaluation_of_Typeface_Design_in_a_Text-Rich_Automotive_User_Interface_Original_Manuscript.
44. Viita, D., and Muir, A. (2013, January 27–30). Exploring comfortable and acceptable text sizes for in-vehicle displays. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1145/2516540.2516568 ↗
45. What are legible Korean font sizes within in-vehicle information systems
46. Effects of font size and font style of traditional Chinese characters on readability on smartphones10.1016/j.ergon.2018.10.002 ↗
47. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing10.1080/00140130903464358 ↗
48. A validation study of a fixed-based, medium fidelity driving simulator for human-machine interfaces visual distraction testing10.1049/itr2.12362 ↗
49. Address inputting while driving: A comparison of four alternative text input methods on in-vehicle navigation displays usability and driver distraction10.1080/15389588.2022.2047958 ↗
50. Dynamic is optimal: Effect of three alternative auto-complete on the usability of in-vehicle dialing displays and driver distraction10.1080/15389588.2021.2010052 ↗
51. Chinese handwriting while driving: Effects of handwritten box size on in-vehicle information systems usability and driver distraction10.1080/15389588.2022.2126936 ↗
52. A usability evaluation toolkit for in-vehicle information systems (IVISs)10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.013 ↗
53. The effect of touch-key size on the usability of in-vehicle information systems and driving safety during simulated driving10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.006 ↗
54. Browsing the information highway while driving: Three in-vehicle touch screen scrolling methods and driver distraction10.1007/s00779-012-0517-2 ↗
55. Effects of interface layout on the usability of in-vehicle information systems and driving safety10.1016/j.displa.2017.07.008 ↗
56. Effect of touch button interface on in-vehicle information systems usability10.1080/10447318.2021.1886484 ↗
57. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2013). Commonly-Used Chinese Characters Table.
58. NHTSA (2025, May 05). Visual-Manual NHTSA Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices, Available online: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/09/16/2014-21991/visual-manual-nhtsa-driver-distraction-guidelines-for-in-vehicle-electronic-devices.
59. How drivers adapt their behaviour to changes in task complexity: The role of secondary task demands and road environment factors10.1016/j.trf.2020.03.015 ↗
60. Multiple resources and mental workload10.1518/001872008X288394 ↗